US

Find a Therapist (City or Zip) Verified by Psychology Today

Steve Taylor Ph.D.

Out of the Darkness

Sport and the Decline of War

How sport can help the human race transcend war and conflict
Posted Mar 14, 2014

In 1910, shortly before his death, the eminent psychologist William James wrote an essay called The Moral
Equivalent of War, in which he attempted to understand the human race’s apparent love of warfare. James
argued that warfare was so prevalent because of its positive psychological effects. Put simply, it made people
feel good.

One way in which it does this, according to James, is by making people feel more alert and alive. Both for
soldiers and civilians, warfare lifts life to "a higher plane of power." It enables the expression of higher human
qualities which often lie dormant in ordinary life, such as discipline, courage, and self-sacrifice. Warfare creates a
powerful sense of community, in the face of a collective threat. It binds people together and creates a sense of
cohesion, with mutual goals. The "war effort" inspires individual citizens (not just soldiers) to behave honorably
and unselfishly, in the service of a greater good.

James’ views might seem old-fashioned, based on a romantic notion of warfare which was no longer possible
after the horrors of the First and Second World Wars. However, the New York Times war correspondent Chris
Hedges identified the same effects while observing recent world conflicts. Hedges witnessed the bonding effect
of being at war with a common enemy, and the transcendence of social conflict and dislocation. He also
describes how war generates a strong sense of purpose and meaning, as he writes, "War is an enticing elixir. It
gives us resolve, a cause. It allows us to be noble."

James’ point in The Moral Equivalent of War is that human beings urgently need to find an activity which has the
same positive psychological and social effects of warfare, but which doesn’t involve the same devastation—this
is what he means by "moral equivalent." Perhaps disappointingly, in the essay he is not very clear about what
this might be. But from our vantage point in history, there is an obvious contender for a "moral equivalent of
war": sport.

Sport satisfies most of the same psychological needs as warfare, and has similar psychological and social
effects. It certainly provides a sense of belonging and unity. Fans of soccer, baseball or basketball teams feel a
strong sense of allegiance to them. Once they have formed an attachment to a team (usually during childhood)
they "support" it loyally through thick and thin. The team forms part of their identity; they feel bonded to it, and a
strong sense of allegiance to the other supporters, a tribal sense of unity. Sport also enables the expression of
"higher" human qualities which often lie dormant in ordinary life. It provides a context for heroism, a sense of
urgency and drama where team members can display courage, daring, loyalty, and skill. It creates an artificial
"life and death" situation which is invested with meaning and importance far beyond its surface reality.

Sport can certainly lift life to a "higher plane of power" too. Watching a major sports match—e.g. a soccer match
in the UK, or a baseball game in the US—is an empathic, rather than a passive experience. It is an experience of
complete, passionate engagement, generating powerful emotional responses. (Although admittedly, this may
partially depend on how exciting the game is.) At the end of the game, the spectator often feels emotionally
drained, in a mood of euphoria or desolation (depending on the result).

The Decline of Warfare 

If sport is a "moral equivalent of war" then it should be able to serve as a substitute for it, and to bring about a
decline in warfare. Is there any evidence for this? US

There are both small scale and large scale examples. In the second half of the 19th century, my home city of
Manchester, UK, was gripped by an epidemic of youth gangs and knife crime. Large parts of the city were
unsafe, as pedestrians could easily be caught up in fighting, and were often randomly attacked. But during the
1890s, a small number of enlightened people realized that the youths needed to be offered other outlets for
satisfying their psychological needs other than gang membership and violence. They set up "working lads"
clubs’ throughout the city, which gave the poorest slum youths access to sport and recreation. This led to a new
"craze" for football (soccer) that spread rapidly through the city. (Indeed, it was during this decade that
Manchester’s two famous modern soccer teams—Manchester United and Manchester City—were originally
established.) As a result, youths who had previously fought against each other in gangs were soon "fighting"
each other in football teams, both in "street football" and in organized games through the lads’ clubs. This
suggests that the psychological needs which had given rise to gang membership and conflict, were now
seemingly being channeled into sport—bringing a massive reduction in actual conflict and violence.

The same principle has been applied in the modern world too. In Columbia and Brazil, for example, the
promotion of soccer in areas of high gang activity has led to a significant reduction in crime and violence.

On a global scale, the last 75 years have seen a steady ongoing decline in the number of deaths due to group
conflict in the world as a whole (Human Security Report Project, 2006). Since the Second World War, there has
been a massive reduction in international conflict (sometimes referred to as "The Long Peace"). In particular, the
last 25-30 years have been by far the least war-afflicted in recent history, and have seen a correspondingly low
number of casualties (Global Conflict Trends, 2014).

Why has the world become more peaceful? It may be partly due to the nuclear deterrent, the demise of
Communist Bloc, increased international trade and commerce, the growth of democracy, the work of
international peacekeeping forces, and increased interconnection between people of different nations. But
sport is most likely an important factor too. It’s surely not a coincidence that, over the 75 years of this steady
decline in conflict, sport has grown correspondingly in popularity. The excitement and intoxication which was
once derived from warfare can be gained from from national and international sporting competitions, from
following your country at the Olympics or the Soccer World Cup. The sense of belonging and allegiance to your
army comrades or the sense of togetherness of being a nation at war can now be gained through supporting
your baseball club. The heroism and loyalty or feeling of being "more alive" on the battlefield can be gained
from the athletic or football field.

This shows how essential it is for sport to be promoted in the world’s conflict zones. It shows how important it is
for governments—and other organizations—to make sport more accessible and attractive to young people,
particularly in areas of social deprivation, where gang membership flourishes. And it also shows that William
James was right—war and conflict aren’t natural or inevitable, and can be transcended.

Steve Taylor, Ph.D. is a senior lecturer in psychology at Leeds Metropolitan University, UK. He is the author
of The Fall: The Insanity of the Ego in Human History and Back to Sanity. www.stevenmtaylor.com

Follow Steve on Facebook Follow Steve on Twitter.

References

Global conflict trends, 2014. Measuring systemic peace. 

Human security research project, 2006. Human security brief, 2006.

About the Author

Steve Taylor, Ph.D., is senior lecturer in psychology at Leeds Beckett University. He is the author of several best-
 y , , p y gy y
selling books, including The Leap and Spiritual Science.
US
Online: www.stevenmtaylor.com, Twitter, Facebook

Read Next

Spiritual Depression David Ditchfield's Remarkable Near-

Death Experience

Watching the World Cup: What the World Cup The Psychology of War The Genius of William Soccer, Moral Decay, and
The Tribal Psychology of Teaches Us About James Ann Coulter
Football Psychology

The Psychology of Sports

Fandom

Most Popular

Half of Singles Don’t Want a Relationship

Looks Matter: How Criminals Choose
or Even a Date
Their Victims

7 Questions to Help People Talk About

Getting Intimate
Their Mental Health

Find a Therapist

Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.

City or Zip

Cities:

Atlanta, GA Jacksonville, FL Phoenix, AZ

Austin, TX Las Vegas, NV Pittsburgh, PA
Baltimore, MD Los Angeles, CA Portland, OR
Boston, MA Louisville, KY Raleigh, NC
Brooklyn, NY Memphis, TN Sacramento, CA
 Charlotte, NC Miami, FL Saint Louis, MO
Chicago, IL Milwaukee, WI San Antonio, TX US
Columbus, OH Minneapolis, MN San Diego, CA
Dallas, TX Nashville, TN San Francisco, CA
Denver, CO New York, NY San Jose, CA
Detroit, MI Oakland, CA Seattle, WA
Houston, TX Omaha, NE Tucson, AZ
Indianapolis, IN Philadelphia, PA Washington, DC

Are you a Therapist?

Get Listed Today

Recent Issues
July 2020 May 2020 March 2020
magazine cover magazine cover magazine cover

Subscribe Today!

About Privacy Terms Accessibility United States

Psychology Today © 2020 Sussex Publishers, LLC