Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finite Element Modelling of Unbounded Post-Tensioned Tendons
Finite Element Modelling of Unbounded Post-Tensioned Tendons
net/publication/301521125
CITATIONS READS
0 24
1 author:
Calin Mircea
Universitatea Tehnica Cluj-Napoca
23 PUBLICATIONS 18 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Calin Mircea on 20 April 2016.
SUMMARY
The paper deals with FE modelling of unbounded post-tensioned cables. In order to avoid the
use of linkage elements that comprise the slipping properties of the tendon-duct contact,
iterative procedures are possible to be performed.
After a brief presentation of the numerical options to be considered in the optional structural
analyses, an iterative procedure based on the “linear strain criterion” has been developed to
simulate the behavior of unbounded tendons in post-tensioned concrete structures. The
combined effect of slip and friction is mathematically modeled to each loading step, the
effects being included in the residual properties of the finite element. The procedure allows
the complete account of the loading path. Finally, comparisons are made with test data of two
spatial concrete structures post-tensioned by external cable networks.
INTRODUCTION
Generally, isoparametric line elements based on the “constant strain criterion” are appropriate
to model reinforcement. The intimate contact between steel bars and concrete is described by
bond-slip linkage elements [1]. In the case of unbounded tendons, as it will be shown later,
linkage elements are not strictly necessary. In non-linear FE analyses, the combined effect of
slip and friction may be mathematically modeled to each loading step, the effects being
included in the residual properties of the finite element.
x
Figure 1. Stress variation in tendons considering different strain criterions
At tensioning, stress variation in tendons follows an exponential rule. On short lengths, the
variation can be considered linear. Shape functions based on the “constant strain criterion” do
not lead to accurate estimations of the exponential variation. As figure 1 reveals, without
linkage elements (i.e. spring elements), the concept determines large deviations from the
stress variation that governs the behavior of unbounded cables. However, it can be
successfully applied in simplified approaches of external prestressing and linear analyses of
straight post-tensioned cables. Simplified procedures may be also used to simulate with
enough accuracy the behavior of all unbounded cables, even if the scientifically approach it is
not very well argued. As the same figure shows, the ”linear strain criterion” is more
appropriate to describe the phenomenon. Below, a numerical procedure is presented as an
extent of the iterative procedure given by Virlogeux [2] for external prestressing.
“Linear strain criterion” leads to compatible stresses and strains in the nodal points. This
continuity does not exclude the lack of stress equilibrium related to the friction properties
between strand and duct (figure 2). The following notation will be used for the friction
properties on the current cable segment (i,i+1):
si,i +1
A i,i +1 = k i,i +1si,i +1 + µi,i +1 (1)
R i,i +1
where ki,i+1 is the linear friction factor and µ i,i+1 is the friction factor in bent portions. Theirs
value may be considered constant on the length between two consecutive nodal points. At the
current loading step, the slip will not be initiated between the nodal points (i) and (i+1) if:
σi e i,i+1 ≤ σi,i +1 ≥ σi e i,i+1
-A +A
(2)
If this condition is satisfied, the duct deformation is compatible with the cable elongation and
the slip is obstructed by friction.
The slip always takes place on the direction of the stress decreasing. Next, an indicator that
shows the direction of the slip will be defined as follows:
Ri,i+1 Ri,i+1
δσi
δσi+1
δσi
δσi+1
+ (k i,i +1s i,i +1 + µ i,i +1 s i,i +1 R i,i +1 ) - (k i,i+1s i,i+1 +µ i,i+1 s i,i +1 R i,i +1 )
σ i +1 = σ i e σ i +1 = σ i e
a. νi,+1= -1 b. νi,i+1= +1
σi+1
σx σ i +1 + δσi +1
σi σσi+1
i +1
σ x
σi
σ i - δσi δWdi+1, x
εi+1
sx,i+1
δW i, x
d
si,x εx
εi
a. νi,i+1= -1
σi+1
σx σi+1
σi σi+1-δ σi+1
σi + 1
σ x
σi + δσi
σi δWdi+1, x
εi+1
sx,i+1
δW i, x
d
si,x εx
εi
b. νi,i+1= +1
µ s i , x δσ i+1
1 1
+ ν i,i+1 A s k i,i+1 + i,i+1 σ i+1 - ν i,i+1 δσ i+1 + σ i + (σ i+1 - σ i ) (s i,i +1 - s i ,x )
8 R i,i+1 2 s i,i +1 E i+1
The right side of the third equation (7.c) of the above system, which represents the work done
by the friction forces, can be reduced to an inferior order by neglecting the insignificant terms.
However, only one solution of the above equation system has significance to the problem.
As figure 4 shows, the lack of equilibrium is transferred to the adjacent segments (i-1,i) and
(i+1,i+2), respectively. A new slip will be possible in these segments if the new nodal forces
do not satisfy the equilibrium relation (2). At each incremental load, analyses of stress
equilibrium should be made between the nodal points. The stress correction should start where
the lack of equilibrium is larger. Iterations should follow the same rules, prior to convergence.
Because load increments are small, the stress continuity will be performed considering null
friction factors if at the same iteration stage the slip changes its direction on the same
segment. As figure 5 put into evidence, if the direction of the slip changes from one load
increment to another, the values of the friction factors should be increased in correlation with
the work done by friction forces on that cable segment.
For low values of the friction factors, the eventual correction of the Young's modulus may be
done after the slip's analysis. For high values of friction factors, the instant character of the
slip may lead to plastic strains in the cable and the correction should be made after the
iterative procedure. Afterwards, residuals of the line elements are computed.
Ri,i+1 Ri,i+1
i+1 i+2 i+1 i+2
i-1 i si,i+1 i-1 i si,i+1
sx sx
δσi δσi+1
σ δσi+1 σ δσi
⇓ ⇓
σ σ
δσi+1 δσi+2 δσi
⇓ δσi-1 ⇓
a. νi,i+1= +1 b. νi,i+1= -1
Figure 4. Redistribution of the stress unbalance to adjacent segments
a. νi,i+1= -1 b. νi,i+1= +1
Figure 5. Increased friction factors at the change of the slip direction
Sub-parametric two nodded line elements were used in structural analyses of two models
tested by Technical University of Cluj-Napoca and INCERC [3]. Lagrange polynomials were
considered as interpolation functions, whereas mapping was ensured by usual first order
polynomials. The first model (figure 6.a) concerned a square ribbed plate achieved at 1:10
scale, bidirectionally outside prestressed, which was loaded until its collapse. The second
model (figure 6.b) represented a translation cupola made at 1:20 scale of precast elements,
also outside prestressed by cables (wires), bidirectionally placed on an afinitive surface.
Figures 7 and 8 show comparative results and theoretic data obtained in the two studied cases.
Wd (Erg)
(MPa)
1,000 50,000
750 θ=7.91°
500
p
∆Wd (Erg)
1,250 50,000
1,000 θ=13.7°
750 Theory
p
a. stress variation in the central segments of b. energy losses in the deflected elements
the median tendon of the median tendon
Figure 8. Results from test and analysis of the prefabricated cupola
FINAL REMARKS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors wish to express theirs gratitude to Professor Mircea Mihailescu from Technical
University of Cluj-Napoca for his guidance.
REFERENCES
[1] Kotsovos, M.D, Pavlović, M.N. -Structural Concrete: FE Analysis for Limit-State Design-
, Thomas Telford Publications, 1995, p. 185-191.
[2] Virlogeux, M. -Analyse non-linéaire des structures a précontrainte extérieure-, XIe
Congres de la FIP, Hambourg 1990.
[3] Mircea, C.G.R -Long Span Prestressed Concrete Roof Systems-, Technical University of
Cluj-Napoca, 1997, PhD Thesis, p. 193-208.