Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 PCCC3 6 Rigby PDF
4 PCCC3 6 Rigby PDF
4 PCCC3 6 Rigby PDF
years
Project DE‐FE0007453
Sean T. Rigby, BASF Corporation
September 09 2015
September 09, 2015
Regina, SK
1
150 years
Ammonia, Syngas
green Biogas
2
150 years
Before 1971:
Use of MEA, DEA & Benfield Now:
for acid gas removal 390+ Reference plants in operation
80+ Plants under design/construction
1971: 15 BASF plants in operation
1st OASE® application in (own experience)
BASF plant
1972 – 1981: 1997:
9 BASF synthesis
th i gas plants
l t 1st LNG customer
(NH3, H2, CO)
1982:
Started OASE® process
licensing
3
150 years
BASF
S / Linde Partnership
Delivers Total Solutions
4
150 years
Project Budget :
DOE
O funding
f and cost share
(Amended Aug 2014)
Budget Period 1 Budget Period 2 Budget Period 3 Total
Source Dec 2011 – Feb Mar 2013 – Aug Sep 2014 – Aug 2016
2013 2014 Operate
p & Test
Design & Engineer Procure & Build
DOE Funding $2,670,173 $11,188,501 $2,360,173 $16,218,847
6
150 years
Project Objectives
Overall Objective
Demonstrate Linde-BASF post combustion capture technology by incorporating
BASF’s amine-based solvent process in a 1 MWel slipstream pilot plant and
achieving at least 90% capture from a coal-derived flue gas while demonstrating
significant progress toward achievement of DOE target of less than 35% increase
in levelized cost of electricity (LCOE)
Specific Objectives
Complete a techno-economic assessment of a 550 MWel power plant
incorporating the Linde-BASF post-combustion CO2 capture technology to
illustrate the benefits
Design, build and operate the 1MWel pilot plant at a coal-fired power plant host
site
i providing
idi theh flflue gas as a slipstream
li
Implement parametric tests to demonstrate the achievement of target performance
using data analysis
Implement
I l t long
l d
duration
ti tests
t t tot demonstrate
d t t solvent
l t stability
t bilit and
d obtain
bt i critical
iti l
data for scale-up and commercial application
7
BASF OASE® blue Technology 150 years
Development
Adopted and optimized for PCC
applications
8
150 years
Niederaussem Pilot
Plant: Operations
and test results
Note: Specific energy above is intrinsic and does not include process or heat integration 9
150 years
Linde-BASF novel amine-
b
basedd PCC ttechnology
h l
features: NCCC 1 MWe pilot
Treated flue gas
Optimized Blower
Concept CO2
Make-up water
Condenser
Advanced emission
control system Absorber Desorber
Higher Des. Pres.
Interstage
High capacity Cooler Gravity Flow
structured packing Interstage Cooler
Steam
Reboiler
Unique reboier
Optimized Energy
design
Consumption Solvent Tank
DOE‐NETL funding: DE‐FE0007453 10
150 years
Linde-BASF PCC Plant
D i for
Design f 550 MWe
MW PC
Power Plant
40-50% reduced
plot area to 180m x
120 m
11
150 years
Key Budget Period 1 (Design &
Engineer) Project Milestones
Successfully Completed
■ Complete purchase orders and fabrication contracts for the 1 MWe pilot
plant (06/30/2013) √
■ M
Mechanical
h i l completion
l ti off 1 MW
MWe pilot
il t plant
l t att NCCC (05/28/2014) –
Completed 7/18/2014√
13
150 years
14
150 years
Mechanical Completion
and Commissioning
Linde-BASF 1 MWe pilot plant at the NCCC
Mechanical completion of the 1
MWe pilot plant achieved : July,
2014
p safety
Pre-start up y review and
comprehensive system installation
checks against P&ID and design
intent performed to identify issues
to address prior to start up
M
Machine
hi start-up
t t and
d water
t
recirculation tests were performed
in August 2014 to establish
functionality and operability of
system components.
15
150 years
16
150 years
01/16/15 to
Flue Gas 1957 81.5
08/10/15
01/16/15 to
Steam 3025 126
08/10/15
01/16/15 to
01/16/15 to
Solvent Circulation 3674 153
08/10/15
17
150 years
18
150 years
Flue gas flow rate to the
pilot
il t plant
l t is
i typically
t i ll very
steady
19
Flue gas composition (11.5% CO2; 150 years
7.6%
6% OO2)) typ
typically
ca y steady but
showed variations from time to
time ( +0.6% )
20
150 years
Pilot plant set up and
operations: Overall mass
balance closures were excellent
Overall Mass Balance (dry basis)
Time/Date Interval Average Mass Flow In (lb/hr) Average Mass Flow Out (lb/hr) % Difference
03/15/15 21:10:00 to
03/16/15 11:30:00 10180.02 10234.55 0.53%
CO2 Mass Balance
Average CO2 Mass Flow In Average CO2 Mass Flow Out
Time/Date Interval (lb/hr) (lb/hr) % Difference
03/15/15 21:10:00 to
03/16/15 11:30:00 1729.01 1716.15 0.75%
CO2 Production Mass Flowrate vs. CO2 Content Solvent Analysis
CO2 Product
(lb/hr)
(lb/hr) CO2 Product
CO2 Product (lb/hr)
Time/Date Interval (calc. from solvent analysis) (measured) % Difference
03/13/15 06:00:00 to
03/13/15 07:30:00 2348.66 2332.53 0.69% 21
150 years
Water balance has an effect
on the
th overall
ll mass and
d CO2
balance closures
Overall Mass Balance (dry basis)
Time/Date Interval Average Mass Flow In (lb/hr) Average Mass Flow Out (lb/hr) % Difference
05/30/15 00:00:00 to
05/30/15 02:00:00 14802.36 14409.53 2.65
CO2 Mass Balance
Average CO2 Mass Flow In Average CO2 Mass Flow Out
Time/Date Interval (lb/hr) (lb/hr) % Difference
05/30/15 00:00:00 to
/ /
05/30/15 02:00:00 2481.01 2453.03 1.13
CO2 P d ti M
CO2 Production Mass Flowrate vs. CO2 Content Solvent Analysis
Fl t CO2 C t t S l t A l i
CO2 Product CO2 Product (lb/hr)
(lb/hr) (measured)
Time/Date Interval ((calc. from solvent analysis)
y ) % Difference
05/30/15 00:00:00 to
05/30/15 02:00:00 2369.06 2236.91 5.58
22
150 years
Specific energy consumption
vs Solvent circulation rate (comparison
with MEA and OASE® blue results from
Niederaussem)
Test conditions:
‐ Flue gas flow
Rate = 10,500 lb/hr
Rate 10,500 lb/hr
‐ Flue gas CO2
Concentration = 11.6%
‐ Regenerator
Pressure = 2 bar a
‐ Flue gas to absorber
Temperature = 35oC
‐ CO2 Capture rate = 90%
C t t 90%
(target)
23
150 years
Pilot plant performance
against
i t targets:
t t Initial
I iti l
accomplishments and plans
Performance Attribute Current achievement against Remarks
target
1. CO2 capture rate >90% per target Achieved. Optimized for specific
energy.
2. CO2 purity 99.9% dry basis per target Achieved. Low O2 impurity level for
EOR applications
3 Pl
3. Plantt capacity
it > 1.5
1 5 MWe
MW per design
d i ttargett Achieved.
A hi d Hi
Higher
h capacity
it ttesting
ti
(>15,500 lbs/hr flue gas) performed ~10 days in May-June
4. Regenerator steam ~ 2.8 GJ/tonne CO2 (same as Energy optimization planned during
consumption Niederaussem consumption) next parametric test campaign.
campaign
5. Emissions control Validation of dry bed (BASF Further emissions control
validation patented) operation per design optimization during next campaign
6. Regenerator
6 Currently 2 bara compared with 3 3 bar tests initiated current campaign;
operating pressure bara target more in next
7. Validation of unique (i) high capacity packing, Optimization of lean-rich heat
features ((ii)) gravity
g y driven intercooler, exchanger
g for energygy reduction
(iii) blower downstream of abs. during next campaign
(iv) unique reboiler design.
Note: Regenerator steam consumption above is intrinsic and does not include process and heat integration
24
150 years
26
150 years
27
150 years
Acknowledgements
US-DOE: Andrew Jones
Acknowledgement: This presentation is based on work supported by the Department of Energy under
Award Number DE-FE0007453.
Disclaimer: “This presentation was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the
United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of
their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or
responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or
process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference
herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark,
manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation,
or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of
authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or
any agency thereof.”
28
150 years
150 years
years
Project DE‐FE0007453
PCCC3 and SaskPower Symposium
Sean T. Rigby, BASF Corporation
Sean T. Rigby, BASF Corporation
September 09, 2015
Regina, SK
29
150 years
30
150 years
Linde, a fully integrated gases and
engineering
i i company with ith a long
l
experience in the field of CO2 handling
CO2 Capture
C t and
d iinjection
j ti CO2 Wash
W h Units
U it
LNG plant for Statoil in Experience in design
Snøhvit/Norway with and erection of different
CO2 capture from wash processes for CO2
natural gas using removal
OASE® purple and CO2 • Linde-Rectisol®
re-injection off-shore • BASF OASE® technology
• Benfield
31