Professional Documents
Culture Documents
kristanc2016BVS PDF
kristanc2016BVS PDF
European medicinal and edible plants associated with subacute and chronic toxicity
part I: Plants with carcinogenic, teratogenic and endocrine-disrupting effects
PII: S0278-6915(16)30113-2
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.04.007
Reference: FCT 8557
Please cite this article as: Kristanc, L., Kreft, S., European medicinal and edible plants associated with
subacute and chronic toxicity part I: Plants with carcinogenic, teratogenic and endocrine-disrupting
effects, Food and Chemical Toxicology (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.04.007.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
European Medicinal and Edible Plants Associated with Subacute and
Chronic Toxicity
PT
RI
SC
Authors: Luka Kristanc 1*, Samo Kreft 2
U
AN
1
Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000
Ljubljana, and Primary Healthcare of Gorenjska, ZD Kranj, Gosposvetska ulica 10, 4000
M
2
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 32, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
TE
C EP
AC
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Abstract
In recent decades, the use of herbal medicines and food products has been widely embraced in
many developed countries. These products are generally highly accepted by consumers who
often believe that “natural” equals “safe”. This is, however, an oversimplification because
PT
several botanicals have been found to contain toxic compounds in concentrations harmful to
human health. Acutely toxic plants are in most cases already recognised as dangerous as a
RI
result of their traditional use, but plants with subacute and chronic toxicity are difficult or
even impossible to detect by traditional use or by clinical research studies. In this review, we
SC
systematically address major issues including the carcinogenicity, teratogenicity and
endocrine-disrupting effects associated with the use of herbal preparations with a strong focus
on plant species that either grow natively or are cultivated in Europe. The basic information
U
regarding the molecular mechanisms of the individual subtypes of plant-induced non-acute
AN
toxicity is given, which is followed by a discussion of the pathophysiological and clinical
characteristics. We describe the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of alkenylbenzenes,
M
pyrrolizidine alkaloids and bracken fern ptaquiloside, the teratogenicity issues regarding
anthraquinone glycosides and specific alkaloids, and discuss the human health concerns
D
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1. Introduction
PT
as a primary source of healthcare (Bodeker et al., 2005; Ekor, 2014). The high prevalence of
people seeking herbal therapy in developing countries, especially in rural areas, is associated
RI
with tradition, availability and low cost. In recent decades, the use of herbal remedies, which
are used in complementary or alternative approaches, has also been widely accepted in
SC
developed countries, including many European countries, especially the UK, France and
Germany (Braun et al., 2010; Calapai, 2008; Ekor, 2014). In contrast to its use in developing
U
countries, phytotherapy has gained popularity in developed countries as a result of the
AN
widespread public belief that it is safe, balanced and nature-friendly. Furthermore, it is
associated with a healthy way of life and is viewed as a nonaggressive and holistic approach
to healing. Thus, people may spend a substantial amount of money for various over-the-
M
counter remedies and food supplements of herbal origin with an intention to improve their
general well-being, appearance and health (Kong et al., 2003; WHO global atlas, 2005; WHO
D
Monographs, 2002).
TE
medicinal and nutritional potential of many herbal species, we must remain aware of the fact
that the majority of them have not been thoroughly studied in terms of their safety and that the
C
adverse effects associated with their use have not been monitored in most cases as rigorously
AC
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
connected to a causative agent. These types of dangers can therefore go unnoticed even when
a plant is widely used.
Generally, the most poisonous plant substances are neurotoxins, which are followed
by cytotoxins and metabolic poisons that disturb the structural integrity and functions of the
internal organs, such as the liver, heart, kidneys, gastrointestinal system and lungs. In addition
to the inherent properties of toxic chemicals, it is important to keep in mind that dose is a
PT
crucial parameter. The idea that it is the dose that causes a poison to be toxic was recognized
by the first true toxicologist, Paracelsus, five centuries ago. Nevertheless, during the last few
RI
decades, it has become apparent that certain substances that originate in plants can cause
serious disturbances, including carcinogenesis, hormonal dysregulation, and the disruption of
SC
reproductive and developmental processes, even at very low doses which are below those
used for traditional toxicological studies (Vandenberg et al., 2012). Therefore, in contrast to
acute toxicity, the dose-effect relationship in cases of chronic toxicity is not always so
U
straightforward.
AN
Another important aspect of the possible intoxications with herbal products and plant
food is their contamination or incorrect identification of plant in the product. A toxic Senecio
M
species were, for instance, found as contaminant in rocket (Eruca sativa) salad (Wiedenfeld,
2011) and herbal teas (Rasenack, 2003; Schulz et al., 2015). Several dozens of Belgian
D
women were intoxicated by herbal slimming pills contaminated (or possibly adulterated) with
Aristolochia species (Cosyns, 2003). Herbal medicinal products often contain toxic amounts
TE
of heavy metals or synthetic medicines (Saper et al., 2004; Au et al., 2000). Furthermore, in
folk medicine, people can incorrectly identify a plant and use a toxic one instead of medicinal
EP
or edible one (e.g. Veratrum album instead of Gentiana lutea (Verovnik, 1999)).
Adulterations, contaminations and misidentification of herbal products are by themselves
extensive topics and will not be covered in this review, nevertheless, they were dealt with to
C
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Herbal products are not always safe. On the contrary, some of them have been found
to contain substances that are potentially genotoxic or carcinogenic. In this respect, substances
PT
belonging to the groups of alkenylbenzenes and pyrrolizidine alkaloids are of special concern
to human health.
RI
Many secondary plant metabolites are known to attack DNA, either through covalent
binding (alkylation) or intercalation (Schmeller et al., 1997; Wink, 2000; Wink, 2008). Plant-
SC
derived alkylating agents, which will be more thoroughly presented in the following chapters,
include alkenylbenzenes, pyrrolizidine alkaloids, ptaquiloside, aristolochic acids and certain
furanocoumarins. If the alkylated DNA bases are not adequately repaired, or if the cell is not
U
directed into apoptosis, the cell may proliferate, thereby fixing the mutation, which represents
AN
the first step of carcinogenesis. While plant-derived alkylating agents are generally
recognized as procarcinogenic substances, the relation between carcinogenesis and plant-
M
derived intercalating compounds, such as β-carboline and certain other alkaloids, including
berberine and sanguinarine (contained in Berberis and Chelidonium), and anthraquinones
D
(found for instance in Senna and Frangula), is not so straightforward (Lu et al., 2012;
Schmeller et al., 1997). It has been shown, that they are capable of inserting themselves
TE
between successive base pairs in DNA which can result in the disruption of DNA replication
and the occurrence of frameshift mutations (Schmeller et al., 1997; Wink, 2000). Although
EP
they can undoubtedly have a profound impact on the cell cycle, these plant-derived
intercalating agents have not been experimentally linked with carcinogenesis. Some of them
C
have even been shown to have antineoplastic activity as a result of their antiproliferative and
proapoptotic effects (Lu et al., 2012; Wink, 2007).
AC
2.1 Alkenylbenzenes
Many alkenylbenzenes, i.e., estragole, eugenol, methyl eugenol, safrole, β-asarone and
myristicin, have been demonstrated to have genotoxic and carcinogenic properties (Figure 1
and Table 1), and the EU Scientific Committee on Food (EU-SCF) has suggested restrictions
for their use (Scientific Committee on Food, 2001a, 2001b, 2001c). They are present in a wide
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
variety of plants, including nutmeg, cinnamon, basil, fennel, anise, tarragon and black pepper
(Table 1) (Scientific Committee on Food, 2001a, 2001b, 2001c). Alkenylbenzenes are used as
flavours and fragrances in many foods and food products, perfumes, soaps, aromatic oils and
detergents. Despite the existence of regulatory efforts in several countries (Van den Berg et
al., 2011), their use in food supplements that contain them in higher levels is not sufficiently
controlled. It has been namely shown, that the recommended use of some food supplements
PT
that contain high concentrations of alkenylbenzenes could lead to exposure levels that have
caused malignant tumours in experimental animals (Scientific Committee on Food, 2001a,
RI
2001b, 2001c; Van den Berg et al., 2011).
U SC
AN
M
Figure 1. The comparison of the chemical structures of the most common alkenylbenzenes.
D
The molecules typically consist of a benzene ring substituted with a propenyl and a methoxy
groups.
TE
Nevertheless, the industrial expert panel from the Flavour and Extract Manufacturers’
EP
Association (FEMA) concluded that the consumption of flavours and the related exposure to
methyl eugenol and estragole is generally too low to pose a significant cancer risk in humans
C
because it has been shown in rodent studies that the activating biotransformation pathway
does not play an important role when these drugs are used at low doses (Smith et al., 2002).
AC
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
but were found to be insignificant because they are rapidly converted to less toxic dihydrodiol
or glutathione conjugates (Guenthner and Luo, 2001; Luo and Guenthner, 1996).
It has been suggested that the results obtained in studies of herbal extracts may be
different from those obtained from isolated carcinogenic compounds (De Paula et al., 2007;
Jeurissen et al., 2008). This discrepancy could be associated with the complex mixture of
compounds present in the extracts that might influence either bio-activation (toxication)
PT
and/or detoxification pathways, the most significant of the later being glucuronidation and
binding with glutathione (Guenthner and Luo, 2001; Iyer et al., 2003). For instance, in HepG2
RI
human hepatoma cells the DNA alkylation mediated by the sulfotransferase-catalysed bio-
activation of estragol was supressed by a flavonoid substance nevadensin, present in the
SC
methanol basil extract (Alhusainy et al., 2010; Jeurissen et al., 2008). Therefore, the level of
the bio-activation of alkenylbenzenes could be significantly diminished when they are
consumed along with other herbal ingredients. The plants that are used in herbal medicine in
U
Europe that contain genotoxic or carcinogenic alkenylbenzenes are listed in Table 1.
AN
Table 1. List of plants species containing alkenyl benzene compounds with genotoxic and/or
M
carcinogenic properties.
D
Laurus nobilis, Eugenol Genotoxicity was indicated in a number of EFSA, 2009b; NTP,
in vitro assays (resulting from oxidative 1983; Swanson et al.,
Ocimum basilicum,
DNA damage). There is also modest 1979
C
Angelica archangelica, Isosafrole A weak hepatocarcinogenic effect was SCF, 2003a; Swanson et
found in rodents (a non-genotoxic al., 1979
Sassafras spp.
mechanism is suspected). In vitro systems
testing mutageniicty gave equivocal
results.
Petroselinum crispum, Apiol DNA adducts were detected in HepG2 Miller et al., 1983; Zhou
cells and laboratory animals (weaker et al., 2007
Anethum graveolens
effects than were observed for estragole
and safrole).
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Acorus calamus, Β-Asarone In vitro genotoxicity tests gave equivocal Cartus and Schrenk,
results. In vivo tests demonstrated an 2015; Cartus et al.,
Asarum europaeum
increased incidence of hepatic adenomas 2015; SCF, 2002
and carcinomas in mice and
leiomyosarcomas in rats.
PT
Myrrhis odorata Trans- Several in vitro and in vivo experiments Newberne, 1999;
Anethole showed that trans-anethole is not Swanson et al., 1979
genotoxic, but it was shown to induce
RI
hepatocellular carcinomas in rats.
Foeniculum vulgare, Methyl Methyl eugenol is mutagenic (can induce EFSA, 2009a; Zhou et
SC
eugenol DNA adducts through its 1-hydroxy- al., 2007
Ocimum basilicum,
metabolite) and has been associated with
Artemisia dracunculus, liver tumours in rodents.
Laurus nobilis,
U
Zingiber officinale,
AN
Cymbopogon spp.
Petroselinum crispum, Myristicin Myristicin and its 1-hydroxy-metabolite EFSA, 2009a; Zhou et
have genotoxic and carcinogenic al., 2007
Anethum graveolens,
M
Myristica fragrans
TE
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
species of Convolvulaceae, Poaceae and Lamiaceae, they are primarily found in the members
of the following four plant families (Reimann, 2004; Smith and Culvenor, 1981):
• Asteraceae – in plants of the Senecioneae subtribe (24 genera, the genus Senecio is
prevalent) and the Eupatorieae subtribe (mainly in the genera Eupatorium and
Ageratum),
• Boraginaceae – in virtually all plant species of this family,
PT
• Fabaceae – in the subtribe Crotalarieae (not found in Europe), mainly in the genus
Crotalaria but also in the genera Chromolaena and Lotononis, and
RI
• Orchidaceae – for instance, in the genus Liparis.
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
Figure 2. Some of the PAs which were characterized as mutagenic and/or carcinogenic in
animal studies. PAs are derived from esters of basic alcohols and share a common chemical
C
In addition to the well described hepatotoxic effects of PAs, many of these substances
have also been shown to have genotoxic and carcinogenic properties (EFSA, 2011). In vitro
and in vivo studies demonstrated that PAs produce, upon metabolic activation, DNA adducts,
cross-linking and breaks, leading to gene mutations (most frequently G:C → T:A
transversions and tandem base substitutions) and chromosomal aberrations (Chen et al., 2010;
EFSA, 2011). Studies in experimental animals that were exposed to different PAs or their
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
metabolites have demonstrated the development of cancers in the liver, lungs, intestines,
bladder, kidneys, pancreas, skin, brain and spinal cord, adrenal glands, blood (leukaemia), and
muscle (Chan et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2010; Hirono, 1993). It has been shown in both
experimental animals and human cell cultures that one of the multiple known genetic targets
of toxic PA metabolites is the gene TP53, which encodes the well-known tumour suppressor
protein p53 (Chen et al., 2010; Couet, 1993; Ji et al., 2005). It has been hypothesized that the
PT
carcinogenesis is particularly favoured by extended, low-level, and intermittent periods of
exposure to PAs since they have been found to be not only genotoxic but also antimitotic
RI
(Mattocks, 1968). Intermittent low-dose exposure to PAs, which is a most likely scenario in
the case of PA-contaminated herbal preparation or food use and is associated with the DNA
SC
injury and the inhibition of mitoses, would, namely, allow intervening periods of normal or
even increased mitotic activity, providing an opportunity for the tumours to evolve (McLean,
1970; Rai et al., 2008; Schoental, 1968). The importance of the antimitotic activity of PAs for
U
the carcinogenic process has, however, not been thoroughly substantiated by the experimental
AN
studies.
A list of plants for which concerns have been raised regarding their PA levels is
M
presented in Table 2. Some of them are foraged by animals, while others are weeds that grow
among grains that are harvested for human use. These can therefore contaminate the food
D
supply. Several of the listed herbs have been used as medicinals for many centuries (the
principal medicinal genera that are currently in use are Senecio, Tussilago, Borago,
TE
Table 2. Plant species and specific PAs that may have genotoxic and carcinogenic effects.
C
Tussilago farfara Senkirkine, Several in vitro genotoxicity studies have Chen et al., 2010;
tussilagine, provided weak positive results for senkirkine. An COC, 2008;
senecionine increased incidence of hepatic adenomas was EFSA, 2011; Fu
observed in male rats after senkirkine et al., 2004;
Petasites spp. Senkirkine, administration. The Committee On IARC, 1983;
Senecionine, Carcinogenicity (COC) and the IARC have
seneciphylline concluded that the present data are not sufficient
to ascertain the carcinogenicity of senkirkine.
Adenostyles spp. Senecionine, Senecionine was found to form DNA adducts and Chen et al., 2010;
seneciphylline, was positive in several genotoxicity assays, COC, 2008;
spartioidine, including UDS assays and a Wing spot test. In EFSA, 2011; Fu
integerrimine spite of a number of negative results for et al., 2004; Gree
senecionine in the Ames test, it is most likely et al., 1981; Mori
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Leucanthemum spp. Spartioidine, carcinogenic. et al., 1985;
integerrimine, Newberne and
retrosine, Genotoxicity was indicated in a number of in vitro Rogers, 1973
Jacobine, and in vivo tests of riddelliine and monocrotaline.
senecionine Riddelliine demonstrated carcinogenicity in
experimental animals and has been listed also as a
probable human carcinogen. In male rats that
Senecio spp. Riddelline, were given monocrotaline, liver cell carcinomas
floridanine, developed.
monocrotaline,
otosenine,
PT
senecionine
Symphytum spp. Symphytine, Genotoxic potential was identified for symphytine Chen et al., 2010;
RI
lycopsamine, in a Wing spot test. In experimental animals COC, 2008;
echimidine, exposed to symphytine, an increased incidence of EFSA, 2011; Fu
symglandine liver haemangiosarcomas and hepatic adenomas et al., 2004
was observed.
SC
Myosotis spp. Symphytine,
lasiocarpine,
myoscorpine
U
Lycopsamine, Lycopsamine displayed no mutagenicity in Ames Chen et al., 2010;
intermedine, tests, but was found to be mutagenic in EFSA, 2011; Fu
AN
Eupatorium spp. supinine, Drosophila. Lycopsamine and its intermediates et al., 2004
rinderine, demonstrated only weak hepatic toxicity in rats.
echinatine
M
Cynoglossum Heliotrine, Many in vitro and an in vivo tests have Chen et al., 2010;
TE
observed.
AC
Bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) is one of the most common fern species with a
wide geographical and ecological distribution. It is present in all continents, except in
Australia, from subtropic to subarctic areas (Taylor, 1990). Bracken fern is a very adaptable
plant and is capable of forming dense, rapidly expanding populations in course of the first
phases of the ecological succession in forest cleanings and other disturbed rural areas
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
(Pakeman and Marrs, 1992). Its aggressive growth, charaterized by an extensive rhizome
system and rapidly growing fronds, sometimes enables it to be a dominant species in certain
plant communities, for instance in the understorey of pine and oak forests, in heather (Calluna
vulgaris) stands, acid grasslands and moors (Le Duc et al., 2003; Smith and Taylor, 1995).
Bracken contains different poisonous agents, including some cyanogen glycosides
(e.g., prunasin), two types of thermolabile thiaminases, a few thermostable thiamine
PT
antagonists (e.g., caffeic acid, astragalin and isoquercetin), and carcinogenic compounds (e.g.,
ptaquiloside and shikimic acid) (Alonso-Amelot and Oliveros 2000; Konishi and Ichijo, 1984;
RI
Meyer, 1989) (Figure 3). Ptaquiloside is certainly the major carcinogen in bracken (Smith and
Seawright, 1995). The distribution of ptaquiloside in a variety of ferns has been examined in
SC
Japan using chromatography and a modified Ames test (Saito et al., 1989). Nineteen of the 31
ferns that were tested were found to contain the potentially carcinogenic ptaquiloside and its
close analogues, in addition to Pteridium, and especially the ferns in the genera Pteris,
U
Microlepia and Hypolepis (Saito et al., 1989).
AN
M
D
TE
EP
Figure 3. Some of the toxic compunds isolated from bracken fern, prunasin (a cyanogen
glycoside), ptaquiloside (the major carcinogen in bracken) and shikimic acid (a potential
C
carcinogen-promoting agent).
AC
After the ingestion of the plant material or contaminated milk, both ptaquiloside and
its aglycone ptaquilosin are converted by the hepatic cytochrome P-450 enzymes into the
unstable dienone, which is regarded as the ultimate carcinogen (Kigoshi et al., 1993). The
dienone metabolite is strongly electrophilic, and it rapidly reacts with amino acids and
nucleotides, forming covalent adducts with DNA and causing DNA strand breaks (Ojika et
al., 1987; Ojika et al., 1989). Crude bracken extracts that were incubated with liver
microsomal systems have been found to be positive in Ames tests (Matsuoka et al., 1989).
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Furthermore, it was found out that ptaquiloside can cause chromatid exchanges in Chinese
hamster lung cells and unscheduled DNA synthesis in rat hepatocytes (Evans, 1986; Hirono et
al. 1984; Matsuoka et al., 1989; Mori et al., 1985; Saffhill et al., 1985). On the other hand,
shikimic acid and its metabolite cyclohexane carboxylate were not mutagenic in Ames tests,
and whether they are carcinogenic in experimental animals and humans remains controversial
(Jones et al., 1983). Hence, although shikimic acid is unlikely to be a cancer-initiating agent,
PT
it may act as a carcinogen-promoting agent (Jones et al., 1983).
Bracken carcinogenicity in animals had already been demonstrated fifty years ago
RI
(Evans and Mason, 1965). Many subsequent studies performed in either the field or the
laboratory have associated the ingestion of bracken or its extracts with diseases and cancers in
SC
many sites in different animal species, such as rats, hamsters, guinea pigs, cattle, sheep and
toads (Evans, 1987). The consumption of bracken was linked to a number of different,
generally well recognised syndromes, some of which are species specific (Smith, 2004): i)
U
bovine enzootic haematuria and mixed tumours of the urinary bladder (in cattle), ii) acute
AN
haemorrhagic disease and upper alimentary carcinoma (in cattle and sheep), iii) thiamine
deficiency (in horses and sheep), and iv) retinal atrophy (in sheep). Three main routes of
M
exposure to the toxic effects of bracken fern have been proposed in humans, i.e., consumption
of the plant, ingestion of milk from affected animals and inhalation of its spores.
D
Bracken ferns have been part of human diets from antiquity. Prehistoric man is
thought to have regularly consumed bracken rhizomes in winter and the young fronds in the
TE
spring. During the First World War, the rhizomes of these plants were consumed by people in
Scotland (Vetter, 2009). Today, its fronds are traditionally eaten in Japan and some parts of
EP
South America, while its rhizomes are a part of the diet of Aboriginal populations and Maori
(Hirayama, 1979; Vetter, 2009). In certain parts of the world, especially in Russia, China and
Japan, bracken fern is even grown commercially for human use (Vetter, 2009). The usual
C
procedure that is performed before eating the plant (boiling in water in the presence of
AC
different chemicals, such as soda ash) appears to render their components less harmful,
presumably by inactivating some of their toxic agents. Nevertheless, some carcinogenic
activity persists (Hirayama, 1979). In some countries (e.g., Japan, Brazil and Venezuela), a
close association was identified between the consumption of bracken fern and cancers of the
upper gastrointestinal tract (Alonso-Amelot and Avendano, 2002; Hirayama, 1979). It has
been found that the concentration of ptaquiloside in fronds increases with their maturation
process, while it is almost absent in rhizomes (Alonso-Amelot et al., 1992; Vetter, 2009).
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Ptaquiloside has been identified in the milk produced by bracken-fed cows, and the
concentrations at which it was found were observed to be roughly linearly dependent on the
dose that was ingested by the cow (Alonso-Amelot et al., 1996). The proportion of
ptaquiloside that was excreted with the milk was estimated to be as high as 8.6 % of the total
consumed substance (Alonso-Amelot et al., 1996). It is quite plausible that the ptaquiloside in
the milk of these animals is responsible for the association between bracken infestation and
PT
the incidence of gastric cancer in the populations of farmers that inhabit cattle-range areas in
Costa Rica and other countries where bracken growth is dense (Villalobos-Salazar, 1995).
RI
Indeed, tumours have been demonstrated in rats that were fed with the milk of cows that had
grazed bracken (Villalobos-Salazar, 1995). While this route of exposure may be relevant in
SC
small, geographically remote rural communities, the dilution resulting from the bulk
processing of milk is thought to reduce any risk from milk in most developed countries to
negligible levels (Vetter, 2009).
U
Because spores have been found to be carcinogenic in mice, there is a theoretical risk
AN
that the inhalation and subsequent ingestion of spores could also be carcinogenic in humans.
To date, there have been no studies of the effects of exposure of animals to airborne spores,
M
but studies have explored the effects of directly ingesting the spores (Povey et al., 1996). In
mice, spores administered by gavage produced DNA adducts (Wilson et al., 1998).
D
ptaquilosides in the soil of the bracken-populated areas were performed. The investigation
conducted in Denmark, has, for instance, detected the following concentrations: 0.008–40.6
EP
µg ptaquiloside/g dry soil in the autumn and 1.56–212 µg ptaquiloside/g dry soil in late winter
(Rasmussen et al., 2005). It has been established that the risk of ptaquiloside soil leaching
depends on many environmental factors, such as the soil pH (it is the highest in slightly acidic
C
to neutral soil), the clay content and the rate of microbiological degradation (Rasmussen et al.,
AC
2005; Vetter, 2009). However, the health risk implications of the presence of ptaquiloside in
soil and in the groundwater for animals and humans are not well established and require
further ecotoxicological research.
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
The compendium of plants that are either wild-growing, cultivated or extensively
consumed in Europe that may have carcinogenic potential has not yet been exhausted. In the
following list (Table 3), an overview of the remainder of plants that might be of concern
because they have genotoxic and/or carcinogenic potential is provided. For the majority of the
selected botanical ingredients, carcinogenicity has been either reported or suspected.
PT
Table 3. List of plant species with potentially genotoxic and/or carcinogenic properties.
RI
Plant Species Compound Genotoxic and/or Carcinogenic Activity Ref.
Rubia tinctorum Lucidin, alizarin Lucidin and alizarin have genotoxic Blömeke et al.,
SC
properties (they were positive in a battery of 1992; EFSA,
short-term in vitro tests). Furthermore, 2009a; Westendorf
carcinogenic activity was demonstrated in
et al., 1988
rats (intestinal and liver tumours).
Cassia spp,
Lavandula spp.
TE
Aristolochia spp., Aristolochic Aristolochic acids are genotoxic and form Arlt et al., 2002;
acids DNA-adducts. They were indicated to be Chen et al., 2012;
Asarum spp.,
carcinogenic in rats, mice and rabbits, and Jelaković et al;
Bragantia spp. also in humans. Urothelial cancers have
EP
2012
namely been observed in patients suffering
from aristolochic acid nephropathy.
C
Aloysia citriodora, Citral Several in vitro as well as in vivo tests for EFSA, 2009c;
Melissa officinalis, genotoxicity have shown negative results for NTP, 2003; Sinha
AC
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Thymus spp., Myrcene No evidence of genotoxicity was found in in NTP, 2010
vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays for
Humulus lupulus, myrcene. However, administration of
Cannabis spp., myrcene to rodents induced liver and kidney
tumours.
Petroselinum crispum
PT
(methoxsalen)
exocarp), detected in male rats. It is classified as Goup
1 carcinogen, but it has carcinogenic activity
Levisticum officinale,
only in combination with UV radiation.
Petroselinum crispum
RI
Mentha spp. Pulegone Mutagenicity assays of pulegone have Da Rocha et al.,
(especially M. provided negative results. Carcinogenic 2012; EMA, 2014;
SC
pulegium), activity was found in mice (liver tumours, NTP, 2011
osteomas, osteosarcomas) and in rats
Agastache spp. (urinary bladder tumours).
U
Cycas spp. Cycasin Cycasin is a mutagenic and a carcinogenic Sieber et al., 1980
AN
agent, but only when it is deglucosylated to
its principal metabolite,
methylazoxymethanol (interestingly, in
adult mammals, the deglucosylation of
M
3. Teratogenic plants
C
In the case of pregnant women, the use of any drug or product, either natural or
AC
synthetic, must be especially seriously considered in light of the risk-benefit ratio. Many
substances can harm a developing embryo or foetus, especially when they are used during the
critical periods corresponding to organogenesis in the first trimester of pregnancy.
Nevertheless, throughout the world, many pregnant women consume a wide variety of herbs
and herbal products during pregnancy for many reasons that may be related or not to
pregnancy. For example, herbal products are used to treat nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia and
constipation, to induce abortion, to treat infections of the urinary tracts, to prepare for labour,
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
etc. (Glover et al., 2003; Nordeng and Havnen, 2005). Plant products are still being routinely
administered to women during pregnancy and childbirth, especially in developing countries.
Plant toxins that can efficiently cross the placenta and that can induce congenital
malformations in a developing embryo or foetus when present at critical time periods during
gestation are called to have teratogenic effects (Keeler, 1984). Therefore, exposure to these
toxins in the prenatal stage can lead to teratogenesis, but many of them can also have a
PT
negative impact on the postnatal growth and maturation processes (developmental toxicity).
Many teratogenic mechanisms have been associated with the use of herbal products. These
RI
include the disruption of the microtubule assembly process, the folate antagonism, the
induction of oxidative stress, the specific receptor-mediated teratogenesis and DNA alkylation
SC
(Schmeller et al., 1997; Van et al., 2010; Wink, 2007 and 2008).
U
3.1 Anthraquinone Glycosides
AN
Plant species containing anthraquinones (Figure 4), including senna glycosides or
M
sennosides, cascarosides, emodine and rhein, are part of the formulations of numerous
medicinal products that are mainly used for the treatment of constipation. Anthranoid
D
laxatives act by exciting peristalsis and increasing fluid secretion in the colon. Worldwide, the
most common such stimulant is made of sena species (Cassia angustifolia Vahl; Cassia senna
TE
L. – syn. Senna alexandrina Mill). However, many other plants containing anthraquinone
glycosides, such as those derived from Frangula alnus L., Rhamnus spp., Aloe spp. and
EP
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
It is well known that constipation is very common in pregnant women. Although this
is not the topic of the current article, in which we focus mainly on the chronic toxicity issues,
it is appropriate to mention here that the use of laxatives containing anthraquinones might
potentially be dangerous because they can induce acute unwanted effects, such as uterine
contractions and increased blood flow to the uterus and its attachments, thereby increasing the
risk of foetal loss (Acs et al., 2009; Conover, 2003). The anthraquinones may even pass into
PT
breast milk to cause unwanted effects, such as spasms, in an infant (Acs et al., 2009).
The potential teratogenic effects of senna were recently examined in a case-control
RI
epidemiological study. No significant risk was found for more than 20 different congenital
abnormality groups in relation to treatment with senna during the second and third gestational
SC
month. It was also demonstrated, somewhat surprisingly, that the gestational age at delivery
was somewhat longer (by 0.2 week) and that the rate of preterm birth was lower (6.6 % vs.
9.2 %) in the newborn infants of mothers who had used senna during pregnancy (Acs et al.,
U
2009).
AN
3.2 Alkaloids
M
The use of the herbs mentioned in Table 4 should be avoided during pregnancy
D
because abortifacient and/or teratogenic potential (demonstrated mainly in animal studies) has
TE
been linked to their alkaloid content (Figure 5). Many of these plants can also induce acute
(Lupinus spp., Veratrum spp., Conium spp., and the included members of the family
Solanaceae) or chronic (neurotoxicity: certain species in the genera Astragalus and
EP
Table 4. List of plant species containing alkaloids that are potentially teratogenic.
Plant Species Active Constituents Responsible for Teratogenicity and their Ref.
Toxicity
Lupinus spp. Quinolizidine and piperidine alkaloids, such as lupinine Bunch et al., 1992;
(Figure 5), ammodendrine and anagyrine, which cause Keeler, 1983 and 1984;
congenital contracture-type skeletal malformations and cleft Panter et al., 2013
palates in foetuses (especially in cows, sheep and goats).
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Nicotiana spp. Piperidine alkaloids, such as anatabine (Figure 5) and Bunch et al., 1992;
anabasine, which cause congenital contracture-type skeletal Crowe and Swerczek,
malformations and cleft palates in foetuses (especially in 1974; Keeler, 1984;
pigs). Panter et al., 2013
Oxytropis spp. and The indolizidine alkaloid swainsonine, an alphamannosidase Bunch et al., 1992;
Astragalus spp. inhibitor that induces neurological defects of foetuses and Keeler, 1984; Lather et
(certain species of vasoconstriction in the placentae of sheep and cattle. al., 2011; Panter et al.,
these two genera, 2013
toxicity varies)
PT
Veratrum spp. Steroidal alkaloids, including veratridine (Figure 5), Incardona et al., 1998;
cyclopamine, cycloposine and jervine, which cause Keeler, 1984; Lather et
RI
craniofacial malformations, including cyclopia, in the al., 2011; Panter et al.,
foetuses of sheep, horses, goats and cows. 2013
SC
Trigonella foenum- Alkaloids, such as trigonelline, that can cause a decrease in Araee et al., 2009;
graecum bone marrow cell proliferation and disrupt foetal Gaffield and Keeler,
development in rats and rabbits. 1994
U
In Morocco, cases of pronounced congenital malformations,
AN
including hydrocephalus, anencephaly and spina bifida, were
linked to the consumption of fenugreek seeds during
pregnancy. However, this causality remains questionable
because fenugreek is widely used by people in Morocco and
M
neighbouring countries.
Ruta graveolens Quinoline and quinolone alkaloids that induce changes in the De Freitas et al., 2005;
D
Conium maculatum Piperidine alkaloids, including coniine and γ-coniceine, Bunch et al., 1992;
which cause congenital contracture-type skeletal Keeler and Balls, 1978;
malformations, cleft palates, restricted foetal movements and Keller et al., 1980;
C
Solanum spp. (green Glycoalkaloides, including solanidanes and spirosolanes, Gaffield and Keeler,
parts of plants and which are capable of inhibiting certain cholinesterase 1994
unripe fruits) enzymes and increasing the permeability of mitochondrial
membranes (thereby promoting apoptosis). These can cause
brain defects, spina bifida and cleft palate in the foetuses of
sheep and cattle.
Some PA-containing PAs (especially heliotrin) have been found to be teratogenic Edgar et al., 2011;
plant species, in rats (e.g., growth retardation, abnormal skeletal Wiedenfeld, 2011
especially development, and deficiencies in ossification). The exposure
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Heliotropium spp. of pregnant women to PAs through the consumption of
herbal teas, herbal medicines, and spices has been linked to
fatal hepatic sinusoidal obctruction syndrome (HSOS) in
human neonates.
Datura stramonium, The tropane alkaloid hyoscyamine, which causes deformities Lather et al., 2011;
in foals during foetal development. Panter et al., 2013
Mandragora
officinarum,
Hyosciamus spp.,
PT
Atropa belladonna
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
Figure 5. Some of the alkaloids that were found to have teratogenic effects:
lupinine (from Lupinus spp.), anatabine (from Nicotiana spp.) and veratridine (from
C
Veratrum spp.).
AC
Other plant species in which the pharmacological potential to cause teratogenicity has
been described but not studied in as much detail as the previously mentioned plants are listed
in Table 5.
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 5. List of other potentially teratogenic plants that grow (or are available) in Europe.
PT
Sorghum bicolor Cyanogenic glycosides that can cause contracture-type Lather et al., 2011;
skeletal defects. Panter et al., 2013
Podophyllum spp. Absent finger anomalies, septal defects of the heart, Lather et al., 2011
RI
defects of the external ears and skin tags in human
foetuses.
SC
Prunus spp. (especially Cyanogenic glycosides that can cause contracture-type Panter et al., 2013
seeds of P. dulcis and P. skeletal defects and cleft palate.
armeniaca)
U
Lathyrus spp. (L. cicera Osteolathyrogens, including γ-aminopropionitrile, which Panter et al., 2013
and L. odorata) cause congenital skeletal malformations in cows and
AN
sheep.
M
In recent decades, great concern has arisen regarding the potential human health risks
that may be associated with exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Endocrine
disruptors are defined as exogenous natural or synthetic substances that alter the function of
C
the endocrine system and that consequently produce adverse health effects in an organism or
AC
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
hypospadias, miscarriages, endometriosis and irregularities in the menstrual cycle (Balabanic
et al., 2011).
In addition to the endocrine-disrupting potential of phytoestrogens, another well
studied type of endocrine imbalance that has been linked to plant substances is presented in
this review, i.e., pseudohyperaldosteronism, associated with the ingestion of products
containing licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra).
PT
4.2 Phytoestrogens
RI
Phytoestrogens are plant secondary metabolites that are structurally and/or
SC
functionally similar to mammalian oestrogens or their active metabolites. The main groups of
phytoestrogen are the lignans, flavonoids (subgroups isoflavones, coumestans and
U
prenylflavonoids) and stilbenes (Limer and Speirs, 2004; Moon et al., 2006; Sirtoti et al.,
2005). Lignans are the main phytoestrogens in a normal diet, and they are found in many
AN
cereals, fruits and vegetables. They can be subdivided into enterolactones and enterodiols,
which have very weak oestrogenic properties (Limer and Speirs, 2004). Isoflavones are a
M
subgroup of flavonoids that are most abundant in soybeans and other legumes but that are also
present in berries, wine, grains and nuts (Kurzer and Xu, 1997). They include, for example,
D
genistein, daidzein and biochanin A (Figure 6). Isoflavones display variable oestrogenic
TE
activity, and they are considered to be natural SERMs (selective oestrogen receptor
modulators) (Zand et al., 2000). Isoflavones act as antioxidants in vitro, where they have been
shown to have antiproliferative activities (Fotsis et al., 1993; Peterson, 1995). Compared to
EP
studies on isoflavones, significantly fewer studies have been performed using coumestans,
prenylflavonoids and stilbenes. Coumestans are potent activators of oestrogen receptor (ER)
C
signalling pathways, but they are not as common in the diet as other phytoestrogens (Kurzer
AC
and Xu, 1997; Limer and Speirs, 2004). The chemopreventive potential of the most common
stilbene, resveratrol, against breast cancer has been studied in rodent models (Limer and
Speirs, 2004).
Phytoestrogens can be regarded as endocrine disruptors and could potentially be
harmful to human health. However, many health benefits have been associated with their use,
including the alleviation of menopausal symptoms, especially the reduction of the frequency
of hot flushes, and a lowered risk of developing atherosclerosis, ischaemic heart disease,
osteoporosis and breast cancer (Chen et al., 2015; Patisaul and Jefferson, 2010; Schmidt et al.,
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2016). As previously mentioned, we are exposed to phytoestrogens on a daily basis because
they are widely distributed in plants that are components of our diets. In spite of their weak
affinity for oestrogen receptors (ER), they therefore cannot be neglected as EDCs, and their
consumption could have profound physiological effects (Patisaul and Jefferson, 2010). In the
next subsection, we consider the mechanism of action of phytoestrogens and reveal that their
interaction with oestrogen receptors is in some way similar to the SERM/ER interaction.
PT
RI
U SC
Fugure 6. Structures of three isoflavones which are characteristic for soy and certain other
AN
legumes, such as red clover, alfalfa and peanuts.
M
they have the potential to affect a wide array of intracellular signalling mechanisms that are
important for regulating cellular growth, proliferation and protection against harmful
TE
and resveratrol (Ruiz-Larrea et al., 1997). Daidzein and genistein are the two best-
characterized isoflavones. Human exposure to these compounds occurs primarily through the
C
consumption of soy-based food and beverage products. Some isoflavones, most notably
genistein, inhibit pathways that are important for cell growth and proliferation, thereby
AC
affecting multiple organ systems (Oseni et al., 2008; Piontek et al., 1993). Genistein, for
instance, inhibits the activity of protein tyrosine kinases, which are very important regulatory
proteins (Piontek et al., 1993).
In vitro assays have shown that although most phytoestrogens, including the
isoflavones, bind both ERα and ERβ and activate ER-dependent gene transcription through
both receptor subtypes, they generally have a higher relative binding affinity for ERβ than for
ERα (Kuiper et al., 1997; Kuiper et al., 1998). Once bound, isoflavones do not act like typical
oestrogen agonists; instead, they act like SERMS, such as tamoxifen, which acts as an ER
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
agonist in the uterus and bone but as an antagonist in the breast, where it has proven
anticancer activity (Oseni et al., 2008). This differential activity by phytoestrogens and
SERMS results, in part, from the profile of co-activator and corepressor proteins in the cell
being affected (Kushner et al., 2000; Oseni et al., 2008). Once bound to ERs, phytoestrogens
can initiate transcription either classically, through interactions with oestrogen response
elements (ERE), or by binding to early immediate genes, such as Jun and Fos (Kushner et al.,
PT
2000).
Phytoestrogens, particularly the isoflavones, fit the definition of an endocrine
RI
disruptor. In animal models, they produce effects such as premature reproductive senescence,
compromised fertility, disruption of the lactation and the timing of puberty, the inhibition of
SC
the sexual behaviour etc. (Jefferson et al., 2007; Patisaul et al., 2001; Patisaul and Jefferson,
2010; Setchell et al., 1987). The exposure to high levels of phytoestrogens could therefore
pose a risk to human reproductive health, especially when taken by women diagnosed with
U
endometriosis or those experiencing irregular menstrual cycles. In addition, phytoestrogens
AN
should be consumed in moderate amounts by women diagnosed with estrogene-sensitive
cancers and during the critical periods, such as puberty and adolescence, pregnancy or
M
lactation. Phytoestrogens have been namely shown to be able to perturb normal menstrual
cycles in humans, for instance, their intake in high amounts can prolong the menstrual
D
bleeding (Strom et al., 2001) or cause dysmenorrhea, worsen the clinical course of
endometriosis, induce postmenopausal bleedings or elicit endometrial prolifeartion with
TE
polyps (Chandrareddy et al., 2008). Nevertheless, there is a relative lack of studies among
humans regarding effects of the phytoestrogen-induced hormonal disbalance on fecundity and
EP
fertility. Some studies have even demostrated that the phytoestrogen supplementation in
women can be even associated with improved reproductive outcomes, such as higher
ovulation and implantation rates (Kohama et al., 2005; Unfer et al., 2004), shorter time to
C
pregnancy (Mumford et al., 2014), higher pregnancy rates among couples with unexplained
AC
infertility (Shahin et al., 2008). Studies in men mainly reported no harmful effects of
phytoestrogens on their reproductive capacity (Beaton et al., 2010; Mitchell et al., 2001),
except for two reports which associated their intake with lower sperm concentration
(Chavarro et al., 2008) and with idiopathic male infertility (Xia et al., 2013).
Amog researchers, there is still no definite arrangement whether the phytoestrogens
increase or reduce the risk of developing breast cancer (Enderlin et al., 2009). While the
majority of epidemiological studies and meta-analyses concluded that the high intake of soy
isoflavones is associated with reduced breast cancer risk in pre- and postmenopausal women
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
(Boucher et al., 2013; Lee et al. 1991; Schmidt et al., 2016; Trock et al., 2006; Verheus et al.,
2007; Wu et al., 2008), some studies state that the opposite might be true (Maskarinec et al.,
2004; Padilla-Banks et al., 2006). Recently, it has been demonstrated that the use of soy
isoflavones is safe in women with the history of breast cancer and is not contraindicated in
women on hormone therapy with tamoxifen and anastrozole (Kang et al., 2010; Schmidt et
al., 2016; Wu et al., 2007). Studies even indicate that the isoflavone intake improves the
PT
prognosis of breast cancer patients, prolonging their life and decreasing the cancer recurrence
rates (Marini et al., 2008; Shu et al., 2009).
RI
4.3 “Oestrogenic” Plant Species
SC
Mainly through our diet, we are exposed to a continuous and complex mixture of plant
U
substances that, as outlined above, probably have a substantial impact on our endocrine
system. “Oestrogenic” plant compounds are widespread in food, including herbs and
AN
seasonings (e.g., garlic and parsley), grains (wheat, rye, and oat), vegetables (e.g., soybeans
and beans), fruits (cherries and apples), and drinks (coffee). In Table 6, we present the plants
M
that are known to contain very high levels of phytoestrogens (Geller and Studee, 2006;
Poluzzi et al., 2014; Thompson et al., 2006); the list is not exhaustive.
D
TE
Table 6. Plant species with potentially endocrine-disrupting potential as a result of their high
level of phytoestrogens.
EP
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Trifolium pratense * Coumestrol, trifoliol, formononetin, Coumestans,
biochanin A
isoflavones
PT
lariciresinol, hydroxymatairesinol
RI
Triticum spp. Hydroxymatairesinol, Syringaresinol, Lignans
Secoisolariciresinol
SC
Avena sativa Pinoresinol, lariciresinol, Lignans
hydroxymatairesinol
U
Humulus lupulus 8-Prenylnaringenin (hopein), xanthohumol, Prenylflavonoids (flavanones)
AN
isoxanthohumol
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
distinctive sweet taste of their roots and stolons (Society of Japanese Pharmacopoeia, 2012).
This taste can be attributed to the triterpenoid substance glycyrrhizin, which is a mixture of
potassium, calcium and magnesium salts of glycyrrhizic acid (Obolentseva et al., 1999). The
level of glycyrrhizin that is present in the roots of different Glycyrrhiza species varies from 2
to 25 %, depending on growth conditions (Obolentseva et al., 1999).
Licorice is popular not only as a food and drink sweetener. It has also been used by
PT
tobacco companies as a flavouring agent and in herbal medicines, especially in China and
Japan. There, it has been used for decades to treat gastric ulcers (Obolentseva et al., 1999).
RI
However, this particular use of licorice has become obsolete as a result of the emergence of
newer, more powerful and safer prescription drugs. Nevertheless, licorice continues to be
SC
included in many health products and could even gain new medical interests as a result of
recent research findings which show that licorice has antiviral, antiinflamatory,
antithrombotic and hepatoprotective activities (Coon and Ernst, 2004; Marianecci et al., 2012;
U
Mendes-Silva et al., 2003; Tsuruoka et al., 2009).
AN
The traditional belief that licorice is a healthy, natural substance without side effects
drives its broad consumption, which can in some cases be dangerous. The active compound in
M
licorice extracts, that is the glycyrrhizic acid, and its metabolites that are produced in the
intestine and in the liver, i.e., glycyrrhetinic acid and 3-monoglucuronyl-glycyrrhetinic acid
D
mineralocorticoid receptors in the kidneys (minor reason) and the inhibition of two enzymes
that are involved in the corticosteroid metabolism (major reason) (Calo et al., 2004; Joshino et
EP
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
in renal proton secretion) and a raised cortisol to cortisone ratio in the peripheral venous
plasma (resulting from the inhibition of 11-ß-HSD) are also found in most cases (Joshino et
al., 2014; Stewart et al., 1987). In cases with rhabdomyolysis (due to severe and long lasting
hypokalemia), creatine phosphokinase may be also elevated, and mioglobinuria with acute
kidney failure may ensue (Joshino et al., 2014; Mumoli and Cei, 2008; Murphy et al., 2009;
Omar et al., 2012; Stewart et al., 1987).
PT
The main difficulty in dosing licorice lies in in the fact that it is available in various
food and medicinal items that contain highly variable levels of licorice. In 1991, the European
RI
Union proposed a provisional dose of 100 mg/day as the upper limit for the ingestion of
glycyrrhizin (approximately the amount found in 60–70 g of licorice) (Murphy et al., 2009;
SC
Omar et al., 2012). Based on data obtained in studies of human volunteers, this upper limit
was later confirmed by the Scientific Committee on Food, which also stated that human
toxicity studies were too limited to define an exact safe average daily intake for glycyrrhizic
U
acid (SCF, 2003b).
AN
5. Conclusions
M
D
While there has long been widespread awareness among people regarding the acute
toxicity of herbs and their preparations, their potential for inducing chronic toxicity has
TE
received the attention it deserves only in the last few decades. A number of compounds with
the potential to induce chronic toxicity have been found in plants that are used in various
EP
what is currently known about these aspects of herbal toxicity and to describe how they could
AC
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Botanicals are self-prescribed and widely available, which make them difficult to
control. Furthermore, folklore and folk practices, and not scientific studies, are often used as a
means of obtaining information on the indications, efficacy and safety of medicinal plants and
herbal medicines (Lather et al., 2011). Many gatherers, manufacturers and consumers of
herbal medicines lack the appropriate level of botanical and toxicological knowledge. They
may be prone to misidentifying plant species, and they may be unfamiliar with the scientific
PT
binomial classification of plants. This lack of knowledge can lead to mistakes resulting from
confusion that is created by the numerous common names that are in use among people (Ekor,
RI
2014; Farah et al., 2000). In addition, the variability of secondary metabolites with
medicinally valuable or toxic effects in herbal products, which are not under strict control, is
SC
very high, as it depends on a myriad of factors, e.g., the plant phenotype, the soil and climate
characteristics, the harvest time, the preparation procedure etc. All of these constraints also
limit the efficiency of monitoring the safety of herbal medicines, which essentially requires
U
the close collaboration of different experts in the field. The same basic standards should
AN
therefore apply to the recognition and reporting of herbal toxicity that apply to prescription
medications. The systematically collected data about the frequency of toxic reactions and the
M
Literature
EP
2) Acs N, Banhidy F, Puho EH, Czeizel AE. Senna treatment in pregnant women and
congenital abnormalities in their off-spring – a population-based case-control study.
Reprod Toxicol. 2009; 28: 100–104.
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4) Alonso-Amelot ME, Avendano M. Human carcinogenesis and bracken fern: a review
of the evidence. Cur Med Chem. 2002; 9: 675–686.
5) Alonso-Amelot ME, Castillo U, Smith BL, Lauren DR, Amelot MEA. Bracken
ptaquiloside in milk. Nature. 1996; 382: 587.
6) Alonso-Amelot ME, Oliveros A. A method for the practical quantification and kinetic
evaluation of cyanogenesis in plant material. Application to Pteridium aquilinum and
PT
Passiflora capsularis. Phytochem Anal. 2000; 11: 309–316.
RI
Ontogenetic variation of biologically active metabolites of Pteridium aquilinum (L.
Kuhn.). J Chem Ecol 1992; 18: 1405–1420.
SC
8) Araee M, Norouzi M, Habibi G, Sheikhvatan M. Toxicity of Trigonella foenum-
graecum (fenugreek) in bone marrow cell proliferation in rat. Pak J of Pharmac Sci.
2009; 22: 126–130.
U
AN
9) Arlt VM, Stiborova M, Schmeiser HH. Aristolochic acid as a probable human cancer
hazard in herbal remedies: a review. Mutagenesis. 2002; 17: 265–277.
M
11) Beaton LK, McVeigh BL, Dillingham BL, Lampe JW, Duncan AM. Soy protein
TE
isolates of varying isoflavone content do not adversely affect semen quality in healthy
young men. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 1717–1722.
EP
13) Bodeker C, Bodeker G, Ong CK, Grundy CK, Burford G, Shein K. WHO Global
Atlas of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Geneva, Switzerland:
WHO, 2005.
14) Born SL, Api AM, Ford RA, Lefever FR, Hawkins DR. Comparative metabolism and
kinetics of coumarin in mice and rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2003; 41 (2): 247–258.
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
15) Boucher BA, Cotterchio M, Anderson LN, Kreiger N, Kirsh VA, Thompson LU. Use
of isoflavone supplements is associated with reduced postmenopausal breast cancer
risk. Int J Cancer. 2013; 132: 1439–1450.
16) Braun LA, Tiralongo E, Wilkinson JM, Spitzer O, Bailey M, Poole S, Dooley M.
Perceptions, use and attitudes of pharmacy customers on complementary medicines
and pharmacy practice. BMC Complement. Altern Med. 2010; 10: 38.
PT
17) Bunch TD, Panter KE, James LF. Ultrasound studies of the effects of certain
poisonous plants on uterine function and fetal development in livestock. J of An Sci.
RI
1992; 70: 1639–1643.
18) Calapai G. European legislation on herbal medicines: a look into the future. Drug Saf.
SC
2008; 31: 428–431.
U
Armanini D. Effect of aldosterone and glycyrrhetinic acid on the protein expression of
AN
PAI-1 and p22(phox) in human mononuclear leukocytes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2004; 89: 1973–1976.
M
21) Cartus AT, Stegmüller S, Simson N, Wahl A, Neef S, Kelm H, Schrenk D. Hepatic
TE
22) Chan PC, Haseman JK, Prejean JD, Nyska A. Toxicity and carcinogenicity of
EP
24) Chavarro JE, Toth TL, Sadio SM, Hauser R. Soy food and isoflavone intake in
relation to semen quality parameters among men from an infertility clinic. Hum
Reprod. 2008; 23: 2584–2590.
25) Chen CH, Dickman KG, Moriya M, Zavadil J, Sidorenko VS, Edwards KL, Gnatenko
DV, Wu L, Turesky RJ, Wu XR, Pu YS, Grollman AP. Aristolochic acid-associated
urothelial cancer in Taiwan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109: 8241–8246.
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
26) Chen M-N, Lin C-C, Liu C-F. Efficacy of phytoestrogens for menopausal symptoms: a
meta-analysis and systematic review. Climacteric. 2015; 18(2): 260–269.
27) Chen T, Mei N, Fu PP. Genotoxicity of pyrrolizidine alkaloids. J Appl Toxicol. 2010;
30: 183−196.
28) Choi, SM, Yoo SD, Lee BM. Toxicological characteristics of endocrine disrupting
PT
chemicals: Developmental toxicity, carcinogenicity, and mutagenicity. J Toxicol
Environ Health. 2004; 7: 1–24.
RI
29) Committee on Carcinogenicity (COC). Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in
Food, Consumer Products and the Environment. Annual Report, 2008.
SC
30) Conover EA. Herbal agents and over-the-counter medications in pregnancy. Best Pract
Res Clin En. 2003; 17: 237–251.
U
31) Coon JT, Ernst E. Complementary and alternative therapies in the treatment of chronic
AN
hepatitis C: a systematic review. J Hepatol. 2004; 40 (3): 491–500.
32) Cooper RL, Kavlock RJ. Endocrine disruptors and reproductive development: A
M
33) Cosyns JP, Jadoul M, Squifflet JP, Wese F, De Strihou CVY. Urothelial lesions in
D
1017.
34) Couet CE, Hanley AB, MacDonald S, Mayes L. The biological assay of natural
mutagens using p53. In: Food and Cancer Prevention, Waldron KW, Johnston IT,
EP
35) Crowe MW, Swerczek TW. Congenital arthrogryposis in offspring of sows fed
C
36) Da Rocha MS, Dodmane PR, Arnold LL, Pennington KL, Anwar MM, Adams BR,
Taylor SV, Wermes C, Adams TB, Cohen SM. Mode of action of pulegone on the
urinary bladder of F344 rats. Toxicol Sci. 2012; 128 (1): 1–8.
38) De Paula JP, Farago PV, Ribas JLC, SpinardiI GMS, Doll PM, Artoni RF, Zawadzka
SF. In vivo evaluation of the mutagenic potential of estragole and eugenol chemotypes
32
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
of Ocimum selloi Benth. Essential Oil. Latin American Journal of Pharmacy. 2007; 26:
846–851.
39) Drinkwater NR, Miller EC, Miller JA, Pitot HC. Hepatocarcinogenicity of estragole (1
Allyl 4 methoxybenzene) and 1 Hydroxyestragole in the mouse and mutagenicity of 1′
acetoxyestragole in bacteria. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1976; 57 (6):
1323–1331.
PT
40) Edgar JA, Colegate SM, Boppré M, Molyneux RJ. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in food: a
spectrum of potential health consequences. Food Addit Contam. 2011; 28: 308−324.
RI
41) Ekor M. The growing use of herbal medicines: issues relating to adverse reactions and
challenges in monitoring safety. Front Pharmacol. 2014; 177: 1–10.
SC
42) EMA, Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products. Public statement on the use of herbal
medicinal products containing pulegone and menthofuran. Draft revision 1, 2014.
U
43) Enderlin CA, Coleman EA, Stewart CB, Hakkak R. Dietary soy intake and breast
AN
cancer risk. Oncol. Nurs. Forum. 2009; 36: 531–539.
44) European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Compendium of botanicals that have been
M
45) European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Flavouring Group Evaluation 60 (FGE.60)
TE
46) European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Flavouring Group Evaluation 61, Revision 1
(FGE.61Rev1)1: Consideration of aliphatic acetals evaluated by JECFA (57th
meeting) structurally related to acetals of branched- and straight-chain aliphatic
saturated primary alcohols and branched- and straight-chain saturated aldehydes and
one orthoester of formic acid evaluated by EFSA in FGE.03Rev1 (2008). The EFSA
Journal. 2009c; 1026: 1–37.
33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
47) European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Scientific Opinion on Pyrrolizidine
alkaloids in food and feed. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain
(CONTAM). The EFSA Journal. 2011; 9 (11): 1–134.
48) Evans IA. Bracken carcinogenicity. Rev Environ Health. 1987; 7: 161–199.
49) Evans IA. The carcinogenic, mutagenic and teratogenicity of bracken. In: Smith RT,
Taylor JA, Eds. Bracken, ecology, land-use and control technology. Carnforth:
PT
Parthenon Publishing Group. 1986: 139–146.
50) Evans IA, Mason J. Carcinogenic activity of bracken. Nature 1965; 208: 913–914.
RI
51) Farah MH, Edwards IR, Lindquist M, Leon C, Shaw D. International monitoring of
SC
adverse health effects associated with herbal medicines. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.
2000; 9: 105–112.
U
52) Fotsis T, Pepper M, Adlercreutz H, Fleischmann G, Hase T, Montesano R,
Schweigerer L. Genistein, a dietary derived inhibitor of in vitro angiogenesis. Proc
AN
Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993; 90: 2690–2694.
53) Fu PP, Xia Q, Lin G, Chou MW. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids – genotoxicity, metabolism
M
enzymes, metabolic activation and mechanisms. Drug Metab Rev. 2004; 36: 1–55.
D
56) Geller SE, Studee L. Contemporary alternatives to plant estrogens for menopause.
Maturitas. 2006; 55: 3–13.
C
57) Glover DD, Amonkar M, Rybeck BF, Tracy TS. Prescription, over-the-counter, and
AC
herbal medicine use in a rural, obstetric population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188:
1039–1045.
58) Green CE, Segall JH, Byard JL. Metabolism, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity of the
pyrrolizidine alkaloid senecionine in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes. Toxicology
and Applied Pharmacology. 1981; 60: 176–185.
34
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
59) Guenthner TM, Luo G. Investigation of the role of the 2',3'-epoxidation pathway in the
bioactivation and genotoxicity of dietary allylbenzene analogs. Toxicology. 2001; 160
(1-3): 47–58.
60) Gutierrez-Pajares J, Zuñiga L, Pino J. Ruta graveolens aqueous extract retards mouse
preimplantation embryo development. Reprod Toxicol. 2003; 17: 667–672.
PT
asarone, myristicin and elimicin as determined by the UDS assay in cultured rat
hepatocytes. Food Chem Toxicol. 1994; 32 (3): 223–231.
RI
62) Hirayama T. Diet and cancer. Nutr Cancer. 1979; 1: 67–81.
SC
63) Hirono I, Aiso S, Yamaji T, Mori H, Yamada K, Niwa H, Ojika M, Wakamatsu K,
Kigoshi H, Niiyama K, Uosaki Y. Carcinogenicity in rats of ptaquiloside isolated from
bracken. Gann. 1984; 75: 833–836.
U
64) Hirono I. Edible plants containing naturally occurring carcinogens in Japan. Jpn J
AN
Cancer Res. 1993; 84: 997−1006.
65) Incardona JP, Gaffield W, Kapur RP, Roelink H. The teratogenic Veratrum alkaloid
M
66) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Some Food Additives, Feed
TE
67) Iyer LV, Ho MN, Shinn WM, et al. Glucuronidation of 1′-hydroxyestragole (1′-HE)
C
68) Jefferson WN, Padilla-Banks E, Newbold RR. Disruption of the female reproductive
system by the phytoestrogen genistein. Reprod Toxicol. 2007; 23: 308–316.
35
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
70) Jeurissen SM, Punt A, Delatour T, Rietjens IMCM. Basil extract inhibits the
sulfotransferase mediated formation of DNA adducts of the procarcinogen 1’-
hydroxyestragole by rat and human liver S9 homogenates and in HepG2 human
hepatoma cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008; 46: 2296–2302.
PT
Vitro. 2005; 19: 41−46.
72) Jones RS, Ali M, Ioannides C, Styles JA, Ashby J, Sulej J, Parke DV. The metabolic
RI
and cell transforming properties of shikimic acid and some of its bacterial and
mammalian metabolites. Toxicol Lett. 1983; 19: 43–50.
SC
73) Kang X, Zhang Q, Wang S, Huang X, Jin S. Effect of soy isoflavones on breast cancer
recurrence and death for patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy. CMAJ. 2010;
U
182(17): 1857–1862.
AN
74) Keeler RF, Balls LD, Shupe JL. Teratogenicity and toxicity of coniine in cows, ewes
and mares. Cornell Vet. 1980; 70: 19–26.
M
75) Keeler RF, Balls LD. Teratogenic effects in cattle of Conium maculatum and conjure
alkaloids and analogs. Clin Toxicol. 1978; 12: 49–64.
D
76) Keeler RF. Lupine alkaloids from teratogenic and nonteratogenic lupines, Crooked
TE
78) Kigoshi H, Imamura Y, Mizuta K, Niwa H, Yamada K. Total synthesis of natural (–)-
C
ptaquilosin, the aglycone of a potent bracken carcinogen ptaquiloside, and the (+)-
AC
enantiomer and their DNA cleaving activities. J Am Chem Soc. 1993; 115: 3056–
3065.
79) Kohama T, Kobayashi H, Inoue M. The effect of soybeans on the anovulatory cycle. J
Med Food. 2005; 8: 550–551.
80) Kong JM, Goh NK, Chia LS, Chia TF. Recent advances in traditional plant drugs and
orchids. Acta Pharm Sin. 2003; 24: 7–21.
36
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
81) Konishi T, Ichijo S. Experimentally induced equine bracken poisoning by
thermostable antithiamine factor (SF factor) extracted from dried bracken. J Jpn Vet
Med Assoc. 1984; 37: 730–734.
PT
83) Kuiper GGJM, Lemmen JG, Carlsson B, Corton JC, Van Der Safe SH, Van Der Saag
PT, Berg B, Gustafsson JA. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens
RI
with estrogen receptor β. Endocrinology. 1998; 139: 4252–4263.
84) Kurzer MS, Xu X. Dietary phytoestrogens. Annu Rev Nutr. 1997; 17: 353–381.
SC
85) Kushner PJ, Agard DA, Greene GL, Scanlan TS, Shiau AK, Uht RM, Webb P.
Estrogen receptor pathways to AP-1. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2000; 74: 311–317.
U
86) Lather A, Valecha R, Sharma K, Garg M. World wide potential of plants causing
AN
teratogenicity – an overview. Spatula DD. 2011; 1: 101–106.
87) Latif S, Conca T, Morris D. The effects of the licorice derivative, glycyrrhetinic acid,
M
52–58.
TE
88) Le Duc MG, Pakeman RJ, Marrs RH. Changes in the P. aquilinum rhizome system
subjected to long-term experimental treatment. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2003; 40:
EP
508–522.
89) Lee HP, Gourley L, Duffy SW, Esteve J, Lee J, Day NE. Dietary effects on breast-
C
90) Limer JL, Speirs V. Phytooestrogens and breast cancer chemoprevention. Breast
Cancer Res. 2004; 6: 119–127.
92) Lu J-J, Bao J-L, Chen X-P, Huang M, Wang Y-T. Alkaloids isolated from natural
herbs as the anticancer agents. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative
Medicine. 2012; 485042: 1–12.
37
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
93) Luo G, Guenthner TM. Covalent binding to DNA in vitro of 2,3-oxides derived from
allylbenzene analogs. Drug Metab Dispos. 1996; 24: 1020–1027.
PT
Anti-inflammatory activity of novel ammonium glycyrrhizinate/niosomes delivery
system: human and murine models. J Control Release. 2012; 164: 17–25.
RI
96) Marini H, Bitto A, Altavilla D, Burnett BP, Polito F, Di Stefano V, Minutoli L, et al.
Breast safety and efficacy of genistein aglycone for postmenopausal bone loss: a
SC
follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 93: 4787–4796.
97) Martins C, Cação R, Cole KJ, Phillips DH, Laires A, Rueff J, Rodrigues AS.
U
Estragole: a weak direct-acting food-borne genotoxin and potential carcinogen.
AN
Mutation Research. 2012; 747 (1): 86–92.
98) Maskarinec G, Takata Y, Franke AA, Williams AE, Murphy SP. A 2-year soy
M
100) Mattocks AR. Toxicity of pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Nature. 1968; 217: 723−728.
C
101) McLean EK. The toxic actions of pyrrolizidine (Senecio) alkaloids. Pharmacol
AC
38
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
104) Miller C, Swanson AB, Phillips DH, Fletcher TL, Liem A, Miller JA.
Structure-activity studies of the carcinogenicities in the mouse and rat of some
naturally occurring and synthetic alkenylbenzene derivatives related to safrole and
estragole. Cancer Res. 1983; 43: 1124–1134.
PT
males. Clin Sci. 2001; 100: 613–618.
106) Moon YJ, Wang X, Morris ME. Dietary flavonoids: effects on xenobiotic and
RI
carcinogen metabolism. Toxicol In Vitro. 2006; 20: 187–210.
SC
ptaquiloside, a bracken carcinogen, in the hepatocyte primary culture/DNA-repair test.
Mutation Research. 1985; 143: 75–78.
108)
U
Mori H, Sugie S, Yoshimi N, Asada Y, Furuya T, Williams GM. Genotoxicity
AN
of a variety of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in the hepatocyte primary culture-DNA repair
test using rat, mouse, and hamster hepatocytes. Cancer Research. 1985; 45: 3125–
M
3129.
109) Mumford SL, Sundaram R, Schisterman EF, Sweeney AM, Boyd Barr D,
D
Rybak ME, Maisog JM, parker DL, Pfeiffer CM, Buck Louis GM. Higher urinary
TE
lignan concentrations in women but not men are positively associated with shorter
time to pregnancy. The Journal of Nutrition. 2014; 144(3): 352–358.
42–44.
111) Murphy S, Agger S. Rainey P. Too much of a good thing: a woman with
C
39
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
114) National Toxicology Program (NTP). Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of
8-methoxypsoralen (CAS No. 298-81-7) in F344/N rats (gavage studies). Technical
Report Series. 1989; 359: 1–130.
PT
116) National Toxicology Program (NTP). Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of
citral (microencapsulated) (CAS No. 5392-40-5) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice
RI
(feed studies). Technical Report Series. 2003; 505: 1–270.
SC
β-myrcene (CAS No. 123-35-3) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (gavage studies).
Technical Report Series. 2010; 557: 1–163.
118)
U
National Toxicology Program (NTP). Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of
AN
pulegone (CAS No. 89-82-7) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (gavage studies).
Technical Report Series. 2011; 563: 1–201.
M
119) Newberne PM, Rogers AE. Nutrition, monocrotaline, and aflatoxin B1 in liver
carcinogenesis. Plant Foods for Man. 1973; 1: 23–31.
D
120) Newberne PM, Smith RL, Doull J, Goodman JI, Munro IC, Portoghese PS,
TE
Wagner BM, Weil CS, Woods LA, Adams TB, Lucas CD, Ford RA. The flavouring
substance. Flavour and extract manufacturer’s association. Food Chem Toxicol. 1999;
37: 789–811.
EP
33.
AC
40
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
124) Ojika M, Wakamatsu K, Niwa H, Yamada K. Ptaquiloside, a potent carcinogen
isolated from bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum var. latiusculum: structure, elucidation
based on chemical and spectral evidence, and reactions with amino acids, nucleosides
and nucleotides. Tetrahedron. 1987; 43: 5261–5274.
PT
warning message. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 3 (4): 125–138.
126) Oseni T, Patel R, Pyle J, Jordan VC. Selective estrogen receptor modulators
RI
and phytoestrogens. Planta Med. 2008; 74: 1656–1665.
SC
phytoestrogen genistein alters mammary gland growth and developmental
programming of hormone receptor levels. Endocrinology. 2006; 147: 4871–4882.
128)
U
Pakeman RJ, Marrs RH. The conservation of bracken, Pteridium aquilinum
AN
(L.) Kuhn -dominated communities in the UK, and an assessment of the ecological
impact of bracken expansion or its removal. Biological Conservation. 1992; 62: 101–
M
114.
130) Panter KE, Welch KD, Gardner DR, Green BT. Poisonous plants: effects on
embryo and fetal development. Birth Defects Research (Part C). 2013; 99: 223–234.
EP
131) Patisaul HB, Jefferson W. The pros and cons of phytoestrogens. Front
Neuroendocrinol. 2010; 31: 400–419.
C
132) Patisaul HB, Dindo M, Whitten PL, Young LJ. Soy isoflavone supplements
AC
antagonize reproductive behavior and ERα- and ERβ-dependent gene expression in the
brain. Endocrinology. 2001; 142: 2946–2952.
41
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
135) Poluzzi E, Piccinni C, Raschi E, Rampa A, Recanatini M, De Ponti F.
Phytoestrogens in postmenopause: the state of the art from a chemical,
pharmacological and regulatory perspective Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2014; 21:
417–436.
136) Povey AC, Potter D, O’Connor PJ. Post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts
formed in the upper gastrointestinal tissue of mice fed bracken extract or bracken
PT
spores. Br J Cancer. 1996; 74: 1342–1348.
137) Rai PR, Cool CD, King JAC, Stevens T, Burns N, Winn RA, Kasper M,
RI
Voelkel NF. The cancer paradigm of severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med. 2008; 178: 558−564.
SC
138) Raynor DK, Dickinson R, Knapp P, Long AF, Nicolson DJ. Buyer beware?
Does the information provided with herbal products available over the counter enable
U
safe use? BMC Med. 2011; 9: 94.
AN
139) Reece AS. Chronic toxicology of cannabis. Clinical Toxicology. 2009; 47:
517–524.
M
141) Roberts JE, Tyler VE. Tyler’s Herbs of choice: the therapeutic use of
phytomedicinals. Haworth Herbal, New York, 1999, 287 pp.
EP
144) Ruiz-Larrea MB, Mohan AR, Paganga G, Miller NJ, Bolwell GP, Rice-Evans
CA. Antioxidant activity of phytoestrogenic isoflavones. Free Radic Res. 1997; 26:
63–70.
42
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
146) Saito K, Nagao T, Matoba M, Koyama K, Natori S, Murakami T, Saiki Y.
Chemical assay of ptaquiloside, the carcinogen of Pteridium aquilinum, and the
distribution of related compounds in the pteridaceae. Phytochemistry. 1989; 28: 1605–
1611.
PT
herbivores. Phytochemistry. 1997; 44: 257–266.
RI
DM, Huber J, Kölbl H, Kreft S, Leodolter S, Linsberger D, Markus M, Simoncini T,
Vrabic Dezman L. Consensus: soy isoflavones as a first-line approach to the treatment
SC
of menopausal vasomotor complaints. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016; 4: 1–4.
149) Schoental R. Pancreatic islet-cell and other tumors in rats given heliotrine, a
U
monoester pyrrolizidine alkaloid, and nicotinamide. Cancer Research. 1975; 35: 2020–
AN
2024.
154) Scientific Committee on Food (SCF). Opinion on the safety of the presence of
safrole (1-allyl-3,4- methylene dioxy benzene) in flavourings and other food
ingredients with flavouring properties. European Commission Health & Consumer
Protection Directorate-General, Brussel, 2001c.
43
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
156) Scientific Committee on Food (SCF). Opinion on isosafrole. European
Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Brussel, 2003a.
157) Scientific Committee on Food (SCF). Opinion on glycyrrhizinic acid and its
ammonium salt. European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-
General, Brussel, 2003b.
158) Setchell KD, Gosselin SJ, Welsh MB, Johnston JO, Balistreri WF, Kramer
PT
LW, Dresser BL, Tarr MJ. Dietary estrogens—a probable cause of infertility and liver
disease in captive cheetahs. Gastroenterology. 1987; 93: 225–233.
RI
159) Shahin AY, Ismail AM, Zahran KM, Makhlouf AM. Adding phytoestrogens to
clomiphene induction in unexplained infertility patients—a randomized trial. Reprod
SC
Biomed Online. 2008; 16: 580–588.
160) Shu XO, Zheng Y, Cai H, Gu K, Chen Z, Zheng W, Lu W. Soy food intake and
U
breast cancer survival. JAMA. 2009; 302 (22): 2437–2443.
AN
161) Sieber SM, Correa P, Dalgard DW, McIntire KR, Adamson RH.
Carcinogenicity and hepatotoxicity of cycasin and its aglicone methylazoxymethanol
M
163) Sirtori CR, Arnoldi A, Johnson SK. Phytoestrogens: end of a tale? Ann Med.
EP
164) Smith BL, Seawright AA. Bracken fern (Pteridium sp.) carcinogenicity and
C
165) Smith BL. Bracken fern (genus Pteridium) toxicity – a global problem. In:
Poisonous Plants and Related Toxins, Acamovic T, Stewart CS, Pennycott TW, Eds.
CAB International, Wallingford, 2004; 224–240.
166) Smith LW, Culvenor CCJ. Plant sources of hepatotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids.
J Nat Prod. 1981; 44: 129–152.
167) Smith RL, Adams TB, Doull J, Feron VJ, Goodman JL, Marnett LJ,
Portoghese PS, Waddell WJ, Wagner BM, Rogers AE, Caldwell J, Sipes IG. Safety
44
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
assessment of allylalkoxybenzene derivatives used as flavouring substances -
methyleugenol and estragole. Food Chem Toxicol. 2002; 40: 851–870.
168) Smith RT, Taylor JA. Bracken: an environmental issue. Leeds: University of
Leeds; 1995.
PT
170) Stewart P, Wallace A, Valentino R, Burt D, Shackleton C, Edwards C.
Mineralocorticoid activity of liquorice: 11-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
RI
deficiency comes of age. Lancet 1987; 2: 821–824.
SC
171) Strom BL, Schinnar R, Ziegler EE, Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Macones GA,
Stallings VA, Drulis JM, Nelson SE, Hanson SA. Exposure to soy-based formula in
infancy and endocrinological and reproductive outcomes in young adulthood. JAMA.
2001; 286: 807–814.
U
AN
172) Swanson AB, Chambliss DD, Blomquist JC, Miller EC, Miller JA. The
mutagenicities of safrole, estragole, eugenol, trans-anethole, and some of their known
M
or possible metabolites for Salmonella typhimurium mutants. Mutat Res. 1979; 60 (2):
143–153.
D
173) Taylor JA. The bracken problem: a global perspective. In: Bracken biology and
TE
176) Trock BJ, Hilakivi-Clarke L, Clarke R. Meta-analysis of soy intake and breast
cancer risk. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006; 98: 459–471.
45
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
178) Unfer V, Casini ML, Costabile L, Mignosa M, Gerli S, Di Renzo GC. High
dose of phytoestrogens can reverse the antiestrogenic effects of clomiphene citrate on
the endometrium in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a randomized
trial. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2004; 11: 323–328.
179) Van den Berg SJPL, Restani P, Boersma MG, Delmulle L, Rietjens IMCM.
Levels of genotoxic and carcinogenic compounds in plant food supplements and
PT
associated risk assessment. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2011; 2: 989–1010.
180) Van GMM, Van RIA, Miller RK, Zielhuis GA, de Jong-van den Berg LT,
RI
Roeleveld N. Teratogenic mechanisms of medical drugs. Human Reproduction
Update. 2010; 16: 378–394.
SC
181) Vandenberg LN, Colborn T, Hayes TB, Heindel JJ, Jacobs DR, Lee DH,
Shioda T, Soto AM, vom Saal FS, Welshons WV, Zoeller RT, Myers JP. Hormones
U
and endocrine disrupting chemicals: Low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose
AN
responses. Endocr Rev. 2012; 33: 378–455.
182) Verheus M, van Gils CH, Keinan-Boker L, Grace PB, Bingham SA, Peeters
M
PH. Plasma phytoestrogens and subsequent breast cancer risk. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;
25: 648–655.
D
183) Vetter J. A biological hazard of our age: bracken fern [Pteridium aquilinum
TE
187) WHO Monographs on Selected Medicinal Plants. WHO, 2002, Vol. 2, Geneva,
Switzerland.
46
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
188) Whorwood C, Sheppard M, Stewart P. Licorice inhibits 11 betahydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase messenger ribonucleic acid levels and potentiates glucocorticoid
hormone action. Endocrinology. 1993; 132: 2287–2292.
PT
review of the evidence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52: 812–817.
191) Wink M. Plant secondary metabolism: diversity, function and its evolution.
RI
Natural Products Communications. 2008; 3: 1205–1216.
SC
192) Wink M. Interference of alkaloids with neuroreceptors and ion channels.
Bioactive Natural Products. 2000; 11: 3–129.
U
193) Wink M. Molecular modes of action of cytotoxic alkaloids - From DNA
intercalation, spindle poisoning, topoisomerase inhibition to apoptosis and multiple
AN
drug resistance. In: The Alkaloids, Cordell G (ed.), Elsevier, 2007; 64: 1–48.
194) Wiseman RW, Fennel TR, Miller JA, Miller EC. Further characterisation of the
M
new adducts at C-8 and N-7 of guanine residues. Cancer Res. 1985; 45: 3096–3105.
TE
195) Wiseman RW, Miller EC, Miller JA, Liem A. Structure-activity studies of the
hepatocarcinogenicities of alkenylbenzene derivatives related to estragole and safrole
EP
196) Wu AH, Pike MC, Williams LD, Spicer D, Tseng CC, Churchwell MI, Doerge
AC
DR. Tamoxifen, soy, and lifestyle factors in Asian American women with breast
cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3024–3030.
197) Wu AH, Yu MC, Tseng CC, Pike MC. Epidemiology of soy exposures and
breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 2008; 98: 9–14.
47
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
199) Yoshino T, Yanagawa T, Watanabe K. Risk factors for pseudoaldosteronism
with rhabdomyolysis caused by consumption of drugs containing licorice and
differences between incidence of these conditions in Japan and other countries: case
report and literature review. J Altern Complement Med. 2014; 20 (6): 516–520.
200) Zand RS, Jenkins DJ, Diamandis EP. Steroid hormone activity of flavonoids
and related compounds. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000; 62: 35–49.
PT
201) Zhou GD, Moorthy B, Bi J, Donnelly KC, Randerath K. DNA adducts from
alkoxyallylbenzene herb and spice constituents in cultured human (HepG2) cells.
RI
Environ Mol Mutagen 2007; 48 (9): 715–21.
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
48
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
European Medicinal and Edible Plants Associated with Subacute and
Chronic Toxicity
PT
RI
HIGHLIGHTS
SC
• Many edible plant species contain alkenylbenzenes, which have genotoxic and
carcinogenic properties.
•
U
Many plants from Asteraceae and Boraginaceae contain carcinogenic pyrrolizidine
AN
alkaloids.
• Humans are mainly exposed to bracken fern carcinogen ptaquiloside through plant
material and milk consumption.
M
• Although phytoestrogens have many beneficial properties, they could also pose a risk
D