Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Steering Stability Control For Four-Motor Distributed Drive High-Speed Tracked Vehicles
Steering Stability Control For Four-Motor Distributed Drive High-Speed Tracked Vehicles
Steering Stability Control For Four-Motor Distributed Drive High-Speed Tracked Vehicles
ABSTRACT A steering stability control method for four-motor distributed drive high-speed tracked vehicle
is proposed to improve handling stability and safety. The dynamic analysis and calculation of center steering,
small radius steering and large radius steering for the four-motor distributed drive tracked vehicle are carried
out respectively. In order to meet the power requirements of the outer drive motor in high-speed steering,
a steering coupling system is constructed, which uses a steering motor to couple with the traction motor at the
rear left or rear right side of the tracks respectively. The steering stability control strategy with the steering
coupling takes the yaw angular velocity and longitudinal speed of the vehicle as the control objectives, and
a direct yaw torque control strategy is proposed to optimize and distribute the torque of four traction motors
in real time according to different steering conditions, and considers the synchronization of two traction
motors on one side of the track, so as to improve the steering stability, safety, comfort and steering trajectory
performance of the four-motor drive tracked vehicle. The simulation results of 0B, 0.2B, 2B and 8B steering
radius show that the proposed control strategy with coupling system can ensure the steering stability for the
four-motor distributed drive high-speed tracked vehicle.
INDEX TERMS Four-motor drive, tracked vehicle, steering stability, power coupling.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
94968 VOLUME 8, 2020
L. Zhai et al.: Steering Stability Control for Four-Motor Distributed Drive High-Speed Tracked Vehicles
A steering motor and planetary platoon between the two allocated according to the steering conditions by electronic
motors are added, however, it is through the mechanical struc- differential control, which improves steering flexibility and
ture that the inner regenerative power flows back to the outer stability, and also improves the efficiency of the electric drive
side in the form of mechanical power [2], [6]. A coupling system of the vehicle. Better path tracking can be achieved by
mechanism is added between the independent drive system of electronic differential steering control, which is conducive to
the two side motors, so that the steering regenerative power the realization of unmanned driving.
was transferred back to the high-speed side[7]. However, However, the increasing number of traction motors will
the mechanical structure of these steering mechanisms is bring the difficulty of electronic differential steering con-
complicated. There are mechanical constraints such as the trol for distributed electric drive tracked vehicle, and special
horizontal axis and mechanical coupler between the two side attention needs to be paid to steering maneuverability, stabil-
motors. It is difficult to achieve electronic differential steering ity, and synchronization of traction motors with single track.
control and the efficiency of braking energy recovery is low. The electronic differential steering control method mainly
A dual-motor driven high-speed tracked vehicle electrome- includes a traction motor speed control method and a torque
chanical steering coupling device is proposed [8], in which control method. Because the transient performance of the
the center steering motor is dynamically coupled to the drive motor speed control is not as good as that of the torque
motors on both sides through two electromagnetic clutches control, most of the distributed vehicle electronic differen-
and two planetary gear couplers, and an electronic steering tial steering control uses the motor torque control method.
control strategy to distribute the driving or braking torque In addition, an electronic control unit is required for compre-
of the motors on both sides to improve the steering stability hensive steering control to achieve high-speed steering han-
of the vehicle is proposed. A new steering coupling device dling stability. Many researches on steering stability control
for dual-motor driven high-speed tracked vehicles is pro- have been carried out on distributed electric drive wheeled
posed, which controls the coupling mechanism to perform electric vehicles [13]–[16]. Traditional PID control, sliding
torque coupling or power coupling by turning on and off the mode control, fuzzy control, linear quadratic optimal control,
electromagnetic clutch. The problems of insufficient steer- feedforward feedback composite control and other methods
ing torque at low speed and small radius and insufficient are usually used to control the steering yaw moment and
steering power at high speed and large radius are solved [9]. distribute the driving or braking torque of the motor, and
A four-wheel independent drive electric vehicle continuous finally realize the control of the yaw angular velocity and the
steering stability control based on an energy-saving torque sideslip angle of the vehicle.
distribution algorithm is proposed, which improves energy The steering principle of tracked vehicles is different
efficiency [10]. A steering stability control of a four-wheel from that of wheeled vehicles. It needs to propose a steer-
independent drive electric vehicle considering different adhe- ing control stability control strategy for distributed driving
sion coefficients is proposed [11]. tracked vehicles based on steering kinematics and dynam-
The above research is about the tracked vehicles driven ics. A coupling drive steering control algorithm for dual
by two motors, while the research on distributed driven motors drive system is proposed to achieve fast and stable
tracked vehicles with more than two motors is rare. However, control of tracked vehicle steering [17], [18]. In order to
four-wheel distributed electric drive technology has been obtain better stability, a steering load adaptive control strat-
applied to wheeled vehicles, and it has special advantages egy based on steering angular velocity closed-loop control
in control performance, transmission efficiency, and chas- is proposed [19]. An electronic stability control strategy for
sis structure. In order to solve the problems that the motor dual-motor drive tracked vehicle is proposed to improve the
volume is too large, it is difficult to install and arrange, maneuverability and stability of the vehicle at low speed
the vibration and noise are large, and power matching caused steering with small radius and high speed steering with
by the excessive power requirements of the single-sided driv- large radius [20], [21]. However, there are few researches
ing motors of the dual-motor driven tracked vehicles [12], on four-wheel drive tracked vehicles. Some literatures only
a steering control system of four-motor distributed drive described the steering principle of four motors drive tracked
tracked vehicle is constructed in this paper. There are two vehicle and the required torque relationship of the four
front and rear driving wheels on each side of the track, and driving wheels in [22]–[26]. A vehicle dynamics stability
four motors are used to drive the four driving wheels of the control strategy with adaptive neural network sliding mode
double side track. Compared with the independent driving theory [27], an interactive control paradigm-based robust
of two motors, the volume and power of a single traction lateral stability controller [28], and an implicit linear model
motor of a four-motor driven tracked vehicle will be reduced, predictive control (MPC) approach [29] are respectively pro-
and the volume and weight of the motor controller will also posed to improve lateral stability and tracking performance
be reduced, which facilitates installation and layout, and it for wheeled vehicles. However, the steering control stability
can distribute energy more flexibly and achieve maximum for tracked vehicle and its control are not considered, and the
energy efficiency. According to the needs of different steering effect of the motor control system as an actuator is ignored.
conditions, there are multiple motor combination modes for We propose a steering control stability control method for
steering. The torque or speed of the motor can be flexibly four-motor driven tracked vehicles.
1 µmgL J dω
F1 = F2 = fmg + + (5)
2 4B B dt
The torques of the four traction motors can be obtained as:
( 12 fmg+ µmgL J dω
4B + B dt ) × rz
T11 = T12 = T21 = T22 = (6)
2ig η
where, all four motors output driving torque, and the driving
FIGURE 3. Force analysis under (a) center steering, (b) 0 <R <0.5B, torque of inner motor is opposite to that of outer motor, which
(c) R = 0.5B, (d) Brake steering, (e) Free steering, (f) Driving steering. is equal to the driving torque of the outer motor.
The power of the four traction motors can be obtained as:
The relationship between the speed of the four motors and
ω, v1 and v2 is: P11 = P12 = P21 = P22
( 12 fmg + µmgL J dω
1000iv1 1000i B 4B + B dt ) × rz n1
n11 = n12 = = × 3.6 × ω × ( − R) = × (7)
120πrz 120πrz 2 2ig η 9549
1000iv2 1000i B
n21 = n22 = = × 3.6 × ω × ( + R)
120πrz 120πrz 2 3) STEERING WITH RADIUS 0<R<0.5B
(1) From Figure 3(b), the at case of 0 < R < 0.5B, the following
dynamic equation can be obtained:
where, n1 and n2 are the speed of the inner and outer motors,
rz is the radius of the driving wheel, and i is the transmission
dv
ratio. F2 − F1 + R1 − R2 = δm
dt (8)
The expression of output torque and output power of each B B dω
(F2 + F1 ) × − M µ − (R1 + R2 ) × = J
motor on both sides is: 2 2 dt
Fx
Tx =
rz δ is the vehicle mass conversion coefficient, and the mag-
ig η (x = 11, 12, 21, 22) (2) nitude of δ is related to the gravity of the tracks. When the
Px = Tx n
number of rotating parts kinematically connected to the driv-
9549
ing wheel increases, δ also increases. The empirical formula
where x = 11 is the front drive wheel motor inside the track, of δ is δ = 1.2945+0.006i2 , and δ is 1.35 according to the
x = 12 is the rear drive wheel motor inside the track, x = 21 is calculation.
the front drive wheel motor outside the track, and x = 22 The drive torques of the four traction motors can be
is the rear drive wheel motor outside the track. Tx and Px are described as:
the output torque and output power of the motor.
( µmgL
1
J dω
4B + 2 fmg + B − 0.5δmR dt )
2) CENTER STEERING T11 = T12 = rz
2ig η
According to vehicle steering dynamics, the force analysis of (9)
( µmgL 1
J dω
center steering of the tracked vehicle is shown in Figure 3(a).
4B + 2 fmg + B + 0.5δmR dt )
T21 = T22 = rz
Where, R1 and R2 are the rolling resistances, F1 and F2 are 2ig η
the traction force, which are respectively in the same running
direction as the corresponding track. where, the driving torque of inner motor is opposite to that of
Based on the force balance of the tracked vehicle, the fol- outer motor and less than that of outer motor.
lowing dynamic equation can be obtained as The power of the four traction motors can be obtained as
F2 − F1 + R1 − R2 = 0
( µmgL 1
J dω
B B dω (3) 4B + 2 fmg + B − 0.5δmR dt )
(F2 + F1 ) × − M µ − (R1 + R2 ) × = J
P11 = P12 = rz
2ig η
2 2 dt
120πrz × 3.6 × ω × ( 2 − R)
1000i B
where R1 = R2 = 0.5fmg, mg is the total body weight. µ is the
×
9549
steering resistance coefficient. The ground steering resistance
(10)
torque Mµ is: µmgL
( 4B + 21 fmg + BJ + 0.5δmR dω
dt )
P21 = P22 = rz
µmax
µmgL 0.925+0.15ρ · mgL 2ig η
Mµ = = (4)
120πrz × 3.6 × ω × ( 2 + R)
1000i B
4 4
×
where ρ is the relative turning radius, and ρ = R / B. 9549
4) STEERING WITH RADIUS R = 0.5B where, the inner two motors are in the power generation state
From Figure 3(c), at the case of R = 0.5B, the speed of and output the braking torque, however the outer two motors
the inner track is zero, so R1 = 0. The following dynamic are in the driving state and output the driving torque.
equation can be obtained: The power of the four traction motors can be obtained as:
[ µmgL
4B − 2 fmg + ( B − 2 δmR) dt ]
1 J 1 dω
dv
F2 − F1 − R2 = δm
P11 = P 12 = rz
2ig η
dt (11)
dω
120πrz × 3.6 × ω × ( 2 − R)
1000i B
F2 B − Mµ − R2 B = J
dt ×
9549 (16)
The drive torques of the four traction motors can be µmgL
[ 4B + 21 fmg + ( BJ + 12 δmR) dω dt ]
described as:
P21 = P22 = rz
2ig η
[ µmgL
4B + ( B − δmR) dt ]
J dω
120πrz × 3.6 × ω × ( 2 + R)
1000i B
T
11 = T 12 = rz
2ig η
×
(12) 9549
[ µmgL + 12 fmg + BJ dω
dt ] where, the energy generated by the brake motor inside the
T21 = T22 = 4B
rz
2ig η
brake can be fed back to the power battery through the motor
where, the driving torque of inner motor is opposite to that of controller.
outer motor and less than that of outer motor, and the driving At case of free steering, as shown in Figure 3(e):
torques of the inner motors shall ensure that the speed of the The inner track of the tracked vehicle is under no force.
inner motor is zero. The torque expressions of the four motors are:
The power of the four traction motors can be obtained as: T11 = T12 = 0
(fmg + δmR dω (17)
[ µmgL + ( BJ − δmR) dω dt )
P11 = P12 = 4B
dt ] T21 = T22 = rz
2ig η
rz
2ig η
120πrz × 3.6 × ω × ( 2 − R)
The inner motor does not output driving torque or braking
1000i B
× torque. The two outer motors are in the driving state and
9549 (13) output driving torque.
µmgL
[ 4B + 12 fmg + BJ dω
dt ] The power of the four traction motors can be obtained as:
P21 = P22 = rz
2ig η
P11 = P12 = 0
120πrz × 3.6 × ω × ( 2 + R)
1000i
B
(fmg + δmR dω
dt )
×
9549 P21 = P22 = rz
2ig η (18)
120πrz × 3.6 × ω × ( 2 + R)
1000i B
5) STEERING WITH LARGE RADIUS
×
The above three small-radius steering conditions are suitable 9549
for scenarios with limited space. The tracked vehicle is steer- At case of driving steering, as shown in Figure 3(f):
ing from stationary starting and the initial speed is zero. When This method is usually used when the vehicle is driving at
the vehicle is turning, the steering radius is generally large, high speed and straight. The driving force of the outer track
usually R > 0.5B. Depending on the output driving torque of a tracked vehicle is greater than the driving force of the
or braking torque of the motor, the steering with large radius inner track. The torque expressions of the four motors are:
R > 0.5B can be further divided into three operating condi- [ 12 fmg − µmgL
4B + ( 2 δmR − B ) dt ]
1 J dω
tions: braking steering, free steering, and driving steering. T11 = T12 = rz
2ig η
At case of braking steering, as shown in Figure 3(d): (19)
The following dynamic equation can be obtained:
[ 12 fmg + µmgL 4B + ( 2 δmR + B ) dt ]
1 J dω
T21 = T22 = rz
2ig η
dv
F2 − F1 − R2 − R1 = δm
where, all four motors output driving torque, and the driving
dt
B B dω (14) force direction of the tracks on both sides is same. The power
(F2 − F1 ) × + (R1 − R2 ) × − Mµ = J
2 2 dt ofthe four traction motors can be obtained as:
where, the braking force of the inner track of the tracked [ 12 fmg − µmgL 4B + ( 2 δmR − B ) dt ]
1 J dω
P = P = rz
11 12
vehicle is the same as the direction of rolling resistance and 2ig η
opposite to the direction of the inner track. The drive torques
1000i vc B
120πrz × R × ( 2 − R)
of the four traction motors can be described as:
×
9549 (20)
[ µmgL [ 12 fmg + µmgL + ( 21 δmR + BJ ) dω
4B − 2 fmg + ( B − 2 δmR) dt ]
1 J 1 dω ]
4B dt
T
11 = T 12 = rz P21 = P22 =
rz
2ig η 2ig η
(15)
[ µmgL + 21 fmg + ( BJ + 12 δmR) dω
1000i vc B
dt ] 120πrz × R × ( 2 + R)
T21 = T22 = 4B
rz ×
2ig η
9549
TABLE 3. Four-motor steering torque and power requirements under small radius steering conditions.
TABLE 4. Steering torque and power requirements of four motors under large radius steering conditions.
carrier c. Planetary gears act as idlers in the mechanism. The where ns is the speed of the sun gear and nr is the speed of
single-sided drive motor is connected to the sun gear input the ring gear. Therefore, the calculated output speed to the
shaft, the steering motor is connected to the ring gear, and is driving wheel is nc = 2452r/min.
connected to the planet carrier through the planet gear. The According to (23), the speed of the inner and outer driving
planet carrier transmits the power of the driving motor and wheels is calculated as: n1 = 1260r/min, n2 = 1392r/min.
the steering motor to the driving wheels on both sides. From the above calculations, it can be seen that the maxi-
mum speed nc of the driving wheel obtained from the struc-
2) PLANETARY COUPLING DEVICE STRUCTURE tural characteristic parameters is greater than n1 and n2 ,
PARAMETERS so the structural characteristic parameters can meet the speed
In order to determine the parameters of each component of requirements for high-speed steering.
the planetary gear mechanism, the structural characteristic
parameter k of the planetary gear mechanism needs to be b: POWER VERIFICATION
determined first. According to the table 3, the maximum According to the relationship between torque, speed and
torque required by the unilateral traction motor when the power, it can be obtained that when the tracked vehicle has
vehicle is in dynamic center steering is Tmax = 19.4Nm. a steering radius of 10B, the torque output by the driving
According to the table and formula, the maximum torque. wheels is: Ts = Tm = 4.244Nm, Tc = (1+k)Ts = 13.37Nm.
Define Tm as the output torque of the single-sided motor, According to the maximum speed of the driving wheel
T0 as the output torque f the steering motor, Ts as the sun n = 2452r/min, the output power of the planet carrier at this
gear input torque, Tr as the ring gear input torque, i0 is the time can be calculated as: Pc = 3.43kW>2.35kW. In sum-
reduction ratio of the steering motor to the ring gear, and it is mary, the structural characteristic parameter k = 2.15 of
determined that i0 = 3. Meet the following relationships: the planetary gear mechanism can meet the needs of maxi-
( mum torque and the requirements of maximum power. The
Tm = Ts
(21) main structural parameters of the planetary gear mechanism
T r = i0 × T 0 are designed based on theoretical calculations, as shown in
The torque relationship between the sun gear and the planet Table 5. The planetary gear coupling mechanism assembly
carrier: is shown in Figure 9. With the designed planetary coupling
Tc device, the peak power of a single drive motor can be reduced
k= −1 (22)
Ts to 2kW instead of 2.55kW. The power of the steering motor
It can be obtained that the structural characteristic parame- is 1.1kW. The total power of the four motors and one steering
ter of the planetary gear mechanism is k = 2.15. The follow- motor is 9.1kW, which is nearly 10% lower than the total
ing is to verify whether the structural characteristic parameter power of the 10.2kW independent drive motors of the four
k can meet the power requirements of the tracked vehicle motors.
during high-speed braking and steering.
a: SPEED VERIFICATION
First, the speed of the driving wheel is calculated from the
structural characteristic parameters.
According to the table 4 and formula (1), when the turn-
ing radius of the tracked vehicle is 10B, the steering speed
reaches a maximum of 50km/h. At this time, the traction
motor and steering motor output the peak speed and peak
power, that is, Pm = Ps = 2kW, nm = ns = 4500r/min,
nr = nm /i0 = 1500r/min◦ From this we can get the planetary
carrier speed:
1 k
nc = ns + nr (23)
1+k 1+k FIGURE 9. Assembly drawing of planetary coupler.
IV. STEERING STABILITY CONTROL STRATEGY FOR and Tmax−braking is the maximum output braking torque of
FOUR-MOTOR DRIVEN TRACKED VEHICLES the motor. The value range of C is [−1, 0].
A. DRIVER INPUT MODEL Defining the steering wheel angle θ ∈ (0, 45◦ ), the linear
The driver input model includes a steering wheel angu- relationship between steering radius and steering wheel dis-
lar displacement signal, an accelerator pedal signal and a placement is:
brake pedal signal to simulate a driver’s operation input. The
45◦ − θ B
input angle signal of steering wheel displacement is shown R= · (27)
in Figure 10. According to different steering wheel angle θ 2
signals, three angles θ1 , θ2 , θ3 , and θ 0 are defined. θ1 indicates where B is the distance between the left and right tracks of
the steering wheel angle when the tracked vehicle is turning the tracked vehicle.
freely, that is, the steering wheel angle when the steering The driving force acting on the driving wheel is:
radius R = R0 . θ2 indicates the steering wheel angle when
the steering radius R = 0.5B; θ3 indicates the center steering Tm (t) · ig · ηt
Ft (t) = (28)
R = 0. θ 0 is a boundary angle for judging whether the vehicle r
is going straight or turning. Among them, ig is the transmission ratio of the reducer,
ηt is the efficiency of the transmission system, and Tm is the
motor torque.
From the tracked vehicle force balance equation:
FIGURE 11. Optimized torque distribution steering control strategy with vehicle longitudinal speed and yaw angular speed.
κ = Hu (35)
The speed following controller adopts PID control. The
desired longitudinal force Fx−des is adjusted and output where
according to the deviation between the actual vehicle speed v
and the desired speed vdes . As shown in Figure 11. Mz−des
κ = (36)
Fx−des
T
3) LOWER CONTROLLER
u = T11 T12 T21 T22 (37)
a: DRIVE WHEEL TORQUE OPTIMAL DISTRIBUTION
B B B B
MODULE
2r 2r 2r 2r , (0 ≤ R < R )
0
The lower-level torque distribution controller adopts an opti-
1 1 1 1
mized distribution method, and calculates the output torques
− −
r r r r
B B
of the four driving wheels inside and outside based on
0 0
the input longitudinal force Fx−des and the expected yaw 2r 2r , (R = R )
H = (38)
0
moment Mz−des . 1 1
0 0
According to the analysis of the steering dynamics of
r r
B B B B
different steering radius on hard roads, the longitudinal force
− −
and yaw moment of four-motor driven tracked vehicles with
2r 2r 2r 2r , (R > R )
0
−1 1 1 1
different steering radius can be obtained as follows.
−
When the turning radius is 0 < R < R0 , r r r r
T21 T22 T11 T12 In order to ensure the vehicle good handling and stabil-
Fx-des = + − − ity on steering, i.e. to make actual yaw rate ω follow the
r r r r
Mz−des = T21 × B + T22 × B + T11 × B + T12 × B
required reference output ωdes quickly. So the error of Mz
r 2 r 2 r 2 r 2 shall be minimized, an optimum torque allocation control
(32) is used to obtain the control inputs for four motors, that is,
T11 T12 T21 T22 are taken as the input variables. A cost function b: STEERING MODE MODULE
for better following characteristics is described as follows: From the steering mode module, whether to use electronic
differential steering or electromechanical coupling steering
h i
J1 = arg min kBv · (H · u − κ)k2 (39)
umin ≤u≤umax is determined.
T If the driving torque of the outer front and rear drive wheels
u = T11 T12 T21 T22 (40)
is less than or equal to the maximum torque of a single motor,
k1 0 the four driving wheels are independently controlled by elec-
Bv = (41)
0 k2 tronic differential steering mode. So, T11, T12, T21, T22 are
where Bv is the diagonal weighting matrix of the input, ki is equal to T11−des, T12−des, T21−des, T22−des respectively, which
the weighting coefficient. are equal to T11−des−m, T12−des−m, T21−des−m, T22−des−m .
In addition, considering energy consuming of the motors, By dynamic calculation, if the required driving torque
the sum of torque command squares as small as possible to of the outer rear drive wheels is greater than the maxi-
save energy while ensuring stability of vehicle motion. A cost mum torque of the single drive motor, the steering motor
function for energy saving is described as follows: starts to work, and the outer rear drive wheel adopt elec-
h i tromechanical coupling steering control mode. However,
J2 = arg min kBu · uk2 (42)
umin ≤u≤umax the other three driving wheels are independently controlled
n
1
by electronic differential mode. T11, T12, T21 or T22 is equal
0 0 0 to T11−des, T12−des, T21−des or T22−des respectively, which are
η1
0 n 2 equal to T11−des−m, T12−des−m, T21−des−m or T22−des−m .
0 0
Bu =
η2
(43) At this time, the driving torque of the outer rear driving
n3
0
0 0
wheel is provided by the steering motor and the outer rear
η3 driving motor through the proposed power coupler. From the
n4
0 0 0 steering mode module and (14) the desired outer rear torque
η4
T22−des−m or T21−des−m of the driving motor and the expected
where Bu is the weighting matrix of efficient driving, torque Ts−des−m of the steering motor will be obtained.
η1, η2, η3, η4 are the real-time motor efficiency obtained by
the efficiency map table of the motor at the corresponding
C. SYNCHRONOUS SPEED CONTROLLER
time.
In order to ensure the synchronization of the front and rear
Another consideration is the stability of the change of
driving wheels of one side, a synchronous speed controller
control variables. a cost function is considered to control the
of motor is designed, and the fuzzy PID control method is
rate of change of the control action as follows:
h i adopted, as shown in Figure13. The fuzzy rules are designed
J3 = arg min kBw · 1uk2 (44) in the same way as that in [9]. The expected torque of
umin ≤u≤umax
the driving wheel is compensated by torque error from the
where Bw is positive weight factor to coordinate the rate of synchronous speed controller. Finally, the expected torque
change of inputs T11, T12, T21, T22 . of the driving wheel T11−des, T12−des, T21−dea, T22−des are
Therefore, considering the above three optimization objec- expressed as:
tives, a cost function is described as follows:
h
J = arg min ξ1 · kBv · (H · u − κ)k2
T11−des = T11 + 1T1
umin ≤u≤umax
= T12 + 1T2
T12−des
i (47)
+ ξ2 kBu · uk2 + ξ3 kBw · 1uk2 (45) T21−des
= T21 + 1T3
= T22 + 1T4
T
where ξ1 is a weight coefficient for regulating tracking error, 22−des
which depends on the degree of attention to distribution error.
ξ2 is a weight coefficient, which depends on the degree of V. SIMULATION
attention to energy saving effect. ξ3 is the weight of the Multi-body dynamics software RecurDyn is used to establish
modified torque, which is smaller than ξ1 any ξ2 . a virtual prototype model, and then an electronic differential
The optimal cost function has the following constraints: steering control system is established in Matlab / Simulink.
Using the Control interface function provided in RecurDyn,
−Tmax−brake ≤ T11,12,21,22 ≤ Tmax−drive co-simulation of RecurDyn and Matlab / Simulink can be
rz mgµ
T11,12,21,22 ≤ performed to realize synchronous control of virtual prototype
4 (46) model and steering control strategy system. The model of
η11,12,21,22 ≥ 85%
the four-motor-driven distributed-drive tracked vehicle sim-
1T11,12,21,22 / T11,12,21,22 ≤ 0.1
ulation system is shown in Figure 14, and consists of a driver
In this way, the optimal solution to satisfy the objective model module, an upper-level control module, a lower-level
function can be found finally and the torque of the required torque distribution control module, a steering coupling device
driving wheel can be obtained. module, and a tracked vehicle dynamic model.
than the expected yaw angular velocity ωdes = 5π /12rad/s. coupling is 22 Nm, while the output torque of the rear-outer
It shows that the larger the turning radius and the faster the wheel motor after coupling is 26 Nm. It can be seen from
speed, the worse the tracking performance of yaw angular Figure 18(f) that the output power of the front and outer rear
velocity. The comparison of the vehicle speed before and wheels before coupling is stable at 2kW due to the limitation
after coupling is shown in Figure 18(c). The vehicle speed of the peak power of the driving motor. After the coupling
before coupling is finally stable at 7m / s, and the vehicle device is added, the output power of the outer rear wheel is
speed after coupling is finally closer to 10m / s, which increased to 3.1kW.
is little different from the theoretical calculation vehicle
speed vdes = 10.5m / s. C. TORQUE OPTIMIZED DISTRIBUTION CONTROL
Only the outer rear driving wheel is power coupled by In order to verify the influence of the torque optimal distri-
electromechanical coupling steering, so the angular speed, bution control strategy on handling stability and trajectory
torque and power of the front and rear outer driving wheels tracking of the whole vehicle, the simulation is performed
are selected for comparison. under the condition of R = 2B and R = 8B to verify the feasi-
From Figure 18(d), it can be seen that due to the limi- bility of the torque optimal distribution control strategy. The
tation of the peak power of the driving motor, the angular simulation results of vehicle trajectories, torque and power
velocity of the outer driving wheels of before coupling finally of outer rear driving wheel before and after optimization are
approaches 95 rad/s, which cannot reach the expected value. shown in Figure19(a-c) and figure 19(d-f), respectively.
After coupling, the angular speed of the outer driving wheels As can be seen from the simulation results in Figures 19,
of the tracked vehicle finally close to 120rad/s, which is the trajectory after optimization is slightly smaller than
slightly higher than the theoretical calculation wheel speed the trajectory before optimization, and the tracking error is
ω = 111.35rad / s. From Figure 18(e), it can be seen that the small. After optimization, the outer and rear drive wheels
output torque of the front-outer rear wheel motor of before have significantly lower torque and lower power than before
optimization. It can be seen that the optimized torque distribu- [9] L. Zhai, H. Huang, and S. Kavuma, ‘‘Investigation on a power coupling
tion control strategy improves the steering stability and path steering system for dual-motor drive tracked vehicles based on speed
control,’’ Energies, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 1118, Aug. 2017.
tracking performance of tracked vehicles under small radius [10] L. Zhai, R. Hou, T. Sun, and S. Kavuma, ‘‘Continuous steering stability
steering conditions, and has energy-saving effects. control based on an energy-saving torque distribution algorithm for a four
in-Wheel-Motor independent-drive electric vehicle,’’ Energies, vol. 11,
no. 2, p. 350, Feb. 2018.
VI. CONCLUSION [11] R. Hou, L. Zhai, and T. Sun, ‘‘Steering stability control for a four hub-
Aiming at the phenomenon that the power of the outer drive motor independent-drive electric vehicle with varying adhesion coeffi-
motor is insufficient when the four-motor distributed drive cient,’’ Energies, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 2438, Sep. 2018.
tracked vehicle is turning at high speed and large radius, a new [12] B. Liu and Z. F. Wang, ‘‘Overview of the development of tracked vehicle
power systems,’’ J. Sichuan Ordnance Eng., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 68–72, 2014.
steering coupling system is proposed in this paper and a direct [13] X. Xie, L. Jin, Y. Jiang, and B. Guo, ‘‘Integrated dynamics control system
yaw torque control strategy is proposed. The article estab- with ESC and RAS for a distributed electric vehicle,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 6,
lishes an optimization function with the driving force and yaw pp. 18694–18704, 2018.
[14] B. Ren, H. Chen, H. Zhao, and L. Yuan, ‘‘MPC-based yaw stability
moment as the optimization goals. The simulation analysis is
control in in-wheel-motored EV via active front steering and motor torque
performed on the working conditions with a steering radius of distribution,’’ Mechatronics, vol. 38, pp. 103–114, Sep. 2016.
0B, 0.2B, and 2B, the electromechanical coupling simulation [15] S. Ding, L. Liu, and W. X. Zheng, ‘‘Sliding mode direct yaw-moment
analysis is performed on a working condition with a steering control design for in-wheel electric vehicles,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,
vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 6752–6762, Aug. 2017.
radius of 8B, and the optimal simulation analysis is per- [16] L. Zhai, T. Sun, and J. Wang, ‘‘Electronic stability control based on motor
formed on the working conditions with a steering radius of 2B driving and braking torque distribution for a four in-wheel motor drive
and 8B. Simulation results show that after power coupling, electric vehicle,’’ IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 4726–4739,
Jun. 2016.
the output power of the outer driving wheels during steering
[17] J. T. Gai, S. D. Huang, and G. M. Zhou, ‘‘Adaptive sliding mode steering
is improved, the running trajectory of the tracked vehicle is control for dual-motor coupled drive tracked vehicles,’’ J. Ordnance J.,
effectively improved, and the running stability of the tracked vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 405–411, 2015.
vehicle is improved. Finally, it is concluded that the steering [18] L. Guo, P. Ge, and D. Sun, ‘‘Torque distribution algorithm for stability
control of electric vehicle driven by four in-wheel motors under emergency
coupling system and optimized control strategy proposed in conditions,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 104737–104748, 2019.
this paper can effectively solve the phenomenon of insuffi- [19] Y. Liu, M. Mao, and X. F. Ma, ‘‘Research on adaptive steering control
cient power of the outer drive motor when the tracked vehicle strategy of zero-differential electric tracked vehicles,’’ J. Vehicles Power
Technol., no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2013.
is turning at high speed and large radius. In the future, the
[20] H. Huang, L. Zhai, and Z. Wang, ‘‘A power coupling system for elec-
following work can be done: (1) The factor of track slip tric tracked vehicles during high-speed steering with optimization-based
can be taken into account, and a better control method is torque distribution control,’’ Energies, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 1538, Jun. 2018.
adopted to improve the stability of the control. (2) The energy [21] J. Wu, G. Wang, H. Zhao, and K. Sun, ‘‘Study on electromechanical per-
formance of steering of the electric articulated tracked vehicles,’’ J. Mech.
optimization of the four-motor drive tracked vehicle can be Sci. Technol., vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 3171–3185, Jul. 2019.
used as the control target, and the energy consumption of [22] J. Huang, Y. Liu, M. Liu, M. Cao, and Q. Yan, ‘‘Multi-objective optimiza-
the two-motor, three-motor, and four-motor under different tion control of distributed electric drive vehicles based on optimal torque
driving conditions can be analyzed and compared to choose distribution,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 16377–16394, 2019.
[23] M. Meywerk, T. Fortmüller, and B. Fuhr, ‘‘Real-time model for simulating
different working modes to achieve energy-saving purposes. a tracked vehicle on deformable soils,’’ Adv. Mech. Eng., vol. 8, no. 5,
pp. 1–14, 2016.
REFERENCES [24] H. Zhang, J. Liang, H. Jiang, Y. Cai, and X. Xu, ‘‘Stability research of
[1] Z. L. Liao, X. J. Ma, and K. M. Zang, ‘‘Comparative analysis of electric distributed drive electric vehicle by adaptive direct yaw moment control,’’
drive schemes for tracked armored vehicles,’’ J. Ordnance J., no. 04, IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 106225–106237, 2019.
pp. 583–586, 2006. [25] A. Rucco, G. Notarstefano, and J. Hauser, ‘‘An efficient minimum-time
[2] H. C. Li, Q. D. Yan, and W. Q. Song, ‘‘Research on electric transmission trajectory generation strategy for two-track car vehicles,’’ IEEE Trans.
scheme for realizing mechanical cycle of tracked vehicle steering power,’’ Control Syst. Technol., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1505–1519, Jul. 2015.
J. Mech. Design, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 60–64, 2011. [26] Q. H. Zeng, B. Yang, and C. G. Liu, ‘‘Multi-wheel drive tracked vehicle
[3] C. Lin, S. Liang, J. Chen, and X. Gao, ‘‘A multi-objective optimal torque power matching calculation and simulation analysis,’’ J. Fire Command
distribution strategy for four in-wheel-motor drive electric vehicles,’’ IEEE Control, no. 5, pp. 58–61, 2013.
Access, vol. 7, pp. 64627–64640, 2019. [27] X. Ji, X. He, C. Lv, Y. Liu, and J. Wu, ‘‘A vehicle stability control strategy
[4] X. P. Jia, J. Ma, and K. L. Yu, ‘‘Performance analysis of electric transmis- with adaptive neural network sliding mode theory based on system uncer-
sion tracked vehicle coupling transmission scheme,’’ J. Mech. Transmiss., tainty approximation,’’ Vehicle Syst. Dyn., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 923–946,
vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 129–132, 2015. Jun. 2018.
[5] X. P. Jia, J. Ma, and K. L. Yu, ‘‘Research on the transmission system of [28] X. Ji, Y. Liu, X. He, K. Yang, X. Na, C. Lv, and Y. Liu, ‘‘Interactive control
electric transmission tracked vehicle,’’ J. Armored Force Eng. Inst., vol. 29, paradigm-based robust lateral stability controller design for autonomous
no. 2, pp. 35–39, 2015. automobile path tracking with uncertain disturbance: A dynamic game
[6] J. Ma, X. P. Jia, and K. L. Yu, ‘‘Modeling and simulation of an electric drive approach,’’ IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 6906–6920,
tracked vehicle drive system based on a coupling mechanism,’’ J. Agricult. Aug. 2018.
Equip. Vehicle Eng., vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 25–28, 2015. [29] H. Guo, J. Liu, D. Cao, H. Chen, R. Yu, and C. Lv, ‘‘Dual-envelop-
[7] J. T. Gai, S. D. Huang, and G. M. Zhou, ‘‘Design method of power coupling oriented moving horizon path tracking control for fully automated vehi-
mechanism driven by two-sided motor,’’ J. China Mech. Eng., vol. 25, cles,’’ Mechatronics, vol. 50, pp. 422–433, Apr. 2018.
no. 13, pp. 1739–1743, 2014. [30] J. Hu, J. Tao, W. Zhao, and Y. Han, ‘‘Modeling and simulation of
[8] L. Zhai, T. M. Sun, Q. N. Wang, and J. Wang, ‘‘Lateral stability control of steering control strategy for dual-motor coupling drive tracked vehicle,’’
dynamic steering for dual motor drive high speed tracked vehicle,’’ Int. J. J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., vol. 41, no. 4, p. 190, Apr. 2019,
Automot. Technol., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1079–1090, Dec. 2016. doi: 10.1007/s40430-019-1692-0.
LI ZHAI (Member, IEEE) received the Ph.D. YUH MING MOK received the B.S. degree in
degree in vehicle engineering from the Beijing aerospace engineering from the University of Min-
Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, in 2004. nesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, in 2017. He is
Since 2009, she has been an Associate Pro- currently pursuing the M.S. degree in mechanical
fessor with the National Engineering Laboratory engineering with the Beijing Institute of Technol-
for Electric Vehicle and the School of Mechani- ogy, Beijing, China.
cal Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology. His research interests include vehicle system
From 2013 to 2014, she was a Visitor Scholar dynamics and control, MPC controllers, and drift-
in electrical and computer engineering with the ing control of vehicles.
University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO, USA.
Her research interests include dynamics control, motor drive system control,
and EMC of EVs.