Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

CASE DIGEST NO.

17

G.R. No. 186006


October 16, 2009
NORLAINE MITMUG LIMBONA, petitioner,
vs
COMMISSIONS ON ELECTIONS and MALIK “BOBBY” T. ALINGAN, Respondents.

FACTS OF THE CASE:


Spouses Norlaine Mitmug Limbona and Mohammad “Exchan” Limbona each filed a Certificate of
Candidacy for Mayor of Pantar, Lanao del Norte. Respondent Malik “Bobby” T. Alingan filed a
disqualification case against the petitioner and her husband base on the ground of lacking the one-year
residency requirement and both were not registered voter of Pantar. On April 17, 2007, petitioner
executed an Affidavit of withdrawal of her Candidacy which was subsequently approved by the Comelec.
On May 24, 2007, Comelec promulgated a resolution disqualifying Mohammad for failure to comply
with one-year residency requirement which prompted the petitioner to file a Certificate of Candidacy as
a substitute for her husband. Respondent filed another petition for disqualification case against
petitioner for among others, lacking the one-year residency requirement.
ISSUE:
1. Whether the petitioner is disqualified as candidate for Mayor of Pantar, Lanao del Norte for
failure to comply with one-year residency requirement.

RULING:
Yes, the petitioner is disqualified as candidate for Mayor of Pantar. The court said that the
Comelec correctly found that petitioner failed to satisfy the one-year residency requirement. The term
residence as used in the election law is synonymous with domicile. The petitioners domicile is her place
of birth and by operation of law (by virtue of marriage) is Rapasun, Marawi City to which her husband
serves a Barangay Chairman. It is presumed that husband and wife live together in one legal residence
which is provided by Article 68 and 69 of the Family Code of the Philippines. Considering that petitioner
failed to show that she maintained a separate residence from her husband, and as there is no evidence
to prove otherwise, reliance on these provisions of the Family Code is proper and is in consonance with
human experience.

Eric M. Recomendable
Arellano University School of Law

You might also like