This document contains a self-evaluation rubric for a microteaching activity. The rubric evaluates various components of the lesson plan and teaching activity across four categories: excellent, good, sufficient, and in progress. For the lesson plan, categories included the lesson aim, written lesson plan, clarity and organization, and instructional components. For the teaching activity, categories included engaging students, delivery and presentation, preparedness, instructional skills, language use, and pronunciation. The student largely rated themselves in the excellent category, with a few components rated as good. They provided a comment apologizing for not turning on their webcam during the activity due to technical issues with their computer.
This document contains a self-evaluation rubric for a microteaching activity. The rubric evaluates various components of the lesson plan and teaching activity across four categories: excellent, good, sufficient, and in progress. For the lesson plan, categories included the lesson aim, written lesson plan, clarity and organization, and instructional components. For the teaching activity, categories included engaging students, delivery and presentation, preparedness, instructional skills, language use, and pronunciation. The student largely rated themselves in the excellent category, with a few components rated as good. They provided a comment apologizing for not turning on their webcam during the activity due to technical issues with their computer.
This document contains a self-evaluation rubric for a microteaching activity. The rubric evaluates various components of the lesson plan and teaching activity across four categories: excellent, good, sufficient, and in progress. For the lesson plan, categories included the lesson aim, written lesson plan, clarity and organization, and instructional components. For the teaching activity, categories included engaging students, delivery and presentation, preparedness, instructional skills, language use, and pronunciation. The student largely rated themselves in the excellent category, with a few components rated as good. They provided a comment apologizing for not turning on their webcam during the activity due to technical issues with their computer.
This document contains a self-evaluation rubric for a microteaching activity. The rubric evaluates various components of the lesson plan and teaching activity across four categories: excellent, good, sufficient, and in progress. For the lesson plan, categories included the lesson aim, written lesson plan, clarity and organization, and instructional components. For the teaching activity, categories included engaging students, delivery and presentation, preparedness, instructional skills, language use, and pronunciation. The student largely rated themselves in the excellent category, with a few components rated as good. They provided a comment apologizing for not turning on their webcam during the activity due to technical issues with their computer.
____________________________ I. Lesson Plan Category 4-excellent 3-good 2-sufficient 1-in progress The lesson is based on a clear The lesson is based on an aim. The lesson is based on an aim. The lesson is not based on an Lesson Aim aim. The aim is complete and The aim is not clear enough, but The aim is not clear enough, aim. well written. X it is well written. and it is not well written All components of lesson plan Most components of lesson plan Some components of lesson Very few components of Written Lesson template are complete and well template are complete and well plan template are complete and lesson plan are complete, Plan written X written well written well written, or are missing Concise, measurable Objectives may lack an essential Objectives lack several The lesson in general was not purpose/objectives embedded in element; Lesson contains most elements; Lesson was not well effective; lacked several Clarity and content/context; elements of lesson plan, but order organized to ensure maximum lesson phases Tasks achievable in specified of tasks are in question learning organization timeframe; all parts of the lesson plan are included X Direct Instruction, Guided One of the following are missing Two or more of the following Several of the following Practice, Modeling, and and/or ineffective: Direct are missing and/or ineffective: areas are either missing Independent Practice are included Instruction, Guided Practice, Direct Instruction, Guided and/or ineffective. Direct and effective. Guiding Questions Modeling, and Independent Practice, Modeling, and Instruction, Guided Practice, Instructional are incorporated into lesson Practice. Guiding Questions are Independent Practice. Guiding Modeling, and Independent Components of X incorporated into lesson Questions are incorporated into Practice are included. Lesson lesson Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson ‘real life’ context, meaningful Context is present, questions are Some context but little Little to no context Lesson inclusive of applications, schemata, engaging present, but choice in application to real life application context questions, related to other questions/context are not situations (questions with no material/concepts, authentic necessarily relatable/memorable purpose-lack of communicative applications material. X planning)
II. Teaching Activity
Category 4-excellent 3-good 2-sufficient 1-in progress Appropriate pace, comprehension Some modes of communication Comprehension checks too few Very few (or no) checks, relating to students, are used, pace or level may be or are not effectively used; comprehension checks, little appropriate for level, interaction slightly off, comprehension interaction and modes of to no interaction, no variety between teacher and checks are regular but don’t communication are lacking in modes of communication Engaging students student/student and student, all accurately gage learning modes of communication are X used Delivery and Good voice, assertiveness, Confidence, some eye-contact, Is confident, but may be Not confident, extensive use Presentation confidence, eye-contact, ‘with may have used L1 occasionally, lacking assertiveness, L1 is of L1, is not assertive for enthusiasm, good body language, not entirely ‘with-it’ for entire present, authentic and most of the class, non- smooth transitions, professional class, meaningful material are not effective visuals appearance X presented, presentation is clearly too short/too long The work group is completely The work group seem pretty The work group seem pretty The work group does not prepared, has rehearsed and prepared but might have needed a prepared but might have seem at all prepared to Preparedness respect the assigned time. couple more rehearsals. They needed a couple more present. X respect the assigned time. rehearsals. They do not respect the assigned time. Instructional exclusive L2; authentic visuals; Predominant use of L2; some Use of L2 not sustained; lesson Little use of L2; Tasks lack Skills within time limit and uses time variety of methods; objectives not embedded in meaningful context and content; effectively; authentic and not embedded in content; tasks or content; objectives do objectives do not drive the meaningful material is used; timing appropriate; May lack not clearly reflect the lesson; tasks; assessment of student objectives clearly stated; some of the items noted in one mode of communication is comprehension lacking; little integration of all modes of excellent column dominant; lack of variety of if any variety of communication; appropriate methods and approaches tasks/methods assessment; variety of methods and strategies. X The speech presents no There are some minor There are some important The speech cannot be grammatical mistakes or they are grammatical mistakes along the grammatical mistakes which followed because of the Language Use not noticeable speech but they do not affect the affect the comprehension at the amount of grammatical comprehension of the level of sentence but not the mistakes information. whole information. X The student speaks clearly and The student speaks clearly and The student speaks clearly The student often mumbles Pronunciation distinctly all the time. There distinctly most of the time. most of the time. A few or cannot be understood. aren't pronunciation mistakes or Pronunciation mistakes occur important pronunciation Pronunciation is poor and they are not noticeable. rarely and they do not affect the mistakes occur which affect the there are a lot of sounds from comprehension of the message. meaning of words, expressions the mother tongue. X or phrase. There are some sounds from the mother tongue. Comments: Sorry for not turning on my webcam, my pc was not working well and as I could not do the activity days before, I could not do it in another device. Please, excuse me. I am still trying to fix it. Hope you understand my situation. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________