Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Response To Health Canada On Release of Clinical Data
Response To Health Canada On Release of Clinical Data
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Health Canada white paper entitled “Public
release of clinical information in drug submissions and medical device applications”. 1 Health
Canada’s proposed policy change could be a major step towards transparency. We support
the public release of clinical information because Canadians and their clinicians require this
information to be publicly accessible in order to make informed decisions. Greater
transparency will also help Health Canada make better decisions by allowing independent
scrutiny of clinical information. This ability to review the evidence will further enhance the
trust that Canadians should have in the safety and efficacy of health care products. We urge
Health Canada to introduce regulations under the Food and Drugs Act in a timely manner
that gives legal force and effect to the policy proposed in the white paper, as modified by the
changes we outline below.
We recommend the following changes, which must be subsequently translated into legally
binding regulations enacted pursuant to the Food and Drugs Act, to ensure that this proposed
policy will achieve its objective of greater transparency. These changes will help avoid
sponsor practices that can severely restrict the release of information and subvert any attempt
at transparency. Our general suggestion is that Health Canada must significantly limit the
exemptions and restrictions in the proposed policy and remove barriers to accessing clinical
information. Finally, there is additional information that was not mentioned in the document
that must be released.
1. The following exemptions to the release of information must be removed from the policy
because they are open to abuse: “secondary or exploratory end points which may
constitute a component of an on-going development programme”, “interim clinical study
results” and “methodological details (e.g. in-house modifications or procedures to
analytical, immunogenicity, bioassay, or sample size calculations methods not commonly
used by the industry)”. If Health Canada obtained this information in order to make
regulatory decisions then Health Canada has an obligation to release it. These exemptions
invite sponsors who wish to suppress information –as they currently do by
inappropriately labelling it “confidential” – to use these labels to subvert transparency.
All aspects of the scientific methodology are key components of credible science and
should be made public. Specifically, withholding methodological details may mean that
1
Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/public-release-clinical-
information-drug-submissions-medical-device-applications.html
1
information such as assays used to assess the efficacy of vaccines remain undisclosed
thereby preventing independent assessment of their efficacy. Similarly, withholding
information about non-conventional sample size calculations may mean that the ability to
test and replicate analyses of efficacy may not be possible.
2. Health Canada’s policy must clearly state that the burden of proof is on industry sponsors
to justify why certain information falls under the narrowly defined exceptions to public
disclosure. In this regard, any redactions to the material that is released must be kept to a
minimum and there should be written reasons given for the redactions. Experience has
shown that the greater the number of redactions the more difficult it is to interpret the
information and the less use the documents are in helping to understand the benefits and
harms of medicines.
3. Health Canada must produce a list of the types of documents that it will release based on
its transparency policy along with a clear definition of the content of each of these
documents.
Restrictions
4. Health Canada must proactively release clinical information without requiring people to
apply for its release. We do not support Health Canada applying any restrictions on who
can receive clinical information or how that data can be used. Health Canada may
preclude information obtained under other provisions of the Food and Drugs Act, for
example, information that remains “confidential business information” from commercial
use upon disclosure. However, information that is deemed clinical information following
a regulatory decision should be available without restriction upon publication.
Barriers
5. Health Canada must have the legal authority and be obliged to publish clinical
information after a single exchange with companies pertaining to redactions and, in any
event, no later than 60 days after a product receives a Notice of Compliance. Protracted
exchanges between Health Canada and sponsors can be used as a delaying tactic to the
release of information and are a major barrier to transparency. Health Canada should have
the authority to release information after a single exchange with companies except under
exceptional circumstances.
6. Health Canada must be specific about what circumstances would prevent it from aligning
its practices with those of other regulators where those regulators have more liberal
policies about the release of information than those proposed by Health Canada.
Additional information
7. Health Canada must release all its reviewers’ reports once a product has received a Notice
of Compliance. Similar to the release of information that the companies submit, there
must be strict time windows for the release of these reports and strict criteria about what
information can be redacted.
8. If external reviewers are used at any time during the drug approval process, the names of
these reviewers along with their conflicts of interest must be publicly released.
Health Canada’s discussion paper begins with the statement that “Opening access to clinical
information used to support the authorization has widespread health system benefits and can
help Canadians make informed decisions about their health. It can also help Canadians to
2
better understand the basis for HPFB’s regulatory decisions.” We believe that to fulfill this
promise, the information used in the drug approval process must be freely available in a
timely manner to anyone who wants to examine it with only minimal restrictions.
We would be pleased to discuss our recommendations with Health Canada. Health Canada
can contact us through Joel Lexchin at either jlexchin@yorku.ca or 416-964-7186.
Sincerely
Joel Lexchin MD
Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Health
York University
Emergency Physician, University Health Network
Toronto
Tom Jefferson MD
Senior Associate Tutor
University of Oxford
Navindra Persaud MD
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Medicine
University of Toronto
Elia Abi-Jaoude MD
Department of Psychiatry
The Hospital for Sick Children
University of Toronto
3
Professor Arthur Schafer
Founding Director
Centre for Professional and Applied Ethics
University of Manitoba
Brian Hutchison
Professor Emeritus
Departments of Family Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact and
the Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis
McMaster University
David Healy
Professor of Psychiatry
Hergest Unit
Bangor Wales
United Kingdom
Michael McDonald
Professor Emeritus of Applied Ethics
Founding Director and Inaugural Chair
W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics
School of Population and Public Health
University of British Columbia
Rob Wipond
Freelance Health Researcher and Journalist
Yan Xu MD
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Internal Medicine Resident
Department of Medicine
University of Toronto
Alice Fabbri MD
Centre for Research in Medical Pharmacology
University of Insubria
Varese, Italy
4
John Abramson MD MSc
Lecturer, Department of Health Care Policy
Harvard Medical School
Lars Jørgensen, MD
Nordic Cochrane Centre
Rigshospitalet, 7811
Blegdamsvej 9
2100 København Ø
Denmark
Danielle Martin MD
Assistant Professor, Family and Community Medicine and Institute for Health Policy,
Management and Evaluation
University of Toronto
Ron Law
Risk & Policy Adviser
Juderon Associates
Scott A. Halperin MD
Professor of Pediatrics and Microbiology & Immunology
Director, Canadian Center for Vaccinology
Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre
Rokuro Hama MD
Director, Japan Institute of Pharmacovigilance (MedCheck),
Part time lecturer, Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University
5
Alcohol Treatment Unit
University Hospital
Amiens, France
David Carmichael
Executive Director
Canadians for Vanessa's Law
Michael Kruse
Executive Director
Bad Science Watch
Toronto
Colleen Fuller
6
President, PharmaWatch Canada
Vancouver
Jonathan Kimmelman
STREAM Research Group
Associate Professor
Biomedical Ethics Unit / Experimental Medicine / Social Studies of Medicine
McGill University
Wendy A Rogers
Professor of Clinical Ethics
Macquarie University
Nick Ross
7
Journalist, author and broadcaster
President of HealthWatch UK
Mandy Payne
Editor
HealthWatch UK Newsletter
Caroline Richmond
62a Woodside Park Rd
London UK
David A Bender
Emeritus Professor of Nutritional Biochemistry
University College London
Janet C. Currie
PhD student, University of British Columbia School of Population and Public Health
Founder and Coordinator: Psychiatric Medication Awareness Group
Co-Chair, Canadian Women's Health Network
8
Jo Ann Cook MSW
Ottawa
9
Co-founder and Executive Director
Evidence for Democracy
Luca De Fiore
Associazione Alessandro Liberati Network italiano Cochrane
Rome, Italy
10
Carl Elliott MD, PhD
Professor, Center for Bioethics
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Stephen Hwang MD
Professor, Faculty of Medicine
University of Toronto
Terence Young
Chair, Drug Safety Canada
Oakville
M.C. Heffernan MD
REACH Community Health Centre
Vancouver
Jacques Thivierge MD
Department of Psychiatry
Laval University
11
Pierre Biron MD
Honorary Professor of Medical Pharmacology
Université de Montréal
Montréal
Adriane Fugh-Berman MD
Professor Department of Pharmacology and Physiology
Georgetown University Medical Center
Washington DC
12
Postdoctoral Fellow, Faculty of Medicine
University of British Columbia
Katrina Perehudoff
PhD Candidate, Global Health Unit
Department of Health Sciences
University Medical Centre
Groningen
Jane Turner
President, REACH Community Health Centre
Vancouver
Shelly McNeil, MD
Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases, Nova Scotia Health Authority
Deputy Director, Canadian Center for Vaccinology,
Dalhousie University
13
Katherine Fierlbeck
McCulloch Professor of Political Science
Dalhousie University
Alana Cattapan
CIHR Postdoctoral Fellow, Faculty of Medicine
Dalhousie University
Rita Banzi
Laboratory of Drug Regulatory Policies
IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri
Milan, Italy
Ian Stewart
Assistant Professor
History of Science and Technology Programme
University of King's College
Halifax
14