Goal: Increase student achievement and learning

Bench Bench
Indicator Data Source Type Time GL 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
10-11 11-12
Objective 1.1: Students will meet state proficiency standards (NCLB).
Math ARMT: Lvl 3/4 % Fall 3 73 78 80 86 84 89
4 72 84 68 85 83 89
5 82 79 88 72 82 88
Reading ARMT: Lvl 3/4 % Fall 3 83 88 84 92 88 92
4 86 88 83 91 86 91
5 90 96 86 86 88 92
AYP Attendance rate % Fall K-8
Additional (year)
Academic 98 98 97 94 95 95
Indicators

AYP Clear School Y / N Fall 3-5 y y y y y y

Objective 1.2: Students will excel in national benchmarks of academic achievement.
Math Stanford 10th NPR Fall 3 56 59 59 69 60 61
4 55 70 57 71 58 59
5 66 67 71 57 72 73
Reading DIBELS: Low Risk % Fall K 78 92 80 69 81 82
/ Established
1 83 98 80 77 81 82
2 73 91 76 79 77 78
Stanford 10th NPR Fall 3 55 54 52 65 53 54
4 65 67 61 68 62 63
5 64 68 65 60 66 67
Science Ala Science % Fall 5
Assmt: Lvl. 3/4 na 73 76 73 77 78
Writing ADAW (Holistic): % Fall 5
Lvl 3/4 73 72 73 73 74 75

1.3: Students will be prepared for acceptance and success in their college and/or career of
Objective
choice.
Objective 1.4: At-risk students will make progress toward achieving standards.
Struggling More than 1 year % pop Fall K-5 na na 9 18 8 7
Readers below grade level
Spring K-5 na na 6 14 5 4
Struggling More than 1 year % pop Fall K-5 na na na 19 na na
Math below grade level
Spring K-5 na na 17* 11 16* 15*
English ACCESS (ELL at % ELL Spring K 80 82 85 100% 84 83
Language Levels 1-2) pop
1 14 20 20 34% 19 18
Learners
2 22 8 25 8% 24 23
3 0 0 10 40% 9 8
4 0 17 11 0% 10 11
5 13 0 0 0% 0 0
AYP Asian / White % diff in Fall 3-5 -1.22 2.12 2.12 2.65
Achievement AYP
Black / White 3-5 12.22 5.14 10.01 9.82
Gaps (ARMT prof
& AHSGE): Hispanic / White index 3-5 6.02 10.25 4.46 10.37
Reading Special Ed / 3-5 26.17 14.74 21.91 24.42
Regular Ed
ELL / Non-ELL 3-5 4.82 8.20 7.52 7.69
Poverty / Non- 3-5
Poverty 6.66 8.58 10.88 9.19
AYP Asian / White % diff in Fall 3-5 5.23 -0.94 1.57 -0.55
Achievement AYP
Gaps (ARMT prof
& AHSGE): index
Math
AYP % diff in Fall
Achievement AYP
Gaps (ARMT Black / White prof 3-5 22.48 14.85 16.49 14.91
& AHSGE): Hispanic / White index 3-5 21.79 9.1 12.0 9.3
Math
Special Ed / 3-5 35.07 25.29 21.62 30.52
Regular Ed
ELL / Non-ELL 3-5 11.12 9.61 6.45 2.57
Poverty / Non- 3-5 16.17 16.25 11.69 10.90
Poverty
 Notes

AMO for 10-11 = 84

AMO for 10-11 = 83
AMO for 10-11 = 82
AMO for 10-11 = 88
AMO for 10-11 = 86
AMO for 10-11 = 88

ment.

llege and/or career of

Lower # is better

Lower # is better

Lower # is better

Lower # is better

Lower # is better
 HCS Balanced Scorecard
2009-10
Strategic Goal # 2 Trace Crossings Elementary

Goal: Support a positive and collaborative learning culture

Bench Bench
Indicator Data Source Type Time GL 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
10-11 11-12
Notes
Objective 2.1: School climate is safe and orderly.
Discipline SIR Reports # Summer K-5
Incidents na 1 0 0
Attendance Students absent % of Winter K-5
10 days or more, pop .8 1.8 2.5 3.5
1st semester
Students absent Summer
10 days or more, .2 .2 1.1 4.8
2nd semester
Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5 1=strongly agree,
Safe and Orderly perceptions Resp- na na 1.4 1.4 <2.0 <2.0 5=strongly disagree
Climate 1 to 5
Survey of teacher
perceptions na na 1.3 1.4 <2.0 <2.0

Protected Time Survey of teacher Avg Spring K-5

for Instruction perceptions Resp- na na 1.1 1.2 <2.0 <2.0
1 to 5

Objective 2.2: School culture is nurturing and enriching.

Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5
Trust and Mutual perceptions Resp- na na 1.6 1.6 <2.0 <2.0 1=strongly agree,
Respect 1 to 5 5=strongly disagree
Between
Stakeholders Survey of teacher
perceptions na na 1.3 1.5 <2.0 <2.0

Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5

Learning perceptions Resp- na na 1.6 1.6 <2.0 <2.0
Opportunities 1 to 5
Beyond the
Basic Survey of teacher
Curriculum perceptions na na 1.0 1.5 <2.0 <2.0

Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5

Collaborative perceptions Resp- na na 1.7 1.6 <2.0 <2.0
Leadership 1 to 5
Survey of teacher
perceptions na na 1.2 1.2 <2.0 <2.0

Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5

Curriculum perceptions Resp- na na 1.7 1.6 <2.0 <2.0
Effectiveness 1 to 5
Survey of teacher
perceptions na na 1.3 1.5 <2.0 <2.0

Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5

Teaching perceptions Resp- na na 1.7 1.7 <2.0 <2.0
Effectiveness 1 to 5
Survey of teacher
perceptions na na 1.1 1.6 <2.0 <2.0

Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5

Access to perceptions Resp- na na 1.5 1.5 <2.0 <2.0
Instructional 1 to 5
Survey of teacher
Resources
perceptions na na 1.0 1.2 <2.0 <2.0

Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5

sufficient perceptions Resp- na na 1.5 1.6 <2.0 <2.0
Collaborative 1 to 5
Survey of teacher
Opportunities
perceptions na na 1.3 1.2 <2.0 <2.0

Teacher-Student # certified / ADM Ratio Winter K-5

Ratio (minus admins & na 1:11.5 1:12
cnslrs)

Objective 2.3: Schools actively engage and communicate with stakeholders.

Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5 1=strongly agree,
Effective School- perceptions Resp- na na 1.5 1.6 <2.0 <2.0 5=strongly disagree
Home 1 to 5
Survey of teacher
Communication
perceptions na na 1.1 1.1 <2.0 <2.0

Page 5 of 12
 HCS Balanced Scorecard
2009-10
Strategic Goal # 2 Trace Crossings Elementary

Goal: Support a positive and collaborative learning culture

Bench Bench
Indicator Data Source Type Time GL 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
10-11 11-12
Notes
Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5
Local Business perceptions Resp- na na 1.7 1.7 <2.0 <2.0
and Community 1 to 5
Survey of teacher
Involvement
perceptions na na 1.1 1.5 <2.0 <2.0

Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5

Opportunities for perceptions Resp-
Student 1 to 5 na na 1.6 1.7 <2.0 <2.0
Leadership

Perceptions of Survey of parent Avg Spring K-5

Engagement perceptions Resp- na na 1.7 1.6 <2.0 <2.0
with Continuous 1 to 5
Survey of teacher
School
perceptions na na 1.1 <2.0 <2.0
Improvement
1.2

Page 6 of 12
Goal: Improve organizational effectiveness
Bench Bench
Indicator Data Source Type Time GL 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
10-11 11-12

Objective 3.1: Transportation is safe and efficient

Meets Survey of Parent % Spring K-5
student needs Perceptions agree na na 1.7 1.3 <2.0 <2.0

Objective 3.2: Facilities are safe and well-maintained

Maintenance % Maintenance % of all Summer 0-5 na na na
requests work orders
completed within 6-14 na na na
5, 15 & 15+ days
15+ na na na
# of Emergency K-5
Work orders open
longer than 24 na na na
hours.

Survey of Teacher % Winter K-5

Perceptions agree na na 1.2 1.2 <2.0 <2.0

Food service % Cafeterias % of all Summer K-5

is safe and passing health
efficient inspection with 95
or higher

Meals per Labor # / hr

Hour
Participation rate: % of
Breakfast pop
Participation rate: % of
Lunch pop
Survey of Student % yes Spring
Perceptions na na

Buildings and Survey of Parent % agee Spring K-5

grounds are Perceptions na na 1.5 1.4 <2.0 <2.0
well
Survey of Teacher
maintained
Perceptions na na 1.3 2.2 <2.0 <2.0

Maintenance Maintenance and $ / sq. Summer K-5

and custodial operations per sq. ft.
costs ft.
Custodial services
per sq. ft.

Buildings are % of compliance % of all Summer K-5

secure with control times
for Fire, Severe
Weather and 100%
Lock-Down Drills

Survey of Teacher % Spring K-5

Perceptions agree na na 1.1 1.1 <2.0 <2.0

Objective 3.3: High quality employees are recruited and retained

School is a Survey of Teacher % Spring K-5
Good Place Perceptions agree
to Work and na na 1.1 1.1 <2.0 <2.0
Learn
Resources for Survey of Teacher % Spring K-12
Professional Perceptions agree na na 1.2 1.8 <2.0 <2.0
Development
Days used for % of all Summer
professional leave
(certified staff) na na na

High Quality % Teachers with % of all Summer K-5

Teachers HQ Status 1.3 100?% <2.0 <2.0
Filled Turnover from % of all Fall K-5
Postiions vacancies na
(certified)

Turnover from
vacancies na
(classified)
Certification National Board Total Winter K-5
Certified teachers 7
(total))
Certified positions % of all Summer K-5
with advanced
degrees

Teachers with
alternative or
emergency 0
certification

3.4: Technological resources support learning and organizational activities effectively and
Objective efficiently

Access to Survey of Teacher Avg Spring K-5

Instructional Perceptions Resp- na na 1.1 1.1 <2.0 <2.0
Technology 1to 5
Ratio of # Summer K-5
computers to na
students
# Mobile computer
labs per school na 0

# Open computer
labs per school na 2

Teacher Survey of Teacher % Winter K-5

Training for Perceptions agree
Instructional na na 1.1 1.3 <2.0 <2.0
Technology

Technical Ratio of Ratio Summer K-5

Support for computers to na
Instructional technicians
Technology
% Technology % of all Summer 0-5 na 100
work orders
completed within 6-14 na 0
5, 15, & 15+
15+ na 0
Objective 3.5: Fiscal management represents effective and efficient accounting practices
Unqualified Fiscal year audit Y/N Spring K-5
external audit Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
opinion

Resource Expenditures for % of Fall K-5

allocations instruction total
Resource % of Fall K-5
allocations total
Expenditures for
general
administration
Notes
ctivities effectively and

ng practices