Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FS 3 Episode 5
FS 3 Episode 5
3
31
Learning Episode 5
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION
IN THE CLASSROOM
32
My Tools
OBSERVATION REPORT
33
My Analysis
34
My Analysis
Use the Technology Integration Matrix to analyze the class you observed.
In what level of technology integration do you thing the teacher operated? Why?
None. The classrooms that I have observed they didn’t use technology
instead they still use the tradition way which is chalk and chalkboard and
paper and pen materials.
Over-all, were the learning resources used effectively? Why? Why not?
Give your suggestions.
Yes I must say that the learning resources were used effectively like the
modules and textbooks as well as the Articles from the internet that has this
technology that can add excitements and interest to the students to engage in
the learning.
35
My Reflections/Insights
36
Integrating Theory and Practice
1. A Science teacher uses a power point presentation
to show the classification in kingdom Animalia. The
teacher then teaches them how to use a software in
making graphic organizers. Students then use this to
create own graphic organizers to classify animals.
This shows technology integration which
is___________.
A. entry-constructive
B. adoption-constructive
C. infusion-constructive
D. transformation-constructive
A. entry-active
B. adoption-active
3. A Grade 7 Social Studies teacher gave a project where her class in Manila
will work together with other Grade 7 classes in their school campuses in
Visayas and Mindanao. They will create posters and a video clip to
communicate a message about peace campaign. This project involves
technology integration which is ____________.
A. entry-active
B. adoption-constructive
C. transformation-constructive
D. adaptation-collaborative
37
My Learning Portfolio
38
My Learning Rubric
Field Study 3, Episode 5 – TCHNOLOGY INTEGRATION IN THE CLASSROOM
Name of FS Student: Mark Anthony N. Rafallo Date Submitted:
Year & Section: 3-C Course: BSED
Learning Episodes Exemplary Superior Satisfactory Needs
4 3 2 Improvement
1
All tasks were done with All or nearly all tasks Nearly all tasks were Fewer than half of
outstanding quality; work were done with high done with acceptable tasks were done; or
Learning Activities exceeds expectatio quality. quality. most objectives
were met but need
improvement.
4 3 2 1
All questions were Analysis questions were Analysis questions were Analysis questions
answered completely; in answered completely. not answered were not answered.
Analysis of the Learning depth answers; completely.
Episode thoroughly grounded on Clear connection with Vaguely related to the Grammar and
theories. Exemplary theories. theories spelling
grammar and spelling. unsatisfactory
Grammar and spelling Grammar and spelling
are superior. acceptable 1
3 2
4
Reflection statements Reflection statements Reflection statements Reflection
are profound and clear; are clear, but not clearly are shallow; supported statements are
Reflections/ Insights supported by supported by by experiences from the unclear and
experiences from the experiences from the learning episodes shallow and are not
learning episodes learning episodes supported by
experiences from
the learning
episodes
4 3 2 1
Portfolio is complete, Portfolio is complete, Portfolio is incomplete; Analysis questions
clear, well-organized and clear, well-organized; supporting were not answered.
Learning Portfolio all supporting; most supporting documentations are
documentations are documentations are organized but are Grammar and
located in sections available and logical and lacking spelling
clearly designated clearly marked locations unsatisfactory
3 1
4 2
Submission of Learning Submitted before the Submitted on the Submitted a day after Submitted two days
Episode deadline deadline the deadline or more after the
deadline
4 3 2 1
COMMENT/S Rating:
Over-all score (Based on
transmutation)
_____________________
Signature of FS Teacher Date: _________________
39