Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment 2 EMM209
Assessment 2 EMM209
Assessment 2 EMM209
This investigative lesson requires students to select appropriate problem Students should use mental strategies to recall multiplication facts up to 10 x 10
-solving strategies and apply existing knowledge and understanding of Students should be able to complete multiplication and addition problems using
mathematical concepts to solve a problem involving geometry. The appropriate mental and written strategies.
investigation will build on students’ knowledge of factors, multiples and Students should use technology to investigate mathematical concepts and check
number patterns and explore real-world situations where these concepts can their solutions
be applied helping ‘students recognise the interconnected nature of Students should use appropriate terminology to describe and link mathematical
mathematical knowledge, other learning areas and the wider world, and idea and give valid reasons for possible solutions.
encourage them to use their mathematical skills broadly’ (ACARA, 2019).
Throughout the lesson students will be explicitly engage with mathematical Students should have a clear understanding of the distinction between
terminology and use it to describe and justify their solutions. Mental- perimeter and area.
computational strategies are and information and communication technology
(ICT) is developed to assist students in the investigation process. Cooperative Students should recognise the need for the square centimetre as a formal unit to
and collaborative learning strategies including think-pair-share and mixed measure area
ability pairs engage students and allow them to negotiate shared meaning
and construct their own meaningful understanding of new or challenging Understanding from Stage 2 that an area of one square metre need not be a
concepts (Ebrahim, 2011). square. It could, for example, be a rectangle two metres long and half a metre
wide.
Students should have an understanding that a factor is a number multiplied by
another number to give a product
Syllabus strand/sub strand
Number / Algebra - Addition and Subtraction, Multiplication and Division
1
EMM209
Measurement and Geometry - Length and Area
Working Mathematically – Communicating, Problem solving, Reasoning
EMM209
Land links E
Tuning In Interactive
T. Before we build the garden bed, I need your help to find white board
out what the dimensions and area might be for us to plant in. (IWB)
Display the problem on the IWB and read it aloud L.
EMM209
problem. Prompt students using questions such as; contribution in
- Where would you start? think-pair-share.
- What materials might help you to find the solutions?
- How will you systematically record the solutions? Pairs QR code -
- How will the prove that you have found all possible Appendix 1
solutions? Whole class Padlet
I-Pad’s
T. Display the QR code (Appendix 1) on the IWB
Ss. In pairs discuss their ideas and then use i-pad’s to scan the IWB
QR code and join the class Padlet. Students share and record
their ideas in response to these questions L & R.
EMM209
start, if students get stuck remind them to work mixed ability
rectangles that have systematically. Students are not expected to find all solutions pairs and role Mixed ability
the same dimensions at this stage, they should be developing their own problem- cards pairs Role cards
solving strategies. Formative -Appendix 3
Record calculations 15 – 8 Ways Assessment Learning
used to find the 20 T. After 10 minutes of students working individually, assign Pedagogy Observations. journals
perimeters of two- mins students into mixed ability pairs with a role card each; Symbols and Are students self- Grid paper
dimensional shapes designer and recorder (Appendix 3) images assessing? Are Colour pencils
Ss Collect materials to manipulate and construct their solutions being Geoboards
solutions suggested materials including grid paper, colour recorded Elastic bands
pencils, geoboards and elastic bands or i-pads with a systematically? I-Pads
Connect factors of a Geoboard app P. Students work through the questions taking Are students Geoboard app
number with the turns in both roles. Students record solutions systematically using 10x10
whole-number on grid paper or in their learning journal S & As. mathematically multiplication
dimensions of T. Encourage students to estimate, notice patterns and see language? square
different rectangles that the dimensions are factors of the area. Make sure
with the same area 5 students self-check to ensure they have found all solutions. Formative
mins Students struggling to identify the factors may be provided Whole class Assessment
Questioning
Gives a valid reason for with a 10 x 10 multiplication square. Observations.
Open ended
supporting one Are students
questions
possible solution over Step 2 Sorting Out sharing ideas?
another T. Bring attention back to the centre to discuss the Are students
investigations. Ask students questions such as; R thinking
Use efficient mental - What solutions did you find? mathematically?
and written strategies - How did you find the solutions?
and apply appropriate - How did you record your solutions?
digital technologies to - Did you find all of the solutions? If so, how do you Formative
solve problems know that you found all the solutions? Assessment
involving addition and - Did you notice any patterns? Individuals or Observations and Learning
subtraction with whole 10 - What did you notice about the perimeter and area? pairs review of journals
numbers mins - Can you describe the relationship between the learning journals. Grid paper
dimensions of the rectangle and its area? Can students Colour pencils
Use efficient mental apply their Geoboards
and written strategies Step 3 Going Further knowledge to Elastic bands
and apply appropriate T. Further challenge students with the following extended more complex I-Pads
digital technologies to questions A, a calculator may be provided for multiplying problems? Geoboard app
solve problems decimals: Calculator
5
EMM209
involving 1. If we had another 2 metres of timber (22 metres in
multiplication and total), what dimensions would give us the largest
division with whole garden bed?
numbers *Hint - The timber can be cut into half metres but no
smaller
2. What if we wanted to build two square garden beds
with the same timber (having a combined perimeter
of 22 metres). What might the dimensions be? Does
two garden beds give more or less area than if we
only have one garden bed? S.
3. If we had 120 metres of timber perimeter and all four Appendix 4 –
sides were the same length, what would the area be? Going Further
Solve problems S. Solutions
involving division by a 4. A garden bed has an area 54 square metres. If its
one-digit number 10 length is 9 metres, then what is the width? How much Whole class
mins timber would we need for the perimeter? Class discussion
(Appendix 4 – Going Further Solutions) Formative
8 Ways Assessment
(Step 4 Making Connections) Pedagogy Observations.
Identify and describe In the last two extension questions students are required to Symbols and Can students
factors and multiples apply their knowledge of the formula and operations to find images apply their
of whole numbers and the solution. Not all students will be immediately able to knowledge to the
use them to solve apply inverse thinking that will allow them to find out; for Direct inverse
problems example, that Length = perimeter – width – width ÷ 2 or that instruction problems? Appendix 5
the area of a rectangle ÷ width = length. Scaffolding
T. Make explicit through class discussion the connection inverse thinking
between inverse operations and the formulae used for finding using enabling
Gives a valid reason for perimeter and area. Use Appendix 5 to visually support prompts
supporting one prompting questions such as: P, A & As.
possible solution over 1. How would I find the width if I know the perimeter
another and the length of a rectangle?
2. How would I find the length of I know the perimeter
and the width of a rectangle?
3. I know the area and the width of a rectangle, how
would I find the length? Individual
4. I know the area and the length of a rectangle, how
would I find the width?
6
EMM209
Formative
5– Ss. In their learning journal, record using words the method Individual Assessment
10 for finding the perimeter, areas and unknown dimensions of Inquiry Can students
mins rectangles. A. approach apply their
Students knowledge to
(Step 5 Taking Action/Application) develop their create a
T. Instruct students to come up with their own question to own inquiry mathematically
challenge a peer A. questions correct problem?
Ss. Come up with their own question, check it is correct and
record their answers and justification of the mathematics
before giving it to another student to attempt. A & As.
EMM209
What concepts do students’ feel need to be developed further? How can these areas be supported in future lesson?
Did the assessment provide a clear representation of the knowledge and understanding of the student?
8 Aboriginal ways of learning Quality Teaching/Quality Learning Framework
Reference:
https://www.8ways.online/ Intellectual Quality Quality Learning Environment Significance
Deep knowledge Explicit quality criteria Background knowledge
Deep understanding Engagement Cultural knowledge
Problematic knowledge High expectations Knowledge integration
Higher-order thinking Social support Inclusivity
Metalanguage Students’ self-regulation Connectedness
Substantiative communication Student direction Narrative
EMM209
Appendix 1 – Padlet QR Code
EMM209
Appendix 2 – Solutions
1. What are the possible whole number dimensions of the garden bed?
1 m by 9 m
2 m by 8 m
3 m by 7 m
4 m by 6 m
5 m by 5 m
2. How can you check that your answers are correct? Show your working for each answer.
The perimeter is equal to the sum of the dimension (sides) of the garden bed.
1 + 9 + 1 + 9 = 20
2 + 8 + 2 + 8 = 20
3 + 7 + 3 + 7 = 20
4 + 6 + 4 + 6 = 20
5 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 20
Or, self-check by taking each side away from the total perimeter which should give an answer of zero.
20 - 1 - 9 - 1 - 9 = 0
20 - 2 - 8 - 2 - 8 = 0
20 - 3 - 7 - 3 - 7 = 0
20 - 4 - 6 - 4 - 6 = 0
20 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 = 0
10
EMM209
Perimeter Minus Side 1 Minus Side 2 Minus Side 3 Minus Side 4 Equals
20 - 1 - 9 - 1 - 9 = 0
20 - 2 - 8 - 2 - 8 = 0
20 - 3 - 7 - 3 - 7 = 0
20 - 4 - 6 - 4 - 6 = 0
20 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 = 0
3. Does each set of dimensions have the same area? Show your working for each answer. Record a method for finding the area of any rectangle
4. Which dimensions will give us the largest area to plant the garden?
To give the largest area the garden bed dimensions should be 5 metres wide and 5 metres long giving an area of 25 square metres
11
EMM209
Appendix 3 – Role Cards
12
EMM209
Appendix 4 – Going Further Solutions
1. If we had another 2 metres of timber, what dimensions would give us the largest garden bed?
2. What if we wanted to build two square garden beds with the same timber (having a combined perimeter of 22 metres). What might the dimensions be? Does
two garden beds give more or less area than if we only have one garden bed?
The largest area for two square garden beds in 22.25 square metres whereas one 5.5 m by 5.5 m would have a total area of 30.25 square metres
3. If we had 120 metres of timber perimeter and all four sides were the same length, what would the area be?
13
EMM209
120 ÷ 4 = 30 metres
4. A garden bed has an area 54 square metres. If its length is 9 metres, then what is the width? How much timber would we need for the perimeter?
Width is 6 metres
Area = length x width or Area ÷ length = width
9 x ? = 54 or 54 ÷ 9 = ?
Perimeter is 30 metres
9 + 6 + 9 + 6 = 30
14
EMM209
Appendix 5 – Making Connections
12 7
P = 60 ? A = 35 ?
? ?
P = 172
29 A= 1120 310
15
EMM209
Appendix 6 – Brainstorm
16
EMM209
Appendix 7 – Self-Assessment
17
EMM209
Maths Garden Self- Assessment
Name __________________
______________________________________________________________
because ______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Essay
18
EMM209
Maths Garden is an investigative inquiry that builds on students’ prior knowledge and develops the stage 3 skills and mathematical understandings of the NSW syllabus;
number and algebra and measurement and geometry strands. The lesson begins with a “short, sharp and focused” (Cheeseman, Clarke, Roche, & Walker, 2016, p. 3)
introduction that incorporates explicit cross-curricular links to science to help engage students and elicit prior knowledge. The lesson then guides students to begin the
inquiry independently before allowing students to work collaboratively to develop solutions to the problem and justify their mathematics. Open-ended questions are used
throughout the inquiry to scaffold to use higher order thinking skills that will further student’s mathematical investigations (Way, 2008) .
This investigation builds on the ELPSARA framework (Lowrie & Patahuddin, 2015) and incorporates constructivist concepts which allow students to develop personal
understanding through both individual thinking and social interactions with others. Throughout the lesson student’s engage with mathematical language and pictorial and
symbolic representations, apply mathematical knowledge, reflect on their learning and have opportunities to be assessed through self and teacher assessment. Lowrie and
Patahuddin (2015) state that for full understanding and effective conceptual development language multiple forms of concrete representation should precede symbolic
understanding. To support this idea, the lesson provides students with a choice of concrete materials to use to model and construct their solutions during the investigation.
During the Going Further, Making Connections, Taking Action and Reflections stages of the inquiry students apply mathematical knowledge to related examples which helps
reinforce the underlying concepts and provides opportunity for the teacher to scaffold and assess understanding (Lowrie & Patahuddin, 2015). Reflection occurs multiple
times throughout the lesson as it allows students to assimilate existing knowledge and make accommodations for new knowledge therefore achieving equilibrium (or ‘aha’
moments). Assessment in its various forms; diagnostic, formative, and summative links to each aspect and acts as a form of reflection for students and teachers allowing
refinement and progression of learning experiences.
Collaborative and cooperative learning activities are included in the lesson plan as these activities “lead to knowledge construction as students construct joint explanations”
(Hmelo-Silver, 2004, p. 257). McInnerney and Roberts (2004) define collaborative learning as “working in a group of two or more to achieve a common goal, while
respecting each individual’s contribution to the whole” and, cooperative learning as “working or acting together as one to achieve a common goal, while tending to de-
emphasize the input of particular individuals” (p. 205). Collaborative learning such as mixed ability pairs “has the potential to increase the motivation and social confidence
of students with special needs, and also help all group members—average and special education—overcome their challenges” (Belland, Glazewski, & Ertmer, 2009, p.16).
Cooperative learning such as the Think-Pair-Share teaching method increases student engagement and understanding by giving students opportunities to practice
communication and problem-solving skills (Prahl, 2016).
19
EMM209
Information and communication technology (ICT) has been integrated extensively into the inquiry using the Interactive White Board (IWB), a QR code and applications such
as Padlet and Geoboard. Verenikina, Wrona, Jones and Kervin (2010) argue that IWB’s do not always correlate with highly interactive learning practices because for
example, the technology often only allows one student at a time to engage with the board. This has been overcome in this lesson plan through the use of i-pad’s and
interactive Padlet’s which allow all students to interact and contribute to the content on the IWB simultaneously. These ICT activity support the ELSPARA framework with
teaching techniques that effectively integrate them with the pedagogical content.
Following peer and tutor evaluation of my draft investigative inquiry and draft learning plan I made revisions to some of the language and mathematics of my investigation.
Firstly activities have been added or extended to ensure that the lesson meets the 90 minutes requirement. I have revised the wording of the initial problem numerous
times but based on feedback from my tutor used ‘rectangular’ as suggested to describe the required shape of the garden bed. To avoid confusion over whether a square is a
rectangle I have included the problem-solving strategy of highlighting key terms and defining them before students begin the investigation. Jackson, Garrison, Wilson,
Gibbons and Shahan (2013) refer to the development of a common language where multiple students share their thoughts through open-ended questions as being
instrumental to communication in ongoing class discussions and small group activities. The initial inquiry questions has been made more open by changing from asking for
the largest area to What might the dimensions and area be? The prompting questions then guide students through systematically finding the dimensions and checking the
solutions and finding the areas before determining that the largest area is the ‘square’ garden bed.
Additionally, the Going Further questions have been extended, with more concepts added including requiring students to generalise to find the area of a larger rectangle
and to think inversely to find a missing dimension. Other feedback suggested more explicit mathematical reasoning and emphasising the number patterns in the solutions.
Open-ended questions prompts such as How did you record your solutions?, and Did you find all of the solutions? If so, how do you know that you found all the solutions?
have been added to support student’s justifications of why they think they have found all possible solutions. Enabling prompts have also been added to guide students in
identifying the number patterns, in particular the factor relationship between the area and dimension of rectangles. Way (2008) suggests, that when teaching mathematics,
teachers should develop questions that “guide, support and stimulate” children without removing the child’s responsibility for problem-solving (p.23). Differentiation has
also been more explicitly addressed with additional enabling tools such as providing a 10 x 10 multiplication square for students struggling to identify the factors and a
calculator to assist students multiply decimals in the Going Further question 2.
20
EMM209
Reference List
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2019). General capabilities- numeracy. Retrieved from
https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/numeracy/
Belland, B, R., Glazewski, K, D., & Ertmer, P, A. (2009) Inclusion and Problem-Based Learning: Roles of Students in a Mixed-Ability Group. RMLE Online:
Research in Middle Level Education, 32(9), 1-19, doi: 10.1080/19404476.2009.11462062
Cheeseman, J., Clarke, D., Roche, A., & Walker, N. (2016). Introducing challenging tasks: Inviting and clarifying without explaining and demonstrating.
Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 21(3), 3-6. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115065.pdf
Ebrahim, A. (2011). The Effect Of Cooperative Learning Strategies On Elementary Students’ Science Achievement And Social Skills In Kuwait. International
Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 293-314. doi:10.1007/s10763-011-9293-0
Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266.
doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L., & Shahan, G. (2013) Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in
concluding whole-class discussions in middle-grades mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646-682. doi:
10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0646
Lowrie, T., & Patahuddin, S. M. (2015). ELPSA as a lesson design framework. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(2), 1-15. Retrieved
from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079522.pdf
McInnerney, J. M. & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Collaborative or Cooperative Learning? In T. Roberts (Ed.), Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice (pp.
203 – 214). Retrieved from Research Gate
NSW Education Standards Authority. (2012). Mathematics K – 6 Syllabus. Retrieved from NSW Education Standards Authority website:
https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-10/learning-areas/mathematics/mathematics-k-10
Prahl, K. (2016). Best Practices for the Think-Pair-Share Active-Learning Technique. The American Biology Teacher, 79(1), 3-8. doi:10.1525/abt.2017.79.1.3
21
EMM209
Verenikina, I., Wrona, K., Jones, P. T. & Kervin, L. K. (2010). Interactive whiteboards: interactivity, activity and literacy teaching. In J. Herrington & B. Hunter
(Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 2605-2614). VA, USA: AACE.
Way, J. (2008). Using Questioning to Stimulate Mathematical Thinking. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 13(3), 22-27. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ818867.pdf
22
EMM209