Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Graphene Oxide (GO) - Based Wideband Optical Polarizer Using A Non-Adiabatic microfiber-JMO
Graphene Oxide (GO) - Based Wideband Optical Polarizer Using A Non-Adiabatic microfiber-JMO
Download by: [Ryerson University Library] Date: 12 October 2016, At: 02:25
Journal of Modern Optics, 2016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2016.1241903
2∫ L
1 dx
The inset of Figure 1 is a photo of the motorized fixed r(x) = r0 exp − (1)
translation stage in the fibre tapering process with the
torch. During the tapering process, these fibre holder
stages are adjusted using a motor controller board such where r0 is the radius of the fibre and L represents the
that the middle range of the clamped fibre remains per- length of the hot zone, which is the area of the microfibre
pendicular at a constant distance to the torch flame. The that is heated that has a distance of x. The value of L has a
torch flame was created from oxygen–butane mixture and linear relationship with x, and this is expressed as follows:
L(x) = L0 + ∝ x (2)
where L0 represents the initial length of the fibre’s hot
zone and ∝ is a constant that varies between –1 and +1.
By manipulating ∝, different tapered fibre shapes can be
realized such as reciprocal, decaying-exponential, linear
and concave curve. Hence, a convenient integral can be
formed as follows:
( )
2 ∫ L0 + ∝ x
1 dx
r(x) = r0 exp − (3)
( )−1∕2∝
∝x
r(x) = r0 1 + (4)
Figure 1. Experimental set-up for the fabrication process of L0
microfibre.
Journal of Modern Optics 3
3. Characterization of GO
The GO solution was prepared via an improved version of
Hummer’s method (24). Figure 3 shows the Raman shift
of the GO solution.
From Figure 3, it can be seen that the Raman spec-
trum exhibits three main characteristics peaks; the D peak
arising from the doubly resonant disorder-induced mode
(~1353 cm−1) due to the stretching of C–C bond; the G
peak, a doubly phonon mode occurring due to the first-or-
der scattering of the E2 g phonon of the sp2 C atoms at the Figure 5. (a) Top view of GO coating and (b) TM and TE polarization
Brillouin zone centre (~1605 cm−1) and the two-dimen- at 1550 nm using GO-based microfibre polarizer.
sional overtone peak (~2715 cm−1) (25). The GO sample
shows a prominent D peak, indicative of significant struc-
tural disorder due to the incorporation of O− ions and is Extra precaution was taken by ensuring the GO spot
related to the size of the in-plane sp2 domains (26). The was fully dried before surface mapping took place. This
increment of the D peak intensity indicates the formation was done to avoid the profiler from scratching out the GO
of more sp2 domains. Additionally, the D band is Raman- spot and damaging the microfibre sample. The insertion
active at the graphitic edge (26). loss and ER for the both TE- and TM-polarized modes
before and after GO coating on the microfibre was meas-
ured using the polarized OPM (27). The polarization state
4. Experimental set-up
of the guided light in the launch fibre was controlled using
The prepared GO solution was deposited on the microfi- a PC and the GO polarization state output was measured
bre-tapered region located on top of the glass slide. Using in free space using a Thorlabs PAX 5710 Polarimeter.
the drop-casting technique, 0.5 μl of GO solution contain- Figure 5(a) represents the top view of drop-cast GO
ing flakes was carefully dropped on the microfibre waist coating, which consists of three drops of GO. The waist
region using a micropipette. Figure 4 shows the set-up diameter of the fabricated microfibre was 5.65 μm and
used to measure the insertion loss of the microfibre with the GO coating was applied to the microfibre using the
the GO layer, with the input of the microfibre connected drop cast method. It was observed that the GO coating
to a TLS via polarization controller (PC) and the output was spread over the waist of the microfibre approximately
is connected to an OPM, which is used to measure the 12 mm long.
insertion loss of the fabricated microfibre. A Point Gray A wide wavelength of the between 1310 and 1600 nm
Fly Capture2 SDK camera by Edmund Optics was used was applied to examine the ER for all three cases (e.g. after
to measure the GO coating length. one drop of GO, two drops of GO and so on). The inser-
The tapered fibre immersed in GO (a drop of GO on the tion loss for TM- and TE-polarized mode was measured
glass slide) was left to dry at room temperature for 15 min. too. A change is detected in the ER and TM/TE polarizer
To obtain better interaction of GO with the tapered fibre, mode because of the additional GO drops in the tapered
two more drops were added in the same drop spot in the fibre. A 1550-nm signal was launched into the microfibre
waist region. Again, for each drop of GO, the deposited and the TM and TE mode output was detected as shown
region was let to dry for approximately 15 min. in Figure 5(b) and (c) correspondingly. The intensity of the
4 H. Ahmad et al.
TM polarization light is brighter than that of the TE polar- drops and becomes constant after the deposition of three
ization light. This indicates that the GO-based microfibre GO drops. The results were summarized in Figure 6(a).
polarizer works as a TM pass polarizer. Before deposition, an ER was recorded at 1310 with a
value of 1.76 dB. After the first drop of GO, an ER of
15.49 dB was recorded at 1600 nm, while after the second
5. Results and discussion
drop deposition, a higher ER was recorded at 1550 nm
In this experiment, it was observed that the insertion (20.53 dB) and 1600 nm (20.43 dB). The ER increased
loss for the TM mode increases with the number of GO further after the third drop of GO with measured values
of 32.83 and 35.74 dB at 1550 and 1600 nm. Extra care
(a) 40 is taken during the experiment as the linear polarization
35 0 Drop state is sensitive and could easily be affected by small
30 1 Drop movements to the fibres or even vibrations in the sur-
Extintion ratio (dB)
25
1600 lower than the penetration depth of the evanescent field.
20
Adding another drop of the GO solution now increases the
15 thickness of the GO coating, while a third drop increases
10 the thickness further. This increases the interaction of the
5 GO coating with the evanescent field, thus generating a
0 higher ER.
0 1 2 3 Figure 7 illustrates the cross-section view of the TM
Number of Drops and TE mode taken from the charge-coupled device cam-
era. The three-dimensional view of the light intensity for
Figure 6. The ER of GO drops with (a) three drops after 15-min TE and TM mode at 1550 nm is shown in Figure 8(a) and
interval (b) Three drops in the same spot from 1310 nm until (b) correspondingly.
1600 nm wavelength sources.
Figure 7. Cross-section view of the light high intensity (a) TM and low intensity (b) TE mode.
Journal of Modern Optics 5
Figure 8. 3D view of the polarizer intensity for (a) TM mode and (b) TE mode at 1550 nm wavelength.
Figure 9. Transmitted power for TM and TE mode at 1550 nm Disclosure statement
wavelength.
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
For the TM mode, the optical intensity obtained from
the measurement was −0.35 dB, while the total power Funding
and peak value was recorded at 52279374.00 and 3261.00
cnts, respectively. Subsequently, for the TE mode, the opti- This work was supported by the University of Malaya for the
research funding [grant number LRGS (2015) NGOD/UM/
cal intensity level obtained from the measurement was KPT], [grant number GA010-2014 (ULUNG)], [grant number
−32.48 dB with total power and peak values of 33126826.00 RU007/2015].
and 876.00 cnts, respectively. The insertion loss of the
device for the TM and TE modes was also measured.
Figure 9 shows the transmitted power for TM and TE mode References
at 1550 nm wavelength after putting different drops of GO. (1) Ashok, N.; Rastogi, V.; Kumar, A. Dual-core Leaky
The insertion loss for TM mode was measured as 0.61, Optical Waveguide as an Integrated-optic Polarizer. Opt.
5.11 and 2.2 dB for 1, 2 and 3 drops of GO, respectively. Commun. 2012, 285, 5094–5099.
(2) Bao, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wang, B.; Ni, Z.; Lim, C.H.Y.X.; Wang,
On the other hand, insertion losses of 14.12, 11.66 and
Y.; Tang, D.Y.; Loh, K.P. Broadband Graphene Polarizer.
13.8 dB were measured for the TE mode polarizer for 1, Nat. Photonics 2011, 5, 411–415.
2 and 3 drops of GO, respectively. (3) Ashok, N.; Rastogi, V. Dual-core Leaky Waveguide-Based
Filters for Erbium-doped Waveguide Amplifier. Fiber
Integr. Opt. 2013, 32, 242–250.
6. Conclusion (4) Boltasseva, A.; Nikolajsen, T.; Leosson, K.; Kjaer, K.;
Larsen, M.S.; Bozhevolnyi, S.I. Integrated Optical
A GO-based polarizer using a non-adiabatic microfi- Components Utilizing Long-range Surface Plasmon
bre is proposed and demonstrated. The polarizer was Polaritons. J. Lightwave Technol. 2005, 23, 413–422.
formed by depositing layers of GO on a tapered fibre (5) Lim, W.H.; Yap, Y.K.; Chong, W.Y.; Pua, C.H.; Huang,
using the drop-casting method. The ER was recorded in N.M.; De La Rue, R.M.; Ahmad, H. Graphene
6 H. Ahmad et al.
Oxide-based Waveguide Polariser: From Thin Film to (17) Bao, Q.L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, B.; Ni, Z.H.; Lim, C.H.Y.X.;
Quasi-bulk. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 11090–11098. Wang, Y.; et al. Broadband Graphene Polarizer. Nat.
(6) Chen, C.H.; Wang, L.K. Design of Finite-length Metal- Photonics 2011, 5, 411–415.
clad Optical Waveguide Polarizer. IEEE J. Quantum (18) Pei, C.Y.; Yang, L.Z.; Wang, G.C.; Wang, Y.H.; Jiang,
Electron. 1998, 34, 1089–1097. X.Q.; Hao, Y.L.; et al. Broadband Graphene/Glass Hybrid
(7) Nakano, T.; Baba, K.; Miyagi, M. Insertion Loss and Waveguide Polarizer. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2015,
Extinction Ratio of a Surface Plasmon-Polariton Polarizer – 27, 927–930.
Theoretical-analysis. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B-Opt. Phys. 1994, (19) Zhou, X.T.; Zhang, T.; Chen, L.; Hong, W.; Li, X. A
11, 2030–2035. Graphene-based Hybrid Plasmonic Waveguide with
(8) Ma, Y.Q.; Farrell, G.; Semenova, Y.; Li, B.H.; Yuan, J.H.; Ultra-deep Subwavelength Confinement. J. Lightwave
Sang, X.Z.; Binbin Yanc, B.B.; Yuc, C.; Guod, T.; Wub, Q. Technol. 2014, 32, 4199–4203.
Optical Microfiber-loaded Surface Plasmonic TE-pass (20) Kim, J.T.; Choi, C.G. Graphene-based Polymer Waveguide
Polarizer. Opt. Laser Technol. 2016, 78, 101–105. Polarizer. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 3556–3562.
(9) Twu, R.C.; Huang, C.C.; Wang, W.S. TE-pass Zn-diffused (21) Liaros, N.; Aloukos, P.; Kolokithas-Ntoukas, A.;
Linbo(3) Waveguide Polarizer. Microwave Opt. Technol. Bakandritsos, A.; Szabo, T.; Zboril, R.; et al. Nonlinear
Lett. 2006, 48, 2312–2314. Optical Properties and Broadband Optical Power
(10) Saitoh, E.; Yuki, K.; Saitoh, K.; Koshiba, M. Compact Limiting Action of Graphene Oxide Colloids. J. Phys.
TE/TM-pass Polarizer Based on Lithium Niobate on Chem. C 2013, 117, 6842–6850.
Insulator Ridge Waveguide. IEEE Photonics Journal, (22) Cordeiro, C.M.B.; Wadsworth, W.J.; Birks, T.A.; Russell,
2013, 5, 634–635. P.S.J. Engineering the Dispersion of Tapered Fibers for
(11) Morand, A.; Sanchez-Perez, C.; Benech, P.; Tedjini, S.; Supercontinuum Generation with a 1064 Nm Pump
Bosc, D. Integrated Optical Waveguide Polarizer on Glass Laser. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 1980–1982.
with a Birefringent Polymer Overlay. IEEE Photonics (23) Ahmad, H.; Rahman, M.; Sakeh, S.; Razak, M.; Zulkifli,
Technol. Lett. 1998, 10, 1599–1601. M. Humidity Sensor Based on Microfiber Resonator with
(12) Watanabe, O.; Tsuchimori, M.; Okada, A.; Ito, H. Mode Reduced Graphene Oxide. Optik-Int. J. Light Electron
Selective Polymer Channel Waveguide Defined by the Opt. 2016, 127, 3158–3161.
Photoinduced Change in Birefringence. Appl. Phys. Lett. (24) Huang, N.M.; Lim, H.N.; Chia, C.H.; Yarmo, M.A.;
1997, 71, 750–752. Muhamad, M.R. Simple Room-temperature Preparation
(13) Chiang, K.S.; Chow, C.K.; Chan, H.P.; Liu, Q.; Lor, K.P. of High-yield Large-area Graphene Oxide. Int. J.
Widely Tunable Polymer Long-period Waveguide Grating Nanomed. 2011, 6, 3443–3448.
with Polarisation-insensitive Resonance Wavelength. (25) Pimenta, M.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M.S.;
Electron. Lett. 2004, 40, 422–424. Cançado, L.; Jorio, A.; Saito, R. Studying Disorder in
(14) Chiang, K.S.; Chow, C.K.; Liu, Q.; Chan, H.P.; Lor, K.P. Graphite-based Systems by Raman Spectroscopy. Phys.
Band-rejection Filter with Widely Tunable Center Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 1276–1290.
Wavelength and Contrast Using Metal Long-period (26) Calizo, I.; Balandin, A.; Bao, W.; Miao, F.; Lau, C.
Grating on Polymer Waveguide. IEEE Photonics Technol. Temperature Dependence of the Raman Spectra of
Lett. 2006, 18, 1109–1111. Graphene and Graphene Multilayers. Nano Lett. 2007, 7,
(15) Avouris, P.; Freitag, M. Graphene Photonics, Plasmonics, 2645–2649.
and Optoelectronics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. (27) Sathiyan, S.; Ahmad, H.; Chong, W.; Lee, S.; Sivabalan,
2014, 20. S. Evolution of the Polarizing Effect of. IEEE Photonics J.
(16) Bonaccorso, F.; Sun, Z.; Hasan, T.; Ferrari, A.C. Graphene 2015, 7, 1–10.
Photonics and Optoelectronics. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4,
611–622.