Professional Documents
Culture Documents
World War: Flaps in The Allies
World War: Flaps in The Allies
World War: Flaps in The Allies
Introduction
Chapter 1: Formation of Allies WW1 - Page 4
Chapter 2: Rise of Axis Powers - Page 31
Parts I – Rise of Adolf Hitler - Page 31
Part II – Rise of Benito Mussolini - Page 57
Part III – Japan after WW1 - Page 72
Part IV – Rise of Netaji Bose - Page 77
Chapter 3: Axis’s ‘Global Conquest’
Part I – Italian Invasion of Ethiopia – Page 84
Part II – Spanish Civil War – Page 107
Part III – Japanese Invasion of China – Page 133
Part IV – Soviet-Japan Conflict – Page 153
Part V – Burning stones of Europe – Page 160
Part VI – Rise of INA – Page 188
Chapter 5: The Flaps in Allies - Page 198
Introduction
The word ‘Flaps’ in the context of this book, means
‘Agitation and Panic’. It’s a basic fact that the Allies of
WW1 and WW2 have a structural change as many
nations changed sides in conflicts of wars. It’s also a fact
that Allies of WW2 have been spreading exaggerated
thoughts and opinions in order to hide facts. The Allies
nation and few such other nations have been spreading
lies against the truth and portraying few absolute great
personalities as tyrannical leaders. Even so the Former
Indian Governments have been hiding reports of some
secrets which every global citizen and resident should
know. Few politicians and few philosophers had different
opinion than they usually had. Hardly people know these
facts and the education systems have been hiding many
such important details in order to exaggerate few topics.
“The ink with which all History is written is merely fluid
prejudice” – Mark Twin
There is a corrupt ideological understanding or thought
that manipulating History and making the facts a mystery
and inserting propaganda will influence the students who
study and they will feel that the textbook is absolutely
correct which isn’t the case today. The textbooks have
either been provocative to communism in such a manner
that you don’t mention word ‘communism’ still you tell
communism. Great personalities like Barrister
Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar have been
manipulated in such a manner that you don’t mention
them or you don’t respect them. If someone is not
agreeing with his views still fine, you can talk against
them up to an extend against them, but don’t vandalize
their profiles. There is a tendency of writers to either
hide facts and make opinions or to keep half facts and
half opinions. Somewhere the border should be drawn in
regards to respect for all people mentioned in the
textbooks. In textbooks it is ‘Mahatma Gandhi’ and ‘V.D.
Savarkar’ is that any type of justice? Either keep it like
‘Mohan Das Karmchand Gandhi’ and ‘V.D. Savarkar’ or
give both individuals respect.
These textbook writers often respect more to the people
whose ideology matches with them leading to a storm of
uncertainty in the writer’s mind. There are many twisted
individuals who vandalize great profiles on Wikipedia in
order to defame such great people. These communist
writers often paint Anti-Religious Fundamentalists as
Religious Fundamentalists and vice-versa. They support a
particular ideology i.e. green politics and then make sure
you write more in its favour for creating future
politicians/future voters who will support the political
party with that specific ideology.
Especially Communist writers give excess respect to the
people who colonized the country. Like if its ‘Louis
Mountbatten’ then the writers will transform it to ‘Lord
Mountbatten’. If it’s ‘Dalhousie’, who has a big name
[writers can hence only keep his surname instead],
writers make it ‘Lord Dalhousie’ that is their Anti-
Nationalist propaganda which these communists, often
proclaim themselves as ‘Socialists’, write.
Harsh .V. Thakur
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Meet-Sergeant-Major-
Mohandas-Karamchand-Gandhi/articleshow/44124189.cms [Meet
Sergeant Major Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi – Times of India]
Chapter 2: Rise of Axis Powers
Part I – Rise of Adolf Hitler
On 9th November 1918, Wilhelm II with the Royal Family
was abdicated.
On the Same day in Weimar a Provincial Government
was established under Social Democratic Party (SDP) and
the Independent Social Democratic Party of Germany
(USDP). In December 1918, elections were held for a
National Assembly tasked with creating a new
parliamentary constitution. On February 6, 1919, the
National Assembly met in the town of Weimar and
formed the Weimar Coalition. They also elected SDP
leader Friedrich Ebert as President of the Weimar
Republic. After signing the treaty of Versailles on 28th
June 1919, Germany was forced to reduce its Military to
1 lakh men and not more, Germany was not allowed to
keep Tanks, Air Planes and Submarines in it Military. That
time the German economic exchange was called as
‘Marks’ like ‘Indian Rupees’. The Allied Forces demanded
war reparations from Weimar Republic, Allied Forces
Demanded 132 billion gold marks [33 billion US Dollar].
This money’s pay was divided in 3 bonds: A, B, and C. Of
these, Germany was required to pay towards 'A' and 'B'
bonds totaling 50 billion marks (US$12.5 billion)
unconditionally. The payment of the remaining 'C' bonds
was interest free and contingent on the Weimar
Republic's ability to pay, as was to be assessed by an
Allied committee. The Allied Forces also prevented
Germany to join League of Nations.
On August 11, 1919, the Weimar Constitution was
signed into law by President Ebert. The law faced
venomous opposition from the military and the radical
left. The Constitution contained 181 articles and covered
everything from the structure of the German state
(Reich) and the rights of the German people to religious
freedom and how laws should be enacted.
The Weimar Constitution included these highlights:
The German Reich is a Republic.
All Germans are equal and have the same civil rights
and responsibilities.
2. https://youtu.be/gAxSVdQofS0 [The Armchair Historian: How did Germany get so strong after
Losing WW1?]
elections]
Elections]
Elections]
Federal Elections]
Federal Elections]
Federal Elections]
Federal Elections]
21. [Referred from the Guardian’s article “All Germans rounded up to vote” link:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/1933/nov/13/secondworldwar.germany2]
Referendum]
of Winston Churchill]
24. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/uncovered-the-%E2%80%9Clost%E2%80%9D-paper-
publishing]
Overview-Territory]
27. https://www.polytechpanthers.com/ourpages/auto/2012/1/24/45532409/ItalyandGermanyafter
Elections]
Italian aims]
Reactions – Italy]
31. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Italy#Italy's_territorial_settlements_and_the_reaction
[Wikipedia: Kingdom of Italy – World War I and the failure of liberal state (1915-1922) – Italy’s
32. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vittorio_Emanuele_Orlando#The_Paris_Peace_Conference
Saint-Germain-en-Laye (1919)]
35. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini#Beginning_of_Fascism_and_service_in_World_
36. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini#Expulsion_from_the_Italian_Socialist_Party
of Benito Mussolini]
38. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini#Beginning_of_Fascism_and_service_in_World_
39. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini#Formation_of_the_National_Fascist_Party
law]
47. https://www.pittsfordschools.org/cms/lib/NY02205365/Centricity/Domain/961/L22%20-
48. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korea#Japanese_occupation_and_Japan-Korea_Annexation
51. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire_of_Japan_(internal_politics_1914%E2%80%931944)#Japan
52. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire_of_Japan_(internal_politics_1914%E2%80%931944)#Japan
53. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire_of_Japan_(internal_politics_1914%E2%80%931944)#The_R
-1931]
54. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire_of_Japan_(internal_politics_1914%E2%80%931944)#The_R
-1931]
55. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose#1921–1932:_Indian_National_Congress
57. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose#1921–1932:_Indian_National_Congress
58. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose#1921–1932:_Indian_National_Congress
59. https://books.google.co.in/books/about/The_Shadow_of_the_Great_Game.html?id=-
60. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose#1937–1940:_Indian_National_Congress
Battle of Ngakyedauk
Battle of Imphal
Battle of Pokoku
Battle of Central Burma
Disputes]
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Somaliland#Italian_East_Africa_(1936–1941) [Wikipedia:
8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Bono%27s_invasion_of_Abyssinia#Adigrat_and_Adwa [Wikipedia:
9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Bono%27s_invasion_of_Abyssinia#Italy_declared_aggressor
Background]
Elections – Results]
26. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_of_the_Spanish_Civil_War#Constitution_of_1931
27. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_of_the_Spanish_Civil_War#Constitution_of_1931
28. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_of_the_Spanish_Civil_War#Constitution_of_1931
29. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_of_the_Spanish_Civil_War#The_"two_black_years”
[Wikipedia: Background of the Spanish civil war – The “two black years”]
League of Nations]
Service as Officer]
36. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Sino-
Background]
38. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mukden_Incident#Background [Wikipedia: Mukden Incident –
Background]
43. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_invasion_of_Manchuria#Operations_in_Southern_Northeas
44. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_invasion_of_Manchuria#Occupation_of_northeast_China
modern Japan]
modern Japan]
52. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet%E2%80%93Japanese_border_conflicts#Border_violations
Build Up]
Austrians cheering approval as cars of Germans entered what had once been an independent
Austria.]
62. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_occupation_of_Czechoslovakia#Demands_for_Sudeten_auto
63. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_occupation_of_Czechoslovakia#Munich_Agreement
64. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_occupation_of_Czechoslovakia#First_Vienna_Award
of Albania]
of Albania - Background]
Albania – Invasion]
68. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II#European_occupations_and_agreements [Wikipedia:
69. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II#cite_note-FOOTNOTELoweMarzari2002330-53
Potential Members]
75. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose#cite_note-FOOTNOTELoiwal2017a-95
[Wikipedia: Note 1]
76. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose#cite_note-FOOTNOTELoiwal2017b-96
[Wikipedia: Note 2]
77. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose#cite_note-FOOTNOTETalwar1976-97
[Wikipedia: Note 3]
78. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMarkandeya1990-98
[Wikipedia: Note 4]
79. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose#cite_note-FOOTNOTEJames1997554-99
[Wikipedia: Note 5]
Hero]
83. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose#1943–1945:_Japanese-occupied_Asia
[Wikipedia: Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose – 1943 to 1945 – Japanese Occupation of Asia]
84. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azad_Hind#Indian_areas_under_the_administration_of_the_Provision
al_Government [Wikipedia: Azad Hind – Indian areas under the administration of Provincial
government]
Mandalay]
Chapter 4: The Flaps in Allies
So now finally we are at the ‘climax’ of the book. There
was a sudden crackdown on Axis Powers which started in
1945. Allied power’s major enemies during the Second
World War included: Japan’s various leaders including its
Prime Minister Hideki Tojo, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose
and Indian National Army, Adolf Hitler, Francisco Franz
and Benito Mussolini. If one studies a sequence a clear
cut conspiracy can be clearly seen. The Assassination of
Benito Mussolini and the relations of many organizations
can’t be ruled out. Many books and Historians have
stated their own theories to bring few conclusions, but
few acts tell the new theories and indeed this book
doesn’t has the theory of Mussolini’s death, but the
entire web which was encircling it.
Soviet Union or USSR has been known for eliminating
‘enemies of its state’. [1][2][3] The Soviets used
assassinations as a major tool of success, but is still
questionable why Italian People would suddenly opposed
war when they only supported it. It’s basically done by
some spies or agents which is a high possibility. It a
global accepted fact that Benito Mussolini was Fascist
while Stalin was Communist so a possible working
together is mostly impossible. It is also accepted that
during the Italian resistance movement had many forms
of communism and communism itself and Italy had
signed the Anti-Comintern Pact in 1937. [4][5] In that time
USSR had KGB which was its Intelligence agency. In 1943
USSR renamed its intelligence agency known as NKVD to
NKGB. It happened on 15th March 1943. Just in the same
year when Italian rebels rebelled against Mussolini. [6][7]
NKGB was working in mid 1941 and was suddenly closed
and reopened in 1943 till 1946. Which indeed leads to
many conclusions and NKGB’s hand in Italian Movement
can’ be ruled out. Even Mussolini was assassinated by a
‘communist’ partisan who also can’t be ruled out. [8] Even
the hand of Fourth International can be subject to be
suspected. [9]
Following Mussolini’s assassination in two days Adolf
Hitler suicides and on same day his Minister of
Propaganda Joseph Goebbels whom he chose as the next
chancellor or Germany also suicides. [10][11]
Another Prominent leader on whom many assassination
attempts happened was Francisco Franco. He had sent
many Spanish Volunteers to help Germany on Eastern
Front. [12] Nearly 20 attempts happened to assassinate
Francisco Franco, but all failed and Franco died in 1975
while the last attempt was done to assassinate the
Franco regime’s Prime Minister which was successful in
1973. So we can say that allies tried to kill Franco till he
died himself in 1975. [13][14]
Now the condition in Japan was the interesting one.
Japanese Global hypocrisy was seen and to surprise all
nations stood silent.
In the Pearl Habour attack 2,402 people were killed who
belonged to US. [15] US had and has a hypocrisy and
always tends to interfere in every single conflict. US’s
intervention in the Second Sino-Japanese war was
unwarranted. China that time had approached League of
Nations and not US. [16] US was not even a member of
League of Nations, so its sanctions on Japan also
contributed to the Second World War. [17] This
interference in conflict of two nations led to the Attack
on Pearl Harbour. Also the US fleets movement to Hawaii
to create pressure on Japan was completely unnecessary.
[18]
The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was also
unwarranted. Not double, not triple but many times than
one would expect. After the bombing nearly 4 lakh
people died and about 2,000 to 6,500 children became
orphans. [19][20]
These harrowing exhibits are among the few physical
reminders of the devastation that greeted survivors after
the US B-29 bomber Enola Gay released Little Boy, a 16-
kilotonne atomic bomb, over Hiroshima at 8.15am on 6
August 1945. Less than a minute later, the bomb
exploded 600 metres above Shima Hospital, creating a
wave of heat that momentarily reached 3,000-4,000
degrees centigrade on the ground. Winds of up to 440
metres per second roared through the entire city. Within
half an hour, almost every building within a two-
kilometer radius of the hypocenter was in flames. About
90% of the city’s 76,000 buildings were partially or totally
incinerated, or reduced to rubble. Of the 33m square
metres of land considered usable before the attack, 40%
was reduced to ashes. The bombed city was barely
recognizable. What a day earlier had been a sprawling
military city and transportation hub, wedged between
mountain ranges to the north and the Seto inland sea to
the south, was now a nuclear wasteland. Wooden homes
had been burnt to the ground by firestorms; the city’s
rivers were filled with the corpses of people desperately
seeking water before they died. With the exception of a
handful of concrete buildings, Hiroshima had ceased to
exist. By the end of the year, the death toll would rise to
141,000 as survivors succumbed to injuries or illnesses
connected to their exposure to radiation. Yet even as
they struggled to comprehend the horror visited on their
homes, businesses, public buildings and fellow citizens,
evidence emerged of remarkable acts of courage and
resourcefulness. Incredible though it may seem, looking
at the handful of black-and-white photos taken in the
immediate aftermath of the attack, Hiroshima’s
resurrection began just hours after it was effectively
wiped from the map. The lights came back on in the
Ujina area on 7 August and around Hiroshima railway
station a day later. Power was restored in 30% of
homes that had escaped fire damage, and to all
households by the end of November 1945, according to
records kept by the Hiroshima Peace Institute. Water
pumps were repaired and started working again four
days after the bombing, although damaged pipes created
vast puddles among the ashes of wooden homes. The
central telephone exchange bureau was destroyed and
all of its employees killed, yet essential equipment was
retrieved and repaired, and by the middle of August 14
experimental lines were back in operation. Eighteen
workers and a dozen finance bureau employees at the
Hiroshima branch of the Bank of Japan, one of the city’s
few concrete buildings, died instantly, yet the bank
reopened two days later, offering floor space to 11 other
banks whose premises had been destroyed. Tellers
worked under open skies in clear weather, and beneath
umbrellas when it rained. A limited streetcar service
resumed on 9 August, the same day Nagasaki was
destroyed by a plutonium bomb, killing more than
70,000 people. With the need to move people and
supplies into the city growing more urgent by the hour,
the Ujina railway line started moving again on 7 August; a
day later, trains on the Sanyo Line started running the
short distance between Hiroshima and Yokogawa
stations. Higashi Police Station, despite being inside the
two-kilometer radius, was commandeered by the
prefectural government and turned into the nerve centre
for search and rescue and relief operations. Historians
say the quick resumption of services was a civic effort,
helped by the arrival of large numbers of volunteers. “I
do not think the restoration of basic services was simply
due to coercion from the authorities,” says Yuki Tanaka,
a historian and former professor at Hiroshima City
University. “Hiroshima received a lot of help from people
in neighbouring towns and cities such as Fuchu, Kure,
and even Yamaguchi. In this sense, the response was
similar to that seen after the2011 Tohoku earthquake,
when many people throughout Japan went to the
devastated areas and helped the victims.”Weeks after
Hiroshima felt the unforgiving force of nuclear fission;
nature compounded the city’s misery. Makurazaki, an
unusually powerful typhoon, swept through the city on
17 September, flooding large areas and ruining many of
the temporary hospitals set up on the outskirts. “The
only good thing that came of it was that it washed a lot
of the residual radiation into the sea,” says Tanaka.
“After the typhoon, radiation levels fell considerably.” It
was inevitable, given the scale of destruction, that early
attempts to re-establish a semblance of civic life on the
scorched earth of ground zero were marked by chaos
and confusion. The mayor, Senkichi Awaya, was among
the dead, leaving the city without a leader; thousands of
public servants, teachers and health professionals were
also among the victims. On 6 August the municipal
government office employed about 1,000 people; the
following day just 80 reported for duty. “They alone had
to deal with emergency medical treatment, establish a
food supply and retrieve and cremate corpses,” says
Tanaka. “They were incredibly difficult times.” Attempts
to care for the dying and seriously wounded verged on
the futile: 14 of Hiroshima’s 16 major hospitals no longer
existed; 270 of 298 hospital doctors were dead, along
with 1,654 of 1,780 registered nurses. Demand for
housing turned the area near the hypocenter into a
shantytown of 10,000 homes that were little more than
wooden shacks, with sanitary facilities shared among
several households. [21]
Now we come back to the conspiracy theory.
After Japan's unconditional surrender in 1945, U.S.
general Douglas MacArthur ordered the arrest of forty
alleged war criminals, including Tojo. Five American GIs
were sent to serve the arrest warrant. As American
soldiers surrounded Tojo's house on September 11, he
shot himself in the chest with a pistol, but missed his
heart. As a result of this experience, the Army had
medical personnel present during the later arrests of
other accused Japanese war criminals, such as Shigetarō
Shimada. [22] After recovering from his injuries, Tojo was
moved to Sugamo Prison. On January 19, 1946,
MacArthur issued a special proclamation ordering the
establishment of an International Military Tribunal for
the Far East (IMTFE). On the same day, he also approved
the Charter of the International Military Tribunal for the
Far East (CIMTFE), which prescribed how it was to be
formed, the crimes that it was to consider, and how the
tribunal was to function. The charter generally followed
the model set by the Nuremberg trials. On April 25, in
accordance with the provisions of Article 7 of the
CIMTFE, the original Rules of Procedure of the
International Military Tribunal for the Far East with
amendments were promulgated. [23]
Following months of preparation, the IMTFE convened
on April 29, 1946. The trials were held in the War
Ministry office in Tokyo. On May 3 the prosecution
opened its case, charging the defendants with crimes
against peace, conventional war crimes, and crimes
against humanity. The trial continued for more than two
and a half years, hearing testimony from 419 witnesses
and admitting 4,336 exhibits of evidence, including
depositions and affidavits from 779 other individuals. [24]
Following the model used at the Nuremberg trials in
Germany, the Allies established three broad categories.
"Class A" charges, alleging crimes against peace, were to
be brought against Japan's top leaders who had planned
and directed the war. Class B and C charges, which could
be leveled at Japanese of any rank, covered conventional
war crimes and crimes against humanity, respectively.
Unlike the Nuremberg trials, the charge of crimes against
peace was a prerequisite to prosecution—only those
individuals whose crimes included crimes against peace
could be prosecuted by the Tribunal. In the event, no
Class C charges were heard in Tokyo.
In the trial there were 11 judges:
William Webb – Australia
Edward Stuart McDougall – British Canada
Mei Ju-ao – China
Henri Bernard – France
Radhabinod Pal – British India
Bert Röling – Netherlands
Erima Harvey Northcroft – New Zealand
Colonel Delfin Jaranilla – Philippines
Patrick – UK
John P. Higgins – US
Myron C. Cramer – US
I. M. Zaryanov – USSR[25]
The United States had provided the funds and staff
necessary for running the Tribunal and also held the
functions of Chief Prosecutor. The argument was made
that it was difficult, if not impossible, to uphold the
requirement of impartiality with which such an organ
should be invested. This apparent conflict gave the
impression that the tribunal was no more than a means
for the dispensation of victors' justice. Solis Horowitz
argues that IMTFE had an American bias: unlike
the Nuremberg trials, there was only a single prosecution
team, led by an American, although the members of the
tribunal represented eleven different Allied countries.
The IMTFE had less official support than the Nuremberg
trials. Keenan, a former U.S. assistant attorney general,
had a much lower position than Nuremberg's Robert H.
Jackson, a justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Justice
Jaranilla had been captured by the Japanese and walked
the Bataan Death March. The defense sought to remove
him from the bench claiming he would be unable to
maintain objectivity. The request was rejected but
Jaranilla did excuse himself from presentation of
evidence for atrocities in his native country of the
Philippines. Justice Radhabinod Pal argued that the
exclusion of Western colonialism and the atomic
bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from the list of
crimes and the lack of judges from the vanquished
nations on the bench signified the "failure of the Tribunal
to provide anything other than the opportunity for the
victors to retaliate". In this he was not alone among
Indian jurists, with one prominent Calcutta barrister
writing that the Tribunal was little more than "a sword in
a [judge's] wig."Justice Röling stated, "[o]f course, in
Japan we were all aware of the bombings and the
burnings of Tokyo and Yokohama and other big cities. It
was horrible that we went there for the purpose of
vindicating the laws of war, and yet saw every day how
the Allies had violated them dreadfully."However, in
respect to Pal and Röling's statement about the conduct
of air attacks, there was no positive or
specific customary international humanitarian law with
respect to aerial warfare before and during World War
II. Ben Bruce Blakeney, an American defense counsel for
Japanese defendants, argued that "[if] the killing
of Admiral Kidd by the bombing of Pearl Harbor is
murder, we know the name of the very man who[se]
hands loosed the atomic bomb on Hiroshima," although
Pearl Harbor was classified as a war crime under the1907
Hague Convention, as it happened without a declaration
of war and without a just cause for self-defense.
Prosecutors for Japanese war crimes once discussed
prosecuting Japanese pilots involved in the bombing of
Pearl Harbor for murder. However, they quickly dropped
the idea after realizing there was no international law
that protected neutral areas and nationals specifically
from attack by aircraft. Similarly, the indiscriminate
bombing of Chinese cities by Japanese Imperial forces
was never raised in the Tokyo Trials in fear of America
being accused of the same thing for its air attacks on
Japanese cities. As a result, Japanese pilots and officers
were not prosecuted for their aerial raids on Pearl
Harbor and cities in China and other Asian countries. [26]
Now we come to Indian National Army [INA]. The
number of INA troops captured by Commonwealth forces
by the end of the Burma Campaign made it necessary to
take a selective policy to charge those accused of the
worst allegations. The first of these was the joint trial
of Shah Nawaz Khan, Prem Sahgaland Gurubaksh Singh
Dhillon, followed by the trials of Abdul Rashid, Shinghara
Singh, Fateh Khan and Captain Malik Munawar Khan
Awan. The decision was made to hold a public trial, as
opposed to the earlier trials, and given the political
importance and significance of the trials; the decision
was made to hold these at the Red Fort. Also, due to the
complexity of the case, the provision was made under
the Indian Army Act rule 82(a) for counsels to appear for
defense and prosecution. The then Advocate General of
India, Sir Naushirwan P Engineer was appointed the
counsel for Prosecution. [27] The first trial, that of Shah
Nawaz Khan, Gurubaksh Singh Dhillon and Prem Sahgal
was held between November and December 1945
against the backdrop of general elections in India with
the Attorney General of India, Noshirwan P. Engineer as
the chief prosecutor and two dozen counsel for the
defense, led by Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru. All three of the
accused were charged with "waging war against the king
contrary to section 121 of the Indian Penal Code". In
addition, charges of murder were leveled against Dhillon
and of abetment to murder against Khan and Sahgal. [28]
The Second trial was against Abdul Rashid, Shinghara
Singh, Fateh Khan and Captain Munawar Khan. In light of
unrest over the charges of treason and glorification in
the first trial, the charges of treason were dropped. [29]
One of the fascinating facts is a copy of Nehru’s letter to
Atlee:
Movement]
13. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahU
KEwimr7C6867rAhXywTgGHV3BBksQFjACegQIERAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newdocs.de%2Fass
assinating-franco-resistance-against-a-dictator%2F&usg=AOvVaw2ivvCRGUdTDS_HXEeN4mXS
18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Events_leading_to_the_attack_on_Pearl_Harbor#Background_to_conf
20. http://www.pcf.city.hiroshima.jp/kids/KPSH_E/hiroshima_e/sadako_e/subcontents_e/12kidssengo_
21. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/apr/18/story-of-cities-hiroshima-japan-nuclear-
destruction [The Guardian: Hoe Hiroshima rose from ashes of nuclear destruction]
22. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hideki_Tojo#Arrest,_trial,_and_execution [Wikipedia: Hideki Tojo –
23. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Military_Tribunal_for_the_Far_East#Creation_of_the_c
ourt [Wikipedia: International Military Tribunal for the Far East – Creation of the Court]
24. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Military_Tribunal_for_the_Far_East#Tokyo_War_Crimes
_Trial [Wikipedia: International Military Tribunal for the Far East – Tokyo War Crimes]
26. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Military_Tribunal_for_the_Far_East#Judgment
30. http://www.netajipapers.gov.in/pdfjs/web/viewer.html?filename=content/prime-ministers-office-
31. http://netajipapers.gov.in/pdfjs/web/viewer.html?filename=content/ministry-external-affairs-
32. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/an-apology-fatally-devalued-by-the-passage-of-