Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transportation Group Project
Transportation Group Project
CE 408
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
FINAL REPORT
(FACULTY-CE DEPT)
Gentlemen:
As a Requirement in order to complete the course in CE400-HIGHWAY
ENGINEERING, we are submitting here with our report on the PLANNING OF
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FOR THE MUNICIPALITIES OF ALFONSO,
MENDEZ, AMADEO, AND CITY OF TAGAYTAY, PROVINCE OF CAVITE.
Area
• Total: 66.58 km2
Population (2015 census)
• Total: 51,839
Time zone: PST (UTC+8)
ZIP code: 4123
IDD area code: +63 (0)46
Income class: 1 s t class
has a land area of 66.58 square kilometers or 25.71 square miles which constitutes
4.23% of Cavite's total area. Its population as determined by the 2015 Census was
51,839. This represented 1.41% of the total population of Cavite province, or 0.36% of
2,016 inhabitants per square mile. According to the 2015 Census, the age group with
the highest population in Alfonso is 15 to 19, with 5,037 individuals. Conversely, the age
group with the lowest population is 75 to 79, with 611 individuals. The population of
Alfonso grew from 17,477 in 1960 to 51,839 in 2015, an increase of 34,362 people. The
latest census figures in 2015 denote a positive growth rate of 1.25%, or an increase of
Area
• Total: 43.27 km2
Population (2015 census)
• Total: 31,529
Time zone: PST (UTC+8)
ZIP code: 4121
IDD area code: +63 (0)46
Income class: 1 s t class
The municipality has a land area of 43.27 square kilometers or 16.71 square miles
which constitutes 2.75% of Cavite's total area. Its population as determined by the 2015
Census was 31,529. This represented 0.86% of the total population of Cavite province,
Area
• Total: 36.92 km2
Population (2015 census)
• Total: 37,649
Time zone: PST (UTC+8)
ZIP code: 4121
IDD area code: +63 (0)46
Income class: 1 s t class
has a land area of 36.92 square kilometers or 14.25 square miles which constitutes
2.35% of Cavite's total area. Its population as determined by the 2015 Census was
37,649. This represented 1.02% of the total population of Cavite province, or 0.26% of
Amadeo grew from 10,560 in 1960 to 37,649 in 2015, an increase of 27,089 people.
The latest census figures in 2015 denote a positive growth rate of 2.27%, or an increase
of 4,192 people, from the previous population of 33,457 in 2010. According to the 2015
Census, the age group with the highest population in Amadeo is 5 to 9, with 3,461
individuals. Conversely, the age group with the lowest population is 75 to 79, with 441
individuals.
TAGAYTAY CITY
Area
• Total: 65.00 km2
Population (2015 census)
• Total: 71,181
Time zone: PST (UTC+8)
ZIP code: 4121
IDD area code: +63 (0)46
Income class: 1 s t class
a land area of 65.00 square kilometers or 25.10 square miles which constitutes 4.13%
of Cavite's total area. Its population as determined by the 2015 Census was 71,181.
This represented 1.94% of the total population of Cavite province, or 0.49% of the
square mile. According to the 2015 Census, the age group with the highest population
in Tagaytay is 5 to 9, with 7,111 individuals. Conversely, the age group with the lowest
population is 75 to 79, with 485 individuals. The city center of Tagaytay is situated at
1. Situation Definition
highway planning.
2. Problem identification
area, most of the residence of the said municipality and city were
going to manila and vice versa to the said municipality and city and
the roads of the said municipality and city consists of 2-4 lanes
only.
that can also cause a traffic and delays and most of the people are
crossing the streets without using the pedestrian crossing that can
cause accidents.
data and will come up with solutions that can help us in the
the solution we’ve come up is suitable to the problem we had using the
After we analyze, our group did the evaluation or voting of the best
highest evaluation.
the process and to the project location and check whether it is suitable
1. Office Works
This where all start. The inside office was all the planning
and decisions were made and it has two parts, the existing maps
and the history data. The existing of maps and the history of data is
2. Reconnaissance Survey
and so on. And chose among the best solution to the problem.
data gathering of how long is the new route and also its curves and
after that we did some solving of how many stations we will had for
its length and calculating how many stakes we will put to every
stations.
4. Preliminary Location Survey
data gathering of how long is the new route and also its curves and
after that we did some solving of how many stations we will had for
its length and calculating how many stakes we will put to every
station.
The Final Location Survey is where you will start and finish
on from the start of the project through to the end of the actual
of the population or the households in the area and the number of trips produced from
the area in one day. Another common form of trip generation model that represents this
model used to determine trip productions. This model is based on estimating the
response (e.g., the number of trip productions per household for a given purpose) as a
function of the household characteristics. Trip rates are derived empirically from travel
grouping the households in different strata; for example, a specific cell is based on
household size and household income. The trip production rate for that specific cell then
is the total number of trips in that cell divided by the number of households that exhibit
where
Work, (3) To School, (4) To Private Business, (5) To Employer’s Business, (6) To Medical, (7)
To Shopping, and (8) To Church. The categorization of the household characteristics defines
the set of attributes that will be associated with a household, for a particular trip purpose. For
from 0.7 up to 1.0. For the “To Home” trips – for the trip production, it can be seen from
Table 1 that only X1 and X2 qualified for high correlation with the dependent variable –
but since the second guideline for the elimination of redundancy among the variables
had to be followed – X1 and X2 should not be in the same equation (i.e., the variables
are perfectly related with each other having a coefficient of determination of 1.0). In line
with this, it can be concluded that the regression should be having two models (i.e.,
linear) which are: the dependent variable P and X1 and the dependent variable P and
X2. Consequently, the researchers had chosen the better equation – that is, the one
with the higher coefficient of determination. For the “To Home” trips – for the trip
attraction, only the variables, workers per zone and students per zone qualified for
having the high correlation with the dependent variable, trips attracted. Also, through the
second guideline, it can be said that the two independent variables were not highly
correlated so both variables could be in the same equation. With these two variables to
getting the multiple linear regression equation, the coefficient of determination should be
examined if it resulted to a high correlation – that is, having a value within the range of
0.7 to 1. The same procedure was done for “To Work” Trips. By looking at Table 1, it
can be said that the population and number of households were the independent
variables that yielded high correlation with the dependent variable, trips produced.
However, it was said earlier that these two variables were perfectly related – therefore,
these variables should not be found in the same equation. Again, the researchers just
used the better equation, which is the one with the higher coefficient of determination.
For the trips produced of the “To Work” trips, only the independent variable, X6 was
able to have a high correlation with the dependent variable – thus, the regression
equation would only have trips produced as the dependent variable and workers per
zone, as the independent variable. Same process was done for the To School, To
Generally, the first to observe was the values of the coefficient of determination that
defined the relationship of the dependent variable with the independent variables. This
is done by just looking at the second row of the correlation matrix or by just looking
directly at Tables 1 to 2. The next thing to look at is if the independent variables that
presented high correlation with the dependent variable are highly correlated among
each other. After the elimination of nuisance and redundant variables, regression
analysis; and (2) trip rate method. For the regression analysis, it has been observed that
the population per zone, number of households per zone, workers per zone, students
per zone and household head monthly income per zone are significant parameters for a
For the trip rate method, cross-classification tables are made for each purpose. Different
household characteristics are cross-classified for each purpose (i.e., household size and
household income for purpose ‘To Home’, or household income and occupation for purpose ‘To
Work’.) Results of the trip rate method illustrated the trip generation rates from different trip
purposes.
APPENDIX
(PLANS AND DETAILED DRAWINGS)
REFERENCES
(SOURCES OF DATA AND
METHODOLOGIES)
https://www.philatlas.com/luzon/r04a/cavite/tagaytay.html
https://www.philatlas.com/luzon/r04a/cavite/amadeo.html
https://www.philatlas.com/luzon/r04a/cavite/alfonso.html
https://www.philatlas.com/luzon/r04a/cavite/mendez.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tagaytay
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendez_Nu%C3%B1ez,_Cavite
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amadeo,_Cavite
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfonso,_Cavite
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavite
https://cavite.gov.ph/home/cities-and-municipalities/
http://www.calabarzon.dilg.gov.ph/cavite