Infographic with visual representations and explanations of three numerical integration methods (Rectangular, Trapezoidal, and Simpson's)
A Math 6 Project by Pher Gibson Palacio, PSHS-MC Batch 2020
Infographic with visual representations and explanations of three numerical integration methods (Rectangular, Trapezoidal, and Simpson's)
A Math 6 Project by Pher Gibson Palacio, PSHS-MC Batch 2020
Infographic with visual representations and explanations of three numerical integration methods (Rectangular, Trapezoidal, and Simpson's)
A Math 6 Project by Pher Gibson Palacio, PSHS-MC Batch 2020
26 me ra cagimation of the area
ily em
area is really puted
eth,
=. Sgmmon m dal So gop s
to rectangles with
"Height used is (=) 0.24719 + 0.24560 + 024282 +023
atthe midpoint of the MM 0.28129 + 0.22335 + 021370-+ 0.20257
rectangle
TRAPEZOIDAL -
= Deak tewopnine 8 CC) AN) HC)
Se oe $4 f(s) 47(s) S(%))
Uses the 41 method [MBN 3.1 29092 +s 02940 + 2.48748 + 4s0309 +
imapproximating the area 2 sonv0 + 43472 + 2.22811 + 424483+1)
seam = 1.84325
~Heights of the bases ‘
sod codon conde oapaseie wed are f(s) at and trapezoidal methods. Since the graph was curved,
the endpoints ofthe [Simpson's was more precise in representing it. However,
= 1.84214 Je wt the two other methods can still prove useful in other cases