Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How To Write A Quality Manual According To ISO/IEC 17025 2017
How To Write A Quality Manual According To ISO/IEC 17025 2017
ISO 17025 has not set a format on how to write a quality manual. However,
laboratories should develop a quality manual because it defines their Quality
Management System and the procedures which implement it.
There are accreditation bodies that provide guidance and format in creating a
quality manual document. The risk is that the manual could veer away from your
laboratory’s ideas and point of view. On the bright side, assessors could easily
understand this format.
Keep in mind that the basis for all audits and assessments of the quality system will
be based on the contents of your laboratory’s quality manual and the documents to
which it refers.
The quality manual should describe the system as it is
operated.
The quality manual should be a working document.
The quality manual should not be a description of an ideal world.
In the context of quality management, this may involve giving a quality manager
authority on quality matters over a line management superior. The superior, in
supporting the quality policy, should respect this authority.
The quality manual will need to give an alternative, such as
a deputy or another point of reference when a post holder or a
member who has a responsibility is not available.
Your laboratory must provide a statement that all
responsibilities ultimately revert to the laboratory manager who
may delegate them again if necessary.
The laboratory should always try to ensure that the
laboratory manager and his or her deputy are never
unavailable at the same time.
Provide Flexibility When Writing a Quality Manual
QSE Academy reminds laboratories to be careful in writing a quality manual
by creating policies or procedures that are bound to fail. However, flexibility
should still be within the limits of the standard.
For instance, your laboratory may describe preferred courses of action while
allowing alternatives under defined circumstances, but there should be clarity
about who has the authority to approve the alternative action.
Another case is when a supplier policy states that alternatives may be used where
the goods are not available from preferred suppliers who are ISO 9001 certified.
Furthermore, the quality manager may approve the use of an alternative if the
goods are checked before their usage.
What to Avoid
Writing a complex documentation structure, which is difficult
to maintain.
Duplicating information across various documents because it
is hard to ensure that versions in the different documents
remain consistent and are all maintained together.
Committing to anything beyond the standard, even if you
intend to go beyond the standard.
Remember…
An assessment will be against your laboratory’s quality documentation in addition
to the standard. This means your laboratory will still have a non-conformance if
you fail to meet a commitment in your documentation that goes beyond the
requirements of the standard, even if what you are doing is within the standard.
For instance, ISO/IEC 17025 requires an annual review of the quality system. If
your laboratory were to enter a commitment to a six-monthly review in your
quality manual, but what you do is review annually, you would be meeting the
standard but would still have a non-conformance against your documentation.
Therefore, the quality manual should indicate that your laboratory will review ‘at
least annually’. In this way, your laboratory gets the flexibility and conformance
with the standard. However, it is not necessary that the information included
appearing explicitly in the manual since subsidiary documentation can be used
and referred to.
In the next parts of this post, QSE Academy explains each part of a suggested
outline for a quality manual that describes an ISO/IEC 17025 compliant
system to ensure your laboratory won’t experience the example provided
above.
ISO/IEC 17025 requires the most senior management body for the laboratory to
create this section. This part must be at the level where decisions on resource
allocation are made.
It contains:
1. Commitment to good professional practice.
2. Commitment to impartiality.
3. Commitment to confidentiality.
4. Commitment to a quality management system based on
ISO/IEC 17025.
5. Commitment to provide resources to support this level of
quality.
Accreditation bodies insist on a single level of service since, otherwise, a
laboratory might use its accreditation to attract the work and then offer an inferior
and cheaper service. Yet, it is possible to be accredited for the same calibration or
test to various levels of accuracy, but it is difficult to see any advantage in this in
most cases.
The policy statement should be comprised of the name, position, and signature of
the senior management body. The chief executive is the ideal person for this task
because he or she will explicitly give authority to the quality manager and
laboratory manager to implement and operate the quality system.
Finally, this section obliges all personnel to familiarise themselves with the quality
documentation and to follow its requirements.
This area requires each level of staff to be described, with an outline of the level of
experience and qualifications. It aims to set a minimum acceptable level of
expertise at each level, which the laboratory undertakes to maintain. Although, the
description should provide flexibility to hire employees with specialized but
narrow capabilities, where required.
Likewise, your laboratory must create a statement of the policy on the use of
employees undergoing training and a requirement for their direct supervision.
In line with ISO/IEC 17025, the organization and management must establish the
supervisory requirements at each grade. For instance, an assistant chemist must
always work under the direct supervision of a chemist or higher, and the limits of
authority and responsibility of each grade should be clearly explained.
Bear in mind that the reference should be made to the staff records or equivalent
source as containing a list of the current post holders.
Approved signatories
This part identifies precisely, either by name, seniority or post, the individuals who
are authorized to take responsibility for the data of your laboratory. Their job
contains authorizing the release of work and signing calibration or test certificates.
Acceptance of work
This section must clarify exactly who may accept work and commit the laboratory
to the delivery date. Also, the formal contract review process can be outlined here.
Quality documentation
This area determines the structure of the quality documentation. This will
traditionally be a hierarchy, headed by the quality manual, which refers to the
methods manual or equivalent technical and other procedural documentation.
Document and Record Control Procedure (Clauses 8.2.1, 8.3
& 8.4)
Quality Policy (Clauses 8.2.1 & 8.2.2)
Competence, Training and Awareness Procedure (Clause
6.2.5)
Addressing Risks and Opportunities Procedure (Clauses
8.5.2 & 8.5.3)
Externally Provided Products and Services Procedure (Clause
6.6.2)
Facilities and Environment Procedure (Clause 6.3)
Equipment and Calibration Procedure (Clauses 6.4.3 & 6.5)
Customer Service Procedure (Clauses 7.1.1 & 8.6)
Test and Calibration Method Procedure (Clauses 7.2.1 &
7.2.2)
Quality Assurance Procedure (Clauses 7.7.1 – 7.7.3)
Sampling Procedure (Clauses 7.3, 7.5 & 7.8.5, applicable
only to laboratories that do sampling)
Handling of Laboratory Test or Calibration Items Procedure
(Clause 7.4)
Complaint, Nonconformity and Corrective Action Procedure
(Clauses 7.9 – 7.10 & 8.7)
Testing Report Procedure (Clauses 7.8.2 & 7.8.3, applicable
to testing laboratories that write test reports)
Calibration Report and Certificate Requirements Procedure
(Clauses 7.8.2 and 7.8.4, applicable to calibration laboratories
that write calibration certificates)
Internal Audit Procedure (Clause 8.8.2)
Management Review Procedure (Clause 8.9)
List of Internal and External Documents (Clauses 8.2.4 &
8.3.1)
List of Types of Records (Clause 8.4)
Registry of Records for Detention/Central Archive (Clauses
8.3.2f & 8.4.1)
Quality Objectives (Clauses 8.2.1 & 8.2.2)
Training Program (Clause 6.2.3)
Training Record and Performance Monitoring (Clause 6.2.2)
Record of Attendance (Clause 6.2.2)
Approval and Authorization Record (Clauses 5.6 & 6.2.5e)
Supplier Evaluation and Approval Record (Clause 6.6.2a)
List of Approved Suppliers of Products and Services (Clause
6.6.2a)
Record of Laboratory Environmental Controls (Clause 6.3.3)
List of Laboratory Equipment (Clause 6.4.13a)
Calibrated Equipment Record (Clause 6.4.13a)
Calibration Record (Clause 6.4.13e)
Equipment Maintenance Record (Clause 6.4.13g)
Customer Order Review (Clause 7.1.1a)
Report of Customer Satisfaction (Clause 8.6.2)
Method Verification, Validation and Development Record
(Clauses 7.2.1 & 7.2.2)
Sampling Plan (Clause 7.3.1) (as applicable)
Sampling Report (Clause 7.3.3) (as applicable)
Corrective Action Report (Clause 8.7.3)
Complaint, Nonconformity and Corrective Action Report Log
(Clause 8.7.3)
Measurement Uncertainty Record (Clause 7.6.3)
Audit Nonconformity Report (Clause 8.8.2d)
Internal Audit Report (Clause 8.8.2e)
Management Review Record (Clause 8.9.2)
Similar to the other sections of the suggested outline, employees must be instructed
to abide by the documented procedures. Staff unwittingly deviating from
documented procedures should inform the laboratory manager, who must conclude
whether the quality is compromised and what action to take.
Validation of methods
This segment should specify the laboratory’s policy to use globally recognized
methods wherever possible, enhanced by completely documented and validated
internal processes.
Moreover, writing a thorough quality manual means containing or referring to a list
of typical sources for methods appropriate to the scope of activities of your
laboratory.
To comply with ISO/IEC 17025 standards, an outline of the format for in-house
documented methods should be provided. Similarly, the procedure for the
withdrawal or amendment of a method must be described.
To make sure your laboratory’s quality manual complies with ISO/IEC 17025, this
part should detail the major items of equipment that you operate and the reference
standards held. This can be expounded in general terms and references made to the
equipment logs as a full inventory.
Metrological traceability
In your quality manual, this section ensures your laboratory has a statement of the
policy to achieve traceability of all measurements by the use of traceable standards
of measurement and certified reference materials.
Uncertainty of measurement
It should entail:
A description of procedures to be used at the initial
validation of methods.
A description of the laboratory manager’s responsibility for
updating the information based on QC data.
Guidance on the general policy of the laboratory on the
frequency of running QC samples, spikes, and duplicates.
Quality control
To be able to write a quality manual that complies with ISO/IEC 17025, your
laboratory must create a general statement on which level of individuals or staff are
allowed to judge whether results meet quality control criteria.
The statement should cover:
Reference to the fact that methods documentation contains
information on the quality control data to be collected and the
criteria to be applied.
The general laboratory manager’s responsibility to monitor
and act upon quality control data.
A commitment to interlaboratory proficiency checking exercises
and/or measurement audits.
A list of such exercises in which the laboratory typically
participates.
QSE Academy reminds us that this part must ensure your laboratory follows a
procedure in the case of a suspicion that faulty data has been released.
1. This usually requires your quality manager to conduct a
probe and an audit. It may also require corrective action.
2. Your laboratory’s policy must inform clients as soon as
possible of suspect data.
3. Your laboratory’s commitment to check the data.
4. Your laboratory’s commitment to issue an amended report,
if necessary.
When writing a quality manual with ISO/IEC 17025 standards in mind, your
laboratory must provide a complete description of the following:
Procedures for receiving, storing, and recording samples
Sample numbering and labeling
Allocation of work
Recording of results
Quality checking of results
Preparation of reports
Issuing reports
QSE Academy’s toolkits and services can help your laboratory describe in a
systematic way how samples and results are managed.
We advise that your laboratory become aware of how the client’s requirements are
communicated to the bench workers and how the bench workers pass the results
back to the reporting process.
Recording of results
This section must explain the use of notebooks and/or worksheets. Likewise, your
laboratory must indicate instructions on the use of ink and the way of making
corrections.
In writing this area of the quality manual following ISO/IEC 17025, your
laboratory must identify:
The policy on the length of time samples is kept.
The policy on disposal.
The commitment to the responsible disposal of toxic
materials.
Records
This segment covers the laboratory policy on the retention of records, as well as
the procedure to be followed in the disposal of records.
This should establish who may authorize disposal and require that an inventory be
kept of the records disposed of.
Your laboratory must state the policy on the security of records, including
computer data and the person responsible for archiving and computer back-up.
Reporting of results
Your laboratory must provide the minimum requirement for the contents of a
report (see section 13.2) and include an example of the preferred layout.
Besides, your laboratory must set out the procedure for retaining confidentiality
when reporting results other than by post. In the case of amendments, your
laboratory can produce a statement that this can only be done by the issue of a
completely new version with an endorsement such as ‘Amendment to Certificate
No…….’
To ease your laboratory’s concerns, QSE Academy’s toolkits can assist you in describing the
system for dealing with incidences of nonconforming work and internally detected quality
problems.
Confidentiality
This means staff must be instructed to take all reasonable precautions to keep the
client’s data and other information confidential. Similarly, no such information is
left out in the laboratory overnight or in an unattended room.
In this area of the quality manual, your laboratory must write the operation of the
staff records, including their use for recording new staff and changes in the training
or status of existing staff.
Hence, staff should be instructed of their responsibility to carry out only operations
for which they are authorized. It should also clearly instruct that staff is entitled to
refuse to do work for which they are not authorized.
Corrective action
Likewise, you must describe the facilities provided to ensure necessary segregation
if there are activities conducted by your laboratory that are incompatible.
Security of premises
Writing a quality manual in line with ISO/IEC 17025 requires this section to
describe the arrangements for the security of the premises during and outside
working hours.
This must also identify the persons authorized to hold keys, establish the procedure
for granting authorization, and determine the person with overall responsibility for
security.
Appendices
Finally, for your quality manual to comply with ISO/IEC 17025 standards, there
should be appendices covering a list of the scope of accreditation held or applied
for, as well as a list of holders of the quality manual.
This area must also identify a list of all controlled documents and subsidiary
documentation together with their scope of issue or storage locations.
It must incorporate examples of recording quality issues like client complaints,
audits, and corrective and preventive actions. An example of your laboratory’s
proposed report format should be accounted for.