Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Conurbations
The Conurbations
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Liverpool University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Town
Planning Review.
http://www.jstor.org
THE CONURBATIONS
by PAUL BRENIKOV
The nature of these key areas and their location within the country as a whole
were
already clearly evident by the beginning of the twentieth century. The
in these centres had grown very in comparison with the
population large rapidly
rest of the country and itwas this fact that first drew attention to them. Itwas
clear too, that the whole character of Britain had been transformed the
during
the a new
preceding century following gradual emergence of type of urban form.
The older and simpler idea of a 'town' as the normal focus for development was no
to describe the which had now become
longer adequate highly complex regions
the main centres of activity. the second half of the nineteenth century a
During
number of observers had already commented on the in emphasis from town
change
to it was not until 191c when Patrick Geddes
region but published his study,
Cities in Evolution, that the major consequences of the nineteenth century urban
revolution were made
apparent.
In thiswork1 Geddes discussed themain features of these new urban
regions,
the forces that to create them, and the processes that influence their
helped
He also coined the term now used to describe such an area ?a
growth.
conuibation. Geddes that conurbations,
perceived although already well
were to increase still further in
established, importance, and in extent. He
that this new of urban form, an urban a cluster
anticipated type region comprising
of small and towns in an area of limited size and all
large closely linked by
economic ties, was to be of not in economic terms but in
special consequence only
an administrative and social context also. He too that the forces
recognised
conurbations into were
bringing being powerful economic and social pressures,
and that transport played a dominant part in the actual process of urbanisation.
He also drew attention to a fact of to
particular importance contemporary
reformers who to into a more efficient,
sought guide physical development
economica], healthy and pleasing pattern. This was that although a conurbation
as a distinct urban an
developed physically region with identity and unity of its
own, the accepted system of local administrative boundaries subdivided this
unit in an arbitrary fashion and
larger prevented any effective expression of
policies suited to its special needs. He saw the need for, and advocated, the
preparation of surveys and that would cover a wide urban
development plans
not as a whole. a
region of this kind, piecemeal but Figure 6, which attempts
modern interpretation of the 'extended' conurbation areas of Merseyside and
South-East Lancashire, illustrates the of area that functions as an urban
type
region to-day.
are
recognised
the
by
Registrar
General
and
used
for
statistical
purposes
are
Fig.
Wales.
Conurbations
England
I?Standard
in
and
The
that
conurbations
in
outlined
red.
special volume of the 19ci Census dealing with Greater London and Five Other
Conurbations marked not only the first officiai
recognition of the value of the
conurbation concept but the first step towards the possibility of its practical use.
It also involved the definition of 'officiar conurbation areas.
areas seem
Unfortunately the principles employed in the selection of these
to have been more related to the restricted definition of a conurbation as a
closely
to the broader con
large continuously built up area, rather than concept of the
urbation as an urban This restricted definition was justified on the
region. grounds
of administrative convenience, and in consequence the Officiar conurbation
areas consist of those or are
groups of local authority districts which either include
to the towns2. Six areas have been defined in this
immediately adjacent largest
way: Greater London, South-East Lancashire, theWest Midlands, West Yorkshire,
Merseyside and
Tyneside. These now comprise the official or standard con
To the extent that official statistics are areas as
urbations. compiled for these
whole units they are now as a
special character of their own
recognised having
and some of coherence.
degree general
the boundaries of the standard conurbations, illustrated in
Although Figure
3, are clearly too narrowly drawn for the purpose of land use guidance, they can
be used as a convenient starting point for the study of the broader conurbation
areas of which A considerable amount of information is now
they form part.
available on the standard conurbations. More will be available after the Census of
1961. While the techniques employed for purposes of definition and the physical
characteristics differ in each individual case, sufficient similarities exist for
to be made. Some estimate can also be formed of the
general comparisons general
of the standard conurbations within the country as a whole.
significance
At the Census of 19CI, the area covered by the six standard
although
conurbations only amounted to 3.6% of the country as a whole, between them
they contained almost 17million persons?38 % of the total population of England
and Wales*. The proportion of the total population of the country living in the
standard conurbation areas does not appear to have varied very since the
greatly
late nineteenth century, the rate of population growth
differs from
although
conurbation to conurbation and from the national These variations are
average3.
of particular in relation to the past and future development. Con
significance
siderable differences in gross population density also occur within and as between
the different standard conurbations.
It is important to differences between the conurbations
recognise the basic
themselves. In all respects the Greater London area is unique. In size, population
and influence it overshadows all the others and it has problems of a very special
kind. The West Midlands conurbation, with Birmingham as its focus and the
industrial towns of the Black Country a urban complex closely
forming large
associated with this centre, provides an interesting example of rapid growth
economic prosperity. Of all provincial conurbations
deriving from sustained
* At the of the total
1961 Census, the six standard conurbations contained 16.9 million persons?36.7%
population of England andWales.
The local authorities named are also planning authorities. Each of these prepares a local develop
ment plan for that part of the conurbation that falls within its boundaries. All the maps are to the same
scale.
(Figs. 4 and 5 are based on the population density map of theMinistry of Housing and Local Government, 1951 )
This shows the grouping of population, by density, in and near three 'less favoured' conurbations
?Merseyside, South-East Lancashire and West Yorkshire. Geddes suggested that Merseyside and
South-East Lancashire might be considered as a single unit. This map shows how closely linked these
two have now become. The wide spread of the high population density area emphasises the seventy
of the land shortage problem in all three conurbations.
CONCENTRATING FORCES
(2) The Settlement Area in pecked black line, based on to work. This can
journey
be modified by the inclusion certain towns
of larger peripheral (named) which have
close connectionswith themain centres
of Liverpool and Manchester.
(3) The Trade Area in hard red line. This encloses the urban over which the
region
twomain centres exert a It can be that in practice the
powerful influence. argued
trade areas overlap along the line and that the
Warrington-Wigan separation shown
is
artificial.
Boundaries are shown in termsof whole local
authority units. County Boroughs?
separate planning Authorities?are shaded.
urbations and the methods of transport available at the time. The tramcar, the
suburban railway and the omnibus have each contributed its own distinctive
section to the urban area. The latest form of mass transport?the
growing
motor vehicle?is now its contribution. So far as dispersal is
private adding
concerned this last phase has proved to be the most significant of all. The
conferred by private motor extent of
degree
of mobility transport and the
itmakes are so much greater than that provided by any other
dispersal possible
means, that the of mass of cars has now
consequences ownership private emerged
as one of the greatest influences affecting the future form of the con
single
urbations. Its have not yet been fully worked out.
implications
The economic of the conurbations may be
history of the development
studied in the of the interplay between these two sets of forces?the
light
this approach it is possible to distinguish
concentrating and the dispersing. Using
three main phases of conurbation development. During
the first of these phases,
which lasted almost up to 1914, the forces of concentration were particularly
In most conurbations retained their form to
powerful. consequence compact up
this time.
During
the second phase, from 1919 to 1939, the general influence of
these forces was weakened. Much outward occurred
concentrating dispersal
and new development took place at lower densities. Concentration of economic
and industrial continued, but this was directed towards a few
development
selected conurbations The rate of in these favoured centres was
only. growth
more In the last phase, from 1946 to the present
greater and rapid than elsewhere.
time, the effects of selective concentration have persisted and have been ac
a further and more
companied by powerful upsurge of the forces making for
dispersal.
These successive phases of conurbation development are
closely associated
with broad in the national economic and industrial structure discussed
changes
in the previous was characterised
chapter. The early phase of general concentration
in a number of conurbations on a narrow range of
by increasing dependence
on coal power and rail transport. The con
heavy and staple industries based
traction of these basic industries lay at the roots of themany severe difficulties and
tensions these conurbations
experienced during the period between the wars.
Their as focal declined In contrast to the decline in some
advantages points sharply.
conurbations a attraction was exerted other more favoured centres?
stronger by
London and theWest Midlands?which were able to offer the kinds of facilities
and the type of location required by a new group of industries. The
expanding
industrial structure of these more favoured conurbations was thusmodified in the
period between the wars by the process of selective concentration and their
physical form by the dispersal of workers and residents.
Further have taken place in the economic and industrial structure
changes
of the conurbations since 1946. Selective concentration has continued
although
this is now
considerably modified by national policy. The sharp decline of basic
industries has been arrested or has worked itself out while secondary industries,
as in the inter-war years, have
expanded still further and dispersed themselves
the past decade. In scale the problems extend from the very large,
product of
the nation as a whole, to the very small, involving the detailed needs of
affecting
an individual area. But whatever the scale or age of the problem questions of
land use are raised. Moreover, each is so closely bound up with others
problem
none can in isolation. on land occur as a
that be considered Heavy pressures
result of these problems. Within the limited compass of a conurbation private
more are to
firms and families are looking for space; Public Authorities trying
banish the slums, improve schools, roads and and find sites for re
open spaces
schemes. All these operations require land. Within the conurbation
housing
the supply of suitable land is very limited. Fierce conflicts and controversies
occur over the way land should be used. All the conurbations are faced with
inter-related land use problems of the same basic type. Although the physical
the social and economic characteristics of a particular conurbation
setting and
of the problems the same basic features constantly reappear.
modify the form
To study these it is necessary to simplify and group them. The
problems
most basic division is perhaps that of scale. Here we may distinguish two major
one hand we can recognise a broad series of problems all related
groups. On the
to the use of land within the conurbation areas. Peripheral expansion, central
area and slum clearance are examples of what we may call
congestion, decay
internal or regional problems. On the other hand, there is a second group of
one conurbation area with another,
problems
which stem from the relationship of
and with the remainder of the country as a whole. The disparity between the
favoured' and 'less favoured' movements, the
conurbations, general population
of industry, power and communications are of this class. So
dispersal examples
far as the conurbations are concerned these are external or national in
problems
scale.
The include matters which politically and socially are
regional problems
most and with which local authorities are most usually concerned. In
pressing
the in this group have received most attention from local
consequence problems
and central authorities during the past fiftyyears. More is known about them and
has been made towards their solution. The national problems
greater progress
have been the subject of serious attention and study for a much shorter period.
Their nature and the type of solutions possible for them are less well-known.
It is likely however that in the long term their influence will be very great and in
more attention will have to be directed towards this class of problem.
consequence
REGIONAL PROBLEMS
Act 19?4, these dwellings can be described as statutory slums. Nearly half of
these, some 430,000 dwellings, were located within the six standard conurbations.
Conditions varied between individual conurbations ; South-East Lancashire with
with 96,000 for
128,000 slum dwellings and Merseyside together accounted
one of the nation's statutory slums, while Greater London's share
nearly quarter
was one twentieth. A list of standard conurbations
only about arranged according
to the proportion of the total within them classed as statutory slums
dwellings
in 19c reads as follows:
has been made nor have any uniform tests or standards been devised. Such
evidence as we have however suggests that the numbers are very great indeed.
The Conurbation volume of the 19C1 Census for shows that in the
example,
as a whole just under one half of the 13.1 million households did
country (48%)
not have the exclusive use of all of the five 'household covered
arrangements'
the in the Census returns?i.e., water, a
by housing questions piped cooking
stove, a kitchen sink, a water closet and a fixed bath. This could be regarded as a
reasonable minimum for modern it is
living conditions?though noteworthy
that it does not include either space or facilities for a car. Of the .2
garaging
million households in the standard conurbations, were in the same
47% position.
The proportion of households without exclusive use of these
arrangements varied
in the individual conurbations but in no case did it fall below
slightly 43%
or rise above In spite of the fact that these
(Merseyside) 49% (Greater London).
returns at best a very indirect indication of the
provide probable numbers of
sub-standard not
dwellings yet slums, they suggest that the proportion may be
frighteningly high. If this type of examination is restricted to the central and
inner of the standard conurbations contained in the Census volume, the
rings
proportion is still.
higher
A measure of the mass and of the problem of sub-standard
toughness
lies in the fact that both the and the economic incentive to
dwellings machinery
renew or remodel these areas to be almost at the present
appear wholly lacking
time. Essential repairs to individual are carried out, but very
buildings large
sums would have to be re-invested in order to
rectify the general obsolescence of
the area as a whole. There is no that this kind of re-investment is con
sign
on such a scale. Private investors find other and better uses for their
templated
money and public authorities, the only alternative agency at present available,
have their hands full with statutory slum clearance. In consequence, it seems
likely that the broad belt of sub-standard that surrounds the central area
housing
will remain a feature of the conurbation for some considerable time. Large
tracts of this sub-standard those in the less favoured
housing area?particularly
conurbations?could descend to the level of the
statutory slum very rapidly. A
special effort will be needed to prevent this from and until some
happening,
means is found for about in these
satisfactory bringing comprehensive changes
areas, the reservoir of potential slums within the conurbations will remain
dangerously large.
The problem of
congestion, like that of slum and sub-standard dwellings, has
its in the past. It is a a
origins multiple problem occurring in variety of forms and
from a number of different causes. In a conurbation, reaches a
congestion high
level in two main areas, within the central area and in the zone of older
develop
ment to it. In both instances the causes of
immediately adjacent underlying
are the
congestion concentrating forces. These forces converge on the central
areas of the conurbations and it is in the central area itself that
congestion in all
its forms reaches its
greatest intensity. The zone of maximum advantage is small
and since users?often unsuited as a location the
many neighbours?desire there,
value of land is
correspondingly high. Developers build as as can
intensively they
to equate land and costs and a investment. In the centre,
high building profitable
therefore, congestion of buildings, uses and high land values occur together. These
factors, in combination and draw in traffic on an
acting generate ever-increasing
scale, producing the congestion of vehicles which is now severe and
widespread
in conurbation.
every major
The concentration of administration, business and activities at
shopping
the key point of the conurbation has continued from the nineteenth century to the
present time. Many influences have contributed towards this intensification of
use in the central area. The of a central location at the heart of the
advantages
conurbation, the extent to which the value of a site can be
exploited through
the number and size of
multi-storey development, undertakings seeking such
locations and the resources available to them, have all increased
during the past
In the amount of
fifty years. consequence employment provided by the central
area and the amount of and traffic within ithas also increased.
activity generated
this of concentration of use, one influence from the past
Against background
still acts powerfully?for as well as the most valuable district, the central
being
area is also the oldest part of the conurbation. Its of streets and
general layout
blocks may have survived for almost a hundred years with relatively few modifi
cations. circumstances?wholesale destruction in war, the
Very exceptional
clearance of a large pocket of blight or radica] changes in the economies of
central area development?are required
before major
changes
in the
general
can occur. This tendency to perpetuate the historic form of the central
layout
area has an influence on one of of
important aspect congestion?congestion
traffic. With the incentive of rising values more refined techniques for intensive
site are the results are super-imposed
development constantly being applied, but
on a street and block constructed to serve the needs of another age. The
pattern
over-intensive use floods the streets (which cater for
heavy traffic generated by
vehicles not only inmotion but also at rest) and chokes movement to a standstill
as the network is compelled to bear ever heavier loads. In time
aged transport
this sequence can and does destroy the and so the value of the central area
advantages
itself. Traffic-generating uses that can do so begin to avoid the chaos by seeking
sites outside. The now come to be so
disruptive effects of traffic congestion have
motor vehicles so much more measures to
powerful, and multiply rapidly than
cater for their needs can be put into effect, that in the conurbations the problem
of trafficwith its visible urgency and the heavy cost of counter measures, causes
attention to be focused on this particular aspect of congestion at the expense of
others.
Other regional problems are associated with the major phase of conurbation
between the wars when themain advantage laywith the forces leading to
growth
this phase facilities for transport were constantly improving,
dispersal. During
land for development was generally available at low cost and the restraints
on its were few or absent In
imposed by public policy development altogether.
consequence, outward expansion of urban development proceeded unchecked,
and large areas were developed on the perimeters of all the conurbations. The
outcome of this outward growth?urban sprawl?at that time was
generally
as beneficial. To some extent thiswas true. The immediate in
accepted change
condition was usually for the better. Public authorities as well as private interests
a considerable part in movements of this kind. It is
played stimulating only when
these movements are considered as a whole and in that are seen to
retrospect they
have raised at least asmany problems as they solved. Some of the reasons for this are
now clear. In the first place a common characteristic of most of new
peripheral
was its was
development relatively low density. Land cheap and the prime incentive
tomove was the desire for more space. Secondly, the uniformity of the type of
structures built, a sustained demand for them and a powerful new form of agency (for
authorities became involved in house building on a large scale in connection
public
with their slum clearance schemes) all made for the utilization of extensive areas for
a class of use?mainly of public
single housing. Thirdly, lack guidance
allowed
to take in a or
development place haphazard way along the lines of least resistance
most immediate this was in the form of ribbons the
advantage. Frequently along
routes. The consequences of this unco-ordinated are
developing transport sprawl
well known. Much land was wasted and more sterilised by ill-considered layouts.
a of use produced
Uniformity of building types and the dominance of single class
visual and social monotony. services in these were
Ancillary dormitory suburbs
overcrowded or so of the residents' needs had to be
lacking altogether, many
catered for elsewhere. Considerable distances the homes
separated occupants'
from their places of work, so daily journeys increased in length and volume. This
caused heavy peak-load congestion and placed further strains on the extended
on the at or
transport system and people themselves. Apart from the difficulties
near the areas of development, the uncontrolled of the suburbs accentuated
growth
elsewhere in the conurbation. The centre, crowded to
problems occurring
was little used after hours. The of the
overflowing by day, working population
The next major phase of development occurred during the inter-war period.
The early theories and ideas were developed still further and others were added.
Influences affecting the conurbations and giving rise to a substantial increase in the
size of the built-up area played a significant part in fostering this process. To
overcome the of the FirstWorld War building took place on a substantial
shortages
scale and local authorities (now charged with the duty of providing dwellings)
schemes. The design of these schemes reflected
began large-scale development
the influence of the garden city and garden suburb. Many of the new extensions
to the conurbations were laid out along these lines. The rapid increase in the
extent of the built-up area within the conurbations gave added force to the
argument for
more and more effective methods of controlling develop
general
ment in or near the great cities, and planning legislation was extended and pro
cedures were simplified. The preparation of definite plans for the new extensions
was made for local authorities. Model Clauses were issued
obligatory larger
which gave greater substance to the idea of control through 'character zoning'
and density.
In spite of these increased powers, there appears to have been little real
in the scope and content of the planning schemes operating within the
change
conurbations. Many of these plans were confined to newly-developing areas and
were with a limited range of objectives in which better
largely pre-occupied
designs
for
housing
estates and improved roads predominated. Apart from
schemes for central area and slum clearance, the special problems
improvement
of the conurbations remained untouched.
great
the value of the conurbation as a unit for planning purposes and the
Although
special character of the conurbation problems were generally unrecognised by
central and local some was made towards a wider
government, progress concept:
control of environment rather than a local scale.
on a
planned regional
Amendments to made it possible for a number of local authorities to
legislation
to prepare a joint and this was done to an
group together planning scheme,
than in any other comparable of time, but the objectives set at the end
length
of the Second World War have not yet been achieved. The
regional and national
of these vital areas of the still In some instances, as, for
problems country persist.
in and the have
example, redevelopment overspill, problems greatly increased.
The events of the last thirteen years that this limited progress towards
suggest
themajor objectives of the not constitute amajor failure of as a
plans does planning
means of environment within the conurbation areas. It is rather the
regulating
outcome of shifts of in in the forces at work within the
emphasis policy, changes
conurbations and under-estimation of the effects these have
changes brought
about. In addition, the of was subjected to a
although organization planning
number of it has never been
changes, properly adapted for the purpose of planning
these complex areas as a whole. can in the
Planning only guide development right
way if the are dealt with at the scale. Since 1947 changes in
right things right
in a
policy have occurred variety of fields ; they have particularly affected housing,
the New Towns, location of on which
industry, the scale planning has been
conservation of land and the financial basis of Since
organised, planning.
conurbation problems are very concerned with matters of this kind,
largely
each in policy has had a on in the conurbation
change profound effect planning
areas.
A major shift of emphasis in occurred in the first phase of
housing policy
reconstruction. Great stress was laid on the for the con
post-war programme
struction of new houses. To meet the acute created by the war this
shortage
was accelerated every means. The was national,
programme by possible shortage
but conditions were particularly difficult in the conurbations that have suffered
heavily from enemy action because of the large numbers of families involved.
Local Authority themajor part in this
building played re-housing programme.
The acquisition of sites and the construction of new estates on the perimeter of
the existing built-up area occupied a great deal of the time and energy of the new
authorities in the conurbations the early post-war years. Private
planning during
slum clearance, central area redevelopment and the of
building, rebuilding
blitzed areas?all of which had been considered as of the
forming part planned
restricted. Because of its size, and
post-war building programme?were urgency,
social implications, the was accorded
far-reaching re-housing programme priority
over other of construction for some time a
types and large share of national
resources was directed to this end. The effect of this in the conurbation
policy
areas was to add further extensions to their outer limits?sometimes on sites
which had not for development.
originally been intended
A different kind of extension to the residential areas of the conurbations
to take on an a further
began place increasing scale after 19C1 when, with
in the restrictions on were
change policy, private building progressively removed.
at low same
The demand for privately built houses?frequently density and in the
form as indeed. At the same time the activities
pre-war?increased very rapidly
of the local housing authorities were directed more towards slum clearance and
or clearance schemes and were
provision for families overcrowded displaced by
The major changes that have occurred in the financial provisions of the 1947
Act have also seriously influenced the progress of planning in the
Planning
conurbations. For the abolition of the development charge released a
example,
on new of general social and
check development and re-established the operation
economic forces as the main factors affecting the use of land. The shift in policy
embodied in the Town and Country Planning Act of 19C9 which restored the
payment of market price for land compulsorily acquired for planning and other
purposes, has introduced a new factor whose full effects are not yet clear. But it
Major Post-War
Difficulties
the most powerful of these factors has been the continual shortage
Among
of land for all types of development. The cornbined effects of forces of con
centration and dispersal has meant that this shortage has been most active where the
demand is highest?within the conurbation areas. It was intended that the
Plan should on the basis of survey, the quantities of
Development anticipate,
land likely to be needed for all purposes during the next twenty years and allocate
to these needs. at the time when most of the initial
according Unfortunately,
work for the was the conditions governing
survey statutory plans being done,
still reflected the shortages and policies of the early post-war years.
development
The post-war housing drive and the growing volume of private development after
19C2 reduced the allocated reserves of landmuch more rapidly thanwas expected.
The local authorities in the conurbations are now faced with
planning
sustained and demands from land uses of all those of the
heavy kinds?including
local authorities themselves?for sites within an area that is constantly
development
in size and constantly rising inmarket value. The pressure on planning
shrinking
authorities to amend their Development Plans and bring in land held as a long-term
reserve for immediate use, is very in the Favoured conurbation
heavy, particularly
so
areas. With
strong Central Government support the green belt has been held
far, but in view of the land that now exists it seems that
grave shortage unlikely
it can be held indefinitely against the great pressure generated by the forces
to
leading dispersal.
THE DUAL PROBLEM OF OVERSPILL AND REDEVELOPMENT
Apart from replacing the slums and the outworn residential areas, the
Development Plans within the conurbations also make proposals for the renewal
and reconstruction of at least of the central commercial and administrative
part
area. These schemes for central area were intended to reduce
redevelopment
a more effective use of these
congestion and provide layout for the future highly
areas. The extensive war suffered central London and some
specialised damage by
an
provincial conurbations provided opportunity for undertaking comprehensive
on a scale that would otherwise have not been possible. In
redevelopment
the amount of distinct from
practice comprehensive redevelopment?as rebuilding
?that has taken place in the central areas of the conurbations has been
trifling.
This failure to renew the fabric and the con
layout within the heart of the
urbations may prove in the run to have been the most serious
long planning
failure of all. A great many factors have contributed to this failure, but here also
it is administrative and financial difficulties rather than lack of technical skill
which seem to The of central area re
predominate. process comprehensive
development involves a number of special problems of acquisition,
design,
and control which are not of a local
management part authority's normal work.
Above all, since planned comprehensive in the central areas of the
changes
conurbations can best be achieved direct ownership of the land, the
through
is faced at the onset with the need to
developing authority acquire substantial
sites at very these sites are subdivided into a
high values. Frequently multiplicity
of small ownerships. land in this way implies substantial financial
Buying
resources tomeet the extensive first costs (since landmust now be at its
acquired
market value) and special organization skills to realise the financial benefits of
Few local authorities can command these skills
comprehensive redevelopment.
and except for special cases very little risk-capital for re-investment in this way
has been available from public funds since the war. In consequence, most local
authorities have had to accept piecemeal owners on
rebuilding by private
individual sites as the only practical way of about reconstruction in the
bringing
central area. The extent to which this private re-investment has taken
place
varies a deal between the Favoured and Less Favoured
great conurbations,
Greater London receiving by far the greatest share. The free play of natural forces
runs counter to the objectives of for it is within a central area
planning policy,
that the potential benefits of comprehensive rather than piecemeal redevelopment
are
greatest, and it is the Less Favoured rather than the Favoured conurbations
which stand in the need of central area re-in vestment. The fact that
greatest
new areas
they receive less capital and that redevelopment within their central
forms a particularly fragmented pattern is perhaps themost unsatisfactory aspect of
all statutory in the conurbations.
post-war planning
rise to development and in the use of land. The most valuable lesson of
changes
British experience has been the importance of these forces to the
planning
process. It is now evident that in a number of important respects the power and
effectiveness of the forces and trends, so far as the conurbation
Development
Plans are concerned, has been under-estimated or even
ignored.
The two groups of forces leading either to national concentration towards
the conurbations or to local dispersal within them, have continued to operate
was itself a declared
very powerfully. Dispersal objective of many of the local
Plans, but the amount of movement which the social and
Development voluntary
economic forces were to was not This outward surge
produce fully anticipated.
of development to more
satisfy the demand for space has involved the local
authorities in the conurbations in constant to prevent a
planning struggles
of inter-war urban and constant difficulties over
repetition sprawl shortage of
land.
were
general objectives and policy being formed. It can now be seen that some
of these new influences have
special significance. Their importance is certain
to increase in future. Some new influences are discussed below.
examples of these
many major changes have taken place in almost every aspect of British industry
that few, if any, parallels can be drawn with
safety between conditions then and
now. Yet the economic in many Plans
concepts incorporated Development
seem to take little account of the of the new economic situation in
consequences
which full employment, a new methods and
greatly changed energy situation,
new are are a
products principal features. These economic changes producing
further redistribution of and The final outcome of their
population industry.
effects is uncertain but the is to
general pattern of change beginning emerge13.
Some features of this new pattern are illustrated in
Figure 7.
It seems con
likely that these changes will have pervasive and profound
sequences for the conurbations. These areas have been foci of ind
always principal
ustrial activity. To some extent this still holds but a of
good, significant proportion
new industrial are now to locations away from central districts
projects gravitating
of are
big cities. The fact that expanding industries taking up
sites either outside
the conurbations or within a broad belt associated with the two
altogether,
Favoured conurbations, may increase the future difficulties of
substantially planning
industrial and for the group of conurbations outside this
employment provision
Favoured area. It has been main reason
argued14 that the why the northern
have not pace with the national rate of economic lies in the
regions kept growth
nature of their industrial structure. These with the
regions, compared country
as a whole, contain or
higher proportions of industries that have expanded less
concentrated more, and lower of industries that have more
proportions expanded
or contracted less. If a similar comparison ismade between the Favoured and
Less Favoured conurbations the is even more marked.
disparity
This position, it has some points of
although similarity with that examined
by the Barlow Commission, differs from it in a number of
important respects.
Control over the location of a
industry, full employment and greater general level
of prosperity have so far
prevented the depressions and large-scale movements of
industry and population of the inter-war years. The Less Favoured
typical
conurbations have received a share of industries but, as the previous
expanding
a share that falls far short of their needs. From the industrial
chapter suggests,
of view the size of all the conurbations has extended
point considerably since
the war. In the Favoured areas the zone of economic influence, within which
journeys towork and the transport of semi-finished products takes place, isnow so
extended that in the case of the area the outer limits enclose most
Metropolitan
of south-eastern It seems that the connection between
England. along motorway
theWest Midland and the areas the
Metropolitan spheres of influence of the two
conurbations are at the point of If this occurs itwill form, in effect,
overlapping.
a and (in British terms) a few
single, gigantic economic region. At points beyond
this main zone, into which the bulk of national is now concen
prosperity being
trated, some new growing points are developing. These are centred on particular
features such as water harbours or abundant water
deep supplies. Within the
main zone smaller industrial are more scattered. This
plants becoming tendency
to scatter is more marked as labour and land becomes more scarce
becoming
within the established industrial areas of Greater London and theWest Midlands.
a wide
In consequence range of county and market towns in a broad belt of
the Midlands and the Home Counties are on a
greater scale
receiving industry
than ever before.
This redistribution of industry and in response to new forces,
employment
most in the two Favoured conurbations, is a
although highly developed having
effect on the form of all the conurbations. The industrial of
powerful importance
the hinterland is
growing very rapidly and this stimulates the spread of housing,
over a wide area to form a
population and other developments very large, loosely
urbanised region. The extension of the conurbation in this way a
produces
decline in the functions of the traditional centre, as a focus for office
except
employment. The boundaries of one conurbation become blurred and
merge
almost into those of its a conurbation,
imperceptibly neighbours. Within the
to move one
ability and the need rapidly from part to another, the number and
of journeys made and the
length congestion of trafficproduced by thesemovements,
all increase In consequence the old radial pattern of movements from
together.
centre to is a new one inwhich criss-cross movements
periphery being replaced by
over the whole
region predominate.
The trends produced by these new influences,
greatly increased demands for
suburban the loose of over a wide area, the
housing, scattering development
decline of the traditional centres as focal points, the move
reorganization of the
ment pattern and the of a number of new focal
development points dependent
on ease of access, all these run counter to of the contained in the
many concepts
local Plans now
Development prepared for the conurbations. The economic and
social forces these results were not effective at the time most
producing fully
were drawn up. these forces are very so
plans being Today powerful, powerful
indeed that new concepts and new to be
techniques will need developed if the
are to
plans modify and influence the future development of the conurbations
satisfactorily.
do not seem to have been fully attuned either to the objectives of planning or to
the needs of the conurbations. A co-ordination of broad policies, as well as
Plans, is needed.
Development badly
Under present conditions the series of local Development Plans prepared by
the various local authorities cannot provide a satisfactory basis for the public
of land use in a conurbation. A number of to the present
guidance changes
for will be before real can be made
organisation planning required any progress
towards the major problems of the key conurbation areas. The need is
solving
must be fundamental. Mere readjustments to the
urgent and the changes existing
Plan system will not serve. are needed in
Development Changes policy and
administration as well as in
technique.
In these it is essential that the conurbation should be
framing changes
considered?at least for a undivided urban
planning purposes?as single, region.
This is no more than a as now stand. This step is a vital
recognition of facts they
for until it is taken no
one, satisfactory adjustment of the machinery of planning
seems
possible.
A number of critical to be taken at national and
policy decisions need regional
level with to the conurbations. At the present time there is little in
regard
dication of any areas
general policy for the future development of these special
either collectively or The that have been
individually. principles generally
are based on the recommendations
accepted and applied within the conurbations
of the Barlow Commission. While these principles to meet new
(adapted
economic and social conditions) may form the basis for a never
policy, they have
been clearly thought out or expressed as a policy. Nor is it certain that all of
these principles should be
accepted to-day without modification, since some of
them run counter to the of the social and economic forces. At least
general push
threemajor decisions need to be taken before any can be formulated.
general policy
First, itmust be decided whether or not the present geographical pattern
of conurbations should be as permanent.
regarded Apart from Greater London,
the conurbations are a reflection of the 19th century distribution of
industry
and population. It can be that this arrangement is outmoded and that new
argued
centres of
population and industry should be encouraged to develop which would
replace them. There is indeed substantial evidence that the social and economic
forces are initiating major if unchecked, could about a
changes which, bring
of an earlier in which most and was
repetition pattern population industry
centred in the south and east. It is sometimes held that itwould be in the national
interest for this trend to be allowed to work itself out, unhindered
by planning
controls. It seems hardly a
likely that national policy for the conurbations based
on these on social or
principles would be acceptable political grounds. Whatever
the short-term the or
advantages might be, decay planned decline of the major
centres of the north-west and north, does not, in view of the social and material
seem any more
capital invested in them, practical today
as a
long-term objective
than it did at the time of the Barlow Commission's Report.
if it be
Secondly, accepted that something like the existing pattern of major
centres must be retained, a decision must be taken on the central issue of how the
disparity between the Favoured Midlands and South and the Less-Favoured North
West and North can be overcome more
effectively. The Barlow Commission
to redress the balance a over the
sought through system of national control
location of reinforced restrictions on future
manufacturing industry, by growth
and by planned decentralisation. These remedies have been applied since 1946.
not halted it. Decentralisation
They have checked the southward flow but has
been attempted, with varying degrees of success. The outward spread of the
conurbations has been halted?only for a the green belt.
expanding time?by
Since in these matters the requirements of policy run counter to the trends of
social and economic some modifications are Controls over
forces, necessary.
and effective. to be
industrial location have proved practical They need
and extended to include office employment as well as
strengthened manufacturing
also need to be farmore closely integrated with land use planning.
industry. They
It seems less certain that decentralisation in its present form is so valuable?
as it is in the Less Favoured conurbations where the con
particularly applied
forces are weak. further
centrating attracting development already Although
from the Favoured conurbations needs to be encouraged, it is the
dispersal
forces which need the support of policy
concentrating rather than the dispersing
in the Less Favoured areas. the new and powerful elements which have
Among
since the Barlow Commission made its review are the almost universal
emerged
motorcar and the new In ten or less the
motorway system. years motorways,
illustrated in will have become the chief communication
diagrammatically Figure 7,
network of the country. As such they could play an important part in a policy
for the redevelopment and rehabilitation of the Less Favoured conurbations,
road and land use planning are closely connected.
provided planning
a broad decision must be taken on what the ultimate form of the
Lastly,
At the present time planning in the conurbations
great city of the future will be.
is very severely
handicapped by
the lack of any clear image. Here, part at least of
the answer is provided by the current trends of development. Inmany parts of the
world the loose, multi-centred urban region, directly dependent on its transport
on a core. In Britain,
system, is replacing the centralised city focused single
and make it inevitable that a variation of
increasing mobility expanding prosperity
this pattern will be established here, modified by the scale of the country and the
of land. While itmay be possible to modify this pattern still
general shortage
further through and the forces creating the
planning policy planning controls,
extended urban region are too powerful to be reversed or even restricted for long.
Future policy must take account of this change.
The principal need for in the present system of planning arises because
change
it is not to broad over urban regions, of which
designed implement policy large
the conurbations are the chief Between the controlling Ministry,
example.
on the national scale, and the local planning authority preparing a local
working
Development Plan there is now a yawning gap in the planning organisation.
The powers to the need only be few, but they are critical.
granted authority
To substance to their decisions itwould be necessary for all statutory
give policy
Plans within the conurbation to receive Ministerial
Development approval if,
and only if, they are in conformity with the declared policy of the regional
It would also be essential for the to have money
authority. regional authority
made available to it from the Central Government funds for capital works and
re-investment schemes initiated and
sponsored by the regional authority itself.
This would carry with it the duty of an annual
preparing and submitting report
to Parliament. An annual could a convenient occasion not
report provide only
for reporting progress, but also for issues out the
raising controversial pointing
main obstacles to further progress and them for debate.
presenting public
The execution of such a
proposal for each conurbation will be difficult.
Matters such as the composition of the extent of
regional authority itself and the
the area over which it should exercise control are very critical. An indication of the
kind of area which could be involved in the case of and South-East
Merseyside
Lancashire is illustrated in 6. are matters on which it would be
Figure They
difficult to since must vary with the needs of the different
dogmatise arrangements
conurbations. But itwould be desirable for the Board of the to be
authority kept
as small as It should include as well
possible. representatives of outside interests
as those of the central and local authorities. The person chosen as full-time
chairman should be of national stature and have the services of a small,
expert
staff. The extent of the conurbation area would on the nature of
largely depend
the problems to be solved. Neither the standard conurbations nor the
special
review areas would answer the purpose. In area controlled
principle, the by the
Board should be to enable most of the main conurbation
sufficiently extensive
to be solved within its It should also be subject to
problems compass. periodic
review.
* * *
Patrick Geddes. Cities in Evolution; revised edition, Williams and Northgate, London 1949.
2 The exact definitions of the standard conurbation areas are given in the introduction to the Conurbation
Volume of the 19^1 Census.
3 At the mid-year estimate of June i960, the six standard conurbations contained 36.9% of the total
population of England andWales. If the hinterland of each of the standard conurbations is taken into account,
it appears that just over half of the population lives in or near a conurbation. The table below attempts an
estimate of this kind. The population figures for the extended conurbation areas are only approximate since
case.
slightly different techniques have been used in each
TOTAL POPULATION IN STANDARD AND EXTENDED CONURBATIONS, JUNE i960
Total
% of Total Total Population
Population Wales
England <&_ (OOO) (approximate)
(OOO)