Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Swine Flue Drug
Swine Flue Drug
December 28th-29,2009
Sikhya O’ Anusandhan University (SOA University),Bhubaneswar
2
III. RESULTS
B. Model Validation
The MODELLER generated structure was further verified
by PROCHECK [11].The PROCHECK program provides the
information about the stereo chemical quality of a given
protein structure. The PROCHECK was used to generate
Ramachandran plot and the quality of the structure was Fig.2. Showing Rasmol [18] view of final 3D structure of the
computed in terms of % of residues in favorable regions, % h1n1 neuraminidase. Yellow color shows beta sheets and Red
of non Proline Glycine residues etc.The quality of structure one is the alpha helixes.
was also further accessed by using ERRAT [12]. ERRAT is a
protein structure verification algorithm that is especially Table 1 The structural information of the modeled
well-suited for evaluating the progress of crystallographic neuraminidase protein
model building and refinement. Along with ERRAT data the Structural features Information
DOPE (discrete optimized potential energy) score [13] per No. of residues 468
residues was observed. DOPE score is calculated by Modeler No. of atoms 3616
program which is the distance dependent statistical potential No. of Hydrogen bonds 252
based on probabilistic theory. This is extremely useful in No. of helices 3
making decisions about reliability. Then the backbone No. of sheets 42
alignment and RMSD (root mean square deviation) study was No. of turns 60
performed by using PYMOL tool [14]. PyMOL is an useful
molecular modeling software allowing the visualization of IV . VALIDATON OF THE MODEL
three dimensional molecular structures as well as for the
backbone alignment between the model and template. A. Structure validation by ERRAT and DOPE score.
To verify further the predicted structures, the coordinates
C. Preparation of drug analogs of the modeled protein was fed into the ERRAT Protein
From the PDB the drug molecular structure of Oseltamivir Verification Server. The overall quality factor was obtained
and Zanamivir were retrieved. Protein Data Bank (PDB) is a as 64. 978 which is satisfactory. The result obtained is shown
repository for the storing of X-ray and NMR retrieved in Figure 3. (B).The DOPE scores of both template and
structural data of molecules for proteins and nucleic acids. model obtained from Modeller output has been shown in
The structural analog for the above drugs were prepared by Figure 3(A). From the comparative chart the peak is showing
MARVIN SKETCH [15]. Marvin sketch is a Java based that there is no defect in the loop regions in the residues. So
chemical drawing tool which allows creating and editing of in the present case the loop refinement method is not
molecules in various file formats. required for the model.
along with the original molecule by the HEX tool. The
D. Docking study energy after each docking was computed given in table 3(A)
Docking was performed between the validated structure of and 3(B).
neuraminidase and the structural analogs by using HEX 5.0
tool [16]. HEX is an interactive molecular graphics program
for protein-ligand docking, assuming the ligand is rigid, and
it can superpose pairs of molecules using only knowledge of
their 3D shapes. It is still the only docking and superposition
program to use spherical polar Fourier (SPF) correlations to
accelerate the calculations [17]. The molecules binding to a
3
B. Docking study
The docking study was performed between the modeled
structure and molecular analogs of Zanaminvir and
Oseltamivir
(A)
Table 3 (A) Docking results of modeled neuraminidase by
Zanmaivir
Fig.4.
V. CONCLUSION
The current drugs like Oseltamivir and Zamanivir are
potential Neuraminidase inhibitor hence used against swine
flu virus H1N1. In this work, we have constructed a
homology based 3D model of Neuraminidase of China H1N1
virus, using the MODELLER software. The final refined
(B) Oseltamivir (original molecule)
model was further assessed by ERRAT and PROCHECK
program, and the results obtained that this model is reliable.
The stable model is further subjected for docking with the
different drug analogs of Oseltamivir and Zanamivir.
Docking results indicate that the analog 8 in case of
Oseltamivir and analog 10 in case of Zamanivir show more
potent binding activity than the original drugs, this
corresponds to inhibition activity against the viral
neuraminidase. More over this type of analysis show that the
some of the modified drugs having more potential activity
than the original one. So in our study the drug analogs
showing higher binding activities can be used as the probable
lead molecules than the rest of drugs for Swine flu.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are thankful to CEO, Director and Dean of
Majhighariani Institute Of Technology & Science ,Ryagada
to provide us the MIRC lab for computing facility.
(C) Zanamivir (Analog 10)
REFERENCES
[1] Salomon R, Webster RG, “The influenza virus enigma,” Cell, vol 136,
pp.402-410, 2009.
[2] Butler D,” Swine flu goes global,” Nature, vol 458, pp.1082-1083, 2009.
[3] Sheri mossad,”The resurgence of swine-origin influenza A (H1N1)
Cleveland clinical journal of medicine,”vol 76, pp.337-343, 2009.
[4] Rungrotmongkol T, etal,”Susceptibility of antiviral drugs against 2009
influenza A (H1N1) virus,” Biochem Biophys Res Commun. May 2009.
[5] Virupakshaiah DBM, Chandrakanth Kelmani, Rachanagouda Patil, and “Computer Aided Docking Studies on Antiviral Drugs for SARS “PWASET,
Prasad Hegade, vol 24, pp. 297-299, 2008.
[6] Huang IC, Li W, Sui J, Marasco W, Choe H, Farzan M , "Influenza A virus [11]Laskowski R A, MacArthur M W, Moss D S & Thornton J M:
neuraminidase limits viral super infection", J. Virol. vol 10, pp. 4834–4843, “PROCHECK: a program to check the stereo chemical quality of protein
2007. structures “ J. Appl. Cryst., vol 26 pp.283-291,1993
[7] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/GQ232095. [12] V C. Colovos and T. O. Yeates “Verification of protein structures:
[8] Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W. & Lipman D.J” Basic patterns of non bonded atomic interactions” Protein Sci vol 2, pp. 1511–1519,
local alignment search tool.” J. Mol. Biol. vol 215, pp.403-410, 1990 1993
[9] Eswar N, Eramian D, Webb B, Shen M, Sali A” Protein structure modeling [13] Min-Yi Shen, Andrej Sali “Statistical potential for assessment and
with prediction of
MODELLER Methods,” Mol. Biol, vol 426 pp.145-159, 2008. Protein structures” Protein Science vol 15 pp.2507-2524, 2006
[10] A. Sali & T.L. Blundell.” Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction [14] Delano, W.L “The PyMol Molecular Graphics System (2002) on World
of spatial restraints” J. Mol. Biol., vol 234 pp.779-815, 1993. Wide Web www.pymol.org”.
5
[15] M Péter Csizmadia,”Marvin sketch and Marvin view molecule applets [17] L. Mavridis and D.W. Ritchie, Toward High Throughput 3D Virtual
for the World Wide Web,” Third International Electronic Conference on screening using Spherical Harmonic Molecular Surface Representations: J.
Synthetic Organic Chemistry (ECSOC-3), September 1-30. Chem. Inf. Model vol 47 pp1787-1796, 2008
[16]D.W. Ritchie,” Evaluation of Protein Docking Predictions Using Hex 3.1 [18] X .Zhu, X.Xu, I.A .Wilson “Structure Determination of the 1918 H1N1
in CAPRI Rounds 1 and 2: PROTEINS,” Struct. Funct. Genet. vol 52 pp 98- neuraminidase from a crystal with lattice –translocation defects,
106. 2003 “unpublished.