Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vanna Venturi House: "Non Sequitur" and "Duality" in Architecture
Vanna Venturi House: "Non Sequitur" and "Duality" in Architecture
ARCHITECTURE
VANNA VENTURI HOUSE
NAME-KAVYA SHARMA
CLASS-2/C
ROLL NO.-180BARCH037
“Robert Venturi's Vanna House broke the rules of architecture through
experimentation with complexity, ambiguity, and contradiction.”
From the book, "Geometry of Design" by Kimberly Elam, Princeton
Architectural Press
In 1962, Mrs. Vanna Venturi instructed her son, the young and promising
architect, Robert Venturi, the project of a house in Chestnut Hill (Philadelphia).
This house, although one of his earliest works, is complex and contradictory in
both formal and functional aspects and soon became a platform from which
Venturi achieved international recognition.
Source- https://www.dezeen.com/2015/08/12/postmodernism-architecture-vanna-venturi-
house-philadelphia-robert-venturi-denise-scott-brown/
Robert Venturi’s seminal book of Complexity and Contradiction in
Architecture, 1966 had already set a theoretical agenda for a post-modern
architecture. He opens the book with what he calls a general manifesto "I like
elements which are hybrid rather than 'pure,' compromising rather than 'clean,'
distorted rather than 'straightforward,' ambiguous rather than 'articulated,'
perverse as well as impersonal, boring as well as 'interesting,' conventional
rather than 'designed,' accommodating rather than excluding, redundant rather
than simple, vestigial as well as innovating, inconsistent and equivocal rather
than direct and clear. I am for messy vitality over obvious unity. I include the
non sequitur and proclaim the duality.” The dualities which Venturi describes
and which run through much post-modern work are as he describes them, the
dualities of the non sequitur and the contradictory. Contradiction is what
Venturi chooses to celebrate: it is what he builds his theory upon.
At the time of both the house and the book the teaching and practice of
architecture were dominated by Modernism. Venturi, rather than accepting the
prevailing orthodoxies of Mies van der Rohe and of Louis Kahn), in favour of
complexity and contradiction, which he argued made products of architecture
more witty and less boring; more appropriate (poetic) reflections of the
complexities.
Source-https://en.wikiarquitectura.com/building/vanna-venturi-house/
Mies van der Rohe and of Louis Kahn), in favour of complexity and
contradiction, which he argued made products of architecture more witty and
less boring; more appropriate (poetic) reflections of the complexities
At first glance the house appears to be a collage of diagonal lines, horizontals,
circles, arcs, squares, rectangles, and planes. A closer visual analysis reveals the
carefully composed interrelationships of each element of the facade.
The house has a uniform appearance, even simple and symmetrical. However,
between that appearance and compositional center sets a series of changes,
geometric changes and unexpected routes. His unit concept is not, after all, an
instrument of historicism, but, as he said, understanding of the silhouette as a
whole.
It represents in simplified form the image of home that we have in memory.
Robert Venturi used to say: “The House… is Home”. The same urban rescues
Popular Culture, because the volume of the house, playing a popularly accepted
model home.
The five room house stands only about 30 feet (9 m) tall at the top of the
chimney, but has a monumental front façade. A non-structural appliqué arch
and "hole in the wall" windows, among other elements, were challenge to
modernist orthodoxy. The house is designed around a chimney that is
centralised and goes all the way to the top of the house. Externally, the house is
built symmetrical. Venturi has distorted this idea of symmetry. There is also a
basement underneath the house that is often not uncovered by people.
The basic elements of the house are a reaction against standard modernist
architectural elements: - pitched roof rather than flat roof, emphasis on central
hearth & chimney, closed ground floor "set firmly on ground" rather than
modernist columns & glass walls which open up the ground floor. On the front
elevation the broken pediment or gable & a purely ornamental applique arch
reflect return to mannerist architecture and a rejection of modernism.
Source-https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:48f7a7db-10d3-411f-8273-
1e2a78ecae37/datastream/OBJ
Source- https://www.behance.net/gallery/9902253/Robert-Venturis-Vanna-House-Geometric-
Analysis
Venturi may have said, “Don’t trust an architect who’s trying to start a
movement,” but that’s exactly what he did. The home stands as a testament to
the woman who raised her son to be a brilliant, iconoclastic artist.
References:
https://www.northernarchitecture.us/analysing-architecture/case-study-fourvanna-venturi-
house.html
https://www.dezeen.com/2015/08/12/postmodernism-architecture-vanna-venturi-house-
philadelphia-robert-venturi-denise-scott-brown/
https://en.wikiarquitectura.com/building/vanna-venturi-house/