Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 40, NO.

4, JULY 2004 2673

Examination of Electromagnetic Inspection of Surface


Hardness: 3-D Nonlinear FEM Analysis Considering
Nonuniform Permeability and Conductivity
Yuji Gotoh and Norio Takahashi, Fellow, IEEE

Abstract—The inspection of surface hardness of the hardened


steel is important in keeping the quality of automobile parts, etc.
The permeability of hardened steel decreases when the hardness is
increased. Therefore, the surface hardness evaluation is possible
by detecting the difference of the magnetic characteristic using
the electromagnetic inspection method. However, the surface hard-
ness inspection is not easy, because the relative permeability and
conductivity of the hardened steel are usually nonuniform com-
pared with that of the normal steel. In this paper, the technique for
reducing the effect of the nonuniformity of the permeability and
the conductivity on the large magnetic noise, and measuring the
surface hardness is examined using three-dimensional edge-based
hexahedral finite element method. In addition, the experimental Fig. 1. Magnetization curves of hardened and normal steels [HV: Vickers
verification is also carried out. hardness (unit of hardness)].
Index Terms—Finite element method (FEM), surface hardened
steel, three-dimensional (3-D) nondestructive inspection. (3-D) edge-based hexahedral finite element method (FEM) [1],
and the experimental verification is also shown.
I. INTRODUCTION II. MEASUREMENT OF INITIAL MAGNETIZATION CURVE AND

T HE INDUCTION hardening method is used for the ex-


tensive manufacture line of automobile parts, etc. The in-
spection of surface hardness of the hardened steel is important
CONDUCTIVITY OF HARDENED STEEL
A. Measurement of Initial Magnetization Curve
in keeping the quality of machine parts, etc. The permeability of A carbon steel S45C is examined. Fig. 1 shows the magne-
hardened steel decreases when the hardness is increased. There- tization curves of hardened steel and normal steel. The perme-
fore, the surface hardness evaluation is possible by detecting the ability of hardened steel is smaller than that of the normal steel.
difference of the magnetic characteristic using the electromag- Fig. 2 shows the electromagnet for measuring the nonuniformity
netic inspection. However, the inspection is not easy, because of permeability in a hardened steel. A column specimen (diam-
the permeability and the conductivity of the hardened steel are eter:9 mm, length:180 mm) is put between pole pieces. The flux
usually nonuniform compared with that of the normal steel. As density in the hardened steel is measured using a search coil, and
a result, the electromagnetic inspection has a magnetic noise. the magnetic field is measured using the transverse type Hall
In this paper, the nondestructive inspection method of the sur- probe. The search coil and the Hall probe are moved in the di-
face hardness of hardened material by applying the alternating rection, and the nonuniformity of permeability in hardened steel
magnetic field is investigated. The initial magnetization curves is measured. Fig. 3 shows the maximum nonuniformity of per-
and conductivities of hardened steels of various kinds of hard- meability of the hardened steel.
ness are measured. The nonuniformity of conductivity of the The dispersion rate of relative permeability is defined
hardened steel is not controlled by the impressed magnetic field. by
However, the nonuniformity of permeability is reduced when
the exciting magnetic field is increased. It is shown that the rate (1)
of change of flux density by the hardness is large when the per-
meability becomes the maximum. The appropriate flux density The figure denotes that the nonuniformity of perme-
to detect the surface hardness is examined by three-dimensional ability is increased when the hardness is increased. However,
when the magnetic field is increased, is decreased, because
Manuscript received October 16, 2003. the direction of each magnetic moment becomes nearly the
Y. Gotoh is with Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,
Kurume National College of Technology, Fukuoka 830-8555, Japan (e-mail: same.
gotou@kurume-nct.ac.jp).
N. Takahashi is with Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, B. Measurement of Conductivity
Okayama University, Okayma 700-8530, Japan (e-mail: norio@elec.okayama-
u.ac.jp). The nonuniformity of conductivity is measured using column
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TMAG.2004.829193 specimens (0 50 mm) having various hardness. A coil is
0018-9464/04$20.00 © 2004 IEEE

Authorized licensed use limited to: Velammal Engineering College. Downloaded on September 30, 2009 at 02:32 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2674 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 40, NO. 4, JULY 2004

yoke having the exciting coil. The frequency is 1 kHz. The flux
and eddy current are analyzed taking account of the nonlin-
earity of hardened steel. The time interval of the step-by-step
method is chosen as s. The ferrite is assumed to be
linear (relative permeability: 3000), and the eddy current in it is
neglected. The conditions of calculation and measurement are
shown in Table I.

B. Modeling of Nonuniform Initial Magnetization Curve and


Fig. 2. Electromagnet for measuring magnetic noise. Conductivity
The magnetization curve (Fig. 1) and conductivity (Fig. 4)
at various hardness are used for 3-D nonlinear FEM. For ex-
ample, the magnetization curves of hardness 700 HV are shown
in Fig. 6. Twenty magnetization curves with the initial perme-
ability in a 28% range are created. A curve is chosen at random
among twenty magnetization curves following normal random
number (standard deviation: 5) [2], and the selected curve is
given in each finite element in the hardened region.
Similarly, the conductivity is generated according to a normal
random number [standard deviation: ] [2] within the
Fig. 3. Dispersion rate " of permeability of each hardened steel (measured).
range between and S/m.

IV. INVESTIGATION OF INSPECTION OF SURFACE HARDNESS


A. Effect of Nonuniformity of Permeability and Conductivity
The nonuniformity of flux density in a search coil is estimated
by calculation. The movement of yoke is simulated by shifting
the permeability and conductivity inside the hardened area in
the direction by 1-mm step. The steel of hardness 700 HV
with the largest nonuniformity of permeability and conductivity
is used for investigation. Fig. 7 shows the calculated results of
flux density in a search coil when the exciting coil is moved.
The dispersion rate of flux density is defined by
each
(2)

Fig. 4. Dispersion of conductivity and relative permeability of each hardened The figure denotes that is reduced when the magnetizing
steel (45 Hz). current is increased. However, stays within a 0.3% range at
1 A. Fig. 8 shows the calculated results of at 1 kHz and 0.5 A.
wound around the center of each hardened steel, and this is The curve (a) denotes that both permeability and conductivity
moved by 1 mm pitch, and ac field (45 Hz) is applied. The are nonuniform. The curves (b) and (c) denote that only con-
impedance of the coil is measured using an LCR meter. On ductivity or only permeability is nonuniform. The figure denotes
the other hand, the impedance is calculated for various kinds of that the dispersion is mainly affected by only the nonunifor-
conductivity and permeability using 3-D axis-symmetric FEM. mity of conductivity.
Then, the nonuniformity of the conductivity and permeability in
hardened steel is evaluated using the calculated and measured B. Effect of AmpereTurns on Change of Flux Density
results of impedance of the coil. Fig. 9 shows the effect of surface hardness on the change of
Fig. 4 shows the calculated results of amplitude and phase flux density in a search coil. is the average value which
angle of impedance. The figure denotes that the nonuniformity is obtained by moving the yoke along the surface of steel. The
of conductivity and permeability is increased with the increase change of flux density is defined by
of hardness.
(3)
III. INSPECTION METHOD AND MODELING OF NONUNIFORM
MATERIAL CHARACTERISTIC
where (245 HV) denotes the absolute value of flux density at
A. Inspection Method the hardness of 245 HV. When the magnetizing current is 0.5 A,
Fig. 5 shows a model of surface hardness inspection of hard- the change of due to the surface hardness becomes maximum.
ened steel. The hardened steel is magnetized using the ferrite As the measured and calculated values are in good agreement

Authorized licensed use limited to: Velammal Engineering College. Downloaded on September 30, 2009 at 02:32 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
GOTOH AND TAKAHASHI: EXAMINATION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC INSPECTION OF SURFACE HARDNESS 2675

(a) (b)
Fig. 5. Model for surface hardness inspection (1/2 domain). (a) x 0 z plane and (b) x 0 y plane.

TABLE I
CONDITIONS OF CALCULATION AND MEASUREMENT

Fig. 8. Effect of nonuniformity of conductivity (1 kHz, 0.5 A, 700 HV,


calculated).

Fig. 6. Example of dispersion of H-r curves (700 HV)

Fig. 9. Effect of ampere-turns on change of flux density (1 kHz).

conductivity, there is a possibility to use the proposed inspection


method in the practical application.

V. CONCLUSION
The results obtained are summarized as follows.
1) When the hardness is increased, the permeability is de-
Fig. 7. Effect of exciting current (1 kHz, 700 HV, calculated). creased and the nonuniformity of permeability and con-
ductivity is increased. When the steel is saturated, the per-
and also due to the limitation of power source, the only mea- meability of various kinds of hardness becomes nearly
surement under 0.5 A is shown. We checked by experiment that constant.
becomes maximum at nearly 0.5 A. When the magnetizing 2) If the magnetic field that reduces the nonuniformity of the
current exceeds 0.5 A, the change of by the surface hardness permeability in hardened steel is applied, the nondestruc-
becomes small, because the change of permeability due to hard- tive inspection of surface hardness is possible.
ness in decreased.
In the practical inspection, hardness between 600 and 700 HV REFERENCES
is usually examined. When 0.5 A is impressed, the change of [1] Y. Gotoh and N. Takahashi, “3-D nonlinear eddy current analysis of al-
is about 8%. On the other hand, of a search coil has magnetic ternating flux leakage testing-analysis of one crack and two cracks,”
IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 38, pp. 1209–1212, Mar. 2002.
noise of 0.3% due to the nonuniformity of conductivity. As the [2] W. H. Press et al., Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN (Second Edi-
change of due to hardness is larger than the noise due to tion). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992.

Authorized licensed use limited to: Velammal Engineering College. Downloaded on September 30, 2009 at 02:32 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like