Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SLP 3 LED402 Maldonado
SLP 3 LED402 Maldonado
Maldonado, Edwin
Introduction
Leadership development needs intervention in order to manage and assist the leaders and
organizational members in the process of carrying out transformation in the organization. The
focus of the intervention is to improve the necessary capabilities and understanding in order to
guarantee positive results. It will also allow the leadership to improve its competence to lead and
direct the organization. Furthermore, the intervention during the leadership development is also
necessary to ensure that the leadership will have the capability to fulfill its roles and
responsibilities during the commencement of the program. The collection and relaying of
insights and feedback will be instrumental in ensuring the positive results of the development
approach through the 360-Degree Feedback since the necessary changes to be made and how to
Cases
The leadership development in the first scenario failed since the method introduced for
the 360-Degree Feedback was unable to comply with the standards. The leaders did not make
any planning and preparations in making a feedback survey. For this reason, the feedback
gathered cannot be relied upon in order to make the leadership development accurate and
successful. According to Taylor et al. (2018), the method to be utilized should comply with the
standards of the instrument set by the model so that the purpose of the intervention will be
achieved. In order to have accuracy in the answers of the participants, the questions to be
included must be aligned with the skills, position and knowledge of the leaders. The success of
the intervention will rely upon the accuracy of the results of the survey based from the answers
of the participants.
In the second case, the leadership development also failed. There are inaccuracies in the
results since the participants of the survey became dishonest in answering the questions due to
the fear that their answers can be used against them. According to Lepsinger (2008), the 360-
degree feedback and leadership development will fail if the participants will not be honest in
answering the survey questions given to them. Since the survey questions were not answered
properly and there are inaccuracies in the results, the leadership development will not be able to
determine the actions that must be taken in order to improve the leadership. Furthermore, the
actual weak and strong points of the leadership cannot be determined if there will be inaccuracies
in the results which will be the basis of the leadership development approach that must be taken
by the management.
Even if an organization will purchase a 360-degree feedback from a third party, errors
can still occur. In the last case, the company would like to improve the leadership by enhancing
their skills. However, the company purchased an instrument intended for the teamwork and
communication qualities of the supervisors. Since the instrument is not aligned with the goal and
purpose of the leadership development initiative, it failed. For this reason, it is important that the
instrument to be used will be aligned with the needs and objective of the organization in order to
prevent the occurrence of errors and inaccuracies. Basically, it is necessary that the question on
the instrument will be anchored with answering the actual needs and objectives of the
Conclusion
intervention tool. However, organizations must be wary of the standards that must be followed in
order to ensure its success. Furthermore, it is also important that there will be accurate answers
that will be used as data or information in evaluating the areas of leadership that must be
enhanced. The instrument to be used must also be appropriate and suitable with the needs and
References:
Lepsinger, Richard & Lucia, Anntoinette D.. ( © 2009). The art and science of 360
https://www.selfstir.com/member/survey/userTraits/create/s/9990
Taylor, S., Chappelow, C., & Fleenor, J. (2008). Leveraging the Impact of 360-Degree