IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF MS.

BHAVANI SHARMA, ARC, KKD, DELHI

E - 13/2015

In the matter of:-

Smt. Renu Mittal &Anr. Petitioners

Versus

Smt. Ruby Respondent

NDOH: 05.01.2016

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS U/S 14 (2) proviso FOR AN

EVICTION ORDER

Most respectfully showeth:-

1. That the above case is pending for disposal before this Hon’ble court and fixed for

05.01.2016 for recording of the evidence of the petitioners.

2. That considering the averments made by the respondent in her written statement, this

Hon’ble court has been pleased to pass an order dt. 27.07.2015 thereby directing the

respondent to deposit the arrears of rent w.e.f. December 2014 till date within thirty days

@ Rs. 500/- per month and also directed to continue to pay at the same rate month by

month upto the 7th day of succeeding month.

3. That the order passed by this Hon’ble court dt. 27.07.2015 was not complied with by the

respondent despite having been elapsed 65 days after the statutory period of 30 days. On

29.10.2015, this Hon’ble court on oral submissions of the respondent granted time in

terms of the section 15(7) of the DRC act to pay arrears of rent of the demised premises

in court to the petitioners. Thereafter, a sum of Rs. 5000/- was paid in the court which

was duly accepted & acknowledged by the petitioners from December 2014 to September

2015.
 4. That respondent has again defaulted in payment of rent for three consecutive months i.e.

October 2015, November 2015 and December 2015 in terms of the order dt. 27.07.2015.

Therefore, at this stage the default created by the respondent is not at all excusable. Thus,

petitioners are entitled to an eviction order. Hence, the present application is filed.

5. That the present application is being filed in view of the facts and circumstances of the

case not otherwise. Therefore, petitioners are entitled for an eviction order at this stage.

6. That there is no undue delay in approaching this Hon’ble court by way of the present

application on the part of the petitioners.

PRAYER
It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to pass an eviction
order of property no. 30/8 E, Hari om Gali, Babarpur, Shahdara, Delhi-32, most particularly
shown in the site plan filed by the petitioners, in favour of the petitioners and against the
respondent in the interest of justice.
Petitioners
Delhi through
Dated 05.01.2016 V K Sharma
Advocate
102, shiv puri, Delhi – 51
9811116149
 IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF MS. BHAVANI SHARMA, ARC, KKD, DELHI

E - 13/2015

In the matter of:-

Smt. Renu Mittal &Anr. Petitioners

Versus

Smt. Ruby Respondent

AFFIDAVIT
I, Renu Mittal W/o Sh. Rakesh Mittal aged about 57, R/o H. No.1175 E Main Hari Om Gali,

East Babarpur, Shahdara, Delhi-32 and Also At H. No.30/8 E Main Hari Om Gali, East

Babarpur, Shahdara, Delhi-32, do solemnly affirm and declare as under:-

1. That I am the petitioner no.1 in the above noted Eviction Petition and therefore fully

conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case as such I am competent to swear

this Affidavit on my behalf and on behalf of the petitioner no. 2 being wife.

2. That the contents of the accompanying application u/s 14 (2) proviso of DRC Act 1958
for an eviction order are true and correct to my knowledge and belief.

Deponent

Verification
Verified on this day of , 2015, in Delhi that the contents of the above affidavit are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge and nothing material has been concealed
therefrom.

Deponent