The document provides a formalist analysis of the short story "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant. It analyzes the necklace itself as a key symbol in the story. The necklace, though beautiful, was actually worthless, symbolizing the main character Mathilde's obsession with her own beauty and perceived wealth, even though she has no real worth or ability to be independent. Both Mathilde and the necklace are deceptive, appearing more valuable than they truly are. This formalist reading relies solely on analyzing symbols and themes within the text itself, without needing context of the author or time period.
The document provides a formalist analysis of the short story "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant. It analyzes the necklace itself as a key symbol in the story. The necklace, though beautiful, was actually worthless, symbolizing the main character Mathilde's obsession with her own beauty and perceived wealth, even though she has no real worth or ability to be independent. Both Mathilde and the necklace are deceptive, appearing more valuable than they truly are. This formalist reading relies solely on analyzing symbols and themes within the text itself, without needing context of the author or time period.
The document provides a formalist analysis of the short story "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant. It analyzes the necklace itself as a key symbol in the story. The necklace, though beautiful, was actually worthless, symbolizing the main character Mathilde's obsession with her own beauty and perceived wealth, even though she has no real worth or ability to be independent. Both Mathilde and the necklace are deceptive, appearing more valuable than they truly are. This formalist reading relies solely on analyzing symbols and themes within the text itself, without needing context of the author or time period.
The Necklace be able to analysis from the formalist perspective because of
the deeply meaningful symbols referenced in the story. The necklace itself, for which the story was named, is a deeply meaningful symbol. The assumption that the necklace is more than simply a necklace, but a deeply meaningful symbol that gives insight into the deeper meaning. The assumption that symbols that appear in a story are important to understanding the overall meaning of a story can be applied to a formalist reading of The Necklace. In The Necklace, the necklace that Mathilde borrowed is a key symbol in interpreting the meaning of the story.
From a formalist perspective, the symbol of the necklace the is key to
interpreting the story. The necklace, though it appeared beautiful and very valuable, was actually worthless. The necklace symbolizes the main character, Mathilde’s, obsession with her own beauty and being perceived as wealthy. Like the necklace, Mathilde is beautiful, but she doesn’t have much worth as a person. She wasn’t born into a wealth family, as she tries to appear, and she doesn’t have any skills that would allow her to be independent without needing a husband. She was deceived by Madame Forestier into believing that the necklace was valuable in the same way she deceived her husband into sacrificing everything for her.
The Necklace can easily be interpreted from a formalist perspective if the
reader becomes familiar with common everyday objects that appear in the story and view the necklace itself as a symbol of the main character’s place in society. Both Mathilde and the necklace are beautiful, but neither has the monetary worth they appear to have. This interpretation is based entirely on the content and language of the story and doesn’t require the reader to be familiar with the author’s life or other works, or with the society and time period in which it was written. This formalist interpretation stands on its own and relies on the text itself.