Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Repealed by RA 9344) : Article 68
(Repealed by RA 9344) : Article 68
Article 69
Article 70
Supposing, you are a judge, can you impose the sentence of 500 counts of malversation, which is each punishable by 15 yrs. of
imprisonment, without violating Article 70? YES, because the 3-fold rule does not refer to the imposition of sentence but refers
to the service to the penalty; the courts can sentence no matter what and no matter how much
The 3-fold rule is the concern of the Director of Prisons, NOT of the courts
If the sum total of all the penalties does not exceed the most severe multiplied by 3, the 3-fold rule does not apply
Duration of convicts’ sentence refers to several penalties for different offenses not yet served out = has to serve continuous
imprisonment
Article 71-77
Example:
Supposing, accidentally you met your neighbor along the road, he challenged you to a fight and you accepted the challenge, there
was a physical fight, then you inflicted a mortal wound that caused his death in the hospital, you were charged with homicide,
because there were no qualifying circumstances, and since there was no mitigating and aggravating you should be sentenced to
a medium period of reclusion temporal (for homicide)
- To get Minimum term, immediately get the penalty next to Reclusion temporal, lower by 1 degree = Prision mayor – anywhere
within Prision mayor, the court can decide what period, regardless of attending circumstances
- The Maximum term, considering the absence of attending circumstances, is Reclusion Temporal medium period
- The sentence now using the ISLAW is Prision mayor in any period as the Minimum term, up to Reclusion temporal medium period
as the Maximum term
If the convict reaches the Minimum term, he shall eligible for parole; terms and conditions can be imposed by the BPP
Note from Prof. Amurao: It pays to be in good terms with the judge and his wife or his number 2 so you can get a low Minimum
term if not the lowest
Objectives/Purpose
1. Promote correction and rehabilitation
2. Opportunity for reformation
3. Prevent commission of offenses
Duration
- not exceeding 6 years and not disqualified
- the accused may file an application for probation with the court
- the court will order an investigation through the probation officer, all the aspects of the life of the convict
- probation officer submits findings and recommendation
- after submission, court may deny or approve recommendation and admit the accused to probation
- Court may impose duration based on: - rehabilitation
- reformation
- reintegration
Duration of the Probation Period
1. sentence not more than 1 year = probation is less than 2 years
2. sentence more than 1 year = probation is less than 6 years
3. sentence is fine with subsidiary imprisonment = probation is twice the days of subsidiary imprisonment
Supposing, convict filed a notice of appeal, later changed his mind, withdrew his appeal then filed an application for probation,
can he do that? NO, once you file for an appeal, you waive your right to file for an application for probation, and vice-versa if you
first file for an application then later on decide to withdraw it.
Supposing, a judgment of conviction was made, thus not entitled to probation, so accused filed an appeal in the CA where his
sentence was lowered, qualifying him for probation, can he apply for probation now?
CA says – YES, there can’t be any waiver of right because he was not entitled to file an application for probation = there’s nothing
to waive
SC says – NO, because he already appealed, though with strong dissenting
opinions about it (The SC is supreme, but it is not always right)
Beyond the 15-day reglamentary period, you can’t file an application for probation, except in RA 9344, a child in conflict with the
law can file an application for probation anytime
ARTICLES 81-85 – PROCEDURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE EXECUTION OF DEATH PENALTY (reading matter)
ARTICLE 87 – DESTIERRO
- prohibition in a certain place or places designated in the conviction
- not permitted to enter the place or places nor within the radius specified not more than 250, but not less than 25 kilometers from
the place
The prescriptive period shall commence to run from the discovery of the crime and shall be interrupted only by filing a complaint
or information in court
Commences to run again when such proceedings terminate without the accused being convicted or acquitted
The prescriptive period shall not run when the offender is absent from the Philippines
Supposing, in 1980 the accused commits a crime, then goes into hiding, he resurfaces 20 years later, then the government finds a
witness, can they institute a case? NO, but if the accused left for the US, YES he can be prosecuted still
The mere filing of a complaint with the following does not interrupt the prescriptive period:
- Chief of Police - Office of the NBI
- Office of the Provincial Director of the PNP
because these do not constitute the court; they are not part of the judiciary, not part of the courts of justice
But filing with: Office of the Public Prosecutor or Office of the Ombudsman, may interrupt the prescriptive period
The prescriptive period shall commence upon evasion of the service of sentence of the convict and shall be interrupted by the
following:
1. if offender gives himself up
2. if he is captured
3. goes to a foreign country with which we have no extradition treaty
4. commits another crime before expiration of the period of prescription