Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

328.

 Fraudulent preference
(1) Where a company has given preference to a person who is one of the creditors
of the company or a surety or guarantor for any of the debts or other liabilities of the
company, and the company does anything or suffers anything done which has the effect
of
putting that person into a position which, in the event of the company going into
liquidation,
will be better than the position he would have been in if that thing had not been done
prior
to six months of making winding up application, the Tribunal, if satisfied that, such
transaction
is a fraudulent preference may order as it may think fit for restoring the position to what
it
would have been if the company had not given that preference.
(2) If the Tribunal is satisfied that there is a preference transfer of property, movable or
immovable, or any delivery of goods, payment, execution made, taken or done by or
against
a company within six months before making winding up application, the Tribunal may
order
as it may think fit and may declare such transaction invalid and restore the position.

 To set aside a transaction under Section 531 of the Act fraud must be clearly alleged, proved and
established and mere general allegations using statutory words or language but lacking in
material particulars would not suffice. If the transaction of transfer amounts to a fraudulent
preference under the bankruptcy law or insolvency law and is entered into within a period of six
months prior to the commencement of the winding up then alone the transaction in question can
be treated as void under Section 531(1) of the Act and not otherwise. It cannot be said that every
transaction of transfer of property effected within six months before the commencement of the
winding up of the company without anything more must be treated as a fraudulent preference
within the meaning of this section and nothing more need be enquired into. In other words, law
does not presume a transaction to be a fraudulent preference merely because it was entered into
within a period of six months prior to the commencement of winding up.

You might also like