Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Veselovsk 2017 Morphology PDF
Veselovsk 2017 Morphology PDF
net/publication/325846880
English Morphology
CITATIONS READS
0 3,397
1 author:
Ludmila Veselovská
Palacký University Olomouc
48 PUBLICATIONS 83 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ludmila Veselovská on 19 June 2018.
Ludmila Veselovská
1st and 2nd editions 2006, 2009. Revised 2017.
Reviews
Jeffrey Parrott, PhD; Dagmar Machová, PhD.
Language consultant
Prof. Joseph Emonds, PhD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1
4 MORPHOLOGY ..................................................................................... 16
4.1 Morphemes ............................................................................................................................ 16
4.2 Lexical and non-lexical Meaning of Morphemes .................................................................. 16
4.3 Criteria for dividing morphemes ........................................................................................... 18
4.3.1 Taxonomy with respect to the meaning/function of the morpheme ................................... 18
4.3.2 Taxonomy with respect to the independent occurrence of the morpheme ......................... 19
4.3.3 Taxonomy of affixes according to their position with respect to the stem......................... 19
4.4 Morphemes as Things or Rules? ........................................................................................... 21
4.4.1 Level of Abstraction of Morphology .................................................................................. 21
7 COMPOUNDING .................................................................................... 36
7.1 Orthography........................................................................................................................... 37
7.2 Stress Placement in Compounds ........................................................................................... 38
7.3 Morphology ........................................................................................................................... 38
7.4 Syntax of idioms vs. compounds ........................................................................................... 38
7.5 Semantics .............................................................................................................................. 40
7.6 Headedness of Compounds ................................................................................................... 41
7.7 Right-hand Head Rule ........................................................................................................... 41
12 ATTACHMENTS .................................................................................... 78
12.1 Irregular Plurals ..................................................................................................................... 78
12.2 Extended Irregular Verb Dictionary ...................................................................................... 85
12.3 LIST OF SOME ENGLISH BOUND MORPHEMES ....................................................... 101
12.3.1 Negative affixes ............................................................................................................... 101
12.3.2 Some of the more frequent English suffixes ..................................................................... 101
12.3.3 Prefixes of Germanic origin ............................................................................................ 104
12.3.4 Non-German prefixes ...................................................................................................... 104
12.3.5 Some morphemes of Greek origin ................................................................................... 105
12.3.6 Some of the more frequent roots of Latin origin ............................................................ 106
1
Nonetheless, the presentation and hypotheses here, such as in the choices of categories, are based on
traditional functional and structuralist grammar (which the students used during their pre-university
education) and only slightly influenced by current theoretical proposals.
Recent functional and generative approaches typically present themselves as returning to the
empirical concerns of traditional grammar and at the moment provide a wide range of plausible
frameworks. The grammatical analyses introduced in this course assume the need for empirical and
scientific understanding of human language and although it concentrates on formal grammar, it
assumes interactions with other disciplines such as a theory of communication, literary study,
psychology, sociology, anthropology, etc.
The author hopes that discussing and trying to understand basic grammar in a more universal
and open-minded way turns out to be useful for all students of English language, who can then go on
in their studies in whichever field or framework suits their fancy. However, this script is not a
textbook in a specific linguistic theory. If some students want to pursue their linguistic studies in the
future, they have to find their field and acquire more specialized knowledge in a more systematic
framework.
And at the end, I would like to thank my colleagues Joseph Emonds, Jeffrey Parrott and other
reviewers for their comments, revisions of the text, adding many usefull examples and all their help
which made the text more suitable for seminar work.
2
2 COMMUNICATION (REVISION)
See also: Huddleston & Pullum (2002) pp. 2-16, Huddleston & Pullum (2005) pp. 1-10; Akmajian,
Demers, Farmer & Harnish (1990) pp. 1-10; Crystal (1987) pp. 395-414.
INFERENCE MODEL: takes into account also inferences, i.e. a specific pragmatic interpretation
must include context and consistency (a large complex of factors).
transmitter receiver
speaker/writer CODE = symbols, signs hearer/reader
channel/noise/etc.
CONTEXT (linguistic/ extralinguistic)
2.3 Linguistics
b. LINGUISTICS
- Language form: syntax/morphology, phonology/phonetics
- Language meaning: semantics
- Language use: pragmatics
4
Some levels of linguistics (e.g., phonetics/phonology, semantics, pragmatics) are more autonomous,
i.e. independent. They have their own definable topics and categories, deal with specific elements and
apply their own rules which are less derived from other fields than others.
In contrast, morphology and syntax (= grammar) use similar elements, apply similar rules and discuss
the same or similar topics and categories.
e. h i z f a đ ә i z t ai ә d
Phonological rules apply without respect to meaning, e.g. final devoicing in Czech applies to all parts
of speech and all sentence members, i.e. to all phonetically defined elements irrespective of their role
in the other parts of the language system.
Notice the duality of patterning, as in (4) above. A few meaningless elements (sound segments such
as consonants and vowels) combine into a huge number of meaningful units (morphemes) which
further combine into an infinite number of larger units (complex words, phrases, clauses, texts).
5
(9) Levels of morpho-syntactic (grammatical) structure:
(10) Syntagma
!!!
- relation between two syntactic categories. Syntagmatic relations are hierarchical. Traditionally they
are equivalents of sentence functions (which relate sentence members), e.g. subject-predicate, noun-
adjectival attribute, verb-object.
Sometimes we use only one of the couple to classify the relation. An 'attribute' means a relation which
e.g. an adjective has with respect to a Noun (blue sky).
The syntactic system is a complex net of grammatical relations. The units which form a system are
not separable from the relations, in fact it is the relations (=functions) that justify the units.
(12) Paradigm
!!!
- a list of (e.g. morphological) forms of one unit (tokens of a type), e.g. he (pronoun): he/ his/ him,
help (verb): help/ helped/ helping, book (noun): book /books, nice (adjective): nice/ nicer/ nicest. One
of the paradigmatic forms is usually taken as unmarked and called the citation form. Paradigms are
traditionally related to specific parts of speech (categories).
6
(14) EXERCISE ===========================================
Discuss the main topics (units, terms) of the following sciences. What does it mean to say that
phonetics and semantics are autonomous parts of linguistics?
a. I’ve never been beaten in a poker game by a woman before, so could you be quiet?
b. Ain’t no dame never beat me at poker afore, so shut up, can you?
a. .......................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................
b. ........................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................
7
(17) EXERCISE =================================================
Name the parts/units involved in the structure at a given level using the following terms: sentence
member, sound, syntagma, part of speech, syllable, phoneme, morpheme, word, clause/sentence,
paradigm, predicate, pronoun, etc. Think of other terms related to a given level.
e. m y b [o+ y] f r [ i+ e] n d
a. ....................................................................................................................................................
b. ....................................................................................................................................................
c. ....................................................................................................................................................
d. ....................................................................................................................................................
e. ....................................................................................................................................................
8
3 LINGUISTICS IS A SCIENCE
See also: Huddleston & Pullum (2002) pp. 17-42, Huddleston & Pullum (2005) pp. 11-28.
Linguistics, as a science, deals with a language system, i.e. this means an structure of interrelated
elements. The language system is a reality, it is a human-specific code for communication. It is subject
to principles and rules that are specific to human language structure, i.e. they are “species-specific
abilities.”
(1) Linguistics
a. observes/studies data within one or many language(s),
b. describes them (classifies their parts),
c. looks for generalizations in these descriptions, and
d. creates a model of grammar that can express these generalizations, but cannot express other
systems that cannot occur as human languages.
a. Observational adequacy: the model must reflect the data correctly, as in (1a-b above).
b. Descriptive adequacy: the model uses symbols and categories to expresses not just the data but
also generalizations in the descriptions of data, as in (1c).
c. Explanatory adequacy: individual rules are related to the whole system, as in (1d).
(4) General UNIVERSALS: e.g. all languages have essentially the same parts of speech.
(5) Language-specific features: e.g. some languages have morphological case on adjectives, e.g.
Czech and German, while others do not, e.g. English and French (comparative linguistics).
The only part of 19th c. linguistics today considered scientific (that is, predictive in some sense)
described historical (“diachronic”) sound changes in Indo-European languages.
(6) The distinction between diachronic and synchronic linguistics, which is the study of language
as a system in the brains of speakers, which has no (significant) historical dimension.
9
Except for learning new vocabulary, an adult’s grammar typically doesn’t change.
For de Saussure, all speakers of the same language share langue, the same store of words and
morphemes, which he calls “signs”. The relation between sound and meaning for each sign is
arbitrary.
Parole is how individuals choose to use items from their langue in making up utterances
communicating with each other. Thus, the parole of any two speakers is different.
Noam Chomsky’s Syntactic Structures (1957) proposed that natural language grammars can be
represented as formal systems that combine minimal units of meaning (= “morphemes”) into well-
formed sentences of a language.
In Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (1965), he argued that humans are innately disposed to acquire such
grammars (without instruction as small children). This ability to acquire, understand, and produce
language is linguistic competence. The actual use of language in particular real life contexts is
performance.
Chomsky’s competence not only includes knowledge of a lexicon (= de Saussure’s langue), but also
the combinatory principles of grammar, in addition to langue.
Labels used in grammar for classifications (e.g. parts of speech or sentence functions) do not denote
any real entities. The classification must reflects some theoretical claim about similarity between the
members of the class. Saying that XX is "a noun" or "an attribute" we are claiming that XX has the
properties and behaviour which a theory assigns to a concept of "noun" or "attribute". If the label does
not correlate with any properties/ characteristics/ behaviour, it is not of any use.
(10) Native speakers have intuitions a) about the WELL-FORMEDNESS of strings of words,
and
b) about STRUCTURE (groupings, etc.).
10
"We may make an intuitive judgment that some linguistic expression is odd or deviant. But we cannot
in general know, pretheoretically, whether this deviance is a matter of syntax, semantics, pragmatic,
belief, memory limitations, style, etc., or even whether these are appropriate categories for the
interpretation of the judgment in question. It is an obvious and uncontroversial fact that informant
judgments do not fall neatly into clear categories: syntactic, semantic, etc.”
(Chomsky: Essays, 1977:4)
B) Semantic Competence
"The borderline between grammar and semantics is unclear, and linguists will draw the line
variously... Similarly the borderline between grammar and pragmatics (and even more between
semantics and pragmatics) is unclear." (Quirk et al. 1985:16)
a. He thought that Elisabeth was there, but it turned out that she wasn't.
b. ! He realized that Elisabeth was here, but it turned out that she wasn't.
a. Petr věděl, že ho někdo určitě viděl. = Peter and ho are the same person
b. (On) Věděl, že Petra někdo určitě viděl. = Peter and on are not the same person
(16) a. Hei hoped that Mary loved himi. - Pronoun co-reference is fine.
b. Whoi hoped that Mary loved himi? - Pronoun co-reference is fine if who= him.
c. Who did he hope that Mary loved? - Pronoun co-reference bad if who= him.
*Whoi did hei hope that Mary loved?
11
C) Grammatical Competence (Grammaticality)
!!!
b. *Opens the window, please!
c. *Each room have two or three window.
d. *Jane might be had pregnant but she had miscarriage.
e. *The witch flying is with straw broom some.
The reason for the ungrammaticality has to be found, defined and explained, referring to some rule
and/or principle, which the ungrammatical sentence violates.
(21) Syntactic competence: I sent him out a copy. vs. *I sent a copy to him out.
Testing grammaticality (native speaker judgments) is the main method for studying a linguistic
system. Grammatical examples, however, illustrate a possibility, not a rule. The rules are defined
correctly only when their violation results in ungrammaticality. We have to find contrasting examples
to demonstrate the potentials and limits of the system.
Compare the following examples in (22). Discuss how each of them 'demonstrates' the rule for the
order of Subject – Verb – Object in English and Czech (and are these fixed vs. free?).
(22) SVO a. Mary wrote the letter. a'. Marie napsala dopis.
SOV b. *Mary the letter wrote. b'. % Marie dopis napsala.
OVS c. *The letter wrote Mary. c'. Dopis napsala Marie.
OSV d. The letter Mary wrote. d'. % Dopis Marie napsala.
VSO e. *Wrote Mary the letter. e'. % Napsala Marie dopis.
VOS f. *Wrote the letter Mary. f'. % Napsala dopis Marie.
12
d. Můj prvok si uvědomil, že jsem mizerná kuchařka.
e. Moje teflonová pánev si uvědomila, že jsem mizerná kuchařka.
f. Moje pravdomluvnost si uvědomila, že jsem mizerná kuchařka.
g. Moje narození si uvědomil, že jsem mizerná kuchařka.
h. Můj bratr Petr si uvědomil, že jsem mizerná kuchařka, ale já jsem dokázala, že
to není pravda.
i. Moje Petr si uvědomil, jsem že mizerný kuchařka.
13
(25) EXERCISE ================================================
Mark the acceptability and try to explain it. Which principle/rule does the ungrammatical example
violate? Be clear, short and accurate.
.........................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................
14
Do your examples in (27) exclude/ take into account also the following data?
If not, do they make your rule 'wrong'? How can one make it 'right'?
a. * I be at home.
b. * The teacher musts read their papers.
g. I saw him.
h. I saw Adam.
i. I saw the tall blond boy.
j. I saw the he/ him.
k. I saw the tall blond he/ him.
l. I saw the tall blond one.
- Aarts, Bas (2008) 'Syntactic Argumentation.' In: English Syntax and Argumentation,
Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire. Chapter 10, p. 167-187.
- Haegemann, Liliane (2006) 'Linguistics as the Science of Language.' In: Thinking Syntactically: A
Guide to Argumentation and Analysis, Blackwell, London. Chapter 1, p. 3-18.
15
4 MORPHOLOGY
See also: Huddleston & Pullum (2002) pp. 1567-1579, Huddleston & Pullum (2005) pp. 264-290;
Crystal (1987) pp. 88-100; Dušková (1994) pp. 13-22; Akmajian/ Demers/ Farmer/ Harnish (1990)
pp. 11-52; Finegan & Besnier (1989) pp. 85-124; Fromkin & Rodman (1990) pp. 122-157; Katamba
(1993); Matthews (1974); Spenser (1991).
4.1 Morphemes
Which kind of meaning? In language everything has ‘some’ meaning = reason/function/role in the
system. Recall that sound segments (= “phonemes”) can distinguish meanings, but they do not carry it
themselves.
Discussing the meaning of all the parts of the words below, we need to refer not only to the lexical
meaning of the stem, but also to the other parts of the word.
Lexical morphemes (stems and fixed combinations of them) express a vast number of meanings –
they reflect human concepts: boy, believe, age, flaw, evolution, game, vegetable, vacuum, China,
Christmas, Islam, strawberry, road block, photo montage, intervene, undermine, disconcerting, etc.
Computational linguists estimate that native speakers control about 30,000 lexical entries, including
compounds, derivational formations, etc.
Non-lexical morphemes are far from infinite in number. They are the core of the
grammar/combinatorial system of a language, i.e. their number, form, position, combinations etc.
define the specific typological characteristics of the language (e.g. Czech vs. English).
16
Some morphemes provide a grammaticalized (simplified, regular) meaning (within the existing
language specific limits). They express "grammatical features."
(5) English: book of good stories, lack of money, the King of Kings, a matter of fact
The morpheme of that introduces NPs inside larger NPs signals the relation of attribute between a
modifying noun and the preceding head noun. It has no other function or meaning in this position.
The morpheme -á in vysok-á is a morpheme of agreement (in gender, number and case), which
signals that the expression is related to a feminine noun (compare with vysoký).
The form these contains a morpheme of agreement in number, which signals, that the expression is
related to a plural noun (compare with this).
Case shows a relation to another member of the syntagma. Here, -m marks the object function of he
with regard to the verb kill or the preposition with. Such a function is interpreted as how the object (of
a verb or preposition) is affected. The meanings include in (i) he is dead, and in (ii) he was spoken to.
-s in his marks the function of he with regard to the noun picture, and such a function is interpreted as
the Agent, Patient, or Possessor role of he.
(10) Feature: a (usually) binary property of sound segments and grammatical categories.
E.g. ±VOICING, ±NUMBER , ±TENSE
17
4.3 Criteria for dividing morphemes
18
4.3.2 Taxonomy with respect to the independent occurrence of the morpheme
4.3.3 Taxonomy of affixes according to their position with respect to the stem
a. prefix
(19) Taxonomy by position (18): b. suffix
c.
d.
circumfix
in(ter)fix !!!
(20) a. Prefixes: under-graduate, en-rich, ex-minister, mis-read, over-sleep, re-design
b. Suffixes: dark-ness, atom-ic, govern-ment, brother-ly, intens-ify, modern-ise
c. Circumfixes: some Czech collective nouns, e.g. sou-ostrov-í ‘island group’, some
German past participles, e.g. ge-hab-t ‘had’
d. Infixes: rare in English, e.g. abso-bloody-lutely, and Czech, e.g. to-ho-to, to-mu-to
a. read-ing .......................................................................................................................
b. stop-s .......................................................................................................................
c. introduc-ed ......................................................................................................................
a. read-ing-s .......................................................................................................................
19
(23) EXERCISE ================================================
Which kind of morpheme are the –S/-ED/-ING/-ER morphemes in the following examples? Justify
your choice. Consider the category of the following word in the context.
a. speak-er ......................................................................................................................
b. moth-er .......................................................................................................................
c. nic-er .......................................................................................................................
a. yawn-ing .......................................................................................................................
b. awn- ing .......................................................................................................................
c. own- ing .......................................................................................................................
a. un-paid .......................................................................................................................
b. un-derling ........................................................................................................................
c. un-do ………..............................................................................................................
a. re-call ........................................................................................................................
b. re-cord ........................................................................................................................
c. re-member .........................................................................................................................
a. She is much nic-er than Mary. a'. She is more beautiful than Mary.
b. I stopp-ed at the traffic lights. b'. I will stop at the traffic lights.
c. Jill does-n't want to come. c'. Jill does not want to come.
d. Chod-íš do parku. d'. You are going to the park.
e. On chod-í do lesa. e'. He go-es to the forest.
20
(26) EXERCISE ================================================
What is the meaning of the morpheme –ER/MORE in the following contexts?
a. big, big-er, the bigg-est b. clever, more clever, the most clever
c. This dwarf is much bigg-er than that dwarf, but neither of them is big.
d. Though Barbara is more clever than Grace, they are both pretty stupid, in fact.
The conditioning for [-s/-z/-iz] in (a) is phonetic, in (b) the conditioning is syntactic, and in (c) the
conditioning is lexical.
21
(29) Affixation to a stem (See again (20).
a. prefixes NA-rostl / DE-stabilize
b. suffixes bez to-HO chlapce, modern-IZE
c. infixes bez to-HO-to chlapce
d. circumfixes chodi-LA BYCH
BUT! There are other examples which make this simplified view less plausible.
Note: Regular phonetic conditioning and conventional spelling changes are not suppletion:
(31) stop> stopp-ed, edit> edited, find> finds, nice> nic-er, city> cities, tomato>tomatoes
Cliticization to a stem. In English this is usually called contraction and written with
apostrophes. Are the bold morphemes on the right bound of free?
Under this view, what is insertion ‘subsequent’ to? If the abstract rules don’t depend on words that
actually exist, then they are all productive, and say little about the real forms of a language. What
describes a given language are the conditions for inserting specific morphemes, as in View I.
But some morphological processes don’t seem to just “add things” to strings of morphemes:
22
(35) Reduplication: Czech: mal-IN-ký > mali-LIN-katý
Spanish: poqu-IT-o > poqu-IT-IT-o
Some languages use reduplication as a grammatical device. But in English it is always word play, and
is limited to spoken language. Nonetheless, different versions are common:
(36) (i) Baby-talk reduplicates trochaic words, replacing initial consonants with w-:
bready-weady, milky-wilky, Daddy-waddy, butter-wutter, button-wutton
(ii) Reduplication can form compounds with regular lefthand stress, meaning ‘genuine,
authentic’:
salad-salad (with no meat), French-french (born in France or ethnic French), city-city (not a
small place more like a town), coffee-coffee (not decaffeinated)
(iii) Disdainful reduplication (U.S. slang, from Yiddish), replaces consonants before initial
stress with shm-: fancy-shmancy, bagel-shmagel, Rolex-shmolex.
These processes appear to apply subsequent to the insertion of specific morphemes, because they
involve modifying such morphemes in systematic ways.
a. Number .......................................................................................................................
b. Gender .......................................................................................................................
c. Case .......................................................................................................................
d. Tense .......................................................................................................................
e. Aspect .......................................................................................................................
f. Grading .......................................................................................................................
23
(40) EXERCISE ================================================
Give four examples (two English and two Czech) of the types of morphemes. Write a complex word
and underline the relevant morpheme.
ENGLISH CZECH
free functional morphemes.................................................................................................................
free stems............................................................................................................................................
bound bases…..………………………………………………………………………........................………
prefixes …….......................................................................................................................................
suffixes…….........................................................................................................................................
circumfixes ….....................................................................................................................................
EXERCISE ================================================
Using your vocabulary and consulting the Appendix 1, derive as many words as possible from the
following roots. Example: employ, employ-ee (V→N), employ-er (V→N), under-employ-ment (V→N),
un-employ-ed (V→Adj), employ-able (V→Adj)...
read .........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
act .........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
light .........................................................................................................................................
a. waiters
......................................................................................................................................
b. modernizeable ..................................................................................................................................
c. re-reads …..................................................................................................................................
d. unspoken ……..............................................................................................................................
e. (he is) reading ..................................................................................................................................
f. having been arrested ………………….………………………………………....…….......……....………
...............................................................................................................................................
24
5 WORD-FORMATION, ‘COINING’, ‘NEOLOGISMS’
See also: Huddleston & Pullum (2002: 1623-1695), Huddleston & Pullum (2005: 264-290); Quirk/
Greenbaum/ Leech/ Svartvik (2004: 1515-1586).
5.1 Lexicon
Word: A simple word is a minimal free form. Lexeme: A word that is listed in lexicon.
A lexical entry is comprised of the form + the meaning, i.e. it includes all specific (idiosyncratic)
phonological/morphological/syntactic/semantic properties of a word.
Some lexemes are smaller than a word (they are bound morphemes), and some are greater (compounds
and idioms).
!!!
.
(1) Center/ Core vs. Periphery of the lexicon:
Grammatical elements and basic lexical words are in the (stable) center.
The Periphery (neologisms, cultural changes, slang, archaisms) undergoes more modifications.
Position of a specific lexical entry in the Lexicon is subject to diachrony - it changes
(2) NEOLOGISMS:
a. Totally new forms are rare, but can be found in slang.
b. old forms with a new meaning, e.g. snail-mail, cool, cruise, surf
c. generalized meaning, e.g. Kleenex, Xerox, Pampers,cola, faucet
(3) LOAN words:
a. genetics, international, infant, perfume, table, sister, they, take
b. coffee, café, teepee, robot, polka, hacek, typhoon, sushi, trek
Languages can differ in their tolerance to loans. The reasons may be social (e.g. xenophobia) or formal
(e.g., synthetic languages must adopt the new words to paradigms).
(4) COMPOSITION:
a. DERIVATION: combining stems and bound morphemes (Ch. 3)
b. COMPOUNDING. Ch. 6 treats regular forms of compounding.
25
(5) Quotation compounds:
are special fixed phrases used as single words:
hard-to-get items, do-it-yourself store, fly-by-night business, hand-me-down shirts,
off the cuff speech.
(8) CONVERSION:
(a) True Conversion: See discussion of (30) in Ch. 3. These may involve a null affix.
(b) Partial Conversion: see the discussion of (31) in Ch. 3. These involve some stress, vowel,
or consonant changes. Frequent but no longer productive in present-day English.
construct (V) > construct n., increase (V) > increase n., loose>loss, choose>choice, sell> sale,
sing>song, advise>advice, believe>belief, extend>extent, see>sight
(9) ABBREVIATIONS:
a. Initial abbreviations: IBM, MP, p.m., sob, UN, EU, ac-dc, pms
b. Acronyms: UNESCO, radar, wasp, NASA, snafu, WACS, awol
c. Clipping:bike, fridge, info, veg, detox(ify), butt(ocks), to con (< confidence), hype(rbole),
mike (<microphone), rehab(ilitation)
Back formation is a (relatively rare but very interesting from a morphological point of view) source of
new stems derived by analogy, when some part of the word is analysed as an affix although it is NOT
historically an affix. (Sometimes backformation can look the same as clipping.)
To claim that some word has been back-formed, we have to provide arguments about the likelihood of
the steps in the process of the word formation. The arguments may result from:
26
c. knowledge of historical data; such as those in (14).
(12) a. tele – vis – ion regular complex word consisting of existing morphemes
tele- e.g. tele-phone, tele-graph, tele-pathy
vis- e.g. vis-ibility, in-vis-ible
-ion e.g. locat-ion, nat-ion, divis-ion, evas-ion
Conclusion: the word 'televise' couldn't be formed in a normal way. It must have been backformed by
speakers assuming an analogy with the words ending on –ion which have the verbal source in –ise
(modern-ise → modernisat-ion; re-vise → revis-ion).
(13) baby – sit – ing regular (old, Germanic) process of incorporating compounds.
The structure is [N+ [V + er/ing ]], never [N+V]. Exceptions
are assumed to follow the regularity, not the opposite:
The knowledge of historical data can thus be a source of information about a word’s origin.
27
(17) EXERCISE ================================================
How were the underlined words first formed?
René, IBM, teepee, zoo, vacuum, Dolores Ibarruri, Ghana, tsunami, knedlich, gnocchi
28
(20) EXERCISE ================================================
What is the origin of the following words?
a. brunch ....................................................................................................................................
b. jeep ...................................................................................................................................
c. boa.tel ..................................................................................................................................
d. co-ed ...................................................................................................................................
e. wi-fi ..................................................................................................................................
f. sci-fi ...................................................................................................................................
g. .......... ...................................................................................................................................
h. .......... . ..................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................
a. hard-to-get ................................................................................................................
b. do-it- yourself store ................................................................................................................
c. fly-by-night ................................................................................................................
d. what's-his-name ................................................................................................................
29
6 DERIVATIONAL MORPHOLOGY
See also: Huddleston & Pullum (2002: 1666-1720), Huddleston & Pullum (2005: 264-290).
(2) (a) blueprint, word-stock, trigger-happy, dry clean, offshoot, back formation
(b) writ-er, invest-ment, final-ize, brother-ly, mis-calculate, re-invent, bilion-th
(c) read-s, John-’s, thinnk-s, wash-ed, spok-en, breath-ing, nic-er, ugli-est
(d) friend-li-est, re-low-er-ing, re-develop-ment-s, de-magnet-ize-s
Real words vs. potential words (‘individual’ occasional nonce-words: uncomplicatedness). Words are
listable (in dictionaries). Core and Periphery of the Lexicon; see (1) in Chapter 4.
Productivity follows from the rule-based processes of forming new words.
A certain process can become more of less productive over many years.
Productive vs. idiosyncratic / frozen morphemes: E.g., past participles V–ed vs. V-en.
Creativity - standard linguistic competence of the system potentials
- individual innovations (poetic language)
Phonetic, morphological and semantic constraints which restrict the application of some more general
rule.
30
6.2.1 Blocking Effect
A more specific (idiosyncratic) form takes preference over (blocks the existence and use of) a less
specific (regular) form. This is the Blocking Principle of Aronoff (1976).
(6) a. fast > fasten, soft > soften, dark > darken, loose > loosen, tough > toughen
b. dry > *dryen, blue >*bluen, low >*lowen, fine >*finen, lame >*lamen
c. stupid >*stupiden, morose >*morosen, urgent >*urgenten, alive >*aliven
The order of morphemes is fixed. And English allows only one productive inflection.
This is unlike even similar languages like German: ein saue-rer-er Apfel ‘a more sour apple’.
(8) a. two boy-s; a boy-’s room; *two boys’s room (where boys’s has two syllables)
some poem-s; a poen-‘s ending;* two poens’s endings (with two syllables)
b. that James family; those James-es are crazy; the James-’s car (two syllables ok)
Sherlock Holmesʼs arrogant; Sherlock Holmes’s career (two syllables ok)
c. men’s room, women’s room, *boys’s room, *kids’s room
Three classes or “levels” of morphemes (Margaret Allen 1978; Dorothy Siegel 1979).
Class I (often Romance): a. -tion, -ity, -ous, ... b. in-, pro-, re-, ...
Class II (often Germanic): a. -ness, -ful, -ly, ... b. un-, sub-, re-, ...
Class III: productive inflections (suffixes)
31
Level Ordering of affixes (Word composition as a Process)
(i) take the base and add Class I affix, possibly several: e.g. nation+al + ize + ation
→ assign word stress rules (and apply non-automatic phonological processes),
(ii) then add affixes of Class II in its position: e.g. de + nation+al + ize + ation,
(iii) then add Class III affixes (regular inflection) e.g. de + nation+al + ize + ation + s.
(9) Class I affixes always precede Class II affixes and Class III endings.
a. danger-ous-ly *danger-ly-ous
b. writ-er-s *write-s-er
c. courage-ous-ness *courage-ness-ous
d. able-ity-s (abil-iti-es) *able-s-ity
e. character-iz-ing *character-ing-ize
Class I affixes have special phonological processes, Classes II/III are phonologically inert.
(12) Compound adjectives of the form ADJ+N+ed seem best for ‘inalienable possession’:
E.g. underemployment = under (prefix, ‘below, less’, e.g. under-ground), employ (root, ‘give
work’, e.g. employ-er), ment (suffix, V→N, ‘state’, ‘process’’, e.g. govern-ment)
32
a. childishness .................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
b. novelists .......................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
c. overdevelopment .......................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
d. governmental .......................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
e. modernize ......................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
f. privatizations ......................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................
g. reinvestment ...............................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
h. immortality ........................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................
i. debriefing ................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................
j. co-operatively ......................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................
k. subcontractor ......................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................
l. multi-talented ......................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
m. monothematic ......................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................
Explain the ungrammaticality of (a) Using examples (b) and (c) discuss whether (a) is due to
"pronunciation difficulty" or "impossibility of possession by a plural noun".
a. *girls’s room (where girl’s has a second syllable with a reduced vowel)
b. Charles → Charles-e-s, → Charles-’s book
c. children / woman → children's room, women’s shoes
Mention the synchronic vs. diachronic approach (which morphemes are synchronically productive?).
33
(15) EXERCISE ================================================
Write the meaning/function of the following morphemes and give two short, distinct example sentences
containing them.
a. -ise ............................................................................................................................................
b. -ic ............................................................................................................................................
c. -al ............................................................................................................................................
d. -en ............................................................................................................................................
e. -hood ...........................................................................................................................................
f. re- ...........................................................................................................................................
g. co- ...........................................................................................................................................
h. dis- ...........................................................................................................................................
i. fore- ...........................................................................................................................................
34
(19) EXERCISE ================================================
Discuss the distinctions between uses of the morpheme -er.
a. baker, cleaner , dancer, fighter, killer, painter, teacher, toiler, worker, wrecker
b. banker, barber, butcher,carpenter, dresser, farmer, gripper,, hooker, lawyer, prisoner
c. bomber, mixer, stretcher, hanger, upper/downer, whisker, rooster, poster, breather
a. V → N ......................................................................................................................................
b. V → A ......................................................................................................................................
c. A → V ......................................................................................................................................
d. A → N ......................................................................................................................................
e. N → A .....................................................................................................................................
f. N→ V .............................................................................................................................,.........
a. to chain smoke
b. to televise
c. to beg
d. a burger
e. cheesburger
f. a crap
35
7 COMPOUNDING
See Huddleston & Pullum (2002) pp. 1644-1666, Huddleston & Pullum (2005) pp. 264-290.
Compounding is a fusion of individual words into one complex unit. It is a process on two levels:
semantic and formal. Some productive (or “transparent”) compunds are fused only formally, but
many lexical (or “opaque”) compounds are fused formally and semantically.
Outside of exceptional cases, the bases are one of the four lexical categoreis, N, V, A, P, and the
compound is also one of these same four lexical categories:
(3) a. Nouns:
stairway, bus ticket, high street, meatloaf ,think tank, holdover, outdoors
b. Verbs:
brainstorm, sandblast, chain smoke, deep fry,underestimate, outswim, overtake
c. Adjectives:
blue green, air tight, noise free, outspoken, ice cold, free standing, outgoing
d. Prepositions:
alongside, inside, on board, throughout, underneath, within
Most examples in (3) are lexical compounds and often only this type is considered true compounds.
The degree of fusion is a matter of degree, not a dichotomy and it is subject to the dimension of time.
Moreover, distinct languages can define compounds in distinct ways. In Czech, orthography is crucial.
In English, nothing stops the two bases from being derived forms: independence movement.
36
(4) I. Phrase: a group of words that syntactic principles treat as a unit.
a. Free syntactic combination, with transparent meaning: A big cat scratched my tongue.
b. Idioms, with several bases connected by syntactic principles but functioning as
single semantic units, i.e. the meaning is opaque: The cat’s got my tongue again today.
(5) II. Compound: a single word in a lexical category formed of several bases which
functions in the language structure as a single word.
Many interesting contrasts can be made here, e.g. between (Ia) and (IIb):
(6)
a. Do centra města nesmějí nákladní auta. = Ia: free syntactic combination (standard collocation)
b. Náklaďáky do centra města nesmějí. = IIb: compound
c. That bird is really black. Have you ever seen such a black bird? = Ia
d. There are many blackbirds in the park. Some of them are not black at all. = IIb
The process of fusion in compounding can (and should) be considered on several levels:
7.1 Orthography
This is the main (necessary and sufficient) criterion in Czech but not in English. English spelling is a
sufficient but not necessary sign of compounding. Many compounds are hyphenated or separated.
37
7.2 Stress Placement in Compounds
Bloomfield (1933): accent subordination is a hallmark of English compounds. Compounds have one
main stress, usually on the lefthand base (but not in all patterns). Any other stress is secondary. The
normal stress in English phrases is on the last word or phrase.
(10) a. to order iced (black) COFFEE vs. to order green ICE cream
b. a white HOUSE with a garden vs. The WHITE house admission of defeat
c. to DEEP fry (shrimp) can be fun vs. a deep DIVE can be dangerous
d. that (huge) MOVING van vs. that (slowly) moving VAN
(11) apple PIE, man MADE, easy-GOING, pea GREEN, knee DEEP, dirt CHEAP
So single stress on the left is a sufficient but not necessary criterion for an English compound. Outside
of contrastive stress, in free syntactic combinations the stress is rather on the right.
7.3 Morphology
In English, lexical morphemes are ordered in front of inflectional ones. There is no meaningful,
productive inflection inside a true compound.
The following are based on irrgular inflections, and are not productive:
We can test whether the semantically opaque combination behaves as one syntactic unit (a compound)
or as a syntactic phrase consisting of several separable parts (an idiom).
a. when the chaps are here a'. when the chips are down
b. rule the country b'. rule the roost
38
c. a man from the village c'. a man about town
d. round the house d'. round-the-clock
e. as clean as you want e’. (as) clean as a whistle
We can test whether a structure can be changed by some regular syntactic process.
Idioms: undergo syntactic operations (to various degrees, not always freely)
Compounds: are inert/frozen with respect to syntax (syntactic atoms).
(i) Enlarging the complex by additional material: e.g. Nouns in a syntactic complex (phrase) can
be premodified by semantically compatible Adjectives rather freely.
(18) a. break the ice a'. The ice was finally broken by Mary.
b. keep tabs on someone b'. Tabs are being kept on new students.
c. take someone for a ride c’. The owner has been taken for a ride.
(iii) Questioning of separate parts: individual parts of a free syntactic verb phrase (Objects,
Adverbials) can be questioned. But parts of idioms often cannot be:
(19) a. stand here/at the station Where was he standing? - Here/ At the station.
b. stand by/at attention Where did he stand? - *By/*At attention.
c. take a coffee What did you take? - A coffee.
d. take courage (idiom) What did you take? - *Courage.
39
e. have a bad cold What does he have now? - A bad cold.
f. have fun (idiom) What did you have? - *A lot of fun.
Premodifying Adjectives can generally be used as Predicates after a copula and in a relative clause.
With idioms the same changes in the structure causes the loss of the idiomatic meaning, as in (20)
and (21). See also section 7.5.
(20) a colorful/ blue/ black bird (after copula) The bird is colorful/ blue/ black.
(relative clause) A bird which is colorful /blue/ black
7.5 Semantics
Remember that transparent meaning includes the syntagmatic information, i.e. a hierarchy, with the
kind of relation expressed in some formal way (word order, morphology, etc.).
BLACK
bird
+ modification
BLACKBIRD
!!!
In the following pair of words, it is not enough to know the meaning of both, we must also know how
they are related. Which is hierarchically higher and what is thefunction does the subordinate element?
40
Many phrases can have both transparent and idiomatic readings:
The grammatical relations between elements can also to some extent be transparent in idioms,
especially if one of the elements is a Verb.
(30) a. playmaker ‘a person who makes plays’ (team leader in football, hockey)
b. man-eater ‘an animal that eats people’
c. house cleaning ‘activity of professionally cleaning houses’
d. ball park ‘a park or grassy stadium where ball games are played’
e. underground ‘(something) which is under the ground’
The HEAD is the most important part of a compound. But what does ‘most important’ mean?
In grammar we take for the head the element which assigns a category to the larger unit, i.e. the one
which takes relevant inflection and determines the syntactic distribution.
In semantics we consider meaning: grandchild is a kind of a child; a man eater is a kind of eater. But
semantics is an uncertain guide: if one overtakes, is one taking? If you baby sit, how much do you sit?
Consider the following compounds consisting of distinct categories. Which of them decides about the
category of the complex?
41
f. P+A=A overconfident, outspoken, inbred, downtrodden
g. N+A=A world-wide, user-friendly
h. P+V=V underestimate, outscore, overrate, downplay
h.
i.
N+V=V
A+V=V
baby sit, sandblast, chain smoke
deep fry !!!
(32) Right-hand Head Rule (Williams, 1981):
In morphology we observe that the head of a morphologically complex word is the
right-hand member of that word .
This holds for all regular compounds in English and Czech as well, and in many languages.
This Right Hand Head Rule explains why the regular and productive inflection in a compound is based
on the right hand member, as seen in Section section 6.3.
The RHHR explains why the gender and number of a Czech compound is the gender of the right hand
member. It further explains the partial semantic correlation between a compound’s meaning and that
of its right hand member, as seen e.g. in (27).
42
(38) EXERCISE ================================================
Paraphrase and translate the examples below. Consider several types of arguments showing that the
following are/are not idioms/compounds. Recall that the arguments are to be (i) stress-based, (ii)
morphological, (iii) syntactic, (iv) semantic.
a. skyline h. overreact
b. wet-suit i. light green
c. near-sightedness j. call girl
d. foolproof k. hanger on
e. hard-hearted l. downplay
f. near-sighted m. brother-in-law
g. chicken supreme n. heir apparent
43
g. to hit the roof/ceiling lose temper violently
h. to hit the jackpot get rich quick
i. to hit the sack/ hay go to bed tired
cf. to have a roll in the hay have sex
j. to hit the big time become famous (entertainer)
k. to hit the spot be exactly the right thing
l. to hit the bull's eye make an exact remark
m. to hit the nail on the head say something exactly true
n. to hit some place e.g. London become the fashion there, e.g. in London
o. to hit a sore spot/a nerve say something really bothering somebody
p. to hit on someone to interact with someone with sexual intent
q. to hit it off get on together really well
r. to hit the dirt get on the ground to avoid shooting
s. to hit paydirt discover gold (literally or metaphorically)
t. to hit home say the most relevant thing in a context
44
8 SOME SPECIAL KINDS OF (ENGLISH) COMPOUNDS
See Huddleston & Pullum (2002) pp. 1644-1666, Huddleston & Pullum (2005) pp. 264-290.
English compounds of the form N+N are productive and recursive, i.e. an already compound Noun
can modify or be modified by another Noun. Modifying Adjectives can also be related to any of the
Nouns. So a given string of say, three nouns, has an ambiguous (more than one) interpretation,
which depends on how the listener relates the elements (which hierarchy is assigned to the structure).
In Czech, a translation must disambiguate the structure.
Stress patterns sometimes disambigurate the structure, but are of course unavailable in writing.
Incorporation of Object/Adverbial into Verb: The basis is a Verb plus its argument. Because of the
RHHR, the verb is last.
The verb’s argument is preposed (“incorporated”), and the compound must be deverbalized by a
nominal or adjectival derivational suffix. It is an old, productive Germanic derivational process.
(2) Verb phrase source: lend money, make shoes, sell books, make hay, lay bricks….
45
Besides objects, an initial incorporated element can be an adjunct of time/place/manner/etc.
In a non-productive set of lexicalized verbal compounds, the N suffixes -er/-ing need not be used. In
this case, the initial element must be adverbial. (See section 5.3 on Back Formation.)
(5) Some lexicalized verbs: babysit, dry clean, chain smoke, bar tend, sand blast
(6) a. My aunt baby sat/ *house-cleaned all weekend.
b. It’s dangerous to chain smoke /*cigar smoke like that.
c. They will sand blast the old cathedral soon.
Some incorporating compounds (esp. those which originated from adjuncts) are subject to
"backformation" when the nominalizing suffix (-er/-ing) which is otherwise unseparable is taken away
and a verb is formed which normally would be ungrammatical.
Alliterative compounds use ABLAUT, combining high front vowel + low vowel. These have often
entered the written language.
(8) wishy-washy, mish-mash ‘random combination’, shilly-shally ‘act indecisively’(a verb), spic
and span ‘very clean’, tip-top ‘best’, be-bop, hip hop, pitter-patter, tick-tock
Rhyming is typical for slang, nursery rhymes, child language, etc. (special stylistic value).
(9) a. backpack, lovey-dovy, hocus pocus, honky tonk, Black-Jack, claptra, super duper
b. goody-goody good person in naive way, or as adjective
c. namby-pamby weak, ineffective person, or as adjective
d. chalk talk strategy session given by a sports coach
e. hanky-panky immature, almost child-like sexual play
In both types, the head is on the right (RHHR): shilly-shallying, goody-goodies, mish-mashes.
46
8.3.2 Cranberry and Neoclassical Compounds (analogical formations)
Some bound morphemes appear only in one or few combinations = 'cranberry' morphemes.
In compounding, the morphemes tend to be of the same origin e.g. the above are all Germanic.
Some compounds were taken from a foreign language as already compounds, or invented as technical
or scientific terms. Their structure may be non-transparent to an English speaker, since their parts are
not used separately. On the other hand, speakers can acquire in varying degrees awareness of their
structure, as in (11) below.
Though semantically coordinate, morphology can detect a hierarchy, using inflection and the RHHR.
These are common in English only as modifying members of compounds as in (12).
These are marked and unusual in English. Inflection again reveals which element is the head.
(14) a. N-PREPOSITION:
i. passer-by, passers-by, *passer-bys
ii. hanger on, hangers on, *hanger ons
iii. stand by, *standsby, standbys
iv. walk on, *walks on, walk ons
47
b. LEGAL BASIS:
i. mother-in-law, mothers-in-law, *mother-in-laws
ii. postmaster general, postmasters general, *postmaster generals
iii. heir apparent, heirs apparent, *heir apparents
iv. wife-to-be, wives-to-be, *wife-to-bes
v. lady-in-waiting, ladies in waiting, *lady in waitings
Language manuals frequenly mention the French origin of, for example, several legal terms. This may
explain why in menus and cooking, with or without French sources, left headed N-A and N-N
compounds are common and not pronounced as foreign phrases:
(15) chicken supreme, chicken Kiev, salad Nicoise, eggs Florentine, oysters Rockefeller, lobster
Newberg, peach melba, beef Stroganoff, veal Marengo, speghetti Bolognese
Compounds can be: a. endocentric (have a head). These are by far the most common.
b. exocentric (have no obvious (semantic?) head).
In English, some compounds appear headless only w.r.t. to semantics/meaning, but syntactically
(and morphologically) the unit almost always does have a right-hand head. One common class of such
compounds are “dead metaphors”; speakers have little or no concept that a metaphor is involved.
It is impossible to define which part is more important with respect to meaning. Morphology,
however, takes the rightmost element for the head of the complex.
Phrasal verbs are idiomatic combinations such as hold NP up ‘delay’ or ‘rob’, put NP down ‘insult’,
buy NP off ‘bribe’, carry NP out ‘successfully conclude’, take NP in ‘trick’.
Phrasal verbs are not compounds. Recall that compounds have parts that cannot be separated, but
object NPs can always separate the two parts of phrasal verbs (though they need not).
There are other reasons why phrasal verbs are not single constituents:
(17) a. Regular compounds are stressed on the left member, but in phrasal verbs, the
prepositional particle receives stress.
b. The RHHR requires that a right member be a head of a productive combination, but
inflection shows that the V is the head of a phrasal verb:
48
(18) a. lock out locked out *lock outed
b. take off took off *take offed
c. phone in phoned in *phone ined
Phrasal Verbs represent combinations that are more semantic than actually syntactic. Their head is the
Verb, and the two elements can be separated. The process of formation of a phrasal Verbs is matter of
diachrony; many are well established, others are more recently created.
Phrasal verbs do give rise, however, to a special and quite productive type of English compound
nouns. These compounds are exocentric i.e. they lack a head. Rather their internal structure is V+P:
(20) a. a take away, a mess up, a sell off, a pick up, a break up
b. some hold ups (robberies), put downs (insults), take offs (plane)
c. a phone in (event to raise money)
d. some buy outs (big company buying a small one),
e. a lock out (management technique during a strike)
f. a run about (old car)
Hyphenated phrases, clauses, parts of sentences are called quotational compounds. Few are in
common use. They also contain grammatical morphemes, not only bases. Some are nouns as in (a-b),
and others are usually N-premodifiers in parts of bigger texts (c-d).
49
(23) EXERCISE ================================================
Discuss a possible meaning and the grammaticality of the following:
50
9 MORPHOLOGICAL TYPOLOGY OF LANGUAGES
See also: Comrie (1989) pp. 33-54, 210-226; Crystal (1987) pp. 84-86, 283-341; Greenberg (1961).
Depending on what one counts as a language, there are 3,000 - 10,000 languages (alive/dead,
language/dialect, pigeon/Creole, style/ slang).
Ranked in terms of numbers of speakers: Chinese, English, Spanish, Hindi, Arabic, Bengali, Russian,
Portuguese, Japanese, German, French, Punjabi....
th
August Schleicher (early 19 c. Comparative Linguistics).
!!!
Both Czech and English are Indo-European languages. And so are Hindi, Persian, Latvian, Slavic
languages, Romance languages, Germanic languages, ...
English is West or North Germanic (there is a debate), Czech is West Slavic.
But Hungarian, Estonian, Basque, Georgian, Hebrew, Turkish, Tamil, etc. are not I.-E.
A classification based on the characteristics of individual morphemes (which kind prevails) and their
combinations into bigger units (words).
Discussing the morphological typology of a language, which criteria are relevant ? Classification from
August von Schleger (1767-1845):
BUT many other typological classifications exist (Sapir 1921, Skalička, etc.). A more contemporary
approach to morphological typology distinguishes languages with respect to two main parameters
(INDEXES):
51
9.1 Index of Synthesis
ANALYTICAL a. isolating
c. agglutinating
c. fusional
d. incorporating
SYNTHETIC e. polysynthetic
Most/All major category words in Czech have more than one morpheme. In English monomorphic
words are more frequent due to the lack of inflection.
(6) Vietnamese Khi toi den nhá ban toi, chúng toi bát dau lám bái.
when I come house friend I PLURAL I begin do lesson
'When I came to my friend's house, we began to do lessons.'
Compared with typical Indo-European languages, these highly isolating languages have:
- many monosyllabic, invariable words (with larger phonetic repertory, e.g. tonic vowels),
- many non-categorial stems (Since they do not fit I.-E. “standard” with its Latin-based
terminology, many of these are indiscriminately called 'particles'),
- fixed orders of morphemes and words.
Isolating/analytic characteristics are far more frequent in English than in Czech, but both languages
have numerous free grammatical morphemes.
52
9.1.2 Polysynthetic and Incorporating Languages
Polysynthesis: the number of compound morphemes is large and single words can often form rather
complex sentences. In such ʼwordsʼ, however, only one of the morphemes, however, is lexical.
Incorporation: a number of lexical morphemes combine into one word. This is possible in many
languages (in compounds), but if it prevails, the language is taken for incorporating.
The index of synthesis of Czech and espeically of English is relatively low, on a world scale.
(12) (i) agglutinating languages (simple concatenation of morphemes with one feature),
(ii) fusional languages (one element containing several inseparable features).
53
Again, current linguistics realizes that even individual constructions can contain both aspects. For
example, in the English verbal form were re-undergoing, were expreses Fi = PAST, STATIVE, PLUR,
while re-under-go-ing concatenates four morphemes of one feature each.
modern - ise - er - s
BASE M1=F1 M2=F2 M3=F3
Individual morphemes are clearly separable (sometimes with phonetic changes at boundaries). Each
has one function/meaning/feature, often identical with distinct parts of speech.
1
Notice how a non-English examples are glossed:
(i) original data (often in italics)
(ii) ʻa glossʻ - i.e. precise translation with grammatical information as needed,
(iii) free translation
54
Is a zero morpheme present, when 'nothing' is present? Is it fused or agglutinating?
In Indo-European languages (both English and Czech), the standard word template consists of 1 or 2
stems, derivational morpheme(s), and inflectional morpheme(s) in this order. Observing the following
examples, check that the distinct kinds of morphemes usually do not fuse.
(21) ONE WORD = ONE BASE + grammatical (derivational & inflectional) morpheme(s)
55
(23) EXERCISE ================================================
Find examples with all the following typological characteristics in:
analytical /isolating
CZECH
....................................................
ENGLISH !!!
....................................................
.................................................... ....................................................
agglutinative .................................................... ....................................................
.................................................... ....................................................
fusional .................................................... ....................................................
synthetic .................................................... ....................................................
(a) In January I will have been living in this town for ten years.
(b) The building had been being built for two years already when the fire happened.
a. psát ...................................................................................................................
b. to write ...................................................................................................................
c. přeskočila jsem ...................................................................................................................
d. I jumped over ...................................................................................................................
56
e. Petrovi ...................................................................................................................
f. to Peter ...................................................................................................................
g. nejkrásnější ...................................................................................................................
h. the most beautiful ...................................................................................................................
57
(33) EXERCISE ================================================
The following words are in Swahili (a language of the Niger-Congo family).
(i) Identify the morphemes occurring in each word - fill in the right column.
(ii) What is the order of the main sentence members in Swahili?
(iii) Which type of language is Swahili?
(See Demers & Farmer 1991, pp 29-32.)
58
(34) EXERCISE ================================================
Each of the following words in Telugu (a Dravidian language spoken in India) is translated into
English by an entire sentence. Analyze the words by identifying the morphemes occurring in each
word - fill in the right column.
(See Demers & Farmer 1991, pp 25-28)
7. cuustunnaađu He is seeing. do 7.
20. ceppincunu I cause (someone) to tell. They will not laugh. 20.
59
(35) EXERCISE ================================================
The following words are in Classical Nahuatl (a Uto-Aztecan language spoken in Mexico).
i. Identify the morphemes occurring in each word - fill in the right column.
Recall that some morphemes can be phonetically empty (Ø).
ii. What is the word order in Nahuatl?
iii. Which type of language is Nahuatl? (See Demers & Farmer 1991, pp 33-36.)
1. nicho:ka I cry I 1.
4. tikochih We sleep we 4.
60
10 PARTS OF SPEECH / WORD CATEGORIES
See also: Huddleston & Pullum (2002) p. 22; Greenbaum & Quirk (1990) pp. 188-203.
Table 1
Table 2:
61
(2) EXERCISE ================================================
Define the criteria applied in the division in Tables 1-4. State the properties of the elements appearing
in the leftmost/ rightmost group. Which division do you prefer? Why?
Table 3
Table 4
62
(4) EXERCISE ================================================
Compare Table 5 and Table 6. Which is ‘better’? Why? State all the reasons.
Table 5
Table 6
.
63
(6) EXERCISE ================================================
Assuming ‘words’ in a language to be ‘objects’, which division is applied to form parts of speech?
Which of the above Tables is closest to the system which results in the traditional 9-11 word classes?
Can you explain
a. - why we should divide the lexicon?
b. - what are the criteria for the division?
c. - how many parts of speech do we have (have to have)?
From the beginning of the theoretical study of language in ancient Greece, words were grouped into
several categories according to various properties. The label for a part of speech expresses a
number of properties shared by specific groups of words. I.e. some specific conceptual field,
morphological format and/or structural relations and usage in a clause can be derived from the
categorial status of a given word.
In an ideal case all the above criteria applied to one lexical item agree, but often they need not. In this
situation some of the criteria are taken for more important, according to the kind of grammatical
definitions used and specific characteristics of the studied language. The definitions of word categories
may therefore vary in different theoretical frameworks.
In traditional grammar, notional and morphological criteria prevailed over the syntactic. Czech
traditional grammar uses the following word categories: Nouns, Adjectives, Pronouns, Numerals,
Verbs, Adverbs, Prepositions, Conjunctions, Particles and Interjections. For English the
64
categories of Articles (more generally, Determiners) and Modals could be added. The usual criteria
for inflecting word categories are morphological, while with non-inflecting word categories, syntactic
criteria are more appropriate.
The notion of a word category is closely related to the notion of ‘word’ and its definition may differ in
different languages as well.
The existence of the major lexical categories appears universal, but the importance and roles of their
members may differ substantially. Sometimes lexical categories are classified by shared grammatical
features; e.g. Nouns and Adjectives may share a general feature “+N”.
The number and character of minor or non-lexical categories may differ across languages. Each
closed category has a limited number of items (a closed or fixed list).
Even though the following properties don’t decide many cases, they reflect fundamental aspects of
categories. Yet, why should courage be a Noun and brave an Adjective (or a Verb)?
(9) Prototypical correlations of syntactic categories (see Croft 1991, p. 55, 65, 79)
65
10.3.1 Derivational Morphology
Derivational morphemes derive a new word, often in a different part of speech (category),
e.g. the Verb ‘write’ + derivational morpheme ‘-er’ = action Noun ‘writer’; ‘write’ + derivational
morpheme ‘-able’ = passive Adjective ‘writable’.
The presence of a derivational morpheme (in the relevant position) is almost always a clear and
sufficient argument in favour of some category. However, not all words contain derivational
morphemes and in languages where conversion and homonymy is frequent (e.g. English), a
derivational morpheme can mislead. For example, British English ‘fiver’, based on a numeral, is a five
pound note, and drug slang includes e.g. a ‘downer’.
(10) Righ-hand Head Rule (“RHHR”) - a head of a (complex) word in English, an element that
provides the category for the whole word, is the rightmost element.
(11) a. nation-al =A
b. nation-al-ise = not an A, but a V
c. nation-al-is-ation = not an A or a V, but an N
d. government: Effective government of desert areas is difficult.
e. moving: -ing = N: Divorce and moving are difficult. He avoided more moving.
-ing = A: Her poetry was very moving. / The en ding seemed so moving.
-ing = V: He was/began/ kept moving his office. I’ll be moving soon.
Inflectional morphemes change a word/part of speech (category) within its own paradigm:
Inflectional morphemes (e.g. plurals of Nouns) are specific to each part of speech:
(14) e.g. Nominal paradigm = nominal declension: Number, Case, Diminutives, etc.
Verbal paradigm = verbal conjugation: Tense, Aspect, Person, Negation, etc.
Inflectional paradigms can differ a lot across languages. Japanese nouns have case and politeness
inflections, but none for number. Japanese verbs are inflected for tense, negative, causative, passive,
politeness and other notions, but not for person or number.
66
10.3.3 Grammaticalization as a source of Morphology
Grammatical morphemes are nonetheless still semantic in that they are related to aspects of reality
which can also be expressed lexically. They represent some simplified version of it.
(17) Real vs. grammaticalized notion e.g. number 6, number three hundred and seven
a. Time, an infinite line: E.g. Future time: tomorrow, two days from now, next year
b. Tense, Grammaticalized: established points (with respect to the speech act)
Past vs. Present vs. Future (= what precedes/occurs with/follows a speech act)
67
Languages can differ as to which categories use which grammaticalized features (i.e., have specific
kinds of inflectional morphology). Compare these English and Czech examples w.r.t. (= with respect
to) grammaticalization of (a/b) Gender and (c/d) Countability:
(20) a. The Great Emper-ess [Fem] was sitting on the throne worried.
The Great Emper-or [Masc] was sitting on the throne worried.
Inflectional morphology on a lexical item reflects features of the following three types:
!!!
b. optional (depends on the choice of the speaker)
b. Julie buys/ bought [Past]/ will buy [Fut] a book [Sing] / many books [Plur].
- the choice of value for theTense feature in bought /will buy depends on speakers.
- the choice of Number in book/ books depends on the speaker (it is optional).
- the Agreement feature on the Predicate introduce(s) depends not on the Verb (it is not inherent), but
on some other (related) element - on characteristics of the Subject. Speakers cannot chose the Verb
form, once they chose the Subject.
68
- Number [singular]: optional feature (the speaker is able to choose plural: knihy).
- Case [accusative]: configurational (the Czech Verb poslat requires accusative Case and no other for
its direct Object).
- Adj agreenment: velk-ou [Fem, Sg, Acc]: All features on the Adjective are secondary, i.e.
configurational; they reflect properties of the superordinate element (knihu) to show that Adj. is its
(pre-) modifier (the role of agreement is to show the relationship).
In a language with rich inflectional morphology (e.g. Czech) each major class lexical item can have
some typical inflectional ending, which identifies the part of speech rather clearly.
However, in a language with poor inflectional morphology (e.g. English) the morphological signal is
frequently absent and co-occurring elements in the syntax decide the category.
(25)
...
List of English bound inflectional morphemes
69
(26) EXERCISE ================================================
The inflectional morphemes –en, –er and -ing have derivational counterparts. What is the
meaning/function of those morphemes? Give examples.
-en ........................................................................................................................................................
-er ........................................................................................................................................................
-ing ......................................................................................................................................................
(a) Those other young girls came back from Prague very tired.
(b) Ty druhé mladé dívky se vrátily z Prahy velmi unavené.
(ii)............................................................. (iii).................................................................
(ii)............................................................. (iii).................................................................
70
Adjectives: (i) water + Y, N + y = Adj
(ii)............................................................. (iii).................................................................
(ii)............................................................. (iii).................................................................
(i) Give the pronunciation of the morphemes –s and –ed. What are the options?
(ii) What is 'assimilation in voicing'?
(iii) Under which conditions does the pronunciation involve [-i-]?
(iv) Can you state the rule about inserting [-i-] in some general way?
71
11 SYNTACTIC CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING A CATEGORY
Syntactic criteria for establishing the category of an item are based on its distribution, i.e. co-
occurrence restrictions. Each part of speech appears in some typical environments.
There are typical elements which are subordinate to it (lower in a structural hierarchy) and typical
elements which are superordinate to it (higher in a hierarchy).
For Nouns: subordinate elements (what depends on N?) are Adjectives, Articles, Numerals, etc. while
superordinate elements (what does the NP depend on?) are Verbs, Prepositions, etc.
Heads. Every part of speech can become a head of a more complex structure = a phrase.
brother
that big out of mine
right was the door
usually a bother
Phrases. The form of a pre-/post-modification is typical for a specific head/part of speech. Some
types of modifiers can be more/ less obligatory in a given type of phrase.
The form of pre-modification (i.e. the kind of “specifier”) and of post-modification (the categories of
the “complements”) may be very typical for a specific head/part of speech. Some, like articles with
count nouns or nouns after many prepositions, can be more or less obligatory. The main function of
each part of speech is to head its phrase (to project into phrases).
72
(4) Universal phrasal projection of a category X: Heads, Specifiers and Complements
XP
SPEC(X)
X0
X'
X-complement
!!!
(5) a. X=N:boy [NP the little boy of hers ] *[NP little boy of hers ]
b. X=A: small [AP much smaller than Theo ] *[AP much smaller than ]
c. X=V: find [VP to never find the article ] *[VP to never find ]
d. X=P: toward [PP right toward a door ] *[PP right toward ]
In a sentence, a constituent (phrase) can appear as (i) simple/bare, or (ii) complex. We call both
“phrases” and say that sentences consist of phrases, not of words.
Sentence functions (sentence members, syntagmas) like ‘Subject’, ‘Object’, ‘Attribute’ and ‘Predicate’
are phrases, although they can be ‘bare’ phrases (i.e. they can be only one word) or in other cases
whole clauses (sentences inside sentences).
Pro-forms. The main or major parts of speech N, V, A, P (in fact their phrases NP, VP, AP, PP)
typically have PROFORMS: grammatical words which can replace them.
The kind of proform used for such substitution is in itself a signal of the kind of phrase. (Pronouns
replace NPs, Adverbials like there, then replace PPs, do so replaces VP, such replaces AP.)
(7) The little boy was already running in the city's only park at 8 o’clock.
73
11.2 Categorial Prototypicality
Ideally the words of the same part of speech have the same (general) type of meaning, the same
(predictable) forms, and the same syntactic distributions/functions/pragmatics.
Grammatical categories have ‘best case’ members and members that systematically depart from the
‘best case’. An optimal grammatical description not only brings out morphosyntactic properties that
are typical, but also the degree of categorial deviation from the ‘best case.’
To ‘know´ the characteristics of a specific part of speech means to know to which extent the members
of the category are ‘the same’ (what they have in common), and to what extent they can differ from
the best case (what are the frequent deviations).
(8) a. book/ books; flaw/ flaws but sheep/ *sheeps; courage/ *courages
b. writing, arriving, doing but *musting/ *shoulding/ *bewaring
c. more/ very/ how important but *more/ *very /*how infinite
Some linguistis believe in so called “Fuzzy” Categories. They claim the boundaries between
categories are (sometimes) indistinct. Then perhaps they believe there are no categories, and parts of
speech are only an “invention” of formalists.
One can, however, claim that the reason for the ‘fuzziness’ of categories lies in the multiple criteria
for each category; see (8) on page 64. ‘Category’ is defined separately in each linguistic component;
so the results of the multiple definitions can conflict and seem contradictory.
If we still must choose only one category, our choice depends on what we focus on (recall that
categories are abstract collections of features and properties). Fuzziness, more likely than being a
phenomena, usually signals a wrong or incomplete analysis. Consider these examples:
74
iii. Meaning is adaptable, morphology signals X and distribution (syntax) signals Y:
Greenbaum & Quirk (1990) pp. 188-203; Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech & Svartvik (2004)
pp. 393-398; Dušková (1994) pp. 136-140, 273-306; Svoboda and Opělová-Károlyová (1989) pp.
138-162; Crystal (1987) pp. 91-93
Minor parts of speech (closed categories) have a limited, basically fixed number of members. They are
lists of specific words. They can be (i) grouped together with some major category that they share
properties with, or (ii) kept separate because of some special property.
In English and Czech, these categories influence morphology, but don’t exhibit it themselves.
On the other hand, these non-lexical categories are central to grammatical systems, i.e. syntactic
distribution.
(15) Numerals
(16) Prepositions, Conjunctions, Adverbs (of location): Perhaps the same category?
75
Consider the notion “transitivity” wrt distinctions among: Preposition/Conjunction/Adverb. A class of
words with the same properties of meaning and syntax (e.g. possible pre-modifiers) are called
Prepositions when they precede NPs, Conjunctions when they precede Clauses, and Adverbs of
Location when they stand alone.
76
(21) EXERCISE ================================================
i. What types of phrases are the underlined parts of sentences? Which are their heads?
ii. Replace the underlined parts of the sentence by one word (and/or its proform).
a. I wrote the long letters. = N: 2b (plural inflection); 3a (Article the shows N).
b. I saw three big whugs in my garden. = ..........................................................
c. I want to plymise this book. = .........................................................
d. He is much hompler than George. = .........................................................
e. I was trumbling the whole afternoon yesterday. = .........................................................
f. Marcel is the most shimable guy I’ve ever met. = .........................................................
g. The book is fin the table, not under the chair. = .........................................................
h. The letter is down the stairs. = ..........................................................
i. I hate bending down. = ..........................................................
j. They prefer to talk in the shower. = ..........................................................
k. She prefers talking German to German talking. = ..........................................................
= ..........................................................
l. He reads a newspaper every day. = ..........................................................
77
12 ATTACHMENTS
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language.
78
britches britches Singular Plural
brother brothers / brethren child children
buffalo buffalos / buffaloes Chinese Chinese
bureau bureaux / bureaus chrysanthemum chrysanthemums
bus buses city cities
bush bushes clergy clergy
buzz buzzes cliff cliffs
cactus cacti / cactuses clip-ons clip-ons
café cafés clippers clippers
calculus calculi coccyx coccyges / coccyxes
calf calves cod cod / cods
calypso calypsos codex codices / codexes
cameo cameos commander-in-chief commanders-in-chief
candelabra commando commandos
candelabrum
/candelabrums
concerto concertos
cargo cargos / cargoes
contralto contraltos
carp carp / carps
conundrum conundrums
casino casinos
copy copies
cattle cattle
corduroys corduroys
cello cellos
corps corps
census censuses
corpus corpora / corpuses
cervix cervices / cervixes
corrigendum corrigenda
chairman chairmen
cortex cortices / cortexes
chassis chassis
courts martial / court
chateau chateaux / chateaus court martial
martials
chef chefs craft craft
cherub cherubim / cherubs crisis crises
Chicano Chicanos criterion (90%
criteria
occurrence) / criteria
chief chiefs
crocus crocuses
crossroads crossroads
crucifix crucifixes
curriculum curricula / -lums
customs (= duties
customs
paid on goods)
cutters cutters
79
dado dados / dadoes essay essays
datum /data data excursus excursuses
deer deer faux pas faux pas
demo demos feedback (uncount.) feedback
desideratum desiderata fibula fibulae / fibulas
diagnosis diagnoses Filipino Filipinos
dice dice fish fish / fishes
dilemma dilemmas flannels flannels
disco discos fly flies
do dos focus foci / focuses
dodo dodos / dodoes foetus foetuses
domino dominoes folio folios
donkey donkeys foot feet
forceps forceps
formula formulae / formulas
Singular Plural
forum forums
dozen dozen (after num.)
fox foxes
draughts draughts
fungus fungi / funguses
drawers drawers
gallows gallows
duck duck /ducks
ganglion ganglia / ganglions
dwarf dwarf / dwarves
genesis geneses
dynamo dynamos
genus genera / genuses
echo echoes
geranium geraniums
electron electrons
giraffe giraffes
elephant elephants
glasses glasses
elf elves
goggles goggles
elk elk / elks
goods goods
ellipsis ellipses
goose geese
embargo embargoes
grandchild grandchildren
embryo embryos
grotto grottos / grottoes
emphasis emphases
Singular Plural
encyclopedia encyclopedias
grouse grouse
erratum errata
grown-up grown-ups
Eskimo Eskimos
guerrilla guerrillas
80
guy guys kangaroo kangaroos
half halves kennels kennels
halo halos / haloes kibbutz kibbutzim / kibbutzes
handkerchief handkerchiefs Kikuyu Kikuyu / Kikuyus
harmonium harmoniums kilo kilos
headquarters headquarters kiss kisses
helix helices / helixes knickerbockers knickerbockers
hero heroes knickers knickers
hiatus hiatuses knife knives
hippopotamus hippopotami /- muses labium labia
homunculus homunculi lacuna lacunae / lacunas
honey honeys Singular Plural
honoraria / lady ladies
honorarium
honorariums
larva larvae
hoof hoofs / hooves
larynx larynges / larynxes
Hopi Hopi / Hopis
latex latices / latexes
horizon horizons
leaf leaves
hundred hundred (after num.)
Lebanese Lebanese
hypothesis hypotheses
libretto librettos
ibex ibices / ibexes
life lives
ice (uncountable) ice
links links
impetus impetuses
lion lions
importance
importance
(uncountable) loaf loaves
(mat. ) indices / locus loci
index
(biblio.) indexes
loss losses
innings innings
lice / (louses when
innuendos / louse
innuendo used for person)
innuendoes
love (uncountable) love
Inuit Inuit / Inuits
maestro maestros
iris irises
Maltese Maltese
Japanese Japanese
man men
jeans jeans
mango mangoes
Jones Joneses
manifestos /
judge judges manifesto
manifestoes
jumbo jumbos man-of-war men-of-war
81
manservant menservants negro negroes
Mary Marys neurosis neuroses
match matches neutron neutrons
mathematics mathematics news news
matrix matrices / matrixes nucleus nuclei / nucleuses
mausoleum mausoleums oaf oafs
maximum maxima / maximums oasis oases
means means oats oats
measles measles octopus octopi / octopuses
media / (mediums – offspring offspring
medium / media
“spiritualists”)
opus opera / opuses
memo memos
overalls overalls
memoranda /
memorandum
memorandums ovum ova
metamorphosis metamorphoses ox oxen
metropolis metropolises p (=penny, pence) p
mews mews panties panties
milieu milieux / milieus pants pants
millennium millennia / -niums paparazzo paparazzi
million million (after num.) paralysis paralyses
minimum minima parenthesis parentheses
money moneys / monies partridge partridges
moose moose passer-by passers-by
moratorium moratoria /-toriums patio patios
mosquito mosquitoes patois patois
motto mottos / mottoes pelvis pelvises
pendulum pendulums
Singular Plural
penis penises
mice (but computer
mouse pentagon pentagons
mouses)
muff muffs persona personae / personas
82
phobia phobias quay quays
photo photos quid (= pound(s)) quid
photograph photographs quiz quizzes
physics physics quota quotas
piano pianos radio radios
pincers pincers radius radii / radiuses
pinetum pineta rectus recti
Singular Plural reef reefs
plateau plateaux / plateaus referendum referenda / -dums
plectrum plectra / plectrums reflex reflexes
pliers pliers reindeer reindeer /reindeers
plus pluses / plusses rendezvous rendezvous
podium podia / podiums replica replicas
police police retina retinae / retinas
policeman policemen roof roofs
policewoman policewomen rose roses
polygon polygons rumba rumbas
portfolio portfolios safe safes
Portuguese Portuguese salmon salmon / salmons
positron positrons scales scales
potato potatoes scarf scarfs / scarves
premium premiums scenario scenarios
prion prions scissors scissors
prolegomenon prolegomena Singular Plural
proof proofs secateurs secateurs
prospectus prospectuses self selves
proton protons seraph seraphim / seraphs
proviso provisos / provisoes serf serfs
psychosis psychoses series series
puff puffs shampoo shampoos
pyjamas pyjamas sheaf sheaves
quail quail / quails shears shears
quantum quanta sheep sheep
quarto quartos shelf shelves
83
shorts shorts taxi taxis / taxies
Sioux Sioux terminus termini / terminuses
skeleton skeletons
ski skis / ski Singular Plural
84
Vietnamese Vietnamese wharf wharfs / wharves
virtuoso virtuosos wife wives
virus viruses wolf wolves
volcano volcanos / volcanoes woman women
vortex vortices / vortixes works works
waif waifs Xhosa Xhosa / Xhosas
weirdo weirdos zero zeros
werewolf werewolves zoo zoos
A
abide abided / abode abided
alight alighted / alit alighted / alit
arise arose arisen
awake awakened / awoke awakened / awoken
B
backbite backbit backbitten
backslide backslid backslidden / backslid
be [ am, is, are] was, were been
bear bore born / borne
beat beat beaten / beat
become became become
befall befell befallen
beget begat / begot begotten
begin began begun
behold beheld beheld
bend bent bent
bereave bereaved / bereft bereaved / bereft
85
beseech besought / beseeched besought / beseeched
beset beset beset
bestrew bestrewed bestrewn / bestrewed
bet bet / betted bet / betted
betake betook betaken
bethink bethought bethought
bid (farewell) bid / bade bidden
bid (offer amount) bid bid
bind bound bound
bite bit bitten
bleed bled bled
blow blew blown
break broke broken
breed bred bred
bring brought brought
broadcast broadcast / broadcasted broadcast / broadcasted
browbeat browbeat browbeaten / browbeat
build built built
burn burned / burnt burned / burnt
burst burst burst
bust busted / bust busted / bust
buy bought bought
C
cast cast cast
catch caught caught
chide chided / chid chided / chidden
choose chose chosen
clap clapped / clapt clapped / clapt
cling clung clung
clothe clothed / clad clothed / clad
colorbreed colorbred colorbred
come came come
cost cost cost
86
creep crept crept
crossbreed crossbred crossbred
cut cut cut
D
dare dared / durst dared / durst
daydream daydreamed / daydreamt daydreamed / daydreamt
deal dealt dealt
dig dug dug
dight dighted / dight dighted / dight
disprove disproved disproved / disproven
dive (jump head-first) dove / dived dived
dive (scuba diving) dived / dove dived
do did done
draw drew drawn
dream dreamed / dreamt dreamed / dreamt
drink drank drunk
drive drove driven
dwell dwelt / dwelled dwelt / dwelled
E
eat ate eaten
enwind enwound enwound
F
fall fell fallen
feed fed fed
feel felt felt
fight fought fought
find found found
fit (tailor, change size) fitted / fit fitted / fit
fit (be right size) fit / fitted fit / fitted
flee fled fled
fling flung flung
fly flew flown
forbear forbore forborne
87
forbid forbade forbidden
fordo fordid fordone
forecast forecast forecast
forego (also forgo) forewent foregone
foreknow foreknew foreknown
forerun foreran forerun
foresee foresaw foreseen
foreshow foreshowed foreshown / foreshowed
forespeak forespoke forespoken
foretell foretold foretold
forget forgot forgotten / forgot
forgive forgave forgiven
forsake forsook forsaken
forswear forswore forsworn
fraught fraught fraught
freeze froze frozen
frostbite frostbit frostbitten
G
gainsay gainsaid gainsaid
get got gotten / got
gild gilded / gilt gilded / gilt
give gave given
go went gone
grind ground ground
grow grew grown
H
hagride hagrode hagridden
halterbreak halterbroke halterbroken
hamstring hamstrung hamstrung
hand-feed hand-fed hand-fed
handwrite handwrote handwritten
hang hung hung
hang (kill by hanging) hanged / hung hanged / hung
88
have had had
hear heard heard
heave heaved / hove heaved / hove
hew hewed hewn / hewed
hide hid hidden
hit hit hit
hold held held
hurt hurt hurt
I
inbreed inbred inbred
inlay inlaid inlaid
input input / inputted input / inputted
inset inset inset
interbreed interbred interbred
intercut intercut intercut
interlay interlaid interlaid
interset interset interset
interweave interwove / interweaved interwoven / interweaved
interwind interwound interwound
inweave inwove / inweaved inwoven / inweaved
J
jerry-build jerry-built jerry-built
K
keep kept kept
kneel knelt / kneeled knelt / kneeled
knit knitted / knit knitted / knit
know knew known
L
lade laded laden / laded
landslide landslid landslid
lay laid laid
lead led led
89
lean leaned / leant leaned / leant
leap leaped / leapt leaped / leapt
learn learned / learnt learned / learnt
leave left left
lend lent lent
let let let
lie lay lain
lie (not tell truth) lied lied
light lit / lighted lit / lighted
lip-read lip-read lip-read
lose lost lost
M
make made made
mean meant meant
meet met met
misbecome misbecame misbecome
miscast miscast miscast
miscut miscut miscut
misdeal misdealt misdealt
misdo misdid misdone
mishear misheard misheard
mishit mishit mishit
mislay mislaid mislaid
mislead misled misled
mislearn mislearned / mislearnt mislearned / mislearnt
misread misread misread
missay missaid missaid
missend missent missent
misset misset misset
misspeak misspoke misspoken
misspell misspelled / misspelt misspelled / misspelt
misspend misspent misspent
misswear misswore missworn
90
mistake mistook mistaken
misteach mistaught mistaught
mistell mistold mistold
misthink misthought misthought
misunderstand misunderstood misunderstood
miswear miswore misworn
miswed miswed / miswedded miswed / miswedded
miswrite miswrote miswritten
mow mowed mowed / mown
N
No irregular verbs beginning with "N."
O
offset offset offset
outbid outbid outbid
outbreed outbred outbred
outdo outdid outdone
outdraw outdrew outdrawn
outdrink outdrank outdrunk
outdrive outdrove outdriven
outfight outfought outfought
outfly outflew outflown
outgrow outgrew outgrown
outlay outlaid outlaid
outleap outleaped / outleapt outleaped / outleapt
outlie (not tell truth) outlied outlied
output output / outputted output / outputted
outride outrode outridden
outrun outran outrun
outsee outsaw outseen
outsell outsold outsold
outshine outshined / outshone outshined / outshone
outshoot outshot outshot
outsing outsang outsung
91
outsit outsat outsat
outsleep outslept outslept
outsmell outsmelled / outsmelt outsmelled / outsmelt
outspeak outspoke outspoken
outspeed outsped outsped
outspend outspent outspent
outspin outspun outspun
outspring outsprang / outsprung outsprung
outstand outstood outstood
outswear outswore outsworn
outswim outswam outswum
outtell outtold outtold
outthink outthought outthought
outthrow outthrew outthrown
outwear outwore outworn
outwind outwound outwound
outwrite outwrote outwritten
overbear overbore overborne / overborn
overbid overbid overbid
overbreed overbred overbred
overbuild overbuilt overbuilt
overbuy overbought overbought
overcast overcast overcast
overcome overcame overcome
overcut overcut overcut
overdo overdid overdone
overdraw overdrew overdrawn
overdrink overdrank overdrunk
overeat overate overeaten
overfeed overfed overfed
overhang overhung overhung
overhear overheard overheard
overlay overlaid overlaid
overleap overleaped / overleapt overleaped / overleapt
92
overlie overlay overlain
overpay overpaid overpaid
override overrode overridden
overrun overran overrun
oversee oversaw overseen
oversell oversold oversold
overset overset overset
oversew oversewed oversewn / oversewed
overshoot overshot overshot
oversleep overslept overslept
oversow oversowed oversown / oversowed
overspeak overspoke overspoken
overspend overspent overspent
overspill overspilled / overspilt overspilled / overspilt
overspin overspun overspun
overspread overspread overspread
overspring oversprang / oversprung / oversprung
overstand overstood overstood
overstrewn
overstrew overstrewed
/ overstrewed
overstride overstrode overstridden
overstrike overstruck overstruck
overtake overtook overtaken
overthink overthought overthought
overthrow overthrew overthrown
overwear overwore overworn
overwind overwound overwound
overwrite overwrote overwritten
P
partake partook partaken
pay paid paid
plead pleaded / pled pleaded / pled
prebuild prebuilt prebuilt
predo predid predone
93
premake premade premade
prepay prepaid prepaid
presell presold presold
preset preset preset
preshrink preshrank preshrunk
presplit presplit presplit
proofread proofread proofread
prove proved proven / proved
put put put
Q
quick-freeze quick-froze quick-frozen
quit quit / quitted quit / quitted
R
read read (sounds like "red") read (sounds like "red")
reawake reawoke reawaken
rebid rebid rebid
rebind rebound rebound
rebroadcast rebroadcast
rebroadcast
/ rebroadcasted / rebroadcasted
rebuild rebuilt rebuilt
recast recast recast
recut recut recut
redeal redealt redealt
redo redid redone
redraw redrew redrawn
reeve reeved / rove reeved / rove
refit (replace parts) refit / refitted refit / refitted
refit (retailor) refitted / refit refitted / refit
regrind reground reground
regrow regrew regrown
rehang rehung rehung
rehear reheard reheard
reknit reknitted / reknit reknitted / reknit
relay (e..g. tiles) relaid relaid
94
relay (pass along) relayed relayed
relearn relearned / relearnt relearned / relearnt
relight relit / relighted relit / relighted
remake remade remade
rend rent / rended rent / rended
repay repaid repaid
reread reread reread
rerun reran rerun
resell resold resold
resend resent resent
reset reset reset
resew resewed resewn / resewed
retake retook retaken
reteach retaught retaught
retear retore retorn
retell retold retold
rethink rethought rethought
retread retread retread
retrofit retrofitted / retrofit retrofitted / retrofit
rewake rewoke / rewaked rewaken / rewaked
rewear rewore reworn
reweave rewove / reweaved rewoven / reweaved
rewed rewed / rewedded rewed / rewedded
rewet rewet / rewetted rewet / rewetted
rewin rewon rewon
rewind rewound rewound
rewrite rewrote rewritten
rid rid rid
ride rode ridden
ring rang rung
rise rose risen
rive rived riven / rived
roughcast roughcast roughcast
run ran run
95
S
sand-cast sand-cast sand-cast
saw sawed sawed / sawn
say said said
see saw seen
seek sought sought
self-feed self-fed self-fed
self-sow self-sowed self-sown / self-sowed
sell sold sold
send sent sent
set set set
sew sewed sewn / sewed
shake shook shaken
shave shaved shaved / shaven
shear sheared sheared / shorn
shed shed shed
shine shined / shone shined / shone
shit shit / shat / shitted shit / shat / shitted
shoe shoed / shod shoed / shod
shoot shot shot
show showed shown / showed
shrink shrank / shrunk shrunk
shrive shrived / shrove shriven
shut shut shut
sight-read sight-read sight-read
sing sang sung
sink sank / sunk sunk
sit sat sat
skywrite skywrote skywritten
slay (kill) slew / slayed slain / slayed
slay (amuse) slayed slayed
sleep slept slept
slide slid slid
96
sling slung slung
slink slinked / slunk slinked / slunk
slit slit slit
smell smelled / smelt smelled / smelt
smite smote smitten / smote
sneak sneaked / snuck sneaked / snuck
sow sowed sown / sowed
speak spoke spoken
speed sped / speeded sped / speeded
spell spelled / spelt spelled / spelt
spend spent spent
spill spilled / spilt spilled / spilt
spin spun spun
spit spit / spat spit / spat
split split split
spoil spoiled / spoilt spoiled / spoilt
spoon-feed spoon-fed spoon-fed
spread spread spread
spring sprang / sprung sprung
stall-feed stall-fed stall-fed
stand stood stood
stave staved / stove staved / stove
steal stole stolen
stick stuck stuck
sting stung stung
stink stunk / stank stunk
strew strewed strewn / strewed
stride strode stridden
strike (delete) struck stricken
strike (hit) struck struck / stricken
string strung strung
strip stripped / stript stripped / stript
strive strove / strived striven / strived
sublet sublet sublet
97
sunburn sunburned / sunburnt sunburned / sunburnt
swear swore sworn
sweat sweat / sweated sweat / sweated
sweep swept swept
swell swelled swollen / swelled
swim swam swum
swing swung swung
T
take took taken
teach taught taught
tear tore torn
telecast telecast telecast
tell told told
test-drive test-drove test-driven
test-fly test-flew test-flown
think thought thought
thrive thrived / throve thrived / thriven
throw threw thrown
thrust thrust thrust
tread trod trodden / trod
troubleshoot troubleshot troubleshot
typecast typecast typecast
typewrite typewrote typewritten
U
unbear unbore unborn / unborne
unbend unbent unbent
unbind unbound unbound
unbuild unbuilt unbuilt
unclothe unclothed / unclad unclothed / unclad
underbid underbid underbid
underbuy underbought underbought
undercut undercut undercut
underfeed underfed underfed
98
undergo underwent undergone
underlay underlaid underlaid
underlet underlet underlet
underlie underlay underlain
underrun underran underrun
undersell undersold undersold
undershoot undershot undershot
underspend underspent underspent
understand understood understood
undertake undertook undertaken
underthrust underthrust underthrust
underwrite underwrote underwritten
undo undid undone
undraw undrew undrawn
unfreeze unfroze unfrozen
unhang unhung unhung
unhide unhid unhidden
unhold unheld unheld
unknit unknitted / unknit unknitted / unknit
unlade unladed unladen / unladed
unlay unlaid unlaid
unlead unleaded unleaded
unlearn unlearned / unlearnt unlearned / unlearnt
unmake unmade unmade
unreeve unreeved / unrove unreeved / unrove
unsay unsaid unsaid
unsew unsewed unsewn / unsewed
unsling unslung unslung
unspin unspun unspun
unstick unstuck unstuck
unstring unstrung unstrung
unswear unswore unsworn
unteach untaught untaught
unthink unthought unthought
99
unweave unwove / unweaved unwoven / unweaved
unwind unwound unwound
unwrite unwrote unwritten
uphold upheld upheld
upset upset upset
V
vex vexed / vext vexed / vext
W
wake woke / waked woken / waked
waylay waylaid waylaid
wear wore worn
weave wove / weaved woven / weaved
wed wed / wedded wed / wedded
weep wept wept
wet wet / wetted wet / wetted
whet whetted whetted
win won won
wind wound wound
withdraw withdrew withdrawn
withhold withheld withheld
withstand withstood withstood
wring wrung wrung
write wrote written
X
No irregular verbs beginning with "X."
Y
No irregular verbs beginning with "Y."
Z
No irregular verbs beginning with "Z."
100
12.3 LIST OF SOME ENGLISH BOUND MORPHEMES
Discuss the distinction among the NEGATIVE AFFIXES w.r.t. their origin and diachronic/synchronic
productivity.
101
salvage, storage, pillage, visage
-al sensual, autumnal, animal, aural, cerebral, decimal, gradual, intellectual, infernal,
internal, manual, mental, natural, optional, oral, spiritual, technical, usual,
phenomenal
-a/e/ory (i) N: factory, memory, dictionary, category, burglary, depository, dormitory, bakery,
bravery, bribery, repertory, reformatory, witchery
(ii) Adj: necessary, primary, voluntary, obligatory, stationary
-ee employee, referee, alienee, donee, invitee, hiree, divorcee, appellee, biographee,
recipient devotee, deportee, fiancée, mortgagee, nominee, refugee, trustee, expellee
-fy diversify, fortify, ratify, simplify, terrify, testify, verify, unify, amplify, solidify,
intensify, modify, typify
-ic poetic, endemic, barbaric, acidic, geologic, metallic, drastic, heroic, majestic, prosaic,
102
patriotic, strategic, satanic, emphatic, realistic
-ile domicile, docile, agile, fertile, fragile, imbecile, juvenile, infantile, mobile, projectile,
senile, reptile, sterile, volatile, versatile
103
-wise (i) counterclockwise, edgewise, marketwise, timewise, crosswise, othewise, moneywise
(ii) streetwise, worldlywise
→Adv /Adj
-y cheery, catty, arty, crafty, furry, dreary, faulty, dirty, foxy, hairy, itchy, misty, rosy,
salty, sleepy, wary
N→A tends/inclines to have the property of the N
be- beloved, bedeck, belabor, bemused, bewail, bequest, betoken, benighted, bestow,
bereave
ab- absolve, abnormal, abolish, abortion, abbreviate, abdicate, absorb, abstract, abstain,
aberration
amb- ambivalent, ambiguous, ambidextrous, ambulance, ambition
around, about, both
an- anemia, anesthetic, anomaly, anonym, anorganism, anecdote
absence of
ad- adaptable, addict, adequate, adhere, adjacent, adjunct, admire, advance, advocate,
advise, administer
104
en- (i) environment, entrap, encamp, encourage, endanger, enroll, signature
(ii) embark, embrace, embitter, employ, embody, employable, embellish
ex- (i) extract, exclaim, extend, exclude, exit, exact, excel, excite, expression, excavate,
e- exception
ec-/ef- (ii) elaborate, eject
(iii) eclipse, eccentric, efficient, effort, effect, effervescent
pro- proceed, process, procedure, proclaim, produce, product, profess, professor, project,
prolific, progress, profluent
re- rebuild, recall, reflect, refold, regain, reiterate, rejoin, relate, relive, remind, remarry,
repay, resell, return, reverse, rewarm, rewrite
105
Gr. monos (→ one, alone)
-pa.ed- (i) pedagogue, pedophilia, pediatrics
(ii) pedestrian, pedometer, orthopedian, pedestal, podium
Gr. paidos (→ boy =child/foot )
-phil- philologist, philosophy, philodendron, philanthropy, philharmonic, Philadelphia,
philatelist
Gr. philos (→ love)
pro- progress, project, procedure, produce, promote, professor, proletariat
Gr. pro (→ forward, before)
-soph- Sophia, sophisticated, sophomore, philosopher
Gr. sophos (→ wisdom)
-the(o) theocracy, theocentric, theology, theologist, atheist
Gr. theos (→ God)
106
V→ ADJ Lat.(French): ADJ ‘having the quality of the Verbs’. In ModE: frozen
-ist artist, biologist, chemist, dentist, evangelist, violinist, humanist, legalist, monarchist,
naturalist, pianist, racist, chartist, communist
N→ N Lat. ‘advocate of X’ (co-occurs with -ism) (anarchist)
N→ ADJ ‘practitioner of X’ (violinist, *drumist)
‘advocating X’ (sexist)
-mar- mariner, marina, mermaid, marsh, marshy, Margaret
Lat. mar (→ sea)
-mem- memory, remember, memoir, memorandum, memento, commemoration
Lat. meminisse (→ remember)
mitt/ss mission, missile, admission, submission, commit, submit, transmit, permit
Lat. mittere, missus (→ send)
-nat-, -nasc- native, nation, nativism, internationalism, nature, natural, naturalize, naive, naivity,
innate, renascence
Lat. natus (→ be born)
-omni- omnibus, omnipotent, omnipresent, omnicompetent
Lat. omnis (→ all)
-port- port, porter, portable, export, importer, exportation, deportee, report, reporter,
reporting, support
Lat. portare (→ carry)
-spond/s sponsor, respond, response, responsible, correspond, irresponsible
Lat. spondere (→ pledge, answer)
-scrib/p describe, script, transcript, ascribe, prescribe
Lat. scribere/scriptus (→ write)
-tempo- temporary, extempore, contemporary
Lat. tempus (→ time)
-tend/s intend, intention, Tense, intensity, intensification, attention, detention
Lat. tensus (→ stretch, strain)
-tent- tenant, tenable, contented, intention, retain, continue, maintain
Lat. teneo (→ hold)
-trib- tribute, Attribute, contribute, distribute
Lat. tribuere (→ pay, bestow)
-vin.c(t)- victory, victim, convict, convince, invincible
Lat. vincere (→ conquer)
-vis- visa, vis-à-vis, visage, visible, vision, visionary, visit, visitor, vista, visual, visualize,
invisible, evident, provide, provisional, providential
Lat. visus (→ see)
-viv(i)/-ta vital, vitamin, vivacity, revive, survive, vivisection
Lat. vita (→ alive, life)
-voc/k- voice, vocal, vocabulary, vocation, invoke, evoke, provoke
Lat. vox, vocis (→ voice, call)
107
13 RELATED LITERATURE
a. The list A below gives practical manuals of English grammar which can help students not fully
familiar with the pratical usage of the structures discussed. The working knowledge of these manuals
is assumed for the course.
b. The list B provides bibliography for the more theoretical manuals covering the topics in more
detail. They provide some discussion of the phenomena, provide much more data and demonstrate
alternative terminologies and analyses.
c. The list C provides bibliography for the cited works and some additional literature related to the
topics discussed in the course.
=======================================================================
A. PRACTICAL MANUALS
Alexander, L.G. (1993): Longman Advanced Grammar. Reference and Practice. Longman.
Hewings, Martin (2005): Advanced Grammar in Use (2nd edition) with answers and CD ROM. CUP.
Jones, Leo (1991): Cambridge Advanced English. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan (1975) A Communicative Grammar of English. Longman, London.
Murphy, Raymond (2004): English Grammar in Use With Answers and CD ROM : A Self-Study
Reference and Practice Book for Intermediate Students of English. 3rd edition. CUP.
Svoboda, Aleš & Opělová-Károlyová, Mária (1998) A Brief Survey of the English Morphology.
Filozofická fakulta Ostravské univerzity, Ostrava.
=======================================================================
B. THEORETICAL MANUALS
Biber et al. (1999) Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman, London.
Biber et al. (1999) Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman, London.
Dušková, Libuše (1994) Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny. Academia Praha, Prague.
Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English
Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2005): A Students Introduction to English
Grammar. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Leech, Geoffrey (1971) Meaning and the English Verb. 3rd edition. Longman, London 2004.
Quirk, R., and Greenbaum, S. (1991): A Student´s Grammar of the English language. Longman1991.
108
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (2004) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. Longman, London.
=======================================================================
109
14 INDEX
Abbreviation, 26 circumfix, 19
ablaut, 22 classification, 10, 51, 57
accent subordination, 38 genetic classification, 51
Acceptability, 10 morphological classification, 51
Acronyms, 26 Clipping, 26
adequacy, 9 Cliticization, 22
descriptive adequacy, 9 code
explanatory adequacy, 9 commusniaction, 9
observational adequacy, 9 coining, 25
Adjectival phrase, 73 communication code, 3
Adverb, 76 competence, 10, 11
affix Grammatical Competence, 12
Germanic prefixes, 104 Morphological Competence, 12
Greek morphemes, 105 Phonological competence, 12
negative affixes, 101 Pragmatic Competence, 11
non-Germanic prefixes, 104 Semantic Competence, 11
Affixation, 22 Syntactic Competence, 12
affixes, 18, 19 complement, 73
agglutinating, 52, 54 compound, 37
agglutinative, 51 compounding, 25, 36
agreement, 17 compounds
allomorph, 21 alliterative compounds, 46
allophones, 4 bahuvrihi compounds, 48
alternation, 22 copulative, 47
analytic, 51 cranberry compounds, 47
animal communication, 3 dvandva compounds, 47
apophony, 22 endocentric compounds, 48
Back Formation, 26 exocentric compounds, 48
bases, 19 left-headed compounds, 47
best case category, 74 quotational compounds, 49
Blends, 26 rhyming compounds, 46
bracketing concatenation, 21
Bracketing Paradox, 45 configurational
Case, 69 feature, 69
categories conjugation, 18
closed-class, 65 conjugations, 18
grammatical, 65 Conjunction, 75, 76
lexical, 65 Conjunctions, 75
major, 65 consonant mutation, 22
minor, 65 content words, 19
non-lexical, 65, 75 contracted forms, 19
open class, 65 contraction, 22
parts of speech, 64 conversion, 22
prototypical correlations, 65 partial Conversion, 26
110
true Conversion, 26 Index of Synthesis, 52
declension, 18 Indo-European, 55
declensions, 18 Indo-European languages, 52
derivation, 25 Inflecting, 51
derivational, 65 inflection, 36
diachronic, 9 inflectional, 65
Discrete infinity, 4 English inflectional morphemes, 69
Double articulation', 4 morphology, 69
duality of patterning, 5 inherent
'Duality of patterning, 4 feature, 68
endings, 18 Innateness Hypothesis, 4
endocentric, 41 intuitions, 10
feature, 17 intuitive judgment, 11
configurational, 69 isolating, 51, 52
optional, 69 Language Faculty, 3
features, 68 langue, 10
agreement, 68 Levels of Linguistic Analysis, 4
configurational, 68, 69 Lexical morphemes, 16
grammaticalized, 68 lexicon, 25, 64
ingerent, 68 loan words, 25
inherent, 68 Message Model, 3
language specific features, 9 Model of Communication, 3
optional, 68, 69 morpheme
primary, 68 zero morpheme, 55
secondary, 68 neologism, 25
free variation, 21 Non-lexical morphemes, 16
function(al) words, 19 Number, 67, 69
fusion, 55 Numeral, 75
fusional, 51, 52, 54 Numerals, 75
fuzziness, 74 opaque, 37, 40
fuzzy, 76 optional
fuzzy categories, 53, 74 feature, 69
Grammatical meanings, 16 orthography, 37
grammatical relations, 41 paradigm, 66
grammaticalised Paradigm, 6
feature, 68 paradigms, 4
grammaticality, 11, 12 parole, 10
Grammaticality, 12 Parole, 10
grammaticalization, 67 parts of speech
Grammaticalization, 67 categories, 64
grammaticalized, 17 performance, 10
head, 41, 72 periphery, 25
Chinese, 52 phonemes, 4
Chukchi, 53 Phonetics, 5
idiom, 37, 38, 39 Phonology, 5
in(ter)fix, 19 phrasal verbs, 48
incorporating, 51, 52 phrase, 37, 72
Incorporation, 45 polysynthetic, 51, 52
111
Portmanteau words, 26 specifier, 73
Possessive, 69 stems, 16
post-modifiers, 72 stress, 38
Pragmatics, 5 structuralism, 16
prefix, 19, 36 substitution, 73
pre-modifiers, 72 suffix, 19, 36
Preposition, 76 Suppletion, 22
Prepositions, 75 Swahili, 54
proforms, 73 synchronic, 9
projection syntagma, 4
phrasal, 73 Syntagma, 6
Pronoun, 75 synthetic, 51
prototypicality Taxonomy, 10, 18, 19, 64
categorial, 74 Tense, 69
Quotation compounds, 26 tonic, 52
quotational compounds, 49 transmitter, 3
receiver, 3 transparent, 36, 40
reduplication, 23 typological, 51
Reflexive, 69 Unacceptability, 10
Righ-hand Head Rule, 66 Universal Grammar, 3
Right Hand Head Rule (RHHR), 41 Verb
root phrasal, 64, 65, 69, 76
Latin roots, 106 Vietnamese, 52
Semantics, 5 Yupik, 53
Semiotics, 4 Zero affixation, 22
species-specific abilities, 9
112