Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Joint and by Product
Joint and by Product
I. Definition of terms
Joint Products Defined- are individual products, each with significant sales values, which are
produced simultaneously from the same raw and/or manufacturing process.
Joint products are two or more products produced together up to a split-off point where they
become separately identifiable. They cannot be produced by themselves.
Joint products incur common, or joint costs, (direct materials, direct labor and applied factory
overhead) before the split-off point. The split-off point is the point of production at which the
joint products can be individually identified and removed from the joint, or common process.
The joint products can then be sold or processed further. Costs incurred after the split-off point
for any one of the joint products are called separable costs or further processing costs. These costs
are already identified to each joint product.
By-product – a product of relatively small total value produced simultaneously with other
products.
Split-off point – the earliest point wherein joint products become separable individual units
Joint cost – costs that arises from the simultaneous manufacturing of products in a joint process
V. Characteristics of By-product
a. The product is not the primary objective of the manufacturing operations.
b. Sales value of the by-product is comparatively low as compared with the sales value of the
main product.
In a nutshell Notes:
Treatment of By-product
1. Upon Sale/Realization - other income (NRV of by-product, Immaterial)
2. Upon Production (Inventoriable)
2.1. NRV Method = Joint Cost - (Est. Selling Price - Further Processing Cost -Cost of Disposal)
*It serves as a deduction & may also be deducted from the Further Processing Cost where that
by-product came from
2.2. Reversal Method
>Operating Income = Sales Value of Production - All Expenses
>Joint Cost = Manufacturing Cost - Further Processing Cost
1. Physical Measure
a. Physical
b. Units produced
c. Weighted ave of units produced
2. Monetary
a. Sales value @ split-off aka Relative Market Value method
(# of units produced x SP/unit @ split-off)
b. NRV @ split-off (used if problem is SILENT)
(Sales value @ split-off - Cost of disposal)
c. Approximated/Estimated NRV (Adjusted Market Value)
(Final Sales Value - Further Processing Cost - Cosst of Disposal)
*also used in computing /assessing CORRECT production process
1. The allocation of joint costs to individual products is useful primarily for purposes of:
a.determining whether to produce one of the joint products
b.inventory costing
c.determining the best market price
d.deciding whether to sell at the split-off point
e.evaluating whether an output is a main product or a by-product
2. The method used for the allocation of joint costs to products is important:
a.only in the minds of accountants
b.because profits will be affected when ending inventories change from the beginning of the period
c.because its validity for justifying prices before regulatory authorities is unquestioned
d.because profit margins differ when the relative sales value method is used
e.for income determination when inventories are nonexistent
4. If a company obtains two salable products from the refining of one ore, the refining process should be
accounted for as a(n)
a. mixed cost process.
b. joint process.
c. extractive process.
d. reduction process.
By-products Scrap
a. yes yes
b. yes no
c. no no
d. no yes
9. Which of the following components of production are allocable as joint costs when a single
manufacturing process produces several salable products?
a. direct material, direct labor, and overhead
b. direct material and direct labor only
c. direct labor and overhead only
d. overhead and direct material only
11. Joint costs are most frequently allocated based upon relative
a. profitability.
b. conversion costs.
c. prime costs.
d. sales value.
12. When allocating joint process cost based on tons of output, all products will
a. be salable at split-off.
b. have the same joint cost per ton.
c. have a sales value greater than their costs.
d. have no disposal costs at the split-off point.
13. If two or more products share a common process before they are separated, the joint costs should be
assigned in a manner that
a. assigns a proportionate amount of the total cost to each product on a quantitative basis.
b. maximizes total earnings.
c. minimizes variations in unit production costs.
d. does not introduce an element of estimation into the process of accumulating costs for
each product.
Marjorie produces two products from a joint process: X and Z. Joint processing costs for this production
cycle are P8,000.
Disposal
Sales price cost per Further Final sale
per yard at yard at processing price per
Yards split-off split-off per yard yard
X 1,500 P6.00 P3.50 P1.00 P 7.50
Z 2,200 9.00 5.00 3.00 11.25
If X and Z are processed further, no disposal costs will be incurred or such costs will be borne by the
buyer.
1. Using a physical measure, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to X (round to the nearest
peso)?
a. P4,000 c. P5,500
b. P4,757 d. P3,243
2. Using a physical measure, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to Z (round to the nearest
peso)?
a. P4,000 c. P5,500
b. P3,243 d. P4,757
3. Using sales value at split-off, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to X (round to the
nearest peso)?
a. P5,500 c. P4,000
b. P2,500 d. P3,243
4. Using sales value at split-off, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to Z (round to the
nearest peso)?
a. P5,500 c. P2,500
b. P4,000 d. P4,757
5. Using net realizable value at split-off, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to X (round to
the nearest peso)?
a. P4,000 c. P2,390
b. P5,610 d. P5,500
6. Using net realizable value at split-off, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to Z (round to
the nearest peso)?
a. P5,500 c. P2,390
b. P4,000 d. P5,610
7. Using approximated net realizable value at split-off, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated
to X (round to the nearest peso)?
a. P3,090 c. P4,000
b. P5,204 d. P2,390
8. Using approximated net realizable value at split-off, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated
to Z (round to the nearest peso)?
a. P2,796 c. P4,000
b. P4,910 d. P2,390
9. Which products would be processed further?
a. Only X c. Both X and Z
b. Only Z d. Neither X nor Z
Disposal
Sales price cost per Further Final
per lb. at lb. at processing sales price
Pounds split-off split-off per pound per pound
A 800 P6.50 P3.00 P2.00 P 7.50
B 1,100 8.25 4.20 3.00 10.00
C 1,500 8.00 4.00 3.50 10.50
If the products are processed further, Aristea Company will incur the following disposal costs upon
sale: A, P3.00; B, P2.00; and C, P1.00.
10. Using a physical measurement method, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to Product
A (round to the nearest peso)?
a. P700 c. P927
b. P679 d. P494
11. Using a physical measurement method, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to Product B
(round to the nearest peso)?
a. P494 c. P927
b. P679 d. P700
12. Using sales value at split-off, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to Product B (round
to the nearest peso)?
a. P700 c. P725
b. P416 d. P959
13. Using sales value at split-off, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to Product C (round to
the nearest peso)?
a. P959 c. P700
b. P725 d. P416
14. Using net realizable value at split-off, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to Product A
(round to the nearest peso)?
a. P706 c. P700
b. P951 d. P444
15. Using net realizable value at split-off, what amount of joint processing cost is allocated to Product C
(round to the nearest peso)?
a. P706 c. P444
b. P951 d. P700