Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P13 Aditya Sharma Box
P13 Aditya Sharma Box
DESIGN METHODOLOGY
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
• CULVERTS - Culverts are cross drainage structures having a total length of 6m or less
between outer faces of walls, measured at right angles. The cross drainage structures
For design and analysis of any type of structure the following
with pipes is termed as culverts, irrespective of its length. needs to be ensured
• Culverts are required to be provided under earth embankments for crossing of water • Safe from falling down (Strength)
course like streams/nallas
• Safe from falling over (Stability)
• Not susceptible to making feel uncomfortable (Serviceability)
Types of culverts – Broadly there are 3 types of culverts namely Box, Slab, and Pipe • Not prone to getting old quickly (Durability)
Box culvert – It has the top and bottom slab monolithically connected to the vertical walls. Before we can do any analysis we must understand what effects
It can be single-celled or multi celled and may or may not have earth cushion over slab
depending on the road profile or loads a structure may resist.
3 4
The primary loads that the box structure will be subjected to are • BRAKING FORCE: Shall be designed for forces arising due to
application of brakes on wheels as per clause no 211.2 and 211.3
• DEAD LOAD: The self weight of the structure
of IRC:6-2014
• SIDL: Load due to surfacing, crash barrier, earth cushion if applicable.
• THERMAL EFFECTS: The structure to be designed for both
• Earth pressure : Side resistance due to earth fill.
(Clause no 214.1 of IRC:6 -2014) uniform and differential thermal effects as per clause no 215 of
IRC:6-2014
• Live load surcharge: Shall be designed for a surcharge equivalent to a 1.2m height
earth fill.
(Clause no 710.4.4 of IRC:78-2014) The structure is to be designed for all the combinations of load in
different limit states. The different limit states, the combination
• Live load : Designed for appropriate critical live load combinations as per clause principles and the design checks are shown in subsequent slides.
no 204 of IRC:6 -2014
5 6
1
POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED POINTS …. CONTD
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
• EARTH PRESSURE: The box shall be designed for earth pressure • TEMPERATURE: As the box is a restrained structure it
at rest. The coefficient of earth pressure at rest is more than that will have to be designed for stresses due to uniform fall
of active pressure and less than passive pressure. For soil Ø = 30 and rise of temperature as well as differential temperature
the coefficient at rest is 0.5 due to difference in temperature of the top surface and
• BRAKING FORCE: Braking force will affect the global stability. For other levels of the structure.
a fill height of more than 3m the braking force can be neglected • For box with cushion the temperature may be neglected.
as the braking effect will be absorbed by the cushion itself and • As per BD 31/01 clause no 3.2.8 temperature effects can
no force will be transmitted to the box beneath. be neglected for the following two cases
For intermediate heights of fill between 0 to 3m the braking effect ü Cushion greater than 2m and clear opening < 0.2 Lt where Lt is the
can be interpolated. transverse width of the box
ü The overall length of the structure shall not be more than 3m
As per latest amendment of IRC 6:2014 Temperature forces
needs to be considered in both ULS AND SLS cases
7 8
Limit States
Refer IRC: 6
Ultimate Service
Table 3.1 Gives Partial Factors to Check Equilibrium of Structure
Table 3.2 Gives Partial Factors for Verification of Structural
1) To check Loss of Equilibrium 1) Stress Check
Strength
2) Structural Strength 2) Crack Width
Table 3.3 Gives Partial Factors for Serviceability Limit State
3) Deflection
Table 3.4 Gives Partial Factors for Design of Foundation
8 10
Table No. 1
Table No. 1
Partial Safety Factor for Verification of Equilibrium
Partial Safety Factor for Verification of Equilibrium
Actions Basic Combination Accidental Combination Seismic Combination Actions Basic Combination Accidental Combination Seismic Combination
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Overturning Restoring Overturning Restoring or Overturning Restoring Overturning Restoring Overturning Restoring or Overturning Restoring
or Sliding or or Sliding Resisting or Sliding or Resisting or Sliding or Resisting or Sliding Resisting or Sliding or
or Uplift Effect Resisting or Uplift Effect Effect or Uplift Effect or Uplift Effect Effect or Uplift Effect Effect or Uplift Effect Resisting
Effect Effect Effect
Permanent Actions: Thermal Action
Dead Load, SIDL except (a) As Leading Load 1.50 0 - - - -
surfacing, Backfill weight, 1.05 0.95 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
(b) As accompanying Load 0.9 0 0.5 0 0.5 0
settlement, creep and
shrinkage effect
Wind
Surfacing (a) As Leading Load 1.50 0 - - - -
1.35 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0
(b) As accompanying Load 0.9 0 - - - -
2
Note:
Table No. 1 1) During launching the counterweight position shall be allowed a
Partial Safety Factor for Verification of Equilibrium variation of + 1m for steel bridges.
Actions Basic Combination Accidental Combination Seismic Combination 2) For Combination principles refer Para 3.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
3) Thermal action includes restraints associated with expansion/
Overturning Restoring Overturning Restoring Overturning Restoring
or Sliding or or Sliding or Resisting or Sliding or
contraction due to type of construction (Portal frame, arch and
or Uplift Resisting or Uplift Effect Effect or Uplift Resisting elastomeric bearings), frictional restraint in metallic bearings and
Effect Effect Effect Effect
thermal gradients. This combination however, is not valid for the
Construction
Condition: design of bearing and expansion joint.
Counter Weights: - 0.9 - 1.0 - 1.0 4) Wind action and thermal action need not be taken simultaneously.
a) When density or self
weight is well defined - 0.8 - 1.0 - 1.0
5) Partial safety factor for prestress and secondary effect of prestress
b) When density or self shall be as recommended in the relevant codes.
weight is not well defined
c) Erection effects
1.05 0.95 - - - - 6) Wherever Snow Load is applicable, Clause 221 shall be referred
for combination of snow load and live load.
Wind
1.50 0 - - - - 7) Seismic effect during erection stage is reduced to half when
(a) Leading Load
(b) Accompanying Load
1.20 0 - - - - construction phase does not exceed 5 years.
8) For repair, rehabilitation and retrofitting, the load combination shall
Hydraulic Actions
(Accompanying Load): be project specific.
Water current forces 1.0 0 1.0 - 1.0 -
Wave Pressure 1.0 0 1.0 - 1.0 -
1.0 - 1.0 - 1.0 -
Buoyancy
13 14
Surfacing: Live Load Surcharge (as accompanying load) 1.2 0.2 0.2
Effects adding to the effect of variable action 1.75 1.0 1.0
Effects opposing the effect of variable action 1.0 1.0 1.0 Construction Dead load 1.35 1.0 1.35
Thermal Loads
Prestress and Secondary effect of prestress - - (Refer Note 2) - 1.5 -
a) As leading load -
Back fill Weight 1.5 1.0 1.0 b) As Accompanying load 0.9 0.5 0.5
Variable Actions:
Carriageway Live Load and associated
actions (braking, tractive and centrifugal
forces) and Pedestrian Live Load:
(a) Leading Load 1.5 0.75 0
(b) Accompanying Load 1.15 0.2 0.2
(c) Construction Live Load 1.35 1.0 1.0
15 16
Note: 1) For Combination principles, refer Para 3.
Hydraulic Actions (Accompanying Load): Shrinkage and Creep Effects 1.0 1.0 1.0
Water Current Forces 1.0 1.0 1.0
Wave Pressure 1.0 1.0 1.0
Earth Pressure due to Back Fill 1.0 1.0 1.0
Buoyancy 0.15 0.15 0.15
Settlement Effects
(a) Adding to the permanent effect 1.0 1.0 1.0
(b) Opposing the permanent effect 0 0 0
17 18
Note: 1) For Combination principles, refer Para 3.
3
Table No. 3
Partial Safety Factor for Verification of Serviceability Limit State
Rare Combination Frequent Semi Permanent Note:
Combination Combination
1) For Combination principles, refer Para 3.
(1) (2) (3) (4)
2) Thermal action includes restraints associated with expansion/
Variable Actions: contraction due to type of construction (Portal frame, arch and
Carriageway Live Load and associated loads
(braking, tractive and centrifugal forces) and
elastomeric bearings), frictional restraint in metallic bearings and
Pedestrian Live Load 1.0 0.75 - thermal gradients. This combination however, is not valid for the
(a) Leading Load 0.75 0.2 0
(b) Accompanying Load
design of bearing and expansion joint.
3) Wind and thermal action need not be taken simultaneously.
Thermal Actions 1.0 0.6 -
(a) Leading Load 0.6 0.5 0.5
(b) Accompanying Load
Table no 4 gives the factors for design of foundation.
Wind
(a) Leading Load 1.0 0.60 -
(b) Accompanying Load 0.60 0.50 0
2 SIDL Without Surfacing = SIDL-1 2 1.35 DL + 1.35 SIDL-1 + 1.75 SIDL-2 + 1.2 LLS + 1.5 EP
3 1.35 DL + 1.35 SIDL-1 + 1.75 SIDL-2 + 1.2 LLS + 1.5 EP + 1.5 BR + 1.5 LL
3 SIDL Only Surfacing = SIDL-2
4 Live Load Surcharge = LLS LOAD CASE GROUP 2:
•Combinations with both earth pressure adding and relieving to the effect of 3 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP + 1.0 BR + 1.0 LL
variable load shall be considered in the design SLS Rare Combination with Uniform Temperature Rise as Accompany Load
1 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 UTR
•Similarly live load combinations with both leading and accompanying load shall 2 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 UTR + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP
be considered 3 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 UTR + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP + 1.0 BR + 1.0 LL
4
SLS COMBINATIONS CONTD……. SLS COMBINATIONS CONTD…….
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
SLS Rare Combination with Uniform Temperature Fall as Leading Load SLS Rare Combination with Temperature Gradient Fall as Leading Load
1 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 UTF 1 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 TGF
2 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 UTF + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP 2 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 TGF + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP
3 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 UTF + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP + 0.75 BR + 0.75 LL 3 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 TGF + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP + 0.75 BR + 0.75 LL
SLS Rare Combination with Temperature Gradient Rise as Accompany Load SLS Rare Combination with Uniform Temp Rise and Temperature Gradient Rise as Accompany Load
1 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGR 1 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGR + 0.6 UTR
2 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGR + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP 2 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGR + 0.6 UTR + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP
3 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGR + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP + 1.00 BR + 1.00 LL 3 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGR + 0.6 UTR + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP + 1.00 BR + 1.00 LL
SLS Rare Combination with Temperature Gradient Fall as Accompany Load SLS Rare Combination with Uniform Temp Fall and Temperature Gradient Fall as Accompany Load
1 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGF 1 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGF + 0.6 UTF
2 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGF + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP 2 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGF + 0.6 UTF + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP
3 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGF + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP + 1.00 BR + 1.00 LL 3 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 0.6 TGF + 0.6 UTF + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP + 1.00 BR + 1.00 LL
SLS Rare Combination with Temperature Gradient Rise as Leading Load SLS Rare Combination with Uniform Temp Rise and Temperature Gradient Rise as Leading Load
1 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 TGR 1 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 TGR + 1.0 UTR
2 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 TGR + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP 2 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 TGR + 1.0 UTR + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP
3 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 TGR + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP + 0.75 BR + 0.75 LL 3 1.0 DL + 1.0 SIDL-1 + 1.2 SIDL-2 + 1.0 TGR + 1.0 UTR + 0.8 LLS + 1.0 EP + 0.75 BR + 0.75 LL
•Design shall be carried out for all possible combinations for different
leading and accompanying load as well as adding and relieving effect of
variable load
DESIGN PARAMETERS
DESIGN DATA
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
5
ANALYSIS
APPLICATION OF LOADS IN STAAD MODEL
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
•Temperature effects has been worked out as per cl no 215 of IRC 6 -2014
and applied in Staad model
•Combinations as shown before for different limit states has been applied in
Staad model itself
•The bending moments and shear force at the critical sections has been
checked .
Stress
= 1.15
Mome Shear Mome Shear Axial Mome Axial
Shear Moment S hear
nt (kN- at d nt kN- at d force nt kN- force fyd = fyk / gs
kN kN-m kN
m) dist kN m dist kN kN m kN = 434.783 Mpa
Mid top 0 0 0 0.0
38
Mid bot 18.6 5.7 33.6 33.6 e yk = fyk / Es e yd = 0.00217 e ud = 0.0041
= 0.0025 Strain
S upport top 9.4 15.6 28 41 29.7 28 41 29.7 28 Design stress- strain diagram for
37 & 40 e yd = fyd / Es Reinfo rcing Steel
S upport bot 0 0 0 0.0
= 0.00217
refer fig 6.2 of IRC 112-2011 and using factored simplified
Outside 18.1 17.3 34.1 41 44.45 34.1 41 44.5 34
24 & 29 e uk = 0.0045 design bilenear d iagram
Inside 0 8 8 8.0
e ud = 0.9 * e uk
Outside 15.6 0 23.4 23.4 = 0.0041
23 & 28
Inside 0 8 8 8.0
fy = e s*Es if e s < e yd
= fyd if e s >= e yd
Outside 13.3 25.1 48 60 45.07 48 60 45.1 48
22 & 27
Inside 0 0 0 0.0 Es = Modulus of Elasticity
fyk = Characteristics yield strength of reinforcement
ft = Tensile strength of stee l
S upport top 15.3 12 50 62.7 34.95 50 62.7 35.0 50
2 - 3 & 8- 9 gs = Partial factor for reinforcing steel
S upport bot 3.7 27 32.55 32.6
fyd = Design yie ld strength of reinforceme nt
e yk = Characteristic yield strain of reinforcement steel
top 24.3 14 50.45 50.5 e yd = Design yie ld strain of re inforce ment stee l
5 & 6
bottom 0 0 0 0.0 33 e uk = Characteristic strain of reinforcement ste el at max imum load
e ud = design strain of reinforcement steel at maximum load
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
= 0.8
ec3 = 0.0018 e cu3 = 0.0035
strain
Modified Design stress -strain diagarm for
Concrete Compression zone factor h = 1 for fck <= 60 Mpa
= 1- (fck-60)/250 for 60 < fck <= 110 Mpa
= 1
ec3 = 0.0018 For fck<= 60 Mpa
ecu3 = 0.0035
0.0035 Strain fcd 1 *fcd
3/7x 0.416 x
fc = fcd/ec3 *ec For 0 ≤ec ≤ 0.0018
0.002 Stress
For 0.0018 ≤ec ≤ 0.0035
@ 0.8 *x
x 4/7x
fck = Characteristic compressive cube strength of concrete at 28 days
fcd = Design Value of concrete compressive strength
ec2 = Strain at reaching characteristic
ecu2 = Ultimate strain
Strain Recatangular- Parabolic Equavelent
ec = Compressive strain in concrete stress block stress block
sc = Compressive stress in concrete
6
Limiting neutral axis Limiting neutral axis
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
d
xu ≤xu,max
d
d-xu
xu,max = 0.464 * d for balanced failure (0.0035 x d/Xu) - 0.0035 >= fy/1.15/Es
The actual strain can be worked out and check if our assumtion of steel yeilding is correct.
If above equation is not hold true than neutral axis will be calculated by trial and error
MOMENT CAPACITY CHECK – ULS AT TOP SLAB MIDSPAN MOMENT CAPACITY CHECK – ULS AT TOP SLAB MIDSPAN CONTD…..
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
MOMENT CAPACITY CHECK – ULS AT TOP SLAB MIDSPAN CONTD….. POINTS ON ULS SHEAR CHECK IN BOX STRUCTURES
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
Minimum Distribution Reinforcement (20% of Main Reinf.) mm2 0.2*798 160 •Reinforcement if required can be worked out as discussed earlier using equations
Reinforcement Provided mm2 3.14*( 8^2)/4*( 1000/ 250) 201
Status OK
10.3.3.2 and provided in form of Open links.
7
ULS SHEAR CHECK IN BOX (At bottom slab)……contd
ULS SHEAR CHECK IN BOX (At bottom slab near support)
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
b Ec,eff b / Es
SLS STRESS CHECK εc
•12.1 (2) of IRC 112 permits an un-cracked concrete cross-section to be dc dc
assumed for stress and deflection calculation provided that the flexural
d d
tensile stress under the relevant combination of actions considered does b
not exceed fctm d-dc
•For calculating stresses with long term effect of creep, effective modulus of
Stresses Strains
elasticity of concrete shall be used.
Ec,eff =
(M qp + M st )E cm • The neutral axis depth and steel strain can be derived from a cracked section
M st + (1 + f )M qp analysis assuming plane section remain plane.
• For rectangular beams from strain diagram es=(d-dc)/dc * ec
Mqp = moment due to quasi-permanent effects • NA to be calculated by Equating area moment of concrete in compression and
Mst = moment due to short-term effects equivalent steel in tension about neutral axis.
f = creep factor
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
Moment kN-m Moment kN-m Moment kN-m Moment kN-m Moment kN- m Moment kN-m Moment kN-m Moment kN-m
I = A s (d - d c ) +
2 3
bd c dc = 37 & 40
Support
Support
9.4
0
10.2
0
19.56
0
15
0
24.4
0
17.18
0
24.23
0
24.4
0.0
3 Es bEc,eff
Outside 18.1 10.3 28.353 26 44.1 35.5 49.08 49.1
24 & 29
Inside 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
M E c , eff
s = Ed
z = I / d
Outside 13.31 17.0 30.31 22.8 36.11 26.6 36.58 36.6
c 22 & 27
z c E s c c
Inside 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
M 2 - 3 & 8- Support 15.3 9.0 24.3 13.3 28.6 19.2 30.68 30.7
s = Ed
z s = I / (d - d c )
9 Support 3.7 18.0 21.7 24.8 28.5 29 31.78 31.8
s
z s top 24.3 9.4 33.71 17.8 42.1 23.5 41.73 42.1
5& 6
bottom 0 0 0 4 4 9 9 9.0
8
BENDING MOMENTS (SLS QUASSI PERMANENT) STRESS CHECK RARE (AT TOP SLAB MIDSPAN)
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
Quasi-permanent Combination
Live Load Normal Load
case
Nor mal Load Nor mal case
case with Normal case
Normal Load STRESS CHECK SAMPLE TOP SLAB MIDSPAN BOTTOM
Case Nor mal Load wit h case with
(unfactor ed Temperatur with Design
Beam No
) fr om
(factored) Case + Live Temperatur
e+ Live Temperature
Temperatur e
Values
Load Data Span
from STAA D Load e Load + Live Load
STA AD Load Load (Leading)
out put
out put (A ccomp.)
(Accomp.)
(Leading) Moment(Mrare) kN-m 27.1
LC 101-106 LC 111-134 LC 141-164
Moment(QP) kN-m 3.6
Moment kN-m Moment kN-m Moment kN-m Moment kN-m Moment kN-m Moment kN-m Moment kN-m Moment kN-m
Moment due to transient loading (Mst) kN-m 23.5
Mid top 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
38
Mid bot 18.6 3.6 3.6 7.6 7.6 3.6 3.6 7.6 Material Data
Grade of Steel Fe 500
Support 9.4 4.6 4.6 8.6 8.6 4.6 4.6 8.6
37 & 40
Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Charecteristic strength of reinforcement ( f yk ) Table 18.1, IRC 112 MPa 500
Outside 18.1 5.7 5.7 18.4 18.4 5.7 5.7 18.4
partial factor for steel ( gs ) Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112 1.15
24 & 29
Inside 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
Design value for tensile strength ( f yd = fyk /gs ) Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112 MPa 434.78
23 & 28
Outside 15.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Modulus of Elasticity of Steel ( Es ) Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112 GPa 200
Inside 0 0.6 0.6 1.6 1.6 0 0 1.6
Grade of Concrete M 30
22 & 27
Outside
Inside
13.31
0
10
0
10
0
14.9
0
14.9
0
10
0
10
0
14.9
0.0
Charecteristics compressive strength ( fck ) Table 6.5, IRC 112 MPa 30
a Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112 0.67
2 - 3 & 8- Support 15.3 3.2 3.2 10.2 10.2 3.2 3.2 10.2
9 Support 3.7 8.3 8.3 13.9 13.9 8.3 8.3 13.9 Concrete material factor ( gm ) Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112 1.5
Design value for concrete compressive strength (Clf 6.4.2.8, IRC 112 MPa 13.40
top 24.3 8.6 8.6 15.6 15.6 8.6 8.6 15.6
5& 6
bottom 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete ( Ecm ) Table 6.5, IRC 112 GPa 31
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
Geometric Data
Width of Sla b / Beam ( b ) mm 1000 Crack width Check
Total Depth of Beam ( D ) mm 250
Cover to Reinforcement ( c ) mm 50 Load Data Span
Eff ective depth of beam / Slab ( d ) 250- 50- 12/2 mm 194
Moment(quassi with temp) kN-m 7.6
Area of Reinforcement ( At ) mm2 798
Reinforc ement ( % ) 798*100/( 1000* 250) 0.319 Moment(QP) kN-m 3.6
Stress Check
Moment due to transient loading (Mst) kN-m 4
Material Data
Concrete Cross Sectiona l Area ( Ac ) mm 250000
Perimeter in contac t w ith atmosphere ( u ) mm 1000
Grade of Steel Fe 500
Notional Size 500.00 Charecteristic strength of reinforcement ( f yk ) Table 18.1, IRC 112 MPa 500
Fina l Creep Co-efficient of 28 days ( f ) Table 6.9 & RH = 80% 1.670
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
9
CRACK WIDTH CHECK CRACK WIDTH CHECK
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
Mean value of tensile strength of concrete effective at the time Eq 12.12, IRC 112 (applicable if spacing of
Maximum Crack Spacing, Sr,max = 1.3 x (h - x) = reinforcement> 5(c+f/2) mm 258.29
when the cracks may occur first, fct,eff = fctm (t) Cl 12.3.3, IRC 112
Maximum Crack Spacing, Sr,max = 3.4c + Eq 12.8, IRC 112 (applicable if spacing <
where, f ctm(t) = (bcc(t))a x f ctm (0.425xk1xk2xf )/r r ,eff 5(c+f/2) mm 326.39
and the value of fctm is = Table 6.5, IRC 112 MPa 2.5 k1 = Cl 12.3.4, IRC 112 0.8
where, bcc(t) = e ^ [S x (1 - (28/(t/t1))^0.5] Eq 6.3, IRC 112 k2 = Cl 12.3.4, IRC 112 for bending 0.5
f equivalent = n1(f1)^2+n2(f2)^2/(n1f1+n2f2) mm 11
bcc(t) = Co-eff depending on age "t" and type of cement
Eq 12.11, IRC 112 (applicable for pure
t = Age of concrete in days = 28 Maximum Crack Spacing, Sr,max = 3.4c + 0.17f/r r,eff
bending) mm 326.39
t1 = Eq 6.3, IRC 112 1 Design Crack Spacing, Sr,max = As spacing is <5(c+f/2) Eq 12.8 is applicable mm 326.39
S = Co-efficient depends on type of cement = Eq 6.3, IRC 112 0.25 As per Eq 12.6 of IRC: 112-2011
So, bcc(t) = e ^ [S x (1 - (28/(t/t1))^0.5] 1.0 e sm -e cm = ((ssc - (kt x fct,eff x (1 + ae x r r,eff))/r r,eff))/Es Minimum 0.6*ssc/Es 0.00016
greater of fctm(t) or 2.9 mpa to cater for Crack width ( wk ) Eq 12.5, IRC 112 mm 0.05
DEFLECTION CHECK
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI
58
10