Portfolio Assessment of Usman Khan Jadoon
Criterion
1. Identification of a need or
opportunity with a brief analysis
leading to a design
brief
2. Research into the design
brief resulting in a
specification
3. Generation and exploration of
design ideas
4. Development of proposed
solution
5. Planning for production
6. Product realization
7. Testing and evaluation
Comments of Examiner Mark
 Detailed analysis of problem and need clearly identified.
 Descriptive design brief and reference to the user requirement is detailed.
4 out of 5
 Good use of task analysis to explore different possibilities.
 Specific constraints clearly set up.
 Conclusive information gathered from research.
 Critical findings in mood board, product analysis, questionnaire, designer research and client profile 8 out of 10
 Detailed specification that is linked well with research.
 A range of ideas showing different possibilities using good drawing technique.
 Comparative analysis of ideas is bit ambiguous
16 out of 20
 Use of descriptive annotations in developed ideas.
 Objective evaluation of ideas against specifications.
 Good development of proposed solution, with appropriate design modifications and reasoned
decision-making on materials.
12 out of 15
 Good use of CAD to develop a solution.
 Effective use of modelling to set up an effective planning for production.
 Sketching lacks in detailed annotations, and dimensions. Clear and detailed sequence of manufacture
proposed using cutting list, time plan and flowchart. 8 out of 10
 Prototype making is detailed and clear.
 Completed to a high standard, fulfils the requirements of product specification and functions well.
27 out of 30
 Photographic record of whole manufacturing process
 Objective testing and evaluation carried out in the actual environment.
 Product evaluated against specification and by the client. 7 out of 10
 Weaknesses and strengths are identified but the suggestions for the future can be added.
Total mark awarded 82 out of 100