Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics: Physics Central

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Jhsdjvdjj

The clocks in space tick faster, according to Physics Central, because the
GPS satellites are above Earth and experience weaker gravity. So even
though the GPS satellites are moving and experience a seven-microsecond
slowing every day because of their movement, the result of the weaker gravity
causes the clocks to tick about 45 microseconds faster than a ground-based
clock. Adding the two together results in the GPS satellite clock ticking faster
than a ground-based clock, by about 38 microseconds daily.

Special relativity and quantum mechanics

As our knowledge of physics has advanced, scientists have run into more
counterintuitive situations. One is trying to reconcile general relativity — which
describes well what's going on with large objects — with quantum mechanics,
which is best used for very small things (such as uranium atom decay). The
two fields, which excellently describe their individual fields, are incompatible
with one another — which frustrated Einstein and generations of scientists
after him.

"Relativity gives nonsensical answers when you try to scale it down to


quantum size, eventually descending to infinite values in its description of
gravity. Likewise, quantum mechanics runs into serious trouble when you
blow it up to cosmic dimensions," an article in The Guardian pointed out in
2015. 

"Quantum fields carry a certain amount of energy, even in seemingly empty


space, and the amount of energy gets bigger as the fields get bigger.
According to Einstein, energy and mass are equivalent (that's the message of
E=mc2), so piling up energy is exactly like piling up mass. Go big enough, and
the amount of energy in the quantum fields becomes so great that it creates a
black hole that causes the universe to fold in on itself. Oops."

There are several ideas to overcome this (which are beyond the scope of this
article), but one approach is to imagine a quantum theory of gravity that would
have a massless particle (called the graviton) to generate the force. But as
physicist Dave Goldberg pointed out in io9 in 2013, there are problems with
that. At the smallest scales, gravitons would have infinite energy density,
creating an unimaginably powerful gravity field. More study will be required to
see if this is possible.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky
and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at:

The clocks in space tick faster, according to Physics Central, because the
GPS satellites are above Earth and experience weaker gravity. So even
though the GPS satellites are moving and experience a seven-microsecond
slowing every day because of their movement, the result of the weaker gravity
causes the clocks to tick about 45 microseconds faster than a ground-based
clock. Adding the two together results in the GPS satellite clock ticking faster
than a ground-based clock, by about 38 microseconds daily.

Special relativity and quantum mechanics

As our knowledge of physics has advanced, scientists have run into more
counterintuitive situations. One is trying to reconcile general relativity — which
describes well what's going on with large objects — with quantum mechanics,
which is best used for very small things (such as uranium atom decay). The
two fields, which excellently describe their individual fields, are incompatible
with one another — which frustrated Einstein and generations of scientists
after him.

"Relativity gives nonsensical answers when you try to scale it down to


quantum size, eventually descending to infinite values in its description of
gravity. Likewise, quantum mechanics runs into serious trouble when you
blow it up to cosmic dimensions," an article in The Guardian pointed out in
2015. 

"Quantum fields carry a certain amount of energy, even in seemingly empty


space, and the amount of energy gets bigger as the fields get bigger.
According to Einstein, energy and mass are equivalent (that's the message of
E=mc2), so piling up energy is exactly like piling up mass. Go big enough, and
the amount of energy in the quantum fields becomes so great that it creates a
black hole that causes the universe to fold in on itself. Oops."
There are several ideas to overcome this (which are beyond the scope of this
article), but one approach is to imagine a quantum theory of gravity that would
have a massless particle (called the graviton) to generate the force. But as
physicist Dave Goldberg pointed out in io9 in 2013, there are problems with
that. At the smallest scales, gravitons would have infinite energy density,
creating an unimaginably powerful gravity field. More study will be required to
see if this is possible.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky
and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at:

The theory of special relativity explains how space and time are linked for
objects that are moving at a consistent speed in a straight line. One of its
most famous aspects concerns objects moving at the speed of light. 

Simply put, as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass becomes
infinite and it is unable to go any faster than light travels. This cosmic speed
limit has been a subject of much discussion in physics, and even in science
fiction, as people think about how to travel across vast distances.

The theory of special relativity was developed by Albert Einstein in 1905, and
it forms part of the basis of modern physics. After finishing his work in special
relativity, Einstein spent a decade pondering what would happen if one
introduced acceleration. This formed the basis of his general relativity,
published in 1915.

History
Before Einstein, astronomers (for the most part)

Internal Forces

Axial Force

Shearing Force

Bending Moment

Relationship Between Loading and Shearing Force

Relationship Between Shearing Force and Bending Moment

Shearing Force and Bending Moment Diagrams


Position of Supports for Uniformly-Loaded Beam to Give
Maximum Load-Carrying Capacity

Beam with Oblique Loading

Three-Pinned Arch

Linear Arch

Beam with Varying Intensity of Loading

Exercise 2

3. Bending Stresses in Beams

Mechanism of Bending

Moment of Resistance

First Moments of Area

Second Moments of Area

Principal Axes of Bending

Modulus of Section

Materials for Beams

Curtailment of Flanges

Moment of Resistance of a B.S.B.

Compound Girder

Simplified Plate Girder Design

Exercise 3
4. Complex Stress

Complementary Shear Stress

The General Case of Plane Stress (Principal Stresses)

Distribution of Shear Stress Across a Solid Rectangular Beam

Exercise 4

5. Statically Determinate Plane Trusses

Perfect Frames

Methods of Analysis

Force Diagrams

Graphical Analysis of a Roof Truss

Solution by s.f. and b.m. Diagrams

Exercise 5

6. Rolling Loads

Influence Lines for Simple Beams

Position of a Train of Loads to Give a Maximum s.f. at a Given


Section

Position of a Train to Give a Maximum b.m. at a Given Section

Position of a Train to Give a Maximum b.m. Under a Given


Load

Influence Lines for Simply Supported Trusses

Influence Line of Horizontal Thrust in a Three-Pinned Arch


Envelope Diagrams of s.f. and b.m.

Exercise 6

7. Combined Bending and Direct Stress

Beams with Longitudinal Loads

Eccentrically Loaded Stocky Struts or Ties

Structures Relying on Gravity for their Stability

Stability of a Chimney

Stresses on the Base of a Dam

Middle Third Rule

Stability of a Retaining Wall

Pre-Stressed Concrete Beams

Exercise 7

8. Deflection of Beams

Curvature

Calculation of Beam Deflections

Cantilevers and Beams with Simple Loadings

Macaulay's Method

Overhanging Beam

Exercise 8

9. Buckling of Struts
Stability of Equilibrium

Determination of Critical Load

Factor of Safety and Load Factor

Effect of Different End Constraints

Exercise 9

10. Deflection of Trusses — Strain Energy Method

Strain Energy

Deflection of a Truss

Steps in the Strain Energy Method of Analysis for Trusses

Exercise 10

11. Deflection of Trusses — Graphical Method

Displacement of a Loaded Particle Supported by Two Cords

Construction of Williot Diagram for a Cantilever Truss

Combined Williot-Mohr Displacement Diagram

Deflection of Simply Supported Truss

Exercise 11

12. Reinforced Concrete

Factors Affecting the Strength of Concrete

Reinforced Concrete Beams

Determining the Moment of Resistance of a Given Beam


Slabs Simply Supported on Two Opposite Edges

Economic Percentage of Steel

Simple Design Problems

You might also like