Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 1 (Component of Soil)
Chapter 1 (Component of Soil)
Geotechnical Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering deals with soil and rock mechanics, and the
interaction between the geological environment and man-made constructions
such as foundations, earth and underground structures.
One of the first books in geotechnical engineering: Terzaghi, K., and Ralph B.
Peck, 1948, Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, emphasized the
importance of both the theoretical and applied aspects of soil mechanics, and
has had an important influence in the development of geotechnical.
By having a —feel“ for how soils and rocks behave, and how fluids
move in soils from performing laboratory and field tests on soils;
From several years of experience in working on geotechnical
problems; and
From studying previous case histories.
Geological studies
Laboratory tests
Case histories
Brooklyn Bridge
Soil Description
~ mnmar 06 ~ 3
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Soils may be described in different ways by different people for their different
~ mnmar 06 ~ 4
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 5
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
C. A. Coulomb W. J. M. Rankine
1) Arthur Casagrande
2) Ralph B. Peck
3) A. W. Skempton
4) Laurrits B jerum
~ mnmar 06 ~ 6
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 8
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 9
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Shape Description
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 12
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 13
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
1. Tetrahedral unit.
2. Octahedral unit.
The tetrahedral unit consists of four oxygen atoms (or hydroxyls, if
needed to balance the structure) placed at the apices of a
tetrahedron enclosing a silicon atom which combines together to
form a shell-like structure with all the tips pointing in the same
direction.
The oxygen at the bases of all the units lies in a common plane.
Each of the oxygen ions at the base is common to two units. The
arrangement is shown in Fig. 1.3.1.
The oxygen atoms are negatively charged with two negative charges
each and the silicon with four positive charges.
Each of the three oxygen ions at the base shares its charges with the
adjacent tetrahedral unit.
The sharing of charges leaves three negative charges at the base
per tetrahedral unit and this along with two negative charges at the
apex makes a total of 5 negative charges to balance the 4 positive
charges of the silicon ion.
The process of sharing the oxygen ions at the base with neighboring
units leaves a net charge of -1 per unit.
The second building block is an octahedral unit with six hydroxyl ions
at apices of an octahedral enclosing an aluminum ion at the center.
Iron or magnesium ions may replace aluminum ions in some units.
These octahedral units are bound together in a sheet structure with
each hydroxyl ion common to three octahedral units.
This sheet is sometimes called as gibbsite sheet.
The Al ion has 3 positive charges and each hydroxyl ion divides its -1
charge with two other neighboring units.
~ mnmar 06 ~ 16
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 17
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Halloysite Mineral
~ mnmar 06 ~ 18
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 19
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
(iii) Illite
~ mnmar 06 ~ 20
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 21
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Figure 1.3.6 (f-g) Schematic diagrams of salt water and fresh water
deposits structures (Lambe, 1958)
~ mnmar 06 ~ 22
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 23
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
soil:
a) Sieve analysis – for particles sizes larger than 0.075mm in
diameter
b) Hydrometer analysis – for particles sizes smaller than
0.075mm in diameter.
Grain-size analysis:
~ mnmar 06 ~ 24
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
M ( M 1 M 2 ........M i
F x100
M
6. Once the percent finer for each sieve is calculated as in step 5, the
calculation are plotted on semilogarithmic graph paper with percent
finer as ordinate (arithmetic scale) and sieve opening as absicca
(logarithmic scale).
~ mnmar 06 ~ 26
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
The results of a dry-sieving test are given below, together with the grading analysis and grading curve.
Note carefully how the tabulated results are set out and calculated. The grading curve has been plotted on special
semi-logarithmic paper; you can also do this analysis using a spreadsheet.
~ mnmar 06 ~ 27
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
The soil comprises: 18% gravel, 45% coarse sand, 24% medium sand,
10% fine sand, 3% silt, and is classified therefore as: a well-graded
Gravelly Sand
~ mnmar 06 ~ 28
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
The distance from the highest hydrometer reading to the center of the bulb
shall be measured and recorded. Draw graph hydrometer readings versus
HH and RH. A straight line is obtained.
This calibration curve is used to calibrate the hydrometer readings
which are taken with in 2 minutes. From 4 minutes onwards the readings
are to be taken by immersing the hydrometer each time. This makes the
soil solution to rise, there by rising distance of free fall of the particle. So
correction is applied to the hydrometer readings. Correction applied to the
Rh and HH.
Both the position and the shape of the grading curve for a soil can
aid its identity and description. Some typical grading curves are shown
in the figure:
A - a poorly-graded medium SAND (probably estuarine or
flood-plain alluvium)
B - a well-graded GRAVEL-SAND (i.e. equal amounts of
gravel and sand)
C - a gap-graded COBBLES-SAND
D - a sandy SILT (perhaps a deltaic or estuarine silt)
E - a typical silty CLAY (e.g. London clay, Oxford clay)
~ mnmar 06 ~ 30
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Effective size
d10
Uniformity coefficient
Cu = d60 / d10
Coefficient of gradation
Ck = d30² / d60 d10
When clay minerals are present in fine-grained soil, the soil can be
remolded in the presence of some moisture without crumbling. This
cohesive nature is caused by the absorbed water surrounding the clay
~ mnmar 06 ~ 31
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 32
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
properties of the soil met with construction. From the results of liquid limit
the compression index may be estimated. The compression index value
will help us in settlement analysis. If the natural moisture content of soil is
closer to liquid limit, the soil can be considered as soft if the moisture
content is lesser than liquids limit, the soil can be considered as soft if the
moisture content is lesser than liquid limit. The soil is brittle and stiffer.
A portion of the paste is placed in the cup of liquid limit device and
spread into portion with few strokes of spatula. Trim it to a depth of 1cm
at the point of maximum thickness and return excess of soil to the dish.
The soil in the cup shall be divided by the firm strokes of the grooving tool
along the diameter through the centre line of the follower so that clean
sharp groove of proper dimension is formed.
Lift and drop the cup by turning crank at the rate of two revolutions
per second until the two halves of soil cake come in contact with each
other for a length of about 1 cm by flow only. The number of blows required
to cause the groove close for about 1 cm shall be recorded. A
representative portion of soil is taken from the cup for water content
determination. Repeat the test with different moisture contents at least
three more times for blows between 10 and 40.
Take about 10gms of this plastic soil mass and roll it between fingers
and glass plate with just sufficient pressure to roll the mass into a threaded
of uniform diameter throughout its length. The rate of rolling shall be
between 60 and 90 strokes per minute. Continue rolling till you get a
threaded of 3 mm diameter. Kneed the soil together to a uniform mass and
re-roll. Continue the process until the thread crumbles when the diameter
is 3 mm. Collect the pieces of the crumbled thread in air tight container for
moisture content determination.
Repeat the test to at least 3 times and take the average of the results
calculated to the nearest whole number. Compare the diameter of thread
at intervals with the rod. When the diameter reduces to 3 mm, note the
surface of the thread for cracks.
~ mnmar 06 ~ 34
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
In the BSCS fine soils are divided into ten classes based on their
measured plasticity index and liquid limit values: CLAYS are distinguished
from SILTS, and five divisions of plasticity are defined:
~ mnmar 06 ~ 35
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Repeat this process for 2nd and 3rd layers also till the dish is
completely filled with the wet soil. Strike off the excess soil and make the
top of the dish smooth. Wipe off all the soil adhering to the outside of the
dish. Weigh immediately, the dish with wet soil and record the weight. Air-
dry the wet soil cake for 6 to 8hrs, until the colour of the pat turns from dark
~ mnmar 06 ~ 36
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
to light. Then oven-dry the to constant weight at 105 0C to 1100C say about
12 to 16 hrs. Remove the dried disk of the soil from oven.
Cool it in a desiccators. Then obtain the weight of the dish with dry
sample. Determine the weight of the empty dish and record. Determine the
volume of shrinkage dish which is evidently equal to volume of the wet soil
as follows. Place the shrinkage dish in an evaporating dish and fill the dish
with mercury till it overflows slightly. Press it with plain glass plate firmly on
its top to remove excess mercury.Pour the mercury from the shrinkage
dish into a measuring jar and find the volume of the shrinkage dish directly.
Record this volume as the volume of the wet soil pat. Determine the
volume of dry soil pat by removing the pat from the shrinkage dish and
immersing it in the glass cup full of mercury in the following manner.
Place the glass cup in a larger one and fill the glass cup to
overflowing with mercury. Remove the excess mercury by covering the cup
with glass plate with prongs and pressing it. See that no air bubbles are
entrapped. Wipe out the outside of the glass cup to remove the adhering
mercury. Then, place it in another larger dish, which is, clean and empty
carefully. Place the dry soil pat on the mercury.
the usage of terminologies. Over the years, through their constant and
consistent use, the soil classification systems have provided the first
indication of the behavior of a particular soil. Soil classifications have
evolved from using general terms to empirical systems that are developed
to serve a specific need of a particular engineering work.
1. The USC uses two letters to classify soils (except in borderline cases
requiring dual symbols), see Table 1 below. To learn more about this
system, use the Guide in Fig.1 below.
2. Determine the soil type using the table below, by proceeding from left
to right and by a process of elimination (work like a detective!). Make
notes along the way.
3. First decide on the prefix for the soil type depending on the grain
size: coarse grained (G,S) or fine-grained (M,C,O).
4. Work on the suffix to describe the soil. For coarse-grained soils, the
symbols W and P are for clean sands and gravels and are based on
the Cu and Cz values. The symbols M and C are for soils with >15%
fines and are based on the character of the fines (see next step).
~ mnmar 06 ~ 38
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
5. For fine-grained soils, use the Plasticity (LL vs. PI) chart. In using this
chart, note the A-line and the LL=50 % line. Soils above the A-line
are clays (C), while soils below are either silts (M) or organics (O).
Soils to the left of LL=50% line have low plasticity (suffix L) and to the
right have high plasticity (suffix H).
6. Note that inorganic silt (ML) plots in the same location as organic silt
(OL), and that inorganic silt (MH) plots in the same location as
organic clay (OH). In these two cases, additional indicators are
needed to ascertain the soil type. For instance, organic soils are
darker and, when dried, have higher shear strengths than inorganic
soils. Also, drying can reduce the LL of organic soil by as much as
30%.
7. Peat (PT) is a separate soil classification requiring visual-manual
classification.
Prefix Suffix
Coarse grained: W = well graded
G = more than 50%* retained in #4 P = poorly graded
sieve M = containing silt
S = more than 50%* pass through #4 C = containing clay
sieve
PT = peat
~ mnmar 06 ~ 39
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 40
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Fig 2 : The Unified Soil Classification System (Reprinted from Cernica, 1995)
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 44
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 45
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Coarse
Fines %
soils
G GW 0-5 Well-graded GRAVEL
GPu/GPg 0-5 Uniform/poorly-graded GRAVEL
G-F GWM/GWC 5 - 15 Well-graded silty/clayey GRAVEL
Poorly graded silty/clayey
GRAVEL GPM/GPC 5 - 15
GRAVEL
Very silty GRAVEL [plasticity sub-
GF GML, GMI... 15 - 35
group...]
Very clayey GRAVEL [..symbols
GCL, GCI... 15 - 35
as below]
S SW 0-5 Well-graded SAND
SPu/SPg 0-5 Uniform/poorly-graded SAND
S-F SWM/SWC 5 - 15 Well-graded silty/clayey SAND
SAND GPM/GPC 5 - 15 Poorly graded silty/clayey SAND
Very silty SAND [plasticity sub-
SF SML, SMI... 15 - 35
group...]
Very clayey SAND [..symbols as
SCL, SCI... 15 - 35
below]
Liquid
Fine soils >35% fines
limit%
MG Gravelly SILT
MS Sandy SILT
SILT M
[Plasticity subdivisions as for
ML, MI...
CLAY]
CLAY C CG Gravelly CLAY
CS Sandy CLAY
CL <35 CLAY of low plasticity
CI 35 - 50 CLAY of intermediate plasticity
~ mnmar 06 ~ 46
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Example Problems:
Given the grain size distribution of three soil samples below, and the liquid
and plastic limits of the fines portions, classify the three soils according to the
UCS system.
~ mnmar 06 ~ 47
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
SOIL A:
About 95% of the soil pass the #200, so it is fine-grained.
The plasticity index is PI=60-45=15 and it plots below the A-line.
Since LL>50 then the soil is either MH or OH.
SOIL B.
About 10% is finer than the #200 sieve, hence this is a coarse-grained
soil and since the % finer than #200 is between 5 and 12%, dual
symbols will be required.
Also, 100% of the total weight is less than the #4 sieve, therefore the
coarse grained portion is a sandy soil (prefix S).
From the figure, D10=0.07, D30=0.3, and D60=0.5, giving Cu= D60/
D10=4.3 and Cc= (D30)2/( D10D60)=2.6, hence sandy portion is poorly
graded (suffix P).
For the fine-grained portion, the plasticity index is PI=30-22=8 (which is
greater than 7), so it plots above the A-line (suffix C), so the final
classification is SP-SC
(i.e., this means that the soil could have either been SP or SC).
SOIL C:
About 20% is finer than #200 (or 80% is retained), hence soil is coarse-
grained.
Of the coarse-grained portion (the 80% retained), about 55% is gravel
by inspection of the grain-size distribution curve (prefix S).
Since about 20% pass #200, possible suffixes are M or C.
The fines portion has a PI=32-12=20, which is greater than 7, and the
soil plots above the A-line, thus suffix is C and the soil classification is
SC.
Figure 1.3 (a) shows an element of soil of volume V and weight W as it would
exist in a natural state. To develop the weight-volume relationships, we must
separate the three phases (that is, solid, water, and air) as shown in Figure
1.3 (b). Thus, the total volume of a given soil sample can be expressed as
V = Vs + Vv = Vs + Vw + Va (1.1)
Where Vs = volume of soil solids
Vv = volume of voids
~ mnmar 06 ~ 48
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Assuming that the weight of the air is negligible, we can give the total weight
of the sample as
W = Ws + Ww (1.2)
The volume relationships commonly used for the three phases in a soil
element are void ratio, porosity, and degree of saturation.
Void ratio (e) is defined as the ratio of the volume of voids to the volume of
solids. Thus,
VV
e= V
S
Water
Solid
Figure 1.3 (a) :Soil element in natural state; (b) three phases of the soil
Porosity (n) is defined as the ratio of the volume of voids to the total volume,
VV
or n=V (1.4)
T
The degree of saturation (S) is defined as the ratio of the volume of water to
~ mnmar 06 ~ 49
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
VW
the volume of voids, or Sr = V x 100 % (1.5)
V
The relationship between void ratio and porosity can be derived from Eqs.
(1.1), (1.3), and (1.4) as follows:
(1.6)
The common terms used for weight relationships are moisture content and
unit weight. Moisture content (w) is also referred to as water content and is
defined as the ratio of the weight of water to the weight of solids in a given
volume of soil:
Ww
w (1.8)
Ws
Unit weight () is the weight of soil per unit volume. Thus,
W
(1.9)
V
The unit weight can also be expressed in terms of the weight of soil solids,
the moisture content, and the total volume. From Eqs. (1.2), (1.8), and (1.9),
(1.10)
Soils engineers sometimes refer to the unit weight defined by Eq. (1.9) as the
moist unit weight.
Often, to solve earthwork problems, one must know the weight per unit
volume of soil, excluding water. This weight is referred to as the dry unit
WS
weight, d. Thus, d (1.11)
V
~ mnmar 06 ~ 50
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
From Eqs. (1.10) and (1.11), the relationship of unit weight, dry unit weight,
and moisture content can be given as d (1-12)
1 w
M Ms
(1-13) and d (1.14)
V V
where = density of soil (kg/m3)
d - dry density of soil (kg/m3)
M = total mass of the soil sample (kg)
Ms = mass of soil solids in the sample (kg)
and
Note that unit weight of water (w is equal to 9.81 kN/m3 or 62.4 lb/ft3 or 1000
kgf/m3.
~ mnmar 06 ~ 51
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
To obtain a relationship among unit weight (or density), void ratio, and
moisture content, let us consider a volume of soil in which the volume of the
soil solids is one, as shown in Figure 1.4.
If the volume of the soil solids is one, then the volume of voids is numerically
equal to the void ratio, e [from Eq. (1.3)].
Figure 1.4 :Three separate phases of a soil element with volume of soil solids
equal to one
Now, using the definitions of unit weight and dry unit weight [Eqs. (1.9) and
(1.11)], we can write
~ mnmar 06 ~ 52
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Ws Gs w Gs w
and d .........(1.16) or e 1 ..........(1.17)
V 1 e d
Because the weight of water for the soil elements under consideration is G sw
the volume occupied by water is
Ws wGs w
Vw wGs .................. (1.17)
w w
Vw wGs
S or Se = wGs ................(1.18)
Vs e
If the soil sample is saturated— that is, the void spaces are completely filled
with water (Figure 1.3) — the relationship for saturated unit weight (sat) can
be derived hi a similar manner:
W Ws Ww Gs w e w Gs e w
sat ....................(1.19)
V V 1 e 1 e
e = wGs ................(1.20)
~ mnmar 06 ~ 53
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
(1.21)
(1.22)
(1.23)
~ mnmar 06 ~ 54
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
The relationship among unit weight, porosity, and moisture content can be
developed in a manner similar to that presented in the preceding section.
Consider a soil that has a total volume equal to one, as shown in Figure 3.5.
Vv
From Eq. (1.4), n
V
~ mnmar 06 ~ 55
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
(1.26)
(1.27)
Figure 3.6 shows a soil sample that is saturated and has V =1. According to
this figure,
(1.28)
(1.29)
Several other forms of relationships that can be obtained for , d, and sat are
given in Table 3.1. Some typical values of void ratio, moisture content in a
saturated condition, and dry unit weight for soils in a natural state are given in
Table 3.2.
~ mnmar 06 ~ 56
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 57
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Table(1.2):
Worked example 1
A specimen of clay was tested in the laboratory and the following data were
collected:
Mass of wet specimen M1 = 148.8 g
Mass if dry specimen M2 = 106.2 g
Volume of wet specimen V = 86.2 g
Specific gravity of particles Gs = 2.70
Determine: (a) the water content, (b) the bulk and dry densities, (c) the void
ratio and porosity, and (d) the degree of saturation.
Solution :
~ mnmar 06 ~ 58
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Worked Example 2
Given :
1. The weight of a chunk of moist soil sample is 45.6 Ib.
2. The volume of the soil chunk measured before drying is 0.40 ft 3.
3. After the sample is dried out in an oven, its weight is 37.8 Ib.
4. The specific gravity of solids is 2.65.
Required
1. Water content.
2. Unit weight of moist soil.
3. Void ratio.
4. Porosity.
5. Degree of saturation.
Solution:
See Figure E1. (Boldface data on the figure indicate given information. Other
data are calculated in the solution of the problem.)
~ mnmar 06 ~ 59
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
4. Porosity (n)
~ mnmar 06 ~ 60
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Worked Example 3
Given:
1. The moist mass of a soil specimen is 20.7 kg.
2. The specimen's volume measured before drying is 0.011 m 3.
3. The specimen's dried mass is 16.3 kg.
4. The specific gravity of solids is 2.68.
~ mnmar 06 ~ 61
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
~ mnmar 06 ~ 62
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Worked Example 4
Given:
An undisturbed soil sample has the following data:
1. Void ratio = 0.78.
2. Water content = 12%.
3. Specific gravity of solids = 2.68.
Required
1. Wet unit weight.
2. Dry unit weight.
3. Degree of saturation.
4. Porosity.
Solution:
See Figure E3:
~ mnmar 06 ~ 63
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
4. Porosity (n)
Worked Example 5
Given:
1. A 100% saturated soil has a wet unit weight of 120 lb/ft 3.
~ mnmar 06 ~ 64
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Required
1. Void ratio.
2. Specific gravity of solids.
Solution:
~ mnmar 06 ~ 65
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
Worked Example 6
Given:
A soil sample has the following data:
1. Void ratio = 0.94.
2. Degree of saturation = 35%.
3. Specific gravity of solids = 2.71.
Required
1. Water content.
2. Unit weight.
Solution :
See Figure E5.
~ mnmar 06 ~ 66
CHAPTER 1- COMPONENTS OF SOILS
1. Water content.
2. Unit weight
~ mnmar 06 ~ 67