Chapter 3 - Capacity Improvement Studies PDF

Feasibility Study of the Proposed Cabusao-Libmanan Road Project (Via Skybridge)
3.0 CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT STUDIES
3.1 ROAD LOCATION STUDY AND INVESTIGATION
The study and investigation of the proposed road project includes:
 Road Location Mapping;

 Road Condition Survey; and
 Topographic Survey
3.1.1 Road Location Mapping
Basis for defining the location of the proposed Cabusao-Libmanan Road Project are the
following:
 DPWH directive to undertake the Feasibility Study of the Proposed Cabusao-

Libmanan Road via Skybridge Project
 Consultation with DPWH Planning Section on available information relative to the
Proposed Cabusao-Libmanan Road Project
The selection of the best alignment to conform to the existing profile of the area including
establishments and economic configurations of the proposed road project was determined
(Figure 3-1). Value engineering/value analysis (VE/VA) was undertaken in compliance with
the terms of reference for the study. Its purpose is to determine the best development
alternative infrastructure that shall serve as an alternative road to ease the traffic congestion
within the project influence area, and reach Naga City and other adjoining towns in a shorter
span of time.
The VE/VA study reveals that proposed road alignment 4 would be able to deliver the
function required. It is therefore, recommended that alternative 4 be pursued for completion
of the feasibility level study.
The possible alignments and the VEVA studies were presented to the Procuring Entity,
DPWH Camarines Sur 1st District Engineering Office. Thereafter, the most feasible route/
alignment 4 has been decided to be pursued for the detailed feasibility study.
The proposed alignment of 60-m. road right-of-way with a carriageway width of 20 meters
shall traverse for the most part, the vast tracts of agricultural rice field alongside the existing
NIA irrigation service roads at barangay Pandan in Cabusao, and barangays Labao, Ibid,
Umalo and Concepcion in Libmanan. The beginning of the proposed project, KM
407+438.97, has geographical location of 13°44’23.63” N, 123°05’12.80” E along Sipocot-
Cabusao national road at barangay Pandan in the municipality of Cabusao, and terminates
at the southern portion of the barangay road in barangay Concepcion in the municipality of
Libmanan (KM 416+200.05) located geographically at 13°40’46.66” N, 123°05’08.35” E.
MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-1

Figure 3-1: Project Vicinity showing the 4 Alternate Road Alignments
Topographic Map provided by NAMRIA with scale of 1:50,000 was used to plot in more
detail the location and alignment of the project road for reference in subsequent Road
Condition Survey and Road Topographic Survey. The NAMRIA-based alignment of the
project road is shown in Figure 3-2.

Source: NAMRIA
Figure 3-2: Topographic Map of the proposed Cabusao-Libmanan Road Project
Reconnaissance of the project site where the most feasible alignment is located was
conducted to identify the road sections for construction, as well as to determine the
conditions of existing roads which shall be upgraded to classified national road. Also,
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)/ drone was used to aid in the reconnaissance activities,
which provided an aerial view of the project site.
Overall, the proposed Cabusao-Libmanan Road Project comprises the construction of new
roads as well as upgrading of existing road sections which will start from barangay Pandan
and ends at barangay Concepcion, with total road length of 8,761 meters.

3.1.2 Road Condition Survey
A road inventory was conducted to quantify and assess the condition of existing roads along
the proposed alignment of the road project which needs to be upgraded or improved to
national road; as well as to evaluate the location of new roads for construction of the road
project. The overall length of 8,761-meter road project will have a road opening or
construction encompassing extensive rice field parcels with an aggregate length of 6,529.57
meters, while utilizing and upgrading the existing roads along the alignment with an
aggregate area of 2,231.51 meters. Table 3-1 shows the road sections subject to road
opening or construction of new roads, while Table 3-2 presents the existing conditions of the
road sections for upgrading to national road. Moreover, for better visualization of the road
project affected areas, Figures 3-3 to 6 present the maps showing the location of stations
mentioned in the succeeding tables.
Table 3-1: Road Sections for Opening or Construction
ROAD SECTION
No. BARANGAY LENGTH (m.)
START END
1 407+438.97 409+547.925 Pandan 2,108.955
2 409+549.925 410+549.485 Labao 999.56
3 410+554.485 412+244.485 Labao 1,690.00
4 412+248.485 412+772.903 Labao, Ibid 524.418
5 412+778.903 413+985.538 Ibid 1,206.635
TOTAL LENGTH (ln.m.) 6,529.568
Table 3-2: Existing Roadway Conditions
ROAD LENGTH SURFACE WIDTH

No BARANGAY CLASSIFICATION CONDITION
SECTION (m.) TYPE (m)
KM
1 Labao 60.00 PCC 2.0. NIA Road Fair
409+547.925
KM
2 Labao 60.00. PCC 5.0 NIA Road Good
410+549.485
KM
3 Labao 60.00 PCC 4.0 Barangay Road Good
412+244.485
KM
4 Ibid 60.00. PCC 6.0 Provincial Road Good
412+772.903
KM Ibid, Umalo,
5 2,048.25 PCC 4.0 Barangay Road Fair
413+985.538 Concepcion
KM
6 Concepcion 166.262 PCC 6.0 Barangay Road Good
416+033.788
TOTAL LENGTH (ln.m.) 2,231.512

Figure 3-3: Map of the Road Project showing existing sections and sections for construction

Figure 3-4: Section 1 of the Road Map

Figure 3-5: Section 2 of the Road Map

Figure 3-6. Section 3 of the Road Map

3.2 PROJECT ROAD INFLUENCE AREA
3.2.1 THE PROJECT ROAD INFLUENCE AREA (RIA)
The project has a broad influence area considering point of origin is in Bgy. Población of the
municipality of Sipocot traversing an existing national road which forms part of the Pan-
Philippine Highway which function as a north-south backbone of the arterial road network; up
to Bgy. Pandan where the project road starts. For this study, the influenced area has been
confined mainly on the direct RIA of the project.
The Direct Road Influence Area (RIA) covers the directly traversed municipalities of
Cabusao and Libmanan in the province of Camarines Sur. The location map of RIA is shown
in Figure 3-7.
Figure 3-7 Location Map of RIA
Start of Proposed Cabusao-

Libmanan Road Project
End of Proposed Cabusao-

Libmanan Road Project
Proposed Sky bridge

The RIA’s combined land area is 406.60 sq.km. The total number of persons living within the
RIA was estimated at 127,113 as of 2015. There are 84 barangays within the jurisdiction of
the two municipalities and 5 barangays within the direct RIA. Table 3-3 shows the physical
profile of the RIA.
Table 3-3: Physical Profile of Road Influence Area

Land Area Number of Population Population Density Number of HH Average HH Size
Province/Municipality
(sq.km.) Barangays 2015 (person/sq.km) 2015 2015
Camarines Sur 5,511.90 1,063 1,952,544 354 400,615 4.9
Cabusao 46.80 9 18,397 393 3,902 4.7
Libmanan 359.80 75 108,716 302 23,629 4.6
RIA 406.60 84 127,113 313 27,531 4.7
Source: Philippine Statistics Authority, Camarines Sur
3.3 PRESENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
3.3.1 Agriculture
The economy of the RIA largely depends on agriculture. The sources of income of the
predominantly rural population is farming. The agricultural area of the RIA covers about
21,289 hectares or 27 percent of its total land area. Rice is the major crop grown planted to
11,183 hectares. This is attributed to the presence of the National Irrigation Administration’s
Libmanan-Cabusao Pump Irrigation System and numerous communal irrigation systems.
Traditional farming method is still being practiced. Copra yields have declined because most
of the coconut trees are already senile and very little replanting was done.
3.3.2 Trade and Industry
Existing commercial establishments within the RIA are concentrated in the población or town
proper although there are small or neighborhood commercial establishments sprouting in
almost all barangays. Such establishments consist primarily of restaurant, welding shop,
sari-sari stores, hardware/spare parts, pharmacy, gasoline station, bakery, wholesale/retail
stores, dry goods store, mini cinema, hair shop, coco-lumber supply, sea foods dealer,
tailoring, grains retailer, Agri-supplier, fishing supply, dried fish retailers, vulcanizing shop,
rural bank, calling station and public market, In summary, these commercial establishments
can be categorized into various types particularly banking & finance, wholesale trade, retail
trade and services.
3.3.3 Tourism
Several tourist spots found in RIA are both scenic and historical in nature. However, these
are not yet fully developed and there are limited tourist facilities and amenities. Tourist
attractions in Libmanan, tourist destinations like the Tinandayagan Falls and Resort, Hi-Way
411 Resort are frequented by both local and foreign tourists. Tourists, already rising in
number have frequented the town for a day or night’s rest and frolic then to Bicol’s growth
center, Naga City and Legaspi City.

3.3.4 Transportation System
The region’s land transport system relies heavily on the road network. Maharlika and Quirino
Highways are the trunk line roads that connect mainland Bicol to Metro Manila and Visayas.
The east-west lateral network is composed of national secondary road and provincial roads
that lead mostly to various national and municipal ports for inter-modal transport services to
the island provinces of Catanduanes and Masbate and other parts of the Visayas.
Bicol Region’s present national road network has a total aggregate length of 2,389.225 km
as of October 2018. It is comprised of 460.81 km national primary roads (19.29%), 1138.035
km of national secondary roads (47.63%) and 790.38 km of national tertiary roads (33.08%).
(Figure 3-8)
Figure 3-8: Road Network Map of the Bicol Region
Source: Bicol RSDF, Bicol Regional Development Plan: 2017-2022

3.4 DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF THE RIA
3.4.1 Population
Assuming that the population growth will follow the NSO population projections (medium
assumption) throughout the project assessment period, population of Camarines Sur is
envisioned to reach 3,052,800 by the end of planning period. (Table 3-4) Population will
grow continuously although at a decelerating rate as shown in Table 3-5
Table 3-4: Population Projection at Road Influence Area

Population
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Camarines Sur 2,102,200 2,305,800 2,506,100 2,697,600 2,879,600 3,052,800
Table 3-5: Average Annual Population Growth Rate (PGR) at Influence Area
Average Annual Population Growth Rate
1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2007 2000-2010 2000-2015 2010-2015
Camarines Sur 1.75 1.72 2.24 1.62 1.52 1.32
Cabusao 0.79 0.31 1.09 1.15 0.84 0.36
Libmanan 1.80 0.78 1.23 0.67 1.36 1.60
3.4.2 Potential Economic Activities
The local economy will remain agriculture based following the completion of the road project.
The road improvement will greatly benefit the movement of goods particularly rice and
coconuts to the public market and growth centers. The movement of goods originating from
the economic activities zone is expected to grow due to lower transportation cost and travel
time with the project.
In accelerating infrastructure development, reliable and resilient infrastructure facilities and

services will spur economic growth.
3.5 ROAD NETWORK IMPROVEMENT WITH THE PROJECT
3.5.1 The Project Road as Part of Tertiary National Road Network Development
The proposed Cabusao-Libmanan Road Project (via Skybridge) is a new road link
complementing the on-going and priority pipeline projects supportive of the connectivity and
vulnerability strategies of the Bicol Regional Development Plan infrastructure development.
(Figure 3-9)
The complementary projects are:

 The Skybridge undergoing detailed engineering and design.

 The on-going construction/rehabilitation/widening of roads linking the Skybridge

either to Naga City or the municipalities of Canaman, Magarao and Calabanga that
will be the routes served from the proposed Cabusao-Libmanan Road. (Table 3-6),
and (Figure 3-9)
 The on-going construction/rehabilitation/widening of roads linking to the proposed
road of the road influence areas. (Table 3-6)
Table 3-6 CY 2018 On-Going Projects in the Road Influence Area

Project Data
Status
Contract Amount ('000)
Programmed
Name of Project a) Original Amount a) Start Date a) Schedule Remarks
Amount (P'000)
b) Revised Amount b) Expiry Date b) Actual Accom.
c) Disbursement c) Rev. Expiry Date c) Slippage
1 18F00125 / P00201079LZ-CW1,CW2 ROW
Naga-Jct Magarao-Canaman-Libmanan Jct PPH Road 207,837.00 a) 185,409.54122 a) 11/26/19 a) 18.50 On-going
(Skybridge), incl. ROW, Camarines Sur b) b) 10/26/19 b) 38.50
c) 27,811.43100 c) 11/19/19 c) 20.00
2 18F-00084 / P00230349LZ-CW1
Access Road leading to Bahao Port, Camarines Sur, 150,000.00 a) 142,145.92342 a) 08/09/18 a) 60.67 On-going
Libmanan, Camarines Sur 2nd DEO b) b) 05/31/19 b) 73.00
c) 21,321.88800 c) 08/19/19 c) 12.33
3 18F00142
Rehabilitation/Reconstruction/Upgrading of Damaged 250,000.00 a) 236,058.32005 a) 06/06/19 a) 2.40 On-going
Paved Roads-Primary Roads, Rolando A. Andaya Highway, b) b) 05/06/20 b) 2.41
K037-K0338 Intermittent Section (Lupi-Sipocot Section) c) c) c) 0.01
4 18F00090 / P00230392LZ-CW1
Sipocot-Cabusao Rd - K0395 + 200 - K0398 + 140 150,000.00 a) 140,698.87135 a) 08/09/18 a) 86.53 On-going
Camarines Sur b) b) 04/23/19 b) 87.11
c) c) 08/30/19 c) 0.58
5 18F00003 / P00201256LZ-CW1
Road Widening-Daang Maharlika (LZ) - K0426 +722 - K0431 137,244.00 a) 127,806.62381 a) 05/09/18 a) 73.07 Suspended as of
+ 150 with exceptions, Camarines Sur b) b) 01/11/19 b) 68.59 04/16/2019 due to Right-of-
c) c) 06/11/19 c) -4.48 Way problem
6 18F00005 / P00202268LZ-CW1
Widening of Permanent Bridges -Baraca Br.2 (B04478LZ) 55,000.00 a) 55,292.71538 a) 04/20/18 a) 27.90 Suspended as of
along Daang Maharlika b) b) 11/27/18 b) 23.94 01/16/2019 due to
c) c) 06/22/19 c) -3.96 obstruction(electrical posts)
7 18F00010 / P00201257LZ-CW1
Road Widening-Daang Maharlika (LZ) - K0437 +258 - K0441 125,000.00 a) 117,004.30377 a) 05/08/18 a) 68.60 Suspended as of 02/1/2019
+ 290 with exceptions, Camarines Sur b) b) 01/08/19 b) 80.90 due to Right-of-Way
c) c) 04/07/19 c) 12.30 problem
8 18F00122 / P00201067LZ-CW1
Camarines Sur Expressway Project (San Fernando-Pili) 300,000.00 a) 283,563.90390 a) 11/26/18 a) 61.73 Suspended as of
Package 1, Camarines Sur b) b) 10/31/19 b) 62.50 06/24/2019 due to
c) c) 01/18/20 c) 0.77 inaccessibility to project site
9 18F00123 / P002012659LZ-CW1
Package 2, Camarines Sur b) 289,476.43518 b) 10/31/19 b) 62.50 06/24/2019 due to
c) c) 01/05/20 c) 0.77 inaccessibility to project site
10 18F00124 / P002012660LZ-CW1, ROW
Package 3, Camarines Sur b) 135,435.58728 b) 08/27/19 b) 77.78 06/24/2019 due to
c) c) 10/23/19 c) -4.04 inaccessibility to project site
Source: DPWH, Regional Office V

Figure 3-9: Map of Bicol RSDF Complimentary Projects
Source: Bicol RSDF, Bicol Regional Development Plan:2017-2022

The construction and improvement/upgrading of the project roads into a tertiary National
Road will provide fast and reliable transport system between the two influence municipalities
and other neighboring towns that would consequently propel agriculture, aquaculture and
fisheries development, promote tourism, increase economic activities and upgrade the
standard of living of the rural populace. Furthermore, via the proposed Skybridge, the
proposed Libmanan-Cabusao road shall serve as an alternative infrastructure to significantly
ease the traffic congestion along the Maharlika highway and reach Naga City and other
adjoining towns in a shorter span of time.
3.5.2 Development Opportunities
Overall, the Bicol Region attained the major plan targets of the Bicol RDP 2017-2022. The
region’s economy expanded the fastest among the 17 regions in the country with a solid
8.9% growth rate in 2018, despite the fluctuating inflation. Poverty incidence among
Bicolanos has substantially decreased to 28% during the first half of 2018, unemployment
rate was 4.9% and underemployment rate was 29.6%. With these developments, the second
year of implementation of the Bicol Regional Development Plan covered sufficient ground
toward enhancing the social fabric, inequality reducing transformation and increasing growth
potential.
The development of strategic infrastructure was pushed through the Build, Build, Build
Program. The length of paved national roads increased and bridges along national roads
were upgraded. The Build, Build, Build Program of the national government will continue to
identify more infrastructure projects in addition to the Quezon-Bicol Expressway Project, the
Bicol International and the Naga Airport development projects, and the PNR South Long-
Haul railway. The recently approved Philippine Transport System Master Plan will generate
and implement transport-related projects in the region.

Annex 3: VALUE ENGINEERING/VALUE ANALYSIS (VE/VA)
A.3.1 PURPOSE
MCRG Engineering Services and Technical Consultancy has been engaged by the
Camarines Sur 5th District Engineer Office, Region V of the Department of Public Works and
Highways (DPWH) to undertake the feasibility study of the Cabusao-Libmanan Road Project
(Via Skybridge).
Value Engineering/Value Analysis (VE/VA) was undertaken in compliance with Section 4

(Prepare comparative proposals as to economic and stability aspects - Value Engineering) of
the terms of reference for the study. Its purpose is to plan and formulate a development
scheme or design concept that will fulfill the desired project function with the least possible
investment. The detailed FS shall then be pursued depending on the result of the VE/VA
depicting the best option of providing the best alignment that would yield the highest value
for money.
Value Engineering and Value Analysis (VEVA) is a systematic process used by a

multidisciplinary team to improve the value of a project, product, or process through the
analysis of functions and resources.
A.3.2 METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH
The VEVA process is applied in the different stages of road development to look at from
Feasibility Study (service) up to Road System (product). This approach ensures the
selection of the optimum option among various alternatives from overall technical, financial,
social and environmental points of view. The different stages of the project development
cycle are as follows:
 Planning Phase – at the feasibility study or options analysis;

 Design Phase – at the preliminary design and at the final design stages
 Project Phase – project construction/implementation period
 Road System – operation and maintenance period.
Similarly, values pertaining to project development, which comprise of four key elements as
follows, need to be studied:
 Performance - This describes the overall effectiveness by which a project delivers

its benefits;
 Cost - The life cycle costs, required to fulfill the functions of the project;
 Time - the required schedule to plan, design, construct, and deliver the project;
 Risk - the degree of uncertainty and related impacts related to the project’s
performance, cost and time.

Value Methodology seeks to consider all four of these elements relative to the realization of
desired functions such that an optimal synthesis is achieved. VEVA Report following the
NEDA Guidelines will be prepared.
A.3.3 PROJECT/STUDY OBJECTIVES
The project aims:
1) To provide an alternative route to motorists who travel as far as Mindanao in the

South and vice versa, using and passing through the existing National Road in
Camarines Sur particularly in the municipalities of Sipocot, Cabusao and Libmanan;
2) To serve as one measure of easing the traffic congestion of the relevant road
network within the project influence area;
Specifically, the objectives of the Study are:
1) To resolve the traffic congestion being experienced during seasons of festivities and
summer months;
2) To adopt the specifications of high standard highway to provide high-speed travel
along the Project Area;
3) To come up with the best alignment with its corresponding structural design and
other improvements considering the existing profile of the area;
4) To conduct technical and preliminary network analysis, engineering, traffic,
economic, environmental and social, and financial assessments of the alternate route
and impact in the influence area;
5) To accelerate economic development in the Province, which is presently constrained
by lack of adequate transportation infrastructure; and
6) To recommend to Government the best approach and other viable alternative options
in constructing an alternate route.
A.3.4 INFORMATION PHASE
The Project is located in the province of Camarines Sur, specifically in the municipalities of
Cabusao and Libmanan. The province of Camarines Sur in the Bicol Region has long been a
destination for nature lovers and adventurers as this rugged land is filled with many idyllic
locals that one can explore and enjoy right in the heart of nature, which resulted to the
continually increasing influx of local and foreign tourists. As of the moment, the Pan
Philippine Highway, which presently serves the said traffic, is experiencing heavy congestion
especially during peak season. The traffic condition often times is at a stand still for around
four (4) hours during the Peñafrancia procession while vehicles move very slowly while
approaching Naga City, much even during peak hours.
The project was conceptualized in view of the worsening traffic congestion being
experienced along the AH 26 (Maharlika Highway), particularly at the junction of Andaya
Highway, Sipocot and Libmanan portion of AH 26 where local as well as all through traffic
from Manila, Naga City and Provinces of Albay to Sorsogon, vice-versa converge.

This phase involves the gathering of data and information pertinent to the feasibility study
and the required functions of the project. A thorough review of all data and information
presented in the pre-feasibility study report was undertaken, focusing on the project
objectives, recommended conceptual design, cost, environmental and social impacts as well
as the expected benefits.
For a better understanding of the required functions of the proposed project, updated
secondary data in hydrology, geology, surveying and mapping, and economy were gathered.
Preliminary analyses of the data were also performed.
A.3.5 CREATIVE PHASE: FORMULATION OF ALTERNATIVES
Field visits and investigations at various sites were conducted to identify and document
doable alternatives to address the project function. Reconnaissance of the project site
where the proposed alignment is located was conducted to identify the road sections for
construction, as well as to determine the conditions of existing roads which shall be
upgraded to classified national road. Also, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)/ drone was used
to aid in the reconnaissance activities, which provided an aerial view of the project site.
In the establishment of the road project, the major factors taken into consideration are the (i)
road site location, (ii) route alignment, and (iii) types and configuration of road development.
The location of the proposed road site was selected, project influence area was delineated,
and the preliminary design was prepared to roughly estimate the cost.
Initial environmental and social assessment was undertaken based on the potential impact
on each alternative. The extent of environmental impact considered such as if there will be
properties and households to be affected within the road right-of-way. Estimated cost of
potential impact on the environment relative to each alternative was also considered in the
initial screening. Also, ocular site inspection was done and based on the available records
of cadastral map, topographic map and tax maps, the extent of land area and improvements
which will be affected were estimated. The prevailing Base Market Values taken from the
respective Offices of Municipal Assessor of Libmanan and Cabusao were used to determine
the unit costs of land and improvement in the acquisition of road right-of-way.
The alternatives considered in the value analysis of the Cabusao-Libmanan Road Project
(via Skybridge) focused on the route that could be the best alignment with its corresponding
structural design and other improvements considering the existing profile of the area that will
serve as the alternate thoroughfare of Maharlika Highway to reach Naga City and adjoining
municipalities in a shorter span of time.
In the analysis, either alternative route would be able to deliver the function/benefits required.
Four (4) development alternatives were considered for value analysis. These are discussed
in the following subsections.

A.3.5.1 THE ALTERNATIVES
Figure A.3-1: The Project Vicinity showing the 4 Alternate Road Alignments

A.3.5.1.1 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE 1
Route 1 traverses the existing gravel and concrete barangay road sections of barangays
Camagong, Poblacion, Sta. Lutgarda and Sta. Cruz of Cabusao and barangays Ibid, Cuyapi
and Umalo of Libmanan. It passes through along densely populated area. It is located within
the low-lying area nearby Libmanan River. The route is near the proposed Skybridge linking
the municipalities of Libmanan and Canaman.
Figure A.3-2: Key Map of Proposed Road Alternative, Route 1

A.3.5.1.1.1 ROUTE 1 : TOPOGRAPHY
Figure A.3-3: Topography Map of Route 1

A.3.5.1.1.2 ROUTE 1 : PROFILE
Figure A.3-4 Profile of Route 1

A.3.5.1.1.3 SECTION A : DESCRIPTION
Sta. 0+000.00 ~
0+215.00 LOCATION PHOTO
Sta. 1+253.00 ~
1+359.00
STATION Sta. 4+167.00 ~
4+849.00
Sta. 5+24300 ~ 5+327.00
Sta. 5+534.00 ~
6+893.00
LENGTH 2,446.00 m.
WIDTH 3.5 m.
SURFACE TYPE Concrete
SURFACE CONDITION Fair
TERRAIN Level
ROAD CLASSIFICATION Barangay Road
Camagong, Cabusao
Poblacion, Cabusao
Sta. Cruz, Cabusao
Sta. Lutgarda, Cabusao
BARANGAYS COVERED
Ibid, Libmanan Figure A.3-5. Aerial View of the Existing
Cuyapi, Libmanan Barangay Road along Station 4+580.00.
Umalo, Libmanan
A.3.5.1.1.4 SECTION A : PRELIMINARY DESIGN
C
L
El. 2.00 m.
1.50% 1.50%
NGL El. 1.0 m.


1 
2  
Figure A.3-6 Preliminary Design of Section A, Route 1

A.3.5.1.1.5 SECTION B : DESCRIPTION
Sta. 0+215.00 ~ 1+253.00 LOCATION PHOTO

Sta. 1+359.00 ~ 4+167.00
STATION Sta. 4+849.00 ~ 5+243.00
Sta. 5+327.00 ~ 5+534.00
Sta. 6+893.00 ~ 7+867.82
LENGTH 5,421.82 m.
WIDTH 3.5 m.
SURFACE TYPE Gravel
SURFACE CONDITION Poor
TERRAIN Level

Camagong, Cabusao
Poblacion, Cabusao
Sta. Cruz, Cabusao
Sta. Lutgarda, Cabusao
BARANGAY COVERED
Figure A.3-7. Aerial View along station
Ibid, Libmanan
7+580 of road Section B showing the
Cuyapi, Libmanan
existing Barangay Road near the end of the
Umalo, Libmanan
Project.
A.3.5.1.1.6 SECTION B : PRELIMINARY DESIGN
C
L
El. 2.00 m.
1.50% 1.50%
NGL El. 1.3 m.


2 

2 
Figure A.3-8 : Preliminary Design of Section B, Route 1

A.3.5.1.1.7 ROUTE 1 : CONCRETING COST
Table A.3-1 : Concreting cost of Route 1
A.3.5.1.1.8 ROUTE 1 : RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION COST
Table A.3-2 : Right-of-Way Acquisition Cost of Route 1

A.3.5.2 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE 2
Route 2 traverses Brgy. Pandan in Cabusao then through Brgy. Labao in Libmanan. It
passes through the existing gravel and concrete NIA Irrigation service road sections and a
road opening section that will pass through rice fields and terminates at the junction of the
existing provincial road interconnecting to Bulaong Bridge. The route traverses the
Poblacion area which is a densely built-up area consisting of institutional, commercial and
residential areas.

A.3.5.2.1 ROUTE 2 : TOPOGRAPHY

A.3.5.2.2 ROUTE 2 : PROFILE
Figure A.3-11: Profile of Route 2

A.3.5.2.3 SECTION A : DESCRIPTION
STATION LOCATION PHOTO

Sta. 0+000.00 ~ 2+131.37
LENGTH 2,131.37 m.
WIDTH 3.5 m.
SURFACE TYPE Gravel
TERRAIN Level
ROAD CLASSIFICATION NIA Irrigation Service

Road
BARANGAYS COVERED Pandan, Cabusao Figure A.3-12 . Existing NIA Irrigation

Service Road at Sta. 2+131.37 along Section
A of Route 2
A.3.5.2.4 SECTION A : PRELIMINARY DESIGN
C
L
El. 1.50 m.
1.50% 1.50%
NGL El. .891 m.


1 
3  
Figure A.3-13 : Preliminary Design of Section A, Route 2

A.3.5.2.5 SECTION B : DESCRIPTION
STATION Sta. 2+131.37 ~ 3+040.00 LOCATION PHOTO
LENGTH 908.63 m.
WIDTH 3.5 m.
TERRAIN Level
NIA Irrigation Service

ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Road
BARANGAY COVERED Labao, Libmanan Figure A.3-14 Road Section B showing the
existing NIA Irrigation Canal and Service Road
A.3.5.2.6 SECTION B : PRELIMINARY DESIGN
C
L
NGL El. 2.0 m. 1.50% El. 1.85 m. 1.50%


2 
3  

A.3.5.2.7 SECTION C : DESCRIPTION
LENGTH 4,220.87 m.
WIDTH 3.5 m.
SURFACE TYPE Topsoil
SURFACE CONDITION N/A
TERRAIN Level
ROAD CLASSIFICATION N/A
Figure A.3-16 . Rice field parcel of land which

BARANGAY COVERED Ibid, Libmanan
Concepcion, Libmanan will be traversed by the proposed Road Route 2.
A.3.5.2.8 SECTION C : PRELIMINARY DESIGN
C
L
NGL El. 2.0 m. El. 2.00 m.

1.50% 1.50%


3 

3 
Figure A.3-17 : Preliminary Design of Section C, Route 2

A.3.5.2.9 SECTION D : DESCRIPTION
LENGTH 5,382.04 m.
WIDTH 8 m.
TERRAIN Level
ROAD CLASSIFICATION Provincial Road
Taban-Fundado, Libmanan Figure A.3-18. Residential and commercial

Station Church Site, Libmanan
BARANGAY COVERED Libod 1, Libmanan areas to be traversed by proposed Route 2
San Juan, Libmanan through existing provincial road.
Concepcion, Libmanan
A.3.5.2.10 SECTION D : PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Figure A.3-19 : Preliminary Design of Section D, Route 2

A.3.5.2.11 SECTION E : DESCRIPTION
STATION Sta. 12+642.91~ LOCATION PHOTO

12+818.34
LENGTH 175.43
WIDTH 6.00 m.
SURFACE CONDITION Good
TERRAIN Level
Figure A.3-20 Aerial View at the start of

Concepcion, Libmanan Road Section E showing the newly
BARANGAYS COVERED
concreted Barangay Road of Concepcion
interconnecting to the existing Barangay
Road of Ibid.
A.3.5.2.12 SECTION E : PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Figure A.3-21 : Preliminary Design of Section E, Route 2

A.3.5.2.13 ROUTE 2 : CONCRETING COST
Section A Section B
UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST (2.13 km x 20 m. x 0.23 m) (0.909 km. x 20 m. x 0.23 m)
(PhP)
QTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT
100 (1) Clearing and Grubbing ha. 92,148.88 0.87 80,169.53 0.10 9,214.89
Removal of Existing
101(1) Structures (affected by l.s. 1.00 1.00
RROW) 26,123.23 5,015.25
Removal of Existing
101(2) sq.m. 161.16 - -
PCCP 3,180.20 512,521.03
Removal of Existing
101(4)a l.m. 102.92 2,031.37 209,068.60
Structures-NIA Canal 908.63 93,516.20
102(1) Unsuitable Excavation cu.m. 205.12 2,095.28 429,783.83

564.12 115,712.29
Roadway Excavation
102(2) cu.m. 162.84 1,017.35 165,665.27
(Surplus Common) 988.98 161,045.50
104(1) Embankment cu.m. 212.61 2,754.33 585,598.10

1,732.26 368,295.80
105 Subgrade Preparation sq.m. 20.08 42,627.40 855,958.19

18,172.60 364,905.81
Aggregate Sub-Base
200 cu.m. 590.52 8,525.48 5,034,466.45
Course 3,634.52 2,146,256.75
Aggregate Base
201 cu.m. 728.74 6,394.11 4,659,643.72
Course 2,725.89 1,986,465.08
Portland Cement
311(1)a Concrete Pavement sq.m. 1,404.81 42,627.40 59,883,397.79
18,172.60 25,529,050.21
(0.23m thk)
404 Reinforcing Steel Bar kgs. 94.67 9,761.38 924,109.84

6,506.25 615,946.69
505 Grouted Riprap cu.m. 2,536.86 - - - -
Spcl-1 Lined Canal l.m 1,030.85 548.45 565,369.68

200.00 206,170.00
73,419,354.25 32,114,115.50
SUB-TOTAL
*Based on Base Market Value by the Municipal Assessor's Office
Table A.3-3 Concreting cost of Route 2

Section C Section D
UNIT
(4.22 km. x 20 m. x 0.23 m) (5.382 km. x 12 m. x 0.23 m)
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST
(PhP) QTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT
Clearing and
100 (1) ha. 92,148.88 2.88 265,388.77 1.55 142,830.76
Grubbing
Removal of Existing
101(1) Structures (affected l.s. 1.00 1.00 1,100,825.75
by RROW) 39,280.15
Removal of Existing
101(2) sq.m. 161.16 - - -
PCCP
Removal of Existing
101(4)a l.m. 102.92 - - -
Structures-NIA Canal
Unsuitable
102(1) cu.m. 205.12 405,054.57 2,807,600.51
Excavation 1,974.72 13,687.60
Roadway Excavation
102(2) cu.m. 162.84 - - 4,269,844.58
(Surplus Common) 26,221.10
104(1) Embankment cu.m. 212.61 1,764,465.27 6,865,602.12

8,299.07 32,292.00
Subgrade
105 sq.m. 20.08 1,691,137.60 1,296,846.72
Preparation 84,220.00 64,584.00
Aggregate Sub-Base
200 cu.m. 590.52 9,967,977.60 7,627,628.74
Course 16,880.00 12,916.80
Aggregate Base
201 cu.m. 728.74 9,225,848.40 7,059,741.62
Course 12,660.00 9,687.60
Portland Cement
311(1)a Concrete Pavement sq.m. 1,404.81 118,313,098.20 90,728,249.04
84,220.00 64,584.00
(0.23m thk)
404 Reinforcing Steel Bar kgs. 94.67 20,215.45 1,913,796.65 1,478,327.91

15,615.59
505 Grouted Riprap cu.m. 2,536.86 3,273,690.99 - -

1,290.45
Spcl-1 Lined Canal l.m 1,030.85 - - 11,096,069.40

10,764.00
146,670,398.20 134,473,567.15
SUB-TOTAL

Section E
ROUTE 2
(0.175 km. x 14 m. x 0.23 m)
UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST
(PhP)
TOTAL COST
QTY AMOUNT
(PhP)
100 (1) Clearing and Grubbing ha. 92,148.88 0.2 18,429.78 516,033.73
Removal of Existing Structures

101(1) l.s. 1 25,380.25 1,196,624.63
(affected by RROW)
101(2) Removal of Existing PCCP sq.m. 161.16 - 512,521.03

-
Removal of Existing Structures-
101(4)a l.m. 102.92 - 302,584.80
NIA Canal -
102(1) Unsuitable Excavation cu.m. 205.12 614.01 125,945.73 3,884,096.94
Roadway Excavation (Surplus
102(2) cu.m. 162.84 245.6 39,993.50 4,636,548.86
Common)
104(1) Embankment cu.m. 212.61 319.28 67,882.12 9,651,843.41
105 Subgrade Preparation sq.m. 20.08 2,456.02 49,316.88 4,258,165.20
200 Aggregate Sub-Base Course cu.m. 590.52 491.2 290,063.42 25,066,392.96
201 Aggregate Base Course cu.m. 728.74 368.4 268,467.82 23,200,166.64
Portland Cement Concrete

311(1)a sq.m. 1,404.81 2,456.02 3,450,241.46 297,904,036.70
Pavement (0.23m thk)
404 Reinforcing Steel Bar kgs. 94.67 810.49 76,729.09 5,008,910.18
505 Grouted Riprap cu.m. 2,536.86 - 3,273,690.99

-
Spcl-1 Lined Canal l.m 1,030.85 175.43 180,842.02 12,048,451.10
4,593,292.06 391,460,067.16
SUB-TOTAL

A.3.5.2.14 ROUTE 2 : RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
UNIT COST* Section A Section B
ITEM CLASSIFICATION UNIT (Philippine Peso) QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL

Cabusao Libmanan Cabusao AMOUNT Libmanan AMOUNT
Residential sq.m. 250 350 652.420 163,105.00 1,075.230 376,330.50
Commercial/
sq.m. 300 400 - -
Institutional
Agricultural
Land Rice – Irrigated ha. 90,200 96,200 5.763 519,822.60 10.439 1,004,231.80
Cocoland ha. 37,700 45,200 0.128 4,825.60 0.492 22,238.40
Nipaland ha. 20,100 22,600 -
Pasture ha. 23,200 25,800 - 0.697 17,982.60
Cogon ha. 15,500 16,200 -
Building
106 ~
Residential sq.m. 159 ~ 954 106.480 11,286.88 3,912.440 622,077.96
Improvement 795
954 ~ 1,060 ~
Commercial sq.m.
1,590 1,749
SUBTOTAL 699,040.08 2,042,861.26
Table A.3-4 Right-of-Way Acquisition of Route 2

UNIT COST* Section C Section D

ITEM CLASSIFICATION UNIT (Philippine Peso) QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL
Cabusao Libmanan Libmanan AMOUNT Libmanan AMOUNT
Residential sq.m. 250 350 1,275.000 446,250.00 13,562,640.00

38,750.40
Commercial/
sq.m. 300 400
Institutional
Agricultural
Rice – Irrigated ha. 90,200 96,200 7.154 688,214.80 2.58 248,196.00

Land
Cocoland ha. 37,700 45,200 1.111 50,217.20
Nipaland ha. 20,100 22,600
Pasture ha. 23,200 25,800 0.218 5,624.40
Cogon ha. 15,500 16,200
Building
106 ~
Improvement Residential sq.m. 159 ~ 954 238.000 37,842.00 5,710,008.00
795 35,912.00
954 ~ 1,060 ~
Commercial sq.m. 4,794,910.00
1,590 1,749 4,523.50
SUBTOTAL 1,228,148.40 24,315,754.00

UNIT COST* Section E ROUTE 2

ITEM CLASSIFICATION UNIT (Philippine Peso) QUANTITY TOTAL TOTAL COST
Cabusao Libmanan Libmanan AMOUNT (PhP)
Residential sq.m. 250 350 987.137 345,497.95 14,893,823.45
Commercial/
sq.m. 300 400
Institutional
Agricultural
Rice – Irrigated ha. 90,200 96,200 0.681 65,512.20 2,525,977.40

Land
Cocoland ha. 37,700 45,200 77,281.20
Nipaland ha. 20,100 22,600
Pasture ha. 23,200 25,800 23,607.00
Cogon ha. 15,500 16,200
Building
Improvement Residential sq.m. 106 ~ 795 159 ~ 954 94,172.84 6,475,387.68

592.282
954 ~ 1,060 ~
Commercial sq.m. 4,794,910.00
1,590 1,749
SUBTOTAL 505,182.99 28,790,986.73


Route 3 traverses Bgy. Camagong in Cabusao along the existing concrete provincial road
and bridge, then pass through the NIA irrigation service gravel road at Bgy. Ibid,
crisscrosses the concrete provincial road, passes the concrete barangay road in Concepcion
and terminates at Bgy Umalo with a new road opening.




Sta. 0+000.00 ~ 3+232.07
LENGTH 3,232.07 m.
WIDTH 8 m.
TERRAIN Level
ROAD CLASSIFICATION Provincial Road
Camagong, Cabusao
BARANGAYS COVERED
Figure A.3-25. Aerial View along Station
Ibid, Libmanan 1+550.00 of the Existing Provincial Road
showing Genova’s Kamalig and Bridge over
Libmanan creek
C
L
El. 2.00 m.
1.50% 1.50%
NGL El. 1.5 m.


1 
3  

A.3.5.3.5 SECTION B : PROFILE

Sta. 3+232.07 ~ 4+405.47
LENGTH 1,173.40 m.
WIDTH 4 m.
SURFACE TYPE Gravel
TERRAIN Level
ROAD CLASSIFICATION NIA Irrigation Service

Road
Figure A.3-27. Aerial View at the start of Road

BARANGAY COVERED Ibid, Libmanan Section B showing the existing NIA Irrigation
Canal and Service Road which interconnect to
the existing Provincial Road.
CL
El. 2.00 m.
1.50% 1.50%
NGL El. 1.6 m.


2 
3  

A.3.5.3.7 SECTION C : PROFILE

Sta. 4+405.47 ~ 6+501.38
LENGTH 2,095.91 m.
WIDTH 3.50 m.
TERRAIN Level
Figure A.3-29. Aerial View at the end of

Ibid, Libmanan Road Section C showing the existing
BARANGAYS COVERED Concepcion, Libmanan Barangay Road of Ibid interconnecting to the
newly concreted Barangay Road of
Concepcion.
CL
El. 2.00 m.
1.50% 1.50%
NGL El. 1.4 m.


3 
3  

LENGTH 175.43
WIDTH 6.00 m.
TERRAIN Level
Figure A.3-31 Aerial View at the start of

BARANGAYS COVERED Road Section E showing the newly
concreted Barangay Road of Concepcion
Road of Ibid.
Figure A.3-32 : Preliminary Design of Section D, Route 3

A.3.5.3.11 BRIDGE SECTION : PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Figure A.3-33 : Preliminary Design of Bridge Section D, Route 3
Figure A.3-34 : Preliminary Design of Bridge Section D, Route 3

SECTION A SECTION B
UNIT
DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL TOTAL
ITEM COST QTY QTY
AMOUNT AMOUNT
PART CONCRETING CONCRETING CONCRETING

A. (3.23 km. x 12 m. x 0.23 m) (3.23 km. x 12 m. x 0.23 m) (1.17 km. x 20 m. x 0.23 m)
Removal of Existing
101(1) Structures (affected by l.s. 1.00 356,414.23 1.00 27,406.50
RROW)
Removal of Existing
101(4)a l.m. 102.92 - - 1,173.00 120,725.16
102(1) Unsuitable Excavation cu.m. 205.12 1,078.68 221,258.84 1,877.03 385,016.39
Roadway Excavation
102(2) cu.m. 162.84 3,562.27 580,080.05 1,040.14 169,376.40
(Surplus Common)
104(1) Embankment cu.m. 212.61 5,630.95 1,197,196.28 2,431.09 516,874.04
105 Subgrade Preparation sq.m. 20.08 38,784.84 778,799.59 23,468.00 471,237.44
Aggregate Sub-Base
200 cu.m. 590.52 7,756.99 4,580,657.73 4,693.60 2,771,664.67
Course
Aggregate Base
201 cu.m. 728.74 5,817.73 4,239,612.56 3,520.20 2,565,310.55
Course
Portland Cement
311(1)a Concrete Pavement sq.m. 1,404.81 38,784.84 54,485,331.08 23,468.00 32,968,081.08
(0.23m thk)
404 Reinforcing Steel Bar kgs. 94.67 18,510.98 1,752,434.48 8,510.98 805,734.48
505 Grouted Riprap cu.m. 2,536.86 579.52 1,470,161.11 - -
Spcl-1 Lined Canal l.m 1,030.85 - - 286.50 295,338.53
SUBTOTAL 70,018,562.11 41,226,695.16
Table A.3-5: Concreting Cost of Route 3

SECTION C SECTION D ROUTE 3

UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL COST
COST QTY QTY
AMOUNT AMOUNT (PhP)

A. (3.23 km. x 12 m. x 0.23 m) (2.09 km. x 16.50 m. x 0.23 m) (2.09 km.x16.50 m.x0.23 m)
100 (1) Clearing and Grubbing ha. 92,148.88 2.37 218,392.85 0.20 18,429.78 723,368.71
Removal of Existing
101(1) Structures (affected by l.s. 1.00 1.00 29,350.25 1.00 25,380.25 438,551.23
RROW)
Removal of Existing
101(4)a l.m. 102.92 - - 120,725.16
Structures-NIA Canal - -
102(1) Unsuitable Excavation cu.m. 205.12 1,559.71 319,927.72 614.01 125,945.73 1,052,148.68
Roadway Excavation
102(2) cu.m. 162.84 3,699.02 602,348.42 245.6 39,993.50 1,391,798.37
(Surplus Common)
104(1) Embankment cu.m. 212.61 2,384.86 507,045.08 319.28 67,882.12 2,288,997.53
105 Subgrade Preparation sq.m. 20.08 34,583.00 694,426.64 2,456.02 49,316.88 1,993,780.55
Aggregate Sub-Base
200 cu.m. 590.52 6,916.60 4,084,390.63 491.2 290,063.42 11,726,776.46
Course
Aggregate Base
201 cu.m. 728.74 5,187.45 3,780,302.31 368.4 268,467.82 10,853,693.24
Course
Portland Cement
311(1)a Concrete Pavement sq.m. 1,404.81 34,583.00 48,582,544.23 2,456.02 3,450,241.46 139,486,197.85
(0.23m thk)
404 Reinforcing Steel Bar kgs. 94.67 13,485.16 1,276,640.10 810.49 76,729.09 3,911,538.14
505 Grouted Riprap cu.m. 2,536.86 607.65 1,541,522.98 607.65 1,541,522.98 4,553,207.07
Spcl-1 Lined Canal l.m 1,030.85 175.43 180,842.02 476,180.54
SUBTOTAL 61,636,891.20 6,134,815.04 179,016,963.51

PART B. `
Bridge Excavation Above Ordinary Water

103(2)a cu.m. 309.13 6,680.50 2,065,142.97
Level
Bridge Excavation Below Ordinary Water

103(2)b cu.m. 695.86 11,975.04 8,332,951.33
Level
400(4)a Precast Concrete Piles, Furnished ln.m 2,969.06 765.74 2,273,528.00
400(6) Structural Steel Sheet Piles, Furnished ln.m. 1,459.98 625.52 913,246.69
400(12) Structural Steel Sheet Piles, Driven ln.m. 636.10 360.00 228,996.00
400(14) Precast Concrete Piles, Driven ln.m. 1,988.76 480.00 954,604.80
Test Piles, Furnished and Driven (400 mm. x

400(16) ln.m. 6,627.56 36.00 238,592.16
400 mm.)
401(2)a Concrete Barrier ln.m. 4,041.84 84.30 340,727.11
404 (1)a Reinforcing Steel Bar, Grade 40 kg. 48.23 8,560.90 412,892.21
404 (1)b Reinforcing Steel Bar, Grade 60 kg. 51.25 16,380.44 839,497.55
405 (1)b3 Structural Concrete, Class A cu.m. 7,568.73 2,101.12 15,902,809.98
407(8) Lean Concrete, Fc=17 MPA cu.m. 4,887.48 1,780.52 8,702,255.89
412 (1) Elastomeric Bearing Pad each 16,278.52 8.60 139,995.27
414 Forms and Falseworks l.s. 1,138,597.42 1.00 1,138,597.42
SUBTOTAL 42,483,837.38
PART C. APPROACHES
104 Embankment cu.m. 309.13 6,680.50 2,065,142.97
104(1) Embankment cu.m. 695.86 11,975.04 8,332,951.33
105 Subgrade Preparation ln.m 2,969.06 765.74 2,273,528.00
200 Aggregate Sub-Base Course ln.m. 1,459.98 625.52 913,246.69
201 Aggregate Base Course ln.m. 636.10 360.00 228,996.00
Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (0.23m

311(1)a ln.m. 1,988.76 480.00 954,604.80
thk)
603(3a) Metal Guardrail (Metal Beam) incuding Post ln.m. 6,627.56 36.00 238,592.16
603(3b) Guradrail (End Piece) ln.m. 4,041.84 84.30 340,727.11
SUBTOTAL 15,347,789.07

PART D. DETOUR
100 Clearing and Grubbing ha. 92,148.88 0.48 44,231.46
Individual Removal of Trees(small
100(2) ea. 1,176.79 20.00 23,535.80
a)
Removal of Structure &
101(1) l.s 46,501.96 1.00 46,501.96
Obstruction
Embankment (from roadw ay
104(1)b cu.m. 350.06 451.12 157,919.07
excavation)
104(1)a Embankment cu.m. 212.61 688.88 146,462.78
200 Aggregate Sub Base Course cu.m. 1,459.98 58.33 85,166.47
201 Aggregate Base Course cu.m. 636.10 38.88 24,731.57
311(1)a PCCP (0.15m thk) sq.m. 1,988.76 355.00 706,009.80
500(2) RCPC (1.22m dia.) l.m. 10,960.95 10.00 109,609.50
505 Grouted Riprap cu.m. 2,536.86 48.88 124,001.72
Spcl-2 Craneway l.s 355,836.30 1.00 355,836.30
REMOVAL OF DETOUR
101(2)c Removal of RCPC(1.22m dia.) l.m. 1,430.16 10.00 14,301.60
101(4)a Removal of PCCP sq.m. 237.43 355.00 84,287.65
Spcl -3 Removal of Grouted Riprap cu.m. 588.40 48.88 28,760.99
Spcl -4 Removal of Embankment cu.m. 204.85 451.12 92,411.93
SUBTOTAL 2,043,768.60
TOTAL 129,893,957.16
GRAND TOTAL
308,910,920.67
(CONCRETING + BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION)

A.3.5.3.OF-WAY ACQUISITION
UNIT COST* SECTION A
CLASSIFICATI UNI (Philippine Peso) QUANTITY

ITEM TOTAL
ON T AMOUNT
Cabusa Libmana Cabusa Libmana
o n o n (Php)
sq.m
Land Residential 250 350
. -
Commercial/ sq.m
300 400
Institutional . -
Agricultural
N/A. Land is classified -
as National
Rice – Irrigated ha. 90,200 96,200 Road/Provincial Road
with 20.00 m width as -
per Cadastral Maps of
Cocoland ha. 37,700 45,200 Municipalities of
Cabusao and -
Libmanan, respectively.
Nipaland ha. 20,100 22,600
-
Pasture ha. 23,200 25,800

-
Cogon ha. 15,500 16,200

-
Improveme
Building
nt
106 ~ 159 ~
Residential
795 954 3,475.00 1,642.00 629,428.00
954 ~ 1,060 ~
Commercial
1,590 1,749 710.00 - 677,340.00
1,306,768.
SUB-TOTAL
00
*Based on Base Market Value by the Municipal Assessor's

Office
Table A.3-6: Right of Way Acquisition of Route 3

UNIT COST* SECTION B SECTION C

TOTAL TOTAL
(Philippine Peso) QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT
ITEM CLASSIFICATION UNIT (Php) (Php)
Cabusao Libmanan Libmanan Libmanan
Land Residential sq.m. 250 350 - 3,593.77

- 1,257,819.50
Commercial/
sq.m. 300 400 - -
Institutional - -
Agricultural
Rice – Irrigated ha. 90,200 96,200 3.37 4.88

324,194.00 469,552.20
Cocoland ha. 37,700 45,200 1.11 1.96
50,217.20 88,682.40
Nipaland ha. 20,100 22,600 - - - -
Pasture ha. 23,200 25,800 0.22 1.05

5,624.40 27,038.40
Cogon ha. 15,500 16,200 -
-
- -
Impv’t. Building
106 ~
Residential 159 ~ 954 3,877.24
795 238.00 37,842.00 616,481.16
954 ~ 1,060 ~
Commercial - -
1,590 1,749 - -
SUB-TOTAL 417,877.60 2,459,573.66

UNIT COST* SECTION D ROUTE 3

(Philippine Peso) QUANTITY
ITEM CLASSIFICATION UNIT TOTAL TOTAL COST
Cabusao Libmanan Libmanan AMOUNT (PhP)
Land Residential sq.m. 250 350 987.14

345,497.95 1,603,317.45
Commercial/
sq.m. 300 400
Institutional -
Agricultural
Rice – Irrigated ha. 90,200 96,200 0.68
65,512.20 859,258.40
Cocoland ha. 37,700 45,200
138,899.60
Nipaland ha. 20,100 22,600 -
Pasture ha. 23,200 25,800
32,662.80
Cogon ha. 15,500 16,200
Improvement Building
Residential 106 ~ 795 159 ~ 954
592.28 94,172.84 1,377,924.00
954 ~ 1,060 ~
Commercial - -
1,590 1,749 677,340.00
SUB-TOTAL 505,182.99 4,689,402.25

Route 4 traverses the NIA irrigation service gravel road at Bgys. Pandan of Cabusao, then
pass through the NIA irrigation service concrete road at Bgys. Labao and Ibid, the gravel
barangay road of Ibid, interconnecting to the concrete barangay road of Concepcion.



LENGTH 2,131.37 m.
WIDTH 3.5 m.
SURFACE TYPE Gravel
TERRAIN Level

ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Road
BARANGAYS COVERED Figure A.3-38. Existing NIA Irrigation

Pandan, Cabusao
Service Road at Sta. 2+131.37 along
Section A of Route 4.
CL
El. 1.50 m.
1.50% 1.50%
NGL El. .891 m.


1 
5  

A.3.5.4.5 SECTION B : DESCRIPTION

Sta. 2+131.37 ~ 5+314.69
LENGTH 3,183.322
WIDTH 3.5 m.
TERRAIN Level
ROAD CLASSIFICATION NIA Irrigation Service Road
Labao, Libmanan
BARANGAYS COVERED Ibid, Libmanan
Figure A.3-40. Existing NIA Irrigation
Service Road at Sta. 5+314.69 along Section
B of Route 4.
CL
El. 2.00 m.
1.50% 1.50%
NGL El. 2.007 m.


2 
5  

A.3.5.4.7 SECTION C : DESCRIPTION
LOCATION PHOTO
STATION Sta. 5+314.69 ~ 6+488.09
LENGTH 1,173.40 m.
WIDTH 4 m.
SURFACE TYPE Gravel
TERRAIN Level

ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Road
Figure A.3-42. Aerial View at the start of Road

BARANGAY COVERED Ibid, Libmanan Section C showing the existing NIA Irrigation
Canal and Service Road which interconnect to
the existing Provincial Road.
CL
El. 1.85 m.
1.50% 1.50%
NGL El. 1.6 m.


3 
5  
FigureA.3-43 : Preliminary Design of Section C, Route 4

LOCATION PHOTO
STATION Sta. 6+488.09 ~ 8+585.65
LENGTH 2,097.56 m.
WIDTH 3.50 m.
TERRAIN Level
Figure A3--44. Aerial View at the end of

Ibid, Libmanan Road Section C showing the existing
BARANGAYS COVERED Concepcion, Libmanan Barangay Road of Ibid interconnecting to
the newly concreted Barangay Road of
Concepcion.
CL
El. 1.85 m.
1.50% 1.50%
NGL El. 1.4 m.


4 
5  
Figure A3-45 : Preliminary Design of Section C, Route 4

A.3.5.4.11 SECTION E : DESCRIPTION
LOCATION PHOTO
STATION Sta. 8+585.65 ~ 8+761.08
LENGTH 175.43
WIDTH 6.00 m.
TERRAIN Level
Figure A.3-46. Aerial View at the start of

Road Section E showing the newly concreted
BARANGAYS COVERED Barangay Road of Concepcion
Road of Ibid.
A.3.5.4.12 SECTION E : PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Figure A.3-47 : Preliminary Design of Section E, Route 4

SECTION A SECTION B
UNIT
UNIT TOTAL TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION COST QTY QTY
AMOUNT AMOUNT

A. (2.13 km. x 20 m. x 0.23 m) (2.13 km. x 20 m. x 0.23 m) (3.18 km. x 16.5 m. x 0.23 m )
Clearing and
100 (1) ha. 92,148.88 0.87 80,169.53 2.87 264,467.29
Grubbing
Removal of
Existing
101(1) Structures l.s. 1.00 26,123.23 1.00 308,862.07
(affected by
RROW)
Removal of
Existing
101(4)a l.m. 102.92 2,031.37 209,068.60 0 0.00
Structures-NIA
Canal
Unsuitable
102(1) cu.m. 205.12 2,095.28 429,783.83 7,878.72 1,616,083.05
Excavation
Roadway
Excavation
102(2) cu.m. 162.84 1,017.35 165,665.27 4,727.23 769,782.13
(Surplus
Common)
104(1) Embankment cu.m. 212.61 2,754.33 585,598.10 3,414.11 725,873.93
Subgrade
105 sq.m. 20.08 42,627.40 855,958.19 11,030.21 221,486.62
Preparation
Aggregate
200 Sub-Base cu.m. 590.52 8,525.48 5,034,466.45 10,504.96 6,203,388.98
Course
Aggregate
201 cu.m. 728.74 6,394.11 4,659,643.72 7,878.72 5,741,538.41
Base Course
Portland
Cement
311(1)a Concrete sq.m. 1,404.81 42,627.40 59,883,397.79 52,524.81 73,787,378.34
Pavement
(0.23m thk)
Reinforcing
404 kgs. 94.67 9,761.38 924,109.84 17,333.19 1,640,933.10
Steel Bar
Grouted
505 cu.m. 2,536.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Riprap
Spcl-1 Lined Canal l.m 1,030.85 548.45 565,369.68 3,183.32 3,281,525.42

73,419,354.25 94,561,319.33
SUB-TOTAL
SECTION C SECTION D
UNIT
DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL TOTAL
ITEM COST QTY QTY
AMOUNT AMOUNT

A. (2.13 km. x 20 m. x 0.23 m) (1.17 km. x 20 m. x 0.23 m) (2.09 km. x 16.5 m. x 0.23 m)
Removal of Existing
101(1) Structures (affected by l.s. 1.00 25,380.25 1.00 25,380.25
RROW) 1.00
Removal of Existing
101(4)a l.m. 102.92 120,725.16 - -
Structures-NIA Canal 1,173.00
102(1) Unsuitable Excavation cu.m. 205.12 1,877.03 385,016.39 1,559.71 319,927.72
Roadway Excavation
102(2) cu.m. 162.84 169,376.40 3,699.02 602,348.42
(Surplus Common) 1,040.14
104(1) Embankment cu.m. 212.61 2,431.09 516,874.04 2,384.86 507,045.08
105 Subgrade Preparation sq.m. 20.08 23,468.00 471,237.44 34,583.00 694,426.64
Aggregate Sub-Base
200 cu.m. 590.52 2,771,664.67 6,916.60 4,084,390.63
Course 4,693.60
201 Aggregate Base Course cu.m. 728.74 3,520.20 2,565,310.55 5,187.45 3,780,302.31
Portland Cement
311(1)a Concrete Pavement sq.m. 1,404.81 32,968,081.08 34,583.00 48,582,544.23
(0.23m thk) 23,468.00
404 Reinforcing Steel Bar kgs. 94.67 8,510.98 805,734.48 13,485.16 1,276,640.10
505 Grouted Riprap cu.m. 2,536.86 0.00 - 607.65 1,541,522.98
Spcl-1 Lined Canal l.m 1,030.85 286.50 295,338.53 - -
41,224,668.91 61,632,921.20
SUBTOTAL

SECTION E ROUTE 4
UNIT
DESCRIPTION UNIT
ITEM COST TOTAL TOTAL COST
QTY
AMOUNT (PhP)
PART CONCRETING
CONCRETING (2.13 km. x 20 m. x 0.23 m)
A. (175.43 l.m. x 14 m. x 0.23 m)
100 (1) Clearing and Grubbing ha. 92,148.88 0.20 18,429.78 711,389.35
Removal of Existing
101(1) Structures (affected by l.s. 1.00 1.00 25,380.25 411,126.05
RROW)
Removal of Existing
101(4)a l.m. 102.92 - - 329,793.76
102(1) Unsuitable Excavation cu.m. 205.12 614.01 125,945.73 2,876,756.72
Roadway Excavation
102(2) cu.m. 162.84 245.60 39,993.50 1,747,165.73
(Surplus Common)
104(1) Embankment cu.m. 212.61 319.28 67,882.12 2,403,273.28
105 Subgrade Preparation sq.m. 20.08 2,456.02 49,316.88 2,292,425.77
200 Aggregate Sub-Base Course cu.m. 590.52 491.20 290,063.42 18,383,974.16
201 Aggregate Base Course cu.m. 728.74 368.40 268,467.82 17,015,262.81
Portland Cement Concrete

311(1)a sq.m. 1,404.81 2,456.02 3,450,241.46 218,671,642.90
Pavement (0.23m thk)
404 Reinforcing Steel Bar kgs. 94.67 810.49 76,729.09 4,724,146.60
505 Grouted Riprap cu.m. 2,536.86 - - 1,541,522.98
Spcl-1 Lined Canal l.m 1,030.85 175.43 180,842.02 4,323,075.65
4,593,292.06 275,431,555.75
SUB-TOTAL

5.3.14 ROUTE 4 : RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
UNIT COST* SECTION A SECTION B
(Philippine Peso) QTY TOTAL QTY TOTAL

ITEM CLASSIFICATION UNIT
AMOUNT AMOUNT
Cabusao Libmanan Cabusao (Php) Libmanan (Php)
Land Residential sq.m. 250 350 790.010 197,502.50 5,883.087 2,059,080.45
Commercial/
sq.m. 300 400 -
Institutional
Agricultural ha.
Rice – Irrigated ha. 90,200 96,200 10.803 974,430.60 15.256 1,467,627.20
Cocoland ha. 37,700 45,200 -
Nipaland ha. 20,100 22,600 -
Pasture ha. 23,200 25,800 -
Cogon ha. 15,500 16,200 -
Impv't. Building
106 ~
Residential 159 ~ 954 264.080 27,992.48 1,966.564 312,683.75
795
954 ~ 1,060 ~
Commercial - -
1,590 1,749
SUB-TOTAL 1,199,925.58 3,839,391.40
Table A.3-8: Right of Way Acquisition Cost of Route 4

UNIT COST* SECTION C SECTION D

(Philippine Peso) QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL
ITEM CLASSIFICATION UNIT
AMOUNT AMOUNT
Cabusao Libmanan Libmanan Libmanan
(Php) (Php)
Land Residential sq.m. 250 350 2,975.734 1,041,506.90 3,593.770 1,257,819.50
Commercial/
sq.m. 300 400 - - -
Institutional
Agricultural ha. - -
Rice – Irrigated ha. 90,200 96,200 5.490 528,138.00 4.881 469,552.20
Cocoland ha. 37,700 45,200 - 1.962 88,682.40
Nipaland ha. 20,100 22,600 - - -
Pasture ha. 23,200 25,800 - 1.048 27,038.40
Cogon ha. 15,500 16,200 - - -
Impv't. Building
106 ~
Residential 159 ~ 954 238.000 37,842.00 3,877.240 616,481.16
795
954 ~ 1,060 ~
Commercial - -
1,590 1,749
SUB-TOTAL 1,607,486.90 2,459,573.66
UNIT COST* SECTION E ROUTE 4

(Philippine Peso) QUANTITY TOTAL COST
ITEM CLASSIFICATION UNIT TOTAL
AMOUNT
Cabusao Libmanan Libmanan (Php) (Php)
Land Residential sq.m. 250 350 987.137 345,497.95 4,901,407.30

Commercial/
sq.m. 300 400 - -
Institutional
Agricultural ha. - -
Rice – Irrigated ha. 90,200 96,200 0.681 65,512.20 3,505,260.20
Cocoland ha. 37,700 45,200 - 88,682.40
Nipaland ha. 20,100 22,600 - -
Pasture ha. 23,200 25,800 - 27,038.40
Cogon ha. 15,500 16,200 -
Impv't. Building
Residential 106 ~ 795 159 ~ 954 592.282 94,172.84 1,089,172.23
954 ~ 1,060 ~
Commercial -
1,590 1,749
SUB-TOTAL 505,182.99 9,611,560.53

A.3.6 EVALUATION PHASE
The purpose of the evaluation phase is to assess the ideas and criteria generated in the
creative phase whether it will satisfy, achieve, improve value, implementable or there are
constraints to overcome in the set functions/objective.
The created ideas were evaluated by using both the qualitative and quantitative methods.
Two approaches are adapted, (1) comparative analysis and (2) by use of ranking system to
select which is the best scheme. Comparative evaluation was done to determine which
scheme would provide best route with lesser cost. The parameters used in the evaluation
are the following, (i) estimated cost, (ii) travel distance, (iii) social and environmental
impacts. Either of the alternative route would be able to deliver the required project benefits.
Table 3-7: Comparative & Ranking of Alternative Routes
IMPROVEMENT TO BE INTRODUCED RANK

TOTAL COST (PhP) Unit Cost RANK Distance Total
AS NATIONAL ROAD (Least
ROUTE / LENGTH (Least from Travel
Distance
SECTION (m) Unit AH26* Distance
Road Road Road Road Right-of- Travelled
Bridge Construction TOTAL (PhP/km) Cost) (km) (km)
Opening Widening Upgrade Way Acquisition )
ROUTE 1
A 2,446.00 √ 94,382,801.08 2,479,545.72 96,862,346.80
B 5,421.82 √ 188,399,340.92 2,670,937.56 191,070,278.48
TOTAL 7,867.82 282,782,142.00 5,150,483.28 287,932,625.28 36,596,239.53 4 17.191 25.059 3
ROUTE 2
A 2,131.37 √ 73,419,354.25 699,040.08 74,118,394.33
B 908.63 √ 32,114,115.50 2,042,861.26 34,156,976.76
C 4,220.87 √ 146,859,738.20 1,228,148.40 148,087,886.60
D 5,382.04 √ 134,473,567.15 24,315,754.00 158,789,321.15
E 175.43 √ 4,593,292.06 505,182.99 5,098,475.05
TOTAL 12,818.34 391,460,067.16 28,790,986.73 420,251,053.89 32,785,138.63 2 14.044 26.862 4
ROUTE 3
A 3,232.07 √ √ 129,893,957.16 1,306,768.00 131,200,725.16
B 1,173.40 √ 41,226,695.16 417,877.60 41,644,572.76
C 2,095.91 √ 61,636,891.20 2,459,573.66 64,096,464.86
D 175.43 √ 6,134,815.04 505,182.99 6,639,998.03
TOTAL 6,676.81 238,892,358.56 4,689,402.25 243,581,760.81 36,481,757.13 3 17.191 23.868 2
ROUTE 4
A 2,131.37 √ 73,419,354.25 1,199,925.58 74,619,279.83
B 3,183.32 √ 94,561,319.33 3,839,391.40 98,400,710.73
C 1,173.40 √ 41,224,668.91 1,607,486.90 42,832,155.81
D 2,097.56 √ 61,632,921.20 2,459,573.66 64,092,494.86
E 175.43 √ 4,593,292.06 505,182.99 5,098,475.05
TOTAL 8,761.08 275,431,555.75 9,611,560.53 285,043,116.28 32,535,149.91 1 14.044 22.805 1
*Distance travelled from the junction of AH26(Maharlika Highway) and Sipocot-Cabusao Road in Bgy. Malobago, Sipocot, Camarines Sur

Initially three alternatives were considered for study: Route 1, Route 2 and Route 3. The
study recommended that the best alignment is Route 3 with proposed road
upgrading/widening, widening of bridge and road opening works.
During the presentation meeting, DPWH 1st DEO, suggested that additional alternative –
Route 4 be considered and further suggested that the bridge be reconstructed not widened
and that there are 2 bridges along Route 3.
In accordance with the agreements arrived at, the study for Alternative 4 – Route 4
commenced and re-computed costing of the reconstructed bridge done (only 1 bridge as
validated) and preliminary design and costing for Route 4 concluded.
The evaluation of the four alternatives to select the best alignment to conform to the existing
profile of the area including establishments and economic configurations of the proposed
road project was undertaken as summarized in Table 3-7. Comparative & Ranking of
Alternative Routes.
A.3.7 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The VE/VA study reveals that proposed road alignment 4 would be able to deliver the function
required. It is therefore, recommended that alternative 4 be pursued for detailed feasibility level
study.
DPWH 1st DEO approved that alternative 4 be pursued for detailed feasibility level study.

Chapter 3 - Capacity Improvement Studies PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 3 - Capacity Improvement Studies PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Feasibility Study of the Proposed Cabusao-Libmanan Road Project (Via Skybridge)

3.0 CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT STUDIES

3.1 ROAD LOCATION STUDY AND INVESTIGATION

The study and investigation of the proposed road project includes:

 Road Location Mapping;

3.1.1 Road Location Mapping

 DPWH directive to undertake the Feasibility Study of the Proposed Cabusao-

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-1

Figure 3-1: Project Vicinity showing the 4 Alternate Road Alignments

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-2

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-3

3.1.2 Road Condition Survey

Table 3-1: Road Sections for Opening or Construction

2 409+549.925 410+549.485 Labao 999.56

3 410+554.485 412+244.485 Labao 1,690.00

4 412+248.485 412+772.903 Labao, Ibid 524.418

5 412+778.903 413+985.538 Ibid 1,206.635

TOTAL LENGTH (ln.m.) 6,529.568

Table 3-2: Existing Roadway Conditions

ROAD LENGTH SURFACE WIDTH

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-4

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-5

Figure 3-4: Section 1 of the Road Map

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-6

Figure 3-5: Section 2 of the Road Map

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-7

Figure 3-6. Section 3 of the Road Map

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-8

3.2 PROJECT ROAD INFLUENCE AREA

3.2.1 THE PROJECT ROAD INFLUENCE AREA (RIA)

Start of Proposed Cabusao-

End of Proposed Cabusao-

Proposed Sky bridge

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-9

Table 3-3: Physical Profile of Road Influence Area

3.3.2 Trade and Industry

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-10

3.3.4 Transportation System

Source: Bicol RSDF, Bicol Regional Development Plan: 2017-2022

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-11

3.4 DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF THE RIA

Table 3-4: Population Projection at Road Influence Area

3.4.2 Potential Economic Activities

In accelerating infrastructure development, reliable and resilient infrastructure facilities and

3.5 ROAD NETWORK IMPROVEMENT WITH THE PROJECT

The complementary projects are:

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-12

 The on-going construction/rehabilitation/widening of roads linking the Skybridge

Table 3-6 CY 2018 On-Going Projects in the Road Influence Area

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-13

Figure 3-9: Map of Bicol RSDF Complimentary Projects

Source: Bicol RSDF, Bicol Regional Development Plan:2017-2022

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-14

3.5.2 Development Opportunities

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-15

Annex 3: VALUE ENGINEERING/VALUE ANALYSIS (VE/VA)

Value Engineering/Value Analysis (VE/VA) was undertaken in compliance with Section 4

Value Engineering and Value Analysis (VEVA) is a systematic process used by a

A.3.2 METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH

 Planning Phase – at the feasibility study or options analysis;

 Performance - This describes the overall effectiveness by which a project delivers

MCRG ENGINEERING SERVICES & TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY 3-16