Under the Resource Management Act 1991

Between
New Zealand Sugar Company Limited
Further Submitter 3843

and

Auckland Council
Territorial authority

Legal Submissions on behalf of New Zealand Sugar

Company Limited
19 April 2016

BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS

AJL BEATSON/ NJ GARVAN
AUCKLAND LEVEL 22, VERO CENTRE, 48 SHORTLAND STREET
PO BOX 4199, AUCKLAND 1140, DX CP20509, NEW ZEALAND
TEL 64 9 916 8800 FAX 64 9 916 8801
May it please the Hearings Panel:

1. The New Zealand Sugar Company Limited (NZ Sugar) has been in
operation on the Chelsea Sugar Refinery site at 100 Colonial Road,
Birkenhead for more than 130 years (the sugar refinery). This area
is subject to the Chelsea Precinct provisions in the Proposed
Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP).

2. Following the exchange of evidence and agreement that the

Framework Plan approach should not apply to the Chelsea Precinct,
the Auckland Council (the Council) officers and Catherine Clarke,
the planning witness for NZ Sugar, met to discuss the provisions
applying to the Chelsea Precinct. Both Council officers and Ms
Clarke agree the Chelsea Precinct in the PAUP should reflect the
intent of the Special Purpose 13A Zone in the Auckland Council
District Plan - Operative North Shore Section (the Operative
District Plan).

3. Council officers and Ms Clarke have worked collaboratively to

develop the attached agreed provisions (set out in Appendix A).
There are no outstanding areas of disagreement between the
Council and NZ Sugar.

Overview

4. The key issue arising from submissions was whether the “Horse
Paddock” should be brought into public ownership, added to the
Chelsea Estate Heritage Park, and made subject to Open Space-
Conservation zoning.

5. The following matters arose in the redrafting of the Chelsea precinct

provisions:

(a) The role of framework plans in the Chelsea Precinct;

(b) The reference to Precinct Plan 2 in the rules; and

(c) Adaptive reuse of the Chelsea sugar refinery.

12043692 1
 6. We will briefly address the issue and matters outlined above to
explain the rationale behind the key areas of agreement.

Horse Paddock

7. The Horse Paddock is to the west of the raw sugar storage facilities
and comprises a 4.5 ha block of largely open bare land. It is
essentially a paddock. 1

8. NZ Sugar and the Council agree that the submissions of Mr Elliot

and Mr Holman seeking that the Horse Paddock be brought into
public ownership, added to the Chelsea Estate Heritage Park, and
made subject to Open Space-Conservation zoning should be
declined. The changes sought are inappropriate because:

(a) The Horse Paddock is an important strategic asset and

essential for any future growth and expansion of NZ Sugar; 2

(b) The changes amount to an unreasonable restriction on this

use of land; 3

(c) There is no archaeological reason why the horse paddock

should form part of the Chelsea Estate Heritage Park; 4

(d) The Chelsea Precinct provisions provide a better long term

land-use outcome for the Horse Paddock; 5 and

(e) The PAUP provisions will ensure the ecological values and
landscape and visual qualities associated with the Horse
Paddock are appropriately recognised and provided for in any
future re-use scenario for the Chelsea sub-precinct C. 6

1
Statement of evidence of John Ellis dated 10 February 2016 at [12].
2
Statement of evidence of John Ellis dated 10 February 2016 at [12].
3
Statement of evidence of Catherine Clarke dated 10 February 2016 at [6.1].
4
Statement of evidence of Rodney Clough dated 10 February 2016 at [5] and [25].
5
Statement of evidence of Rachel de Lambert dated 10 February 2016 at [5.1].
6
Statement of evidence of Catherine Clarke dated 10 February 2016 at [6.1]; Statement of
evidence of Rachel de Lambert dated 10 February 2016 at [5.1].
12043692 2
 9. We note that no evidence has been provided by the submitters. As
discussed by Mr Ellis, these submitters were involved in the
proceedings in 2005 and the sale of NZ Sugar’s land to the Council. 7
As members of the Trust (and the North Shore City Council in
respect of Mr Holman), these submitters agreed to the transaction
and the conditions that went with it. 8 Their submissions with respect
to NZ Sugar’s private property are unreasonable and an attempt to
re-litigate this matter. 9

Role of Framework Plans in the Chelsea Precinct

10. Both NZ Sugar and the Council agree that a Framework Plan approach
does not need to apply to the Chelsea sub-precinct C, regardless of the
Environment Court’s final decision concerning the legality of
Framework Plan provisions in the PAUP. This is because the
objectives and policies following the cessation of sugar refining
activities for the Chelsea Precinct and Precinct Plan 2 “is more or less a
‘framework plan.” 10 The PAUP already contains a comprehensive set
of provisions for the future adaptive re-use of the site post-cessation of
NZ Sugar’s refinery operations, developed by way of a master planning
process undertaken in 2005.

11. Following extensive mediations and consultations between the former

North Shore City Council and NZ Sugar, 11 the master planning and
district plan processes resulted in the provisions in the Special Purpose
13A Zone of the Operative District Plan. The Council and NZ Sugar
agree the provisions for the Chelsea Precinct in the PAUP should
reflect the intent of these provisions, in order to provide the PAUP with
an appropriate policy framework to assess the effects of any future
adaptive re-use of the site post-cessation of sugar refining activities.

7
Statement of evidence of John Ellis dated 10 February 2016 at [20].
8
Statement of evidence of John Ellis dated 10 February 2016 at [20].
9
Statement of evidence of John Ellis dated 10 February 2016 at [20].
10
Evidence report on submissions by Emily Ip and Ewen Patience on behalf of Auckland Council
– Chelsea Precinct dated 28 January 2016 at [14(1)(c)].
11
Statement of evidence of John Ellis dated 10 February 2016 at [23].
12043692 3
 The Operative District Plan provisions relating to the Chelsea Precinct
were generally carried across into the notified version of the PAUP. 12

Reference to Precinct Plan 2 in the Rules

12. NZ Sugar is concerned that if the rules are expressly linked to

Precinct Plan 2 (as had initially been proposed by the Council’s
officers 13) then any future land use, subdivision or development
post-cessation of refining operations that is not consistent with the
specific layout and height in Precinct Plan 2 would be assessed as a
non-complying activity.

13. This outcome is not appropriate, because variations in the layout

and height in Precinct Plan 2 may still achieve the objectives and
policies of Chelsea Precinct, and the intent of Precinct Plan 2. The
Council and NZ Sugar have agreed that the reference to Precinct
Plan 2 in the activity rule should be deleted. 14 Instead it is agreed
that any proposed activity needs to be assessed against all relevant
provisions, including the Precinct Plan 2 and the objectives and
policies.

Adaptive Re-use

14. The Council and NZ Sugar agree that the concept of “adaptive re-
use” and the “appropriateness” of redevelopment and adaptive re-
use should be included in Objective 4, in order to reflect the master
planning process for the future adaptive re-use of the site that has
already been undertaken and assessed through a public planning
process.

15. The work undertaken to provide for and enable future adaptive re-
use to residential, business, community, employment, and recreation
activities was undertaken with full consideration of potential

12
Statement of evidence of Catherine Clarke dated 10 February 2016 at [5.1].
13
Evidence report on submissions by Emily Ip and Ewen Patience on behalf of Auckland Council –
Chelsea Precinct dated 28 January 2016 at Attachment B; Rebuttal report of Ewen Patience on
behalf of Auckland Council – Chelsea Precinct dated 26 February 2016 at [4.3].
14
Instead, the Council and NZ Sugar have agreed that in Section 5.8 – Chelsea, 1. Activity Table,
1.3 – Chelsea sub-precinct C, Activities following cessation of sugar refining activities, the words
“Any land use, subdivision and/or development” should be reintroduced without including any
reference to Precinct Plan 2.
12043692 4
 landscape and visual effects, and the level of proposed development
is entirely consistent with the maintenance of the site’s various
natural and cultural values. 15 The provisions are also sufficient to
protect the heritage values of the site, as they are responsive to the
significance of the built heritage and enable the retention of the core
values and heritage attributes of the existing refinery. 16 Provisions
in the historic heritage overlay should not ‘override’ what has already
been agreed for the Chelsea site and the sugar refinery.

16. NZ Sugar will call evidence from the following witnesses:

(a) Mr John Ellis (Corporate);

(b) Mr Rod Clough (Heritage);

(c) Ms Rachel de Lambert (Landscape); and

(d) Ms Catherine Clarke (Planning).

________________________
AJL Beatson/NJ Garvan
Counsel for NZ Sugar
Dated 19 April 2016

15
Statement of evidence of Rachel de Lambert dated 10 February 2016 at [B].
16
Statement of evidence of Rodney Clough dated 10 February 2016 at [26] and [29]; Statement of
evidence of Rachel de Lambert dated 10 February 2016, Appendix 1 at [5.7].
12043692 5
Appendix A – Provisions agreed between NZ Sugar and Auckland Council

12043692 6
 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

Editorial notes:

Council's proposed changes are shown in strikethrough and underline

Black text changes record amendments proposed in track changes version

Yellow highlighted text changes record amendments that are considered to be outside the scope of
submissions

Grey highlighted text changes records amendments that are consequential amendments from previous
hearings/evidence.

Numbering of this precinct will be reviewed as part of the overall review of the UP numbering protocols.

Turquoise highlighted text changes record amendments that have been agreed between Council officers
and planning witness for NZ Sugar following the exchange of evidence.

PART 2 REGIONAL AND DISTRICT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES, Chapter F:

Precinct objectives and policies, 5 North

5.8 Chelsea

1 Precinct description

The underlying zoning of land within this precinct is Public Open Space – Conservation and Light Comment [EI1]: Out of scope
Industry. Refer to the planning maps for the location and extent of the precinct. editorial amendment so as to ensure
consistency of drafting across all PAUP
precincts.
This precinct covers land and water areas either owned and or formerly used by the Chelsea Sugar
Refinery at Birkenhead. Chelsea Estate Heritage Park is owned by the council. The purpose of the
precinct is to provide for the existing operations of the refinery as well as a future use scenario for mixed
use development should refinery operations cease, while safeguarding significant heritage values. at the
site. It contains three sub-precincts as described below.

The provisions give effect to the RPS (section 4.1 Historic Heritage) and address matters that are unique
to the working industrial site, first established in the 1880’s, at this coastal location. The site has national
and international significance.

Sub-precinct C relating to the sugar refinery site provides for exceptions to the Historic Heritage Overlay
on the basis that the most appropriate manner to give effect to this site and its heritage resources is
through this precinct.

The provisions of Chapter E2 (overlay objectives and policies; Scheduled Historic Heritage Places) and
J2 (overlay rules, Scheduled Historic Heritage Places) apply, but the precinct takes precedence for
specific activities and assessments. Minor changes to scheduled buildings are addressed differently from
the overlay rules, as is ‘total or substantial demolition’ (which are defined in the overlay but not in the
precinct). The other major difference is that specific industrial buildings and plant are located on Precinct

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

Plan 1, and given activity status in accordance with their significance (controlled or discretionary). This
provides certainty to the sugar company and the community as to what changes are likely to occur, up
until the time (and if) sugar refining ceases.

Following any cessation of sugar refining, an application for consent to a mix of activities is provided for,
as a discretionary activity. A comprehensive set of objectives and policies for the precinct and Precinct
Plan 2: Chelsea sub-precinct C – Future use will guide the assessment of the application, and any
relevant information that may sit outside the Unitary Plan, such as the ‘Conservation Plan’ prepared by
the sugar company. As such, the provisions of the precinct take precedence over the provisions of the
Scheduled Historic Heritage Places overlay (Chapters E2 objectives and policies, and J2 rules) when
assessing land use, development and subdivision provided for in the precinct.

Precinct description

Sub-precinct A and B description

Sub-precincts A and B cover specified areas within Chelsea Estate Heritage Park, zoned Public Open Comment [BL2]: Amended to reflect
correct name
Space – Conservation. Some of sub-precinct A was once a sludge disposal area for the adjacent
Chelsea sugar refinery site. The area requires rehabilitation and is subject to regional discharge consents
and will contain archaeological evidence. Sub-precinct B covers the water areas, in the form of ponds,
that historically provided the freshwater water source for refinery operations. Water is still used for
refining purposes. The ponds have important habitat and amenity values as well as a stormwater quality
control function. The dams have significant historic heritage value.

The management of this part of the Chelsea Estate Heritage Park will recognise the particular history of
its use and historic heritage values of these land and water areas. management, and its artificial (landfill)
characteristics.

The main issues arising from the use, development or protection of these areas are:

• ensuring land stability and providing for appropriate open space and future land use activities
• safeguarding and enhancing the amenity values of the park and adjoining areas
• managing stormwater flows to maintain or enhance fresh and coastal water quality
• managing the habitat (wildlife) values of the ponds and associated riparian (land) areas
• intermittent odour from the ponds affecting residential amenity

The purpose of these sub-precincts is to manage these issues.

Sub-precinct C description

Sub-precinct C relates to the Chelsea sugar refinery site at Birkenhead which is recognised as a unique
industrial heritage site of national and international significance located in a distinctive inner harbour
coastal location. The underlying zoning of sub-precinct C is Light Industry and Public Open Space –
Conservation. Comment [EI3]: Auckland Council
(5716-1171)

The Chelsea sugar refinery is the only sugar refinery ever to be built and operated in New Zealand, and
since 1884 sugar refining and related activities have continued without interruption in purpose-built
industrial buildings and structures that house machinery and equipment unique to the sugar refining

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

operation. These buildings have been altered and adapted as methods and refining operations have
changed since the refinery first operated. It is the continual sugar refining on the site that is a principal
source of the heritage values attributed to the Chelsea sugar refinery today.

The purpose of the sub-precinct is to protect the significant heritage values and character of scheduled
buildings while recognising that some ongoing adaptation of these buildings and structures will be
necessary to accommodate ongoing sugar refinery operations. Consequently, exemptions to the
scheduled heritage place provisions provide for the management of the effects of activities on the site,
taking account of both operational and heritage considerations. Some known future refinery buildings,
identified by the refining company as being needed within the life of the Unitary Plan, have been
specifically provided for within these provisions.

In addition, the sub-precinct provides for a future use scenario, should the sugar refinery operation cease
in the future., under which Scheduled historic heritage buildings and structures may have to be adapted,
and new buildings erected, to accommodate new activities. In this scenario, the landowner is encouraged
to prepare a framework plan before Lland use, subdivision and/or development will be provided for as a
discretionary activity and will assessed against the objectives and policies and Precinct Plan 2: Chelsea
sub-precinct C – Future use. in the area starts, with greater development opportunities provided for in the
sub-precinct following the approval of a framework plan.

The ‘current use’ provisions should be read in conjunction with Figure 1 (refer Part 4.5.3.16) Precinct
Plan 1 which identifies the historic heritage and associated built and natural environment values of the
central core and oldest part of the sugar refinery. Building height controls recognise the nature and
location of the existing sugar processing industry, and the existence of many tall buildings that have
significant heritage value. The height limits give flexibility to meet ongoing operational needs and ensure
that new buildings and structures will not significantly detract from scheduled historic heritage buildings or
be obtrusive in the landscape.

• Area H, as shown in Figure 1, comprises the part of the site in which taller, bulkier structures are
considered less likely to have adverse effects. However, such structures in or adjacent to the
area containing the Category A scheduled items are of greatest concern in terms of the adverse
effects referred to above.

• Area D, as shown in Figure 1, comprises the 'front' of the site adjacent to the coastline where
development has the potential to create adverse effects on scheduled historic heritage buildings,
and on the cultural heritage landscape. Accordingly a lower permitted base height is appropriate,
in order to provide for adequate consideration of the potential adverse effects of the 'operational'
or other buildings and structures that might be proposed for this area.

The ‘future use’ scenario is set out in the objectives and policies below which should be read in
conjunction with [Figure 2 Precinct Plan 2: Chelsea sub-precinct C – Future use Future Use Concept
Plan (refer Part 4.5.3.16)].

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

2 Objectives

The objectives of Chapter E2 (Scheduled Historic Heritage Places), the Auckland-wide provisions and the Comment [EI4]: Out of scope
underlying zones apply in this precinct, in addition to those specified below, and in so far as they support editorial amendment so as to ensure
consistency of drafting across all PAUP
the objectives below. precincts.

Sub-precincts A and B

The objectives are as listed in the Public Open Space - Conservation zone in addition to those specified
below:

[rp/dp]

1. Use, development and protection of the both the former sludge disposal area and water areas
associated with the refinery within Chelsea Park maintains and protects land stability, the life-
supporting capacity of land and water resources, and local amenity, taking into account any
importance for refining operations.

The historic heritage values of the area are identified and appropriately managed with any
disturbance of the land or water areas, including values associated with dams and any other
structure associated with the Chelsea ponds.

Sub-precinct C

Prior to the cessation of sugar refining activities:

Prior to cessation of sugar refining activities the objectives are as listed in the Light Industry zone in
addition to those specified below:

1. The unique cultural heritage values of the buildings and structures of the Chelsea sugar refinery Comment [EI5]: This should be re-
numbered Objective 2 and subsequent
industrial site are recognised. objectives to be re-numbered
accordingly.
2. The unique cultural heritage sites are protected and the ongoing operational requirements of the
working refinery activities are enabled.

Following the cessation of sugar refining activities

Following the cessation of sugar refining activities the objectives are as follows. The policies objectives in Comment [EI6]: To correct an error.
the underlying Light Industry zone do not apply but Tthe objectives of Chapter E2 and the Auckland-wide
provisions do apply, however should be applied on the basis that the comprehensive redevelopment and
adaptive re-use of the land and buildings is appropriate.

3. The historic heritage values and character, including the heritage scheduled refinery buildings, and
ecological, landscape and amenity attributes of the sub-precinct are maintained and enhanced.

4. A The comprehensive redevelopment and adaptive re-use of land and buildings, enabling a range
of appropriate uses including for a range of uses including appropriate residential, business,
community, employment and recreation activities is enabled.

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

5. Public transport services are provided enabled to serve development on the land, including if Comment [EI7]: As per Evan
Keating’s (AT) comments provided via
appropriate in the circumstances, water-based transport. email on 22/11/15.

6. Activities and re-development in the sub-precinct recognise the natural and physical resources and
historic heritage values of the land and the open space areas of the site.

3 Policies

The policies of Chapter E2 (Scheduled Historic Heritage Places), the Auckland-wide policies and the Comment [EI8]: Out of scope
editorial amendment so as to ensure
underlying zones apply in this precinct, in addition to those specified below, unless otherwise stated and consistency of drafting across all PAUP
in so far as they support the policies below. precincts.

Sub-precinct A and B

The policies are as listed in the Public Open Space - Conservation zone in addition to those specified
below:

[rp/dp]

1. Avoid activities that contribute to the instability of the land or generate any discharge that could
adversely impact on water quality.

2. Manage changes to any part of the land and water areas of the subprecincts to ensure that
recognised historic heritage values are safeguarded ,and where appropriate enhanced to add to
the significance of these values at Chelsea Estate Heritage Park. noise, odour or other effects that
arise from the use or management of the land and water areas that could diminish the established
amenity values or environmental qualities of the area, including the well-established ecological
values of the margins of water bodies that are immediately south of this area.

3. Ensure disposal of waste in the area is in accordance with best practice and takes account of the
established values and future land use potential of the area.

Sub-precinct C

Prior to the cessation of sugar refining activities

Prior to the cessation of sugar refining activities the policies are as listed in the Light Industry zone in
addition to those specified below:

4. Protect and maintain the cultural heritage values of the Chelsea sugar refinery industrial site whilst
recognising the ongoing operations of the refinery.

5. Enable the adaptation of scheduled buildings and structures to accommodate refinery operations.

6. Recognise and conserve the collective significance of scheduled buildings and structures.

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

7. Avoid the demolition of scheduled buildings and structures unless all reasonable options for
adaptation, alteration or reuse have been considered. Where demolition is to allow for new
buildings or activities consideration of alternative methods and sites should be undertaken.

8. Maintain the landmark importance and visual integrity of the scheduled buildings and structures as
viewed from public vantage points across the water.

9. Retain the original fabric, appearance and character of scheduled buildings and structures.

10. Require any additions to scheduled buildings to be identifiable as new but use materials and forms
that are sympathetic to the heritage character of the collection of scheduled buildings.

11. Require new buildings and structures to be constructed in preference to making additions to
scheduled buildings and structures.

12. Require new buildings and structures to be sympathetic to the robust industrial form, bulk,
character and scale of scheduled buildings and structures, and to not dominate or obscure them, or
seriously detract from their collective significance.

13. Require new buildings to maintain the distinctive profile of the scheduled buildings centred on the
Cistern House turret (or cupola), and views of the vegetated backdrop and avoid occupying the
foreground with inappropriate building forms or with tall or bulky structures that dominate or
obscure scheduled buildings and structures, principally as viewed from public vantage points
across the water.

14. Require structures that are necessary to link scheduled buildings or connect these to new buildings
to be simple in form, small in scale, and enclosed only to the extent necessary to provide weather
protection.

15. Manage routine maintenance to minimise adverse effects on the heritage elements or values of
scheduled buildings and structures.

16. Require replacement and repair of the original fabric of scheduled buildings and structures to be
carried out using materials the same as or similar to the original, and is sympathetic to the original
design of the building or structure.

17. Require photographic records to be made, prior to work commencing, for any significant alteration
to or demolition affecting a scheduled building or structure. The records are to be deposited with
the Birkenhead Library archive of the Chelsea sugar refinery.

Following the cessation of sugar refining activities

Following the cessation of sugar refining activities the policies are as follows. The policies in the
underlying Light Industry zone do not apply but Tthe policies of Chapter E2 (Scheduled Historic Heritage
Places) and the Auckland-wide provisions do apply, however should be applied on the basis that the
comprehensive redevelopment and adaptive re-use of the land and buildings is appropriate.

18. Enable a range of activities including residential, business, community and recreational
opportunities.

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

19. Require that the bulk, massing and heights of buildings are appropriate to a prominent coastal
location and its significant cultural heritage and landscape values.

20. Require land to be set aside for public access to the harbour and for recreation.

21. Require development in the area to be of a design that achieves a high level of amenity and
pedestrian-oriented character, where development is integrated with public spaces, including the
surrounding open space.

22. Require habitat and ecological values to be fully appraised and that areas identified as having
significant landscape and/or habitat value or as conservation areas, either be transferred to the
council as reserve upon the development of the land, or covenanted to provide protection and
ongoing management of the landscape and habitat values.

23. Promote development which complements the role of the Highbury shopping centre.

24. Require the integration of linkages and connectivity through and beyond the area including public
transport and policies promoting water-based transport.

Historic heritage and built form

25. Provide for the appropriate and protective adaptive re-use of heritage buildings, with particular
regard to the ICOMOS New Zealand Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage
Value principles.

26. Require development to conserve and protect the historic heritage values of the area, including the
architecture and heritage characteristics of the scheduled buildings and landscape attributes of the
site and nearby public open space.

27. Identify and manage the use and redevelopment of historic buildings recognising their intrinsic
heritage values in a building conservation plan.

28. Maintain views of the scheduled buildings from public areas within the site, from residential areas
surrounding the site, including Birkenhead Point and Northcote Point, and from across the water.

29. Identify and protect archaeological sites, trees or vegetation of cultural heritage value and other
heritage items.

Coastal landform, landscape values and ecology

30. Retain the existing shape of the landform where practicable, by avoiding significant earthworks, and
any modification of the coastal escarpment from its point of 'roll-over' seawards and any identified
conservation area.

31. Maintain the continuity and natural character values of the coastal escarpment (including the native
vegetation) west of the refinery area by avoiding the massing of contiguous bulky building form,
excessive building height and continuous building facades.

32. Incorporate existing mature trees and significant native bush into the landscape design for the site
as a physically cohesive 'whole' that links with the coastal escarpment and planting around the
adjoining ponds.

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

33. Retain the existing exotic tree and native plantings that have an important screening function
between built development and the coastal margin. In particular, the vegetation located in the
conservation areas immediately adjacent to the coast in the horse paddock and along the coastal
boundary of the bulk sugar store area.

34. Retain vegetation framing/flanking the existing ponds allowing for limited development around the
refinery car park.

Traffic and transportation

35. Encourage the comprehensive integration of future land uses and transport infrastructure and
services.

36. Require any intensive development proposals to focus on public transport, cycling and walking Comment [EI9]: As per Evan
Keating’s (AT) comments provided via
modes rather than private vehicles. email on 22/11/15.

Urban design, public realm and open space

37. Require redevelopment to achieve a high level of public amenity, a pedestrian-oriented character,
integrated with public spaces and a distinctive and unique sense of place.

38. Require curtilages and open spaces around new buildings to be designed to respect the settings of
significant heritage buildings and enhance the visual appreciation of scheduled heritage buildings,
features and sites. The interface between heritage structures and new buildings must be addressed
in the building conservation plan required to be prepared.

Refinery area

39. Limit the capacity of the land to accommodate mixed use development providing approximately 286
dwellings based on the ratio of one unit per 175m2 usable floor area, including those located within
the readapted refinery buildings, and 3,200m2 business land within the areas identified in Figure
Precinct Plan 2 as the refinery area.

40. Limit the height of new buildings to avoid dominating heritage buildings and be within the locations
identified and height limits on the number of levels set out in Figure Precinct Plan 2.

41. Require the area identified in Figure Precinct Plan 2 as 'open space/ferry parking' to be available Comment [EI10]: For clarity
for land-based ancillary facilities and back-up parking in the event ferry services are provided to the
land. In the event the area is not able to be used for ferry services in the short-term, it should be
retained in its current use or as open space.

Horse paddock and bulk sugar store areas

42. Require development of the horse paddock and bulk sugar store areas to protect and integrate with
the recognised historic heritage, ecological, and coastal landscape values of the area.

43. Limit the capacity of the land to accommodate 240 dwellings within the area identified in Figure
Precinct Plan 2 as the horse paddock and bulk sugar store areas.

44. Avoid works or development in conservation areas unless any environmental effects are minor and
an equivalent area of land is set aside as a conservation area.

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

45. Limit building heights to 9m in the horse paddock area, subject to achieving an overall urban design
outcome that is sympathetic to the coastal landscape, local natural and historic values, and views
of the site from significant public vantage points across the water.

46. Building heights may be increased if vegetation cover in conservation areas between the future use
areas and the coastal escarpment obscures views of the site from key public vantage points
including across Waitemata Harbour.

47. Limit building heights to 25m in the bulk sugar store area provided that the building platforms are
generally within the locations identified in Figure Precinct Plan 2.

48. Require buildings in the bulk sugar store area to be stepped back in height away from the coast
with a maximum height at the coastal edge end being no more than 15m for the first 20m of the
length of the building. No more than 50 per cent of the total area of any one building may be 25m
high with the balance of the building being no more than 20m high.

49. Avoid buildings dominating the entrance to the refinery area, or detracting from the scheduled
buildings within the refinery area.

50. Require new buildings to be less visually prominent than the existing bulk sugar store building, and
be sympathetic to the coastal landscape, local natural and historic values.

51. Require new buildings in the bulk sugar store area to exhibit a varied form, bulk and design and
avoid a continuous bulky mass, facade or height.

Framework plans Comment [BL11]: Reflects proposal

contained in the precinct evidence to
delete framework plans.
52. Following the cessation of sugar refining activities, encourage the development of a framework
plan, under which scheduled heritage buildings and structures may have to be adapted, and new
buildings erected, to accommodate new activities.

53. Encourage consultation with any other owners of land within sub-precinct C when preparing a
framework plan.

54. Require a framework plan to demonstrate the interrelationship and future integration with:

a. other land within in the sub-precinct, where a framework plan can only be prepared for part of
a sub-precinct.

b. any neighbouring sub-precinct.

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

PART 3 - REGIONAL AND DISTRICT RULES, Chapter K: Precinct rules, 5 North

5.8 Chelsea

The underlying zonings of land within this precinct is are Public Open Space – Conservation and Light Comment [EI12]: Out of scope
Industry. Refer to the planning maps for the location and extent of the precinct. editorial amendment so as to ensure
consistency of drafting across all PAUP
precincts.
The provisions in Chapter E2 J2 (Overlay rules, Scheduled Historic Heritage Places), Chapter H
Auckland-wide rules, and Chapter I underlying zones apply in this precinct unless more specific provisions
are set out below.

The activities, controls and assessment criteria in the underlying Public Open Space - Conservation, and
Light Industry zones and Auckland-wide rules apply in the following precinct and sub-precincts unless
otherwise specified below. Refer to planning maps for the location and extent of the precinct and sub-
precincts.

For the purposes of this precinct, the date of cessation of refining operations at the refinery site shall be
the date that formal notice is provided to the council which confirms that the Chelsea Sugar Refinery has
ceased operating at the site.

1. Activity table

The underlying zones and Auckland-wide activity tables apply in this precinct unless otherwise specified Comment [EI13]: Out of scope
below more specific provisions are set out below. editorial amendment so as to ensure
consistency of drafting across all PAUP
precincts.
1.1 Chelsea sub-precinct A

The activities in the Public Open Space - Conservation zone apply in this sub-precinct unless otherwise
specified in the table below.

[rp]

Activity Activity status

Disposal of sugar refining waste to best industry land management practices and in P
accordance with discharge permits
Stormwater and wastewater systems and structures that have had prior approval as part P
of a catchment management plan and/or regional resource consent

Activity Activity status

Landscape planting and features not including any structure requiring a building consent P
Any activity associated with or ancillary to the operation of the Chelsea sugar refinery D
not provided for as a permitted activity disturbing the land and for which an authority to
modify would be required under the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014

1.2 Chelsea sub-precinct B

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

The activities in the Public Open Space - Conservation zone apply in this sub-precinct unless otherwise
specified in the table below.

[rp]

Activity Activity status

Maintenance of dams, water storage lakes, bridges and their abutments P
Activities and structures necessary for ensuring water quality and control of odour, provided P
they comply with the noise standards of adjoining residential zones
Riparian management activities appropriate to and which enhance the natural values of the P
water body and/or riparian zone
Stormwater and wastewater systems and structures, including structures on the surface of P
water, that have had prior approval as part of a catchment management plan and/or regional
resource consent
Any activity associated with or ancillary to the operation of the Chelsea sugar refinery not D
provided for as a permitted activity
Structural alterations to existing dam structures or to any other scheduled structure D
New dams and water storage lakes, and alterations to bridges and their abutments, where not D
provided for as a permitted activity

Any activity affecting any structure except routine maintenance that is specified and authorised by D
an operative reserve management plan (approved by Auckland Council)

1.3 Chelsea sub-precinct C

Prior to cessation of refining activities, the activities in the Light Industry zone apply in sub-precinct C
unless otherwise specified.

Following cessation of refining activities, the activity table below specifies the activity status of activities in
sub-precinct C. Chapter JE2 (Overlay rules, Scheduled Historic Heritage Places) and Chapter H
Auckland-wide rules The Auckland-wide rules shall apply to all activities in sub-precinct C following
cessation of refining activities unless more specific provisions are set out below.

Activity table - Chelsea C sub-precinct

Activity Activity status
Pre-cessation Post-cessation
of refining of refining
operations operations
Industrial activities associated with sugar refining P NA
Development

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

Minor additions and alterations to scheduled buildings and structures including: P NA

a. the passage of piped or wired services or ducting through existing openings or
old openings reopened
b. removal of redundant fixtures, brackets or attachments provided this does not
damage the original fabric
c. new openings in corrugated iron of no more than 2m2 in area
d. new openings in brick walls of no more than 0.1m2 in area
e. lean-to or minor adjoining structures that:
i. are no higher than 30 per cent of the adjoining wall's height
ii. cover or obscure not more than 20 per cent of the total original wall surface
area
iii. extend out (at right angles) by less than half their own height
f. the siting of plant and equipment immediately adjacent which is self-supporting,
open in nature, and not higher than the adjacent wall
g. minor structures running aerially between buildings which are open in nature, not
higher than the adjacent wall, and do not involve openings greater than specified
in iii and iv
h. the attachment of security or safety equipment required for operational reasons,
provided it could be removed at any future time without permanent damage to
the building or structure

Maintenance and routine repair of scheduled buildings and structures required for P NA
the continuous protective care of the fabric, detailing and structural integrity,
including re-painting

Additions and alterations to any Category B scheduled item not provided for RD NA
above, including placing, fixing, painting or extending of a sign, attachment, flag,
banner or lighting on or in association with any scheduled building or structure
excluding small signs not visible from off the site displayed for on- site vehicle
control or the health, safety, convenience or information of persons working
within or visiting the site

Total or substantial demolition of any Category A* scheduled item NC NA Comment [BL14]: A* is for
consistency with Chapter J2, App 9.1
Total or substantial demolition of a Category B scheduled item D NA Schedule

Demolition of buildings or structures not identified above provided that there is: P NA
a. no likelihood of there being any permanent loss or damage of any protected
fabric, element or component of a scheduled building or structure

b. no threat to the foundations or structural integrity of any scheduled building

[Format change, paragraph]

To demonstrate compliance with clauses a and b a report prepared by a suitably

qualified person must be completed and available at the time of any building
consent application prior to any demolition work starting

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

New buildings and structures specified as follows, sited in accordance with C NA

Precinct plan 1: Chelsea sub-precinct C - current use, and within the defined
footprint area (where applicable):
a. cogeneration gas boiler, not exceeding 15m high or 200m2 in footprint

b. drive-through bulk loading facility, not exceeding 25m high or 240m2 in

footprint

c. carbon plant (decolourisation) columns extension, not exceeding the height of

the adjoining carbon plant or 50m2 in footprint

d. No. 2 (MAF) warehouse expansion, not exceeding 20m high or 2,025m2 in

footprint

e. administration office building extension/s, not exceeding the height of the

adjoining administration building or 200m2 in footprint

New freestanding buildings and structures within Areas H or D, defined in D NA

Precinct plan 1: Chelsea sub-precinct C - current use, where any part is
within 5m of a scheduled item or within 10m of MHWS:

a. alterations and additions to any Category A* scheduled item where not

provided for as permitted activities

b. any building or structure that does not comply with the siting, height or
footprint conditions set out in Precinct plan 1: Chelsea sub-precinct C -
current use

c. new buildings and structures, specified as follows and sited in accordance

with Precinct plan 1: Chelsea sub-precinct C - current use:

i. a continuous vacuum pan (VKT) structure visible outside the scheduled

pan and powerhouse building

ii. a new bulk sugar silo structure and enclosure where any part is above 25m
high

iii. coal boiler and associated buildings or structures

Activities following cessation of sugar refining activities Framework Plans

A framework plan, amendments to an approved framework plan or a
replacement framework plan complying with clause 3.1 below
NA D
Residential, retail and office activities in new and scheduled buildings in a
development scheme that is consistent in layout and height with the details of
Precinct Plan 2 and which also provides for open space and community facilities

Any land use, subdivision or development NA D

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

Any land use, subdivision and/or development complying with an approved NA RD

framework plan
A framework plan, amendments to an approved framework plan or a NA NC

Any land use, subdivision and/or development prior to the approval of a framework NA NC
plan, or which does not comply with an approved framework plan

2. Notification

1. The council will consider discretionary resource consent applications for framework plans (including
amendments/replacement framework plans) without the need for public notification. However,
limited notification may be undertaken, including to any land owner within the sub-precinct who has
not provided written approval.
Comment [BL15]: Reflects proposal
in precinct evidence to delete
3. Framework Plans framework plans.

1. A resource consent application for a framework plan, amendments to an approved framework plan
or a replacement framework plan must:

a. apply to the whole of the sub-precinct

b. comply with:

i. the General Provisions - Framework plans

ii. clause 2.7.3 of the General Provisions -Information requirements for resource consent

iii. the special information requirements for framework plans specified in clause 6 below

iv. any relevant controls in sub-precinct C

c. seek consent for the following land uses (as a minimum):

i. the mix and location of residential, business, community, employment and recreation
activities

ii. where appropriate, the provision of public open space, community or social
infrastructure

iii. where required, new or upgraded storm and/or wastewater infrastructure

iv. land uses not provided for in the precinct or underlying zone

v. block and roads layouts

d. address the following:

i. any protected historic heritage buildings, places, objects and structures (items)

ii. any protected archaeological site/s

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

iii. any protected and/or notable trees.

4. Development controls

The underlying zone development controls and Auckland-wide controls apply in this precinct, unless Comment [EI16]: Out of scope
otherwise specified below. editorial amendment so as to ensure
consistency of drafting across all PAUP
precincts.
1. The following development controls apply in sub-precinct C pre-cessation of refining operations.

1. Building height

1. In area H as shown in Precinct plan 1: Chelsea sub-precinct C - current use:

a. buildings must not exceed 16m in height

b. buildings between 16m and 20m height area controlled activity

c. buildings between 21m and 25m in height are a restricted discretionary activity

d. buildings greater than 25m in height are a discretionary activity

2. Buildings greater than 25m in height are a discretionary activity.

3. In area D as shown in Precinct plan 1: Chelsea sub-precinct C - current use:

a. buildings must not exceed 12m in height

b. buildings between 12m and 16m in height are a restricted discretionary activity

c. buildings greater than 16m in height are a discretionary activity cHeights must be measured
using 'mean ground level' being R.L 6.35 in terms of LINZ Datum.

cd. Heights must be measured using 'mean ground level' being R.L 6.35 in terms of LINZ Datum.

4. Where specified height limits are provided in relation to an activity in the activity table for sub-
precinct C above, the controls in clauses 1- 4 3 above do not apply.

5. Assessment – Controlled Activities

1. Matters of control

1. The council will reserve its control to the matters below for the activity listed as controlled in the Comment [EI17]: Out of scope
editorial amendment so as to ensure
sub-precinct C activity table: consistency of drafting across all PAUP
precincts.
a. location, scale and bulk

b. effects on scheduled buildings and structures

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

For development that is a controlled activity in Chelsea sub-precinct C, the council will reserve its control
over the following matters:

1. Location, scale and bulk

2. Effects on scheduled buildings and structures

2. Assessment criteria

1. The council will consider the relevant assessment criteria below for the activity listed as controlled in Comment [EI18]: Out of scope
editorial amendment so as to ensure
the sub-precinct C activity table: consistency of drafting across all PAUP
precincts.

For development that is a controlled activity in Chelsea sub-precinct C, the following assessment criteria
apply.

1. The location, scale and bulk of new buildings should respect the exterior forms and scale of
scheduled buildings and should not block or obscure their elevations.
2. New buildings and structures should acknowledge the scale and character of scheduled buildings
and structures and their location, design and external appearance should be compatible with and
respect the scheduled buildings and structures.

6. Assessment – Restricted discretionary activities

1. Matters of discretion

The council will restrict its discretion to the matters below for the activities listed as restricted Comment [EI19]: Out of scope
editorial amendment so as to ensure
discretionary activities in the sub-precinct C activity table. consistency of drafting across all PAUP
precincts.
For development that is a restricted discretionary activity in Chelsea sub-precinct C, the council will
restrict its discretion to the following matters:

1. Alterations and additions to any Category B scheduled item not otherwise provided for in the sub-
precinct C activity table, including placing, fixing, painting or extending of a sign, attachment, flag,
banner or lighting on or in association with any scheduled building or structure excluding small
signs not visible from off the site displayed for on-site vehicle control or the health, safety,
convenience or information of persons working within or visiting the site:

a. historic heritage place

b. operational requirements

c. design and character

d. heritage values.

2. Any land use, subdivision and/or development complying with an approved framework plan: Comment [BL20]: Deleted due to
proposal in precinct evidence to remove
framework plans
a. the matters set out in clause 8.1 below, as if any reference in those matters to a "framework
plan" were a reference to the proposal

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

b. the matters set out for the activity in the relevant Auckland--wide rules.

2. Assessment criteria

The council will consider the relevant assessment criteria below for the restricted discretionary activities Comment [EI21]: Out of scope
editorial amendment so as to ensure
listed above. consistency of drafting across all PAUP
precincts.
For development that is a restricted discretionary activity in Chelsea sub-precinct C, the following
assessment criteria apply.

1. When considering a restricted discretionary consent application for alterations and additions to any
Category B scheduled item not otherwise provided for in the sub-precinct C activity table, the
council will consider:

a. Historic heritage places

i. the matters referred to in J6.2 (historic heritage overlay restricted discretionary

assessment criteria) refer to clause 6.1-6.2 of the Overlay - Special Character
Residentail North Shore rules.

b. Operational requirements

i. the efficient operational requirements of the Chelsea Sugar Refinery.

c. Design and character

d. Comment [EI22]: For clarity

i. the style and character of scheduled buildings or structures should be preserved.

ii. matching materials should be used and respecting original forms and profiles.

iii. changes should be reversible and loss of original material minimised.

iv. changes to any scheduled building or structure should not significantly alter its primary
form or characteristic details.

v. changes to individual scheduled buildings should respect and complement the style and
scale of such buildings and adjacent scheduled buildings, and should not detract from
the collective heritage significance of scheduled buildings and structures.

vi. existing openings in exterior walls of scheduled buildings should be used in preference
to making new openings. If new openings cannot be avoided these should be as small
as practicable and should be located in the lower part of any external wall.

vii. additions should be small in scale, structurally self-supporting and identifiable as new.

viii. additions should complement the form of the existing building and acknowledge existing
patterns, bay rhythms and window openings. Additions should be set back from the
main building lines of the scheduled building.

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

ix. roof additions should complement existing roof forms by repeating these, or by using
secondary forms such as lean-tos or clerestories.

x. where any new building or structure is proposed to be higher than any adjacent
scheduled building or structure, or where it is proposed to increase the height of any
scheduled building or structure, particular regard should be given to the design and
appearance of the upper parts of the structure.

xi. new work and demolition activity should not endanger, damage or destroy the fabric of
scheduled buildings, or significantly detract from the features or attributes for which they
were scheduled.

xii. structures extending or linking scheduled buildings, or connecting with new buildings,
should be simple in form, small in scale, and enclosed only to the extent necessary to
provide weather protection.

e. Heritage values

i. where the structural skeleton of a scheduled building is integral to the heritage value of
the building, this should be retained. New components should be fitted within, and
around structural frames rather than necessitating their removal.

ii. any changes of built form should be such that the visual impact would not be
significantly adverse. In general no views other than from public vantage points near
water level will be considered in such an assessment. Views from the Auckland
Harbour Bridge may be considered.

iii. where it is proposed to partly demolish a scheduled building or structure, it must be

demonstrated that alteration, adaptation or refurbishment and reuse, or any
combination thereof, are not practicable or viable options.

iv. photographic and other recordings should be made prior to work commencing and/or
after work has been completed. This information should be deposited with the
Birkenhead Library archives.

2. When considering a restricted discretionary resource consent application for any land use, Comment [BL23]: Deleted to reflect
proposal in precinct evidence to delete
subdivision and/or development complying with an approved framework plan, the council will framework plans
consider:

a. the assessment criteria set out in clause 8.1 below, as if any reference in those criteria to a
"framework plan" were a reference to the proposal

b. the assessment criteria set out for the activity in the relevant Auckland-wide rules.

7. Assessment – Development controls infringements

1. Matters of discretion

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

In addition to the general matters set out in clause 2.3 Auckland-wide rules – General provisions, the Comment [EI24]: Out of scope
editorial amendment so as to ensure
council will restrict its discretion to the matters below for the relevant development control infringement. consistency of drafting across all PAUP
precincts.
In addition to the general matters set out in clause G2.3 of the General Provisions, the council will restrict
its discretion to the matters below for the relevant development control infringement.

1. Building height

a. buildings in Area H as shown in Precinct plan 1: Chelsea sub-precinct C - current use

between 20m and 25m in height

i. location, scale and bulk of new buildings

ii. compatibility with scale and character of scheduled buildings and structures

iii. the design and appearance of the upper parts of any new building or structure

b. buildings in Area D as shown in Precinct plan 1: Chelsea sub-precinct C - current use

between 12m and 16m in height

i. location, scale and bulk of new buildings

ii. compatibility with scale and character of scheduled buildings and structures

iii. the design and appearance of the upper parts of any new building or structure.

2. Assessment Criteria

In addition to the general assessment criteria in clause 2.3 Auckland wide rules – General provisions, the Comment [EI25]: Out of scope
editorial amendment so as to ensure
council will consider the relevant assessment criteria below for the development control infringement. consistency of drafting across all PAUP
precincts.
In addition to the general assessment criteria in clause G2.3 of the General Provisions, the council will
consider the relevant assessment criteria below for the development control infringement.

1. The location, scale and bulk of new buildings should respect the exterior forms and scale of
scheduled buildings and should not block or obscure their elevations.

2. New buildings and structures should acknowledge the scale and character of scheduled buildings
and structures and their location, design and external appearance should be compatible with and
respect the scheduled buildings and structures. In particular the design should have regard to the
distinctive built heritage profile the scheduled buildings create which in turn is accentuated by both
the 'green' (vegetated) backdrop (visible behind the cistern house) and the vegetated, and
predominantly open, foreground.

3. Where any new building or structure is proposed to be higher than any adjacent scheduled building
or structure, or where it is proposed to increase the height of any scheduled building or structure,
particular regard should be given to the design and appearance of the upper parts of the structure.

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

Comment [EP26]: Reflects proposal

8. Assessment –discretionary activities in precinct evidence to delete
framework plans.

8.1 Matters of discretion

While not limiting the exercise of its discretion, the council may consider the particular matters specified
for a framework plan, amendments to an approved framework plan or a replacement framework plan
complying with clause 3.1 above, to the matters set out below and any other matters relating to the
special information requirements outlined in clause 9.2 below.

1. The location and design of buildings

The framework plan should provide for a built form that:

a. ensures development is integrated and connected with the surrounding neighbourhood

b. mitigates adverse effects on properties neighbouring the framework plan area through
reduced heights, larger setbacks and landscaping or any other appropriate design response

c. the mass of large buildings, including any large facades, are modulated or includes
transitional elements or use of contrast, including colour and material, to reduce apparent
scale

d. a variety of housing types and sizes is provided to cater for the diverse needs of the
community

e. is indicative of the layout of streets and height limits as shown in Precinct plan 2: Chelsea
sub-precinct C - future use

f. breaks down building forms to create a human scale and visual interest, safety and activity
along street frontages for pedestrians

g. provides shelter for pedestrians and continuous areas of paving along streets to provide for
pedestrian amenity and other activities anticipated for in the sub-precinct

h. avoids blank facades or walls along street frontages, or adjacent to and visible from other
public spaces

i. provides access to daylight and sunlight within buildings and in streets, other public spaces
and private outdoor spaces

j. protects views of the site and heritage buildings from within the site, from the surrounding
residential land including Birkenhead Point and Northcote Point, and from the Harbour

k. provides for a distribution of intensity so that there are lower forms of development and
intensity toward the periphery of the site adjacent to the coastal escarpment and the western
boundary of the site, and reducing intensities across the Horse Paddock area towards its
western boundary

l. is set well back from elevated coastal areas

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

m. provides for appropriate setbacks, curtilages and integration of new buildings and structures
with the scheduled Refinery buildings within the sub-precinct, to ensure that their heritage
context and setting is maintained and enhanced

n. avoids buildings and development along the harbour edge outside the defined building areas
in the Refinery Area, and provide for public access to this harbour edge area

2. Provision for activities

Land use activities provided for through a framework plan should:

a. ensure the resultant population will be adequately supported by community amenities, e.g.
local convenience shopping, local parks, community facilities

b. enable, where there is a need by the current or future residents, the establishment of
community facilities such as health, educational and care facilities

c. include the scale and extent of any non-residential activity and ensure that adverse effects on
residential sites within or adjoining the framework plan area are avoided or mitigated

d. locate land use activities so that they can integrate with adjoining centres

3. The location, physical extent and design of public open space

The framework plan should provide for development that:

a. ensures buildings and sites are located to maximise access to public open space

b. integrates natural, landscape and cultural features and ensures parking, access or service
areas are appropriately landscaped or screened

c. where open space is proposed, will provide a layout and design will enable well-connected,
legible and safe cycling and pedestrian routes with appropriate provision of footpaths,
servicing, infrastructure and landscape treatment

d. will provide a layout and design of open space that will integrate with and complement the
form and function of the existing public open space network

e. protects and enhances cultural and heritage items and historic places of significance

f. maximises the bush, open space and public reserve areas across the precinct and retains the
Conservation Areas shown in Precinct plan 2: Chelsea sub-precinct C - future use.

4. The location and design of access and parking

The framework plan should provide for pedestrian, cycle and vehicle access and parking that:

a. creates connections within the framework plan area and to the surrounding neighbourhood

b. prioritises safe and efficient pedestrian movements

c. identifies a clear road hierarchy

d. provides parking in a manner that does not dominate the street frontage

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

e. avoids large car parking areas at fronts of sites, and parking areas at grade between
buildings and streets

f. provides a system of public pedestrian linkages throughout the sub-precinct, particularly to

buildings or structures within the zone having significant heritage values, to areas having high
recreational values (for example, that provide access alongside, or extensive views of, the
Waitemata Harbour) and to existing pedestrian walkways within the greater Chelsea Estate

g. ensures integration between and connectivity of the following elements:

i. parking and pedestrian linkages within the site

ii. internal linkages to existing pedestrian and roading connections

iii. interconnectivity between any proposed residential development and service points,
and areas of public space and the foreshore

5. Protected historic heritage buildings, places, objects and structures (items), protected
archaeological site/s and any protected and/or notable trees
The framework plan should provide for development that:

a. provides for the protection and maintenance of significant native vegetation and habitats,
exotic tree plantings that have an important screening function or have cultural heritage value
and known ecological corridors within the zone, including by avoiding vegetation alteration
which fragments significant ecological linkages between native vegetation and wildlife
habitats. The screening that largely obscures the built development on the Bulk Sugar Store
and Horse Paddock areas should be maintained, and as trees reach their life expectancy
they should be replaced so that at all times a visual screen is provided.

b. avoids adverse effects on significant individual (or groups of) trees within the sub-precinct

c. provides for the protection, conservation and, where appropriate adaptation of the scheduled
heritage refinery buildings

Comment [EP27]: Reflects proposal

9. Special information requirements in precinct evidence to delete
framework plans.

1. An application for the demolition of buildings or structures that are not scheduled must be
accompanied by a report prepared by a suitably qualified person and available at the time of any
building consent application prior to any demolition work starting.

2. Any resource consent application for a framework plan (including an amended or replacement
framework plan) must include:

a. comprehensive and integrated development scheme plans for the whole of the sub-precinct,
where all components of the scheme are sought to be consented in the one application

b. the comprehensive and integrated development scheme plans must address the following:

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

i. a landscape and habitat plan, including proposals for (and how the resource consent or
Framework Plan provides for) the conservation and management of areas of high
natural, coastal, landscape and habitat values, taking into account the conservation of
significant elements of the landscape and habitats, and avoidance or mitigation of
effects on wildlife habitats or sites of ecological or wildlife significance (SSWI)

ii. a Building Conservation Plan for any heritage buildings, having regard to:

• New Zealand Historic Places Trust guidelines based on the J. Kerr conservation
plan model

• the heritage provisions of the Unitary Plan with specific reference to the
objectives, policies and assessment criteria relating to the Chelsea Sugar
Refinery

• protection of open space and, including curtilages around buildings where these
form part of the heritage value and contribute to the settings that enhance the
visual appreciation of scheduled heritage buildings

• the conservation and re-adaptation of the Refinery heritage buildings in a manner

that addresses the heritage elements and potential effects upon heritage values

• the ICOMOS New Zealand Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural
Heritage Value

iii. land use and development patterns and building forms, consistent with the objectives
and policies for the future use of sub-precinct C following cessation of refining activities

iv. elements of urban form, which contribute to maintaining and enhancing amenity values
and the creation of a strong local identity

v. the geotechnical limitations of the site, particularly in areas known to have historically
been used for landfill purposes

vi. provision for services and utilities (e.g. wastewater disposal, stormwater management,
water supply, roads, electricity supply)

vii. an archaeological assessment, having regard to the recognised guidelines series of

Archaeological Guidelines issued by the New Zealand Historic Places Trust

viii. the need for protocols to ensure the appropriate handling of artifacts which may be of
archaeological or cultural significance

ix. an Integrated Transportation Assessment in accordance with G1.4B of the Plan. Such
an assessment must also include, as appropriate:

• an assessment of the degree to which the proposal is in accordance with regional

transport strategies, with particular reference to public transport policies (including
the potential for ferry access) and the service delivery capability of public

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

transport service providers. In carrying out such an assessment, reference shall

must be made to the passenger transport plans and policies of the regional public
transport provider.

• provision for adequate vehicular access to the land within the zone and circulation
of motor vehicles (including buses and emergency service vehicles), provision of
onsite bus stopping and turnaround facilities within the zone, walkways and cycle
ways

• provision for land-based ancillary facilities including an adequate parking and

vehicle circulation area to support water-borne transportation (if appropriate in the
circumstances)

• an analysis of traffic effects on the roading network

• consideration of the benefits and desirability of extending a connecting link from

the end of Onetaunga Road to Colonial Road immediately south of the main
Refinery access bridge, in a manner that protects the values of the Chelsea
Estate while providing for improved access functions and greater security

x. an economic impact assessment of the effects of the proposal, with particular reference
to employment implications for the North Shore area and the impact the development
may have on planned residential intensification and business activity in Highbury

xi. assessment of the risks of coastal erosion and how any potential adverse effects (if
any) are addressed

xii. a risk assessment, using the provisions and procedures outlined in the Auckland Civil
Defence Emergency Management Group Plan, Section 2, Strategic Direction. The
natural events to be assessed include tidal and surge effects, tsunami, storm and
rainfall. Man-made risks shall must include dam over-topping or collapse, bridge
vulnerability and the security of essential services that may cross hazardous areas, and
how any potential adverse effects (if any) are addressed

xiii. assessment of any contamination on the site and the location and status of any
potentially hazardous material and how any potential adverse effects (if any) are
addressed

xiv. assessment of noise and traffic effects of demolition and construction activities.

3. All resource consent applications must include:

a. a landscape and habitat plan that also provides for the conservation and management of
areas of high natural, coastal, landscape and habitat values. This must take into account the
conservation of significant elements of the landscape and habitats, and avoid or mitigate any
adverse effects on wildlife habitats or sites of ecological or wildlife significance.

b. a building conservation plan for each scheduled heritage building having regard to:

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for Chelsea precinct,
dated 19 April 2016.

i. New Zealand Historic Places Trust guidelines based on the J. Kerr conservation plan
model

ii. the historic heritage provisions of the Unitary Plan with specific reference to the
Chelsea Sugar Refinery area within the sub-precinct

iii. protection of open space and curtilages around buildings where these are integral to
heritage values and contribute to the visual appreciation of scheduled heritage buildings

iv. the conservation and readaptation of the refinery heritage buildings in a manner that
addresses the unique industrial heritage elements and potential effects on heritage
values

v. the ICOMOS New Zealand Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage
Value

vi. land use and development patterns and building forms, consistent with the objectives
and policies of the sub-precinct.

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for
Chelsea precinct, dated 19 April 2016.

10. Precinct plans

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for
Chelsea precinct, dated 19 April 2016.

Comment [EI28]: Updated Precinct

Plan 1 to remove the reference to
‘Landscape Protection Area’.

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016

 Agreed amendments between Council officers and planning witness for New Zealand Sugar for
Chelsea precinct, dated 19 April 2016.

Topic 081 Chelsea precinct – tracked changes_19042016