Professional Documents
Culture Documents
All Justices of The Peace Are Magistrates' by Default - Class Notes 20/10/03
All Justices of The Peace Are Magistrates' by Default - Class Notes 20/10/03
The first Justice of the Peace1 was appointed in 1361. The Magistrates
Court system has evolved radically to keep abreast with developments in
social/cultural spread and technological advancements.
This report tackles the issues and looks at possible solutions available,
with references to the Auld Report 2001.
1
All Justices of the Peace are Magistrates’ by default – Class notes 20/10/03
1
Contents
Summary 1
1. Introduction 3
4. Video Court 8
5. Conclusions 9
6. Appendices A to D 10
7. Glossary 14
2
1. Introduction
The Criminal Justice System in the UK spends more capital than the
education system.2The role of the magistrates’ courts (MC’s) play a major part
in the workings of the Criminal Justice System as a whole. Nearly all criminal
cases originate at a Magistrates’ court and most of them completed there.3
This report will discuss and analyse the operation of a London Magistrates’
Court(s) based on my findings on visits’ to Ealing and Uxbridge Magistrates’.
The purpose of this report is to comment on the positive workings of the
Magistracy system, the way the system has evolved over the years to keep
abreast and utilise current technological advancements (Video Courts) and to
recommend any positive actions to improve the system (based on the Auld
Report (2001)).4
To begin with, all websites recommended within the course notes were
visited. The Magistrates Association Website5 provided
address/location/contact details for the Magistrates’ Courts in the Ealing Petty
Session area. I then visited Ealing Magistrates’ the evening before my actual
Court visit to obtain a court listing, in order to get an idea of types of cases
were heard at each court.6
2
Class lecture notes 29/09/03.
3
Over 95% cases completed. Source: The Magistrates’ Court, Courtesy of CourtServices Website
http://www.courteservice.gov.uk/you_courts/criminal/introduction/magistrates.htm
- Refer to Appendix A
4
Refer to appendix A for a summary of the Auld Report
5
http://www.glmca.org.uk. Refer to appendix A
6
Refer to Appendix B for information copied from the original court listing for 29/10/03. Personal
details of defendants are not shown to protect confidentiality.
3
2. The Magistrates’ Court
This section gives a brief account on the court personnel that are involved
in a MC9 and differentiates between the common court layout and a video
court layout. Also covered are the court etiquette, procedure and
practices’.
Crown Prosecutor – Presents the case for the CPS7. Representing the
Crown.
Defence Attorney – Represents the defendant. Argues the case for the
defendant.
Although the general layout of the courtroom may differ slightly from MC to
MC9 the seating for the Magistrates’, the legal advisor and
prosecution/defence council’s are identical at each MC. The Magistrates
sit on a somewhat raised platform with a plaque of the Crown behind
them.
7
Crown Prosecution Service. Refer to Appendix C - Glossary
8
Pre-sentence Report. Refer to Appendix C - Glossary
9
Magistrates’ Court. Refer to Appendix C - Glossary
4
Fig 2.1 – Showing typical layout of a Magistrates’ Court.
Almost identical to the typical courtroom, the major difference being that
the defendant is not present in person in court. A live communications link
between the courtroom and prison (e.g.: Wormwood Scrubs) provides the
court with live images/sound of the defendant and vice versa.
5
The Magistrates
The Clerk
TV Screen
Usher
Press
Seating
Authorised Person(s)
Public Seating
A person entering the court bows to the crown not the Magistrates (as
some think), supported by the fact that some do not bow at all when
Magistrates’ are not present.
In a video court the Legal Advisor explains to the defendant that the
hearing is taking place through video link and that it does not in any way
affect the seriousness of the offence(s).11 Two of the cases that were
observed at video court required an Interpreter (Somali). Initially, the
Interpreter takes an oath, which is slightly different to the oath taken by a
witness for example.
10
See Court notes – Appendix B page 07
11
See court notes – Appendix B
6
3. The Court Room – An Inside story
MC’s have a long schedule of cases that will be heard each day.
Although, the majority of cases may seem clear-cut, either-way cases
or a ‘not guilty’ plea case calls for an adjournment on the first hearing.
A good example of this is where a defendant accused of theft from a
department store is captured on CCTV15 video12. The prosecution
mentions to the court that this video evidence is available. The defence
is no doubt interested in getting hold of this evidence to evaluate
his/her client’s position. An adjournment will result due to the provisions
for ‘advanced disclosure’13 as stated within the Criminal Procedure and
and Investigations Act 1996. Furnishing the defence with this evidence
in advance of the proceedings will not only prevent delays but also
prevent the prosecutions case from weakening.
All three of the cases observed within the video court saw bail
applications being refused due to one or more of these criteria being
negative.
Although, the bulk of adjournments stem from the defence, there are
occasions when the prosecution request adjournment due to lack of
preparation. 17
12
See case notes on appendix B – pg 2
13
Course Notes on ‘Disclosure’ pg 47
14
The criteria used is as defined within the Bail Act 1976
15
No Fixed Abode – See Appendix C Glossary
16
Justice of the Peace Pg 561, Sept 5, 1992 Vol. 156 No.36
17
See case notes on Appendix B – Pg 1/2
7
3.3 Background of a Magistrate
4. Video Court
The video court was fully introduced in England and Wales in Feb 2002.20
The system provides a method of trying dangerous criminals without the
need for secure transportation to/from a MC. Thereby cutting-down on
costs for the Police/Prisons Service. Often, cases are adjourned due to
various reasons as described in section 3.2. The court heard that one of
the defendants had continuously had the case adjourned for well over a
year on medical grounds, the last time his reasoning being that he was
diagnosed as having a “hole in the heart”. The defendant did not have any
medical proof to support his statement.21
Each case heard through the video court is allocated a 30mins slot. The
system relies on all personnel. I.e.: Defendant, prison Guards(s), Video
Link Officer to be ready to hear the case at a pre-defined time. The
defendant is shown the Magistrates’, Defence Council, Prosecutor,
interpreter (where needed) and other personnel before proceeding with the
case.
18
Course notes – 13/10/03
19
English Legal System by Catherine Elliott and Francis Quinn - pg 189
20
Article Title: “Video links remand prisoners with magistrates court” –
<http://www.excelsior.pwcglobal.com/knowledge/article.asp?artID=898>
21
See case notes – Appendix B – Pg 6
22
Auld Report - http://www.criminal-courts-review.org.uk/summary.htm
8
5. Conclusions
Video courts are a very cost-effective means of hearing cases before the
trial stages. The system works extremely well in general. Improvements
can be made to the way the audio system is handled. There is a red light
on each microphone that illuminates when it’s their cue to speak. The
defendant should be informed of this in order prevent person(s) speaking
out of turn and maintain the order of the court.
23
See Justice of the Peace Pg 561, Sept 5, 1992 Vol. 156 No.36
24
See Appendix D – Average number of days from arrest to sentence (young offenders) courtesy
http://www.statistics.gov.ukj/cci/nscl.asp?ID=5679
2
25
Class notes from Lecture by Magistrate Pam Ulstein on 20/10/03
26
Auld Report Summary - http://www.criminal-courts-review.org.uk/summary.htm
9
APPENDIX A
-------------------
10
APPENDIX B
-------------------
11
APPENDIX C
-------------------
12
APPENDIX D
-------------------
13
7. Glossary
M
Magistrates’ Court (MC) – Hears cases for offences/crimes committed in that
area, plus family matters. There are 105 geographically divided commissions in
the UK which are further subdivided in to Petty Sessional areas’.
P
Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) – Magistrates have the option of ordering a Pre-
Sentence Report before sentencing in order to gain an understanding of the
offender’s background (work/study history, previous convictions etc). This is
carried out by the Probation service.
14
8. Bibliography and References
Internet Resources:
15