Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Expansion Done and Consolidation On Re-Rating Ahead?: Nitin Agarwal Nirmal Gopi
Expansion Done and Consolidation On Re-Rating Ahead?: Nitin Agarwal Nirmal Gopi
SECTOR UPDATE
Expansion done and consolidation on;
re-rating ahead?
Listed Indian hospital services companies within our universe have shifted gears into a likely prolonged
consolidation phase, post intensive capital expenditure, which entailed significant capacity additions.
Management commentaries point to limited or no incremental capex, with no new hospital units being
set up over next two years. Managements would instead focus on sweating out mature hospital units
and turning around relatively new hospitals, driving accelerated earnings growth over FY19-21E. Given
the sharp reduction in future capex outlays, we estimate most listed hospital units would generate
positive free cashflows (FCF), sharply improving return ratios over the next 2-3 years. Managements
stated their intent to sustain focus on profitability/return ratios, which we believe will help address key
investor concerns in the healthcare services space. On the regulatory side, while concerns on
incremental action around price control stay, this time around, hospital networks are better prepared to
mitigate any negative impact on them, than they were when price control on stents was announced. We
see limited impact from implementation of Ayushman Bharat on listed hospital networks. Prices of
stocks within our coverage have corrected by ~14% in last 3 years due to companies’ weak operating
performances and heightened regulatory risk. However, valuations are now reasonable at ~13x FY21E
EBITDA, given strong near-term growth visibility and long-term growth outlook. Apollo Hospitals
(Target price – Rs1629) and Narayana Hrudayalaya (Target price – Rs270) are our top picks.
Indian healthcare services – A heady expansion phase ends: Buoyed by secular growth narrative for
private sector healthcare services, hospital networks in India embarked on an aggressive expansion phase
FY14 onwards. As a result, companies ventured into new geographies, especially in Tier 2/3 towns,
through a combination of buyouts, greenfield capacity additions and asset-light expansion strategies. For
instance, Apollo added 14 new hospitals over last 5 years. However, most hospital operators found it
difficult to successfully scale up these Tier 2/3 units due to challenges in hiring adequate medical talent
and generating adequate footfalls of paying patients, causing the break-even period of these units to
stretch. This adversely impacted consolidated profitability and return ratios of hospital networks (most
hospital networks have now reoriented their strategies to limit future investments into Metro/Tier 1
towns). Additionally, regulatory shocks from price caps on stents/implants and growing negotiating clout
of health insurers, which impacted growth/ profitability of mature hospitals added to the chaos of private
sector hospital service providers in FY17-18. Hospital networks have now slammed brakes on future
expansions and refocused on improving profitability of existing networks. Results are evident from the
marked improvement seen in profitability of Apollo and NH in FY19.
Consolidation is the mantra going forward: Our discussions with various hospital management teams
indicate clear focus on sweating existing assets, optimizing costs across the network and enhancing
profitability. With abatement of macro issues like GST implementation, revenue and profitability growth
of mature hospitals have begun to recover, with networks focussing on measures like case mix
optimization, in addition to enforcing cost discipline. Further, there is wide variation in unit-level
profitability across networks, with well-established mature hospitals operating at 25%+ operating
margins, and the <5-year old hospitals struggling at <10% EBITDA margin. Although we believe new
hospitals are unlikely to match profitability of top tier hospitals, managements see scope for significant
improvement from current levels, albeit gradually. This improvement would provide opportunity to newer
hospitals to meaningfully enhance EBITDA contribution in the coming years.
Sector M&A activity will accelerate the consolidation process: Challenges in the listed hospital universe
reflect profitability pressures across the entire industry. Heightened M&A activity over last few years, with
some large hospital networks changing hands reflect this trend (Buyout of Max Healthcare by
Radiant/KKR and of Fortis by IHH are few examples). In our view, these large-ticket buyouts will likely
prompt buyers to focus on optimising existing networks before embarking on ambitious expansion plans.
This, in turn, will likely limit capacity expansions across the sector and help rationalise costs associated
with hiring/retaining doctors. Notably, hospitals’ race to expand over the years has induced significant
inflation in medical talent costs (a relatively scarce commodity), which, in turn, has exerted significant
downward pressure on profitability across hospital networks. We believe this cost discipline will create a
stronger growth platform for hospital network operators over the medium-long term.
For Private Circulation only. “Important disclosures appear at the back of this report”
Hospitals
Location Beds Location Beds Location Beds Location Beds Location Beds Location Beds Total
Vanagaram,
FY14 300
Chennai
Jayanagar, 700
150
Bangalore
Trichy, TN 250
Ameerpet, 158
FY15 OMR 200 Ludhiana 260 Trichy 35
Hyd
Aster 670 2063
Women & Child Fortis La
100 70 Medcity,
care FMR Femme
Kochi
Women & Child
70
care OMR
Nellore 250
Nashik 250
FY16 Malleshwaram 230 Gulbarga 85 Jabalpur 233
Vizag 250 Indore 243 1186
Mohali 145
Wayanad, 880
FY17 Indore 200 Vizag, AP 88 Jammu 230 Mumbai 50
Kerala
Vadodara, Guntur 350 2645
Navi Mumbai 450 69
Gujarat
Kanpur, UP 90 Vijayawada 184
Vijayawada 54
SRCC,
FY18 Guwahati 200 Nagpur 125 207 Jaipur 237
Mumbai
Delh-NCR 1734
Borivali 105 (Dharamsh 350 Ahmedabad 267
ila)
Surat 243
FY19 Lucknow 250 Jaipur 50 Gurgaon 230 Ongole, AP 150
Kannur, 302 1194
Bhavnagar NA
Kerala
Nashik
92
Phase II
Rajkot 120
Total
3150 330 859 1017 1418 2748 9522
beds
Source: Company, IDFC Securities Research
The expansion entailed sustained high capex levels and negative FCF generation for most players
during this period.
Unfortunately, at the time of these expansions, the industry underwent a challenging environment, as
the government imposed price caps on stents/implants in 2017 and introduced various healthcare
schemes. Growing negotiating clout of health insurers and increasing competition in Tier-1 metros,
exacerbated by long breakeven periods of new hospitals (~3 years to breakeven and 5 years to achieve
profitability of mature hospitals) further added to the pressures, causing margins and thereby, return
ratios to reduce.
Growing
negotiating
power of Increasing
health insurers competition in
tier-1 metros
Challenging operating
environment for hospitals
Aggressive expansion +
3 year breakeven period Price controls
for new hospitals on coronary
stents & knee
implants
All these caused valuations to de-rate across the entire hospital universe. Almost all hospitals
significantly underperformed Nifty 50 over FY17-19, once expansion-driven challenges came to the fore.
27,000
60,000
18,000
30,000 9,000
0
0
Mar-16
Mar-17
Mar-18
Mar-19
Sep-16
Sep-17
Sep-18
Jan-16
Jul-16
Jan-17
Jul-17
Jan-18
Jul-18
Jan-19
Jul-19
Source: Company, IDFC Securities Research Source: Company, IDFC Securities Research
225,000
150,000
75,000
0
Mar-10
Mar-12
Mar-13
Mar-14
Mar-15
Mar-16
Mar-11
Mar-17
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-02
Mar-03
Mar-04
Mar-05
Mar-06
Mar-01
Mar-07
Mar-08
Mar-09
Exhibit 11: Relative performance of hospitals versus BSE Healthcare and Nifty 50
Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Narayana Hrudayalaya Ltd Healthcare Global Enterprise
Fortis Healthcare Ltd S&P BSE Healthcare Nifty 50
220
175
130
85
40
Jul-16
Feb-17
Mar-17
Feb-18
Mar-18
Feb-19
Mar-19
Jan-18
Jul-18
Jan-19
Jul-19
Oct-16
Dec-16
Jan-17
Jul-17
Oct-17
Dec-17
Oct-18
Dec-18
Aug-16
Nov-16
Apr-17
May-17
Nov-17
Apr-18
May-18
Nov-18
Apr-19
May-19
Jun-17
Aug-17
Jun-18
Aug-18
Jun-19
Sep-16
Sep-17
Sep-18
Source: Bloomberg
Exhibit 14: From a peak in FY17, capacity additions are expected to taper meaningfully across the industry
Addition of beds
3,000
2,250
1,500
750
0
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20E FY21E
Source: Company, IDFC Securities Research
We believe the slowdown in new planned capacity additions will have a multi-pronged positive impact
on the financials of listed hospital universe, as it coincides with the progressive improvement in the
external regulatory environment. We expect strong improvement in profitability, combined with balance
sheet strengthening over next 2-3 years across the universe.
On the regulatory front, while risk of further government action on price controls over larger set of
consumables persists, this time around, hospitals are much better placed to handle any such proposed
move. Further, hospital financials have overcome demonetization and GST implementation issues. Based
on various management interactions, we see limited positive/negative impact of government’s
Ayushman Bharat Scheme in its current structure.
A slower pace of new hospital additions too will lower the profitability drag that typically accompanies
new hospital commissioning in the initial 2-3 years. In the past, losses from commissioning of some or
the other new units across hospital networks at regular intervals built the profitability pressure from this
cluster. Capacity addition slowdown will provide enhanced bandwidth to hospital networks to
accelerate scale-up of capacities added over last 3-4 years. Consequently, we expect losses from new
hospitals to reduce significantly/increase in profitability contribution from this cluster of hospitals across
groups. For instance, for Apollo, EBITDA contribution from new hospitals improved from losses of
Rs60m in FY17 to a gain of Rs822m in FY19, and we expect the same to improve to Rs1.33bn in FY21E. In
the case of NH, we envisage progressive reduction in start-up hospital losses from Rs703m in FY19 to
Rs500m in FY21E. We expect a similar trend in HCG, post FY21E, as the company has culminated its
ongoing expansion plans.
Strong focus on cost optimization across hospital networks will further reinforce this positive trajectory.
In particular, medical talent costs (potentially the biggest cost element for a tertiary care set-up) should
gradually rationalize. Slowdown in new hospital additions and growing intent among hospital networks
to prioritize network brand over star doctor brand in attracting patients too would aid this growth.
Given the multiple large-ticket transactions involving buyouts by large hospital operators in the NCR
region, we see this trend to play out fairly strong in this region.
Overall, we estimate EBITDA CAGR across hospital networks to improve strongly, though the trajectory
will vary across hospitals, based on ageing/profitability profile of their networks. With easing capex
spends, we expect FCF to improve, consequently enhancing return ratios. This should drive a re-rating
across stocks, whenever the consolidation is visible.
Foreign
Cash flow 33.1%
Year to 31 Mar (Rs
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20E FY21E
m)
Pre-tax profit 348 178 (224) (124) 61
Depreciation 568 715 851 996 1,095
Chg in Working
155 154 (302) (132) (22)
capital
Total tax paid (27) (136) 11 49 (25)
Net Interest 230 424 699 655 655 Promoters
Others 0 108 1,248 (1,248) 0 24.1%
Operating cash
1,275 1,443 2,284 196 1,764
flow
Capital expenditure (1,789) (2,402) (2,687) (1,300) (1,000)
Free cash flow Institutions
(514) (960) (403) (1,104) 764 25.1%
(a+b)
Chg in investments 522 (417) 41 0 0
Debt raised/(repaid) 491 519 1,302 1,000 1,000
Net interest (230) (424) (699) (655) (655)
As of Mar 19
Capital
6 12 10 0 0
raised/(repaid)
Dividend (incl. tax) 0 0 0 0 0
Other items (257) 629 1,211 (624) 0
Net chg in cash 266 (590) 545 (758) 1,109
Cash flow
Year to 31 Mar (Rs
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20E FY21E
m)
Pre-tax profit 1,366 798 934 1,357 1,868 Institutions
13.2%
Depreciation 799 1,000 1,374 1,483 1,602
Chg in Working
374 (241) 154 (707) (390)
capital Govt
Total tax paid (524) (290) (341) (357) (504) Holding
Net Interest 218 468 714 714 714 0.0%
Others (13) 5 449 (449) 0
Operating cash
2,220 1,740 3,283 2,041 3,290
flow
Capital expenditure (1,464) (8,482) (1,710) (1,500) (1,500)
Promoters
Free cash flow
756 (6,742) 1,573 541 1,790 63.9%
(a+b)
Chg in investments (89) 873 (86) 0 0
Debt raised/(repaid) (406) 6,068 121 0 0
Net interest (218) (468) (714) (714) (714)
As of Mar 19
Capital
0 0 0 0 0
raised/(repaid)
Dividend (incl. tax) 0 0 0 0 0
Other items 138 326 7 72 71
Net chg in cash 101 12 654 52 1,076
US Disclaimer:
This report is distributed in the US, by IDFC Securities (Parent of IDFC Capital (USA) Inc.) only to major U.S institutional investors (as defined in Rule
15a-6 under the U.S Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) pursuant to the exemption (a)(2) of the Rule and any transaction effected
by a U.S customer in the securities described in this report must be effected through IDFC USA as defined in the Rule.
Neither the report nor any analyst who prepared or approved the report is subject to U.S legal requirements or Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) or other regulatory requirements pertaining to research reports or research analysts.
This communication is produced by an analyst/strategist of IDFC Securities Ltd.
This material was produced by IDFC Securities solely for information purposes and for the use of the recipient, It is not to be reproduced under any
circumstances and is not be copied or made available to any person other that the recipient, it is distributed in the United States of America by IDFC
Securities under 15a-6(a)(2). And elsewhere in the world by IDFC Securities or any authorised associate of IDFC Securities.
13 | IDFC SECURITIES
For any assistance in access, please contact research@idfc.com
11 July 2019