AB BC CA A REFERANCE B REFERANCE

0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
42 0 0 33 42 0 0 33 42 0 0 33 42 0 0 33 42 0 0 33
 C REFERANCE Effectiveness
0 0 0 3 ### ### ###
0 0 0 3 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
0 0 0 3 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
0 0 0 3 ### ### ###
0 0 0 3 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
0 0 0 3 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
0 0 0 3 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
0 0 0 3 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
0 0 0 3 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
0 0 0 3 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
3 0 0 0 ### ### ###
0 0 0 3 ### ### ###
42 0 0 33 ### ### ###
 Format No.:
Dated:
Attribute Gauge R&R Data Sheet

Part Name Torsion Spring Date 16.05.2019

Gauge Type ID Gauge
Part Number IB10009A2 Reference Rinku Tak
Specification - A Ashwani Kamboj
Gauge No ID/9A/01
Prepared By : Rinku Tak B Kuldeep

PARTS 25 Appraiser 3 C Sanjeev

PART A-1 A-2 A-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 C-3 C-2 C-1 REFERANCE
01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
02 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 Format No.:
Dated:
Attribute Gauge R&R Data Sheet

Part Name Torsion Spring Date 16.05.2019

Gauge Type ID Gauge
Part Number IB10009A2 Reference Rinku Tak
Specification - A Ashwani Kamboj
Gauge No ID/9A/01
Prepared By : Rinku Tak B Kuldeep

PARTS 25 Appraiser 3 C Sanjeev

Hypothisis Test Analysis - Cross Tabulation Method

A * B Cross tabulation
APPRAISER--> B
↓ APPRAISER TOTAL pe = 0.51
0 1 po = 1
0 COUNT 42 0 42
EXPECTED COUNT 23.52 18.48 42 kappa AB =
A
1 COUNT 0 33 33 po-pe
= 1.00
EXPECTED COUNT 18.48 14.52 33 1 - pe
COUNT 42 33 75
TOTAL
EXPECTED COUNT 42 33 75
B * C Cross tabulation
APPRAISER--> C
↓ APPRAISER TOTAL pe = 0.51
0 1 po = 1.00
0 COUNT 42 0 42
EXPECTED COUNT 23.52 18.48 42 kappa BC =
B
1 COUNT 0 33 33 po - pe
= 1.00
EXPECTED COUNT 18.48 14.52 33 1 - pe
COUNT 42 33 75
TOTAL
EXPECTED COUNT 42 33 75
C *A Cross tabulation
APPRAISER--> A
↓ APPRAISER TOTAL pe = 0.51
0 1 po = 1.00
0 COUNT 42 0 42
EXPECTED COUNT 23.52 18.48 42 kappa AC =
C
1 COUNT 0 33 33 po - pe
= 1.00
EXPECTED COUNT 18.48 14.52 33 1 - pe
COUNT 42 33 75
TOTAL
EXPECTED COUNT 42 33 75
po = The sum of the observed proportions in the diagonal cells
pe = The sum of the expected proportions in the diagonal cells

A * REF Cross tabulation

REFERANCE
↓ APPRAISER TOTAL pe = 0.51
0 1 po = 1.00
0 COUNT 42 0 42
EXPECTED COUNT 23.52 18.48 42 kappa A =
A
1 COUNT 0 33 33 po - pe
= 1.00
EXPECTED COUNT 18.48 14.52 33 1 - pe
COUNT 42 33 75
TOTAL
EXPECTED COUNT 42 33 75

B* REF Cross tabulation

REFERANCE
↓ APPRAISER TOTAL pe = 0.51
0 1 po = 1.00
0 COUNT 42 0 42
EXPECTED COUNT 23.52 18.48 42 kappa B =
B
1 COUNT 0 33 33 po - pe
= 1.00
EXPECTED COUNT 18.48 14.52 33 1 - pe
COUNT 42 33 75
TOTAL
EXPECTED COUNT 42 33 75
C * REF Cross tabulation
REFERANCE
↓ APPRAISER TOTAL pe = 0.51
0 1 po = 1.00
0 COUNT 42 0 42
EXPECTED COUNT 23.52 18.48 42 kappa C =
C
1 COUNT 0 33 33 po - pe
= 1.00
EXPECTED COUNT 18.48 14.52 33 1 - pe
COUNT 42 33 75
TOTAL
EXPECTED COUNT 42 33 75
 Format No.:
Dated:
Attribute Gauge R&R Data Sheet

Part Name Torsion Spring Date 16.05.2019

Gauge Type ID Gauge
Part Number IB10009A2 Reference Rinku Tak
Specification - A Ashwani Kamboj
Gauge No ID/9A/01
Prepared By : Rinku Tak B Kuldeep

PARTS 25 Appraiser 3 C Sanjeev

Attribute Study Results (A*B,B*C,C*A) Attribute Study Results (A*REF,B*REF,C*REF)
Kappa A B C A B C
A - 1.00 -
B - - 1.00 Kappa 1.00 1.00 1.00
C 1.00 - -
Miss Rate w.r.t. "A"=
No. of times Accepting a bad part x 100 0 X100=
Total no. of opportunities to accept a bad part
= 14 X3 0.00 %
Miss Rate w.r.t. "B"=
No. of times Accepting a bad part x 100 0 X100=
= 14 X3 0.00 %
Total no. of opportunities to accept a bad part
Miss Rate w.r.t. "C"=
No. of times Accepting a bad part x 100 0 X100
Total no. of opportunities to accept a bad part
= 14 X3 0.00 %
Average of Miss Rate w.r.t. "A, B & C"= 0.00 %
False Alarm Rate w.r.t. "A"=
No. of times Rejecting a good part x 100 = 0 X100=
Total no. of opportunities to reject a good part 11 X3 0.00 %
False Alarm Rate w.r.t. "B"=
No. of times Rejecting a good part x 100 0 X100=
Total no. of opportunities to reject a good part = 11 X3 0.00 %
False Alarm Rate w.r.t. "C"=
No. of times Rejecting a good part x 100 0 X100=
Total no. of opportunities to reject a good part = 11 X3 0.00 %
Average False Alarm Rate w.r.t. "A, B & C"= 0.00 %
Effectiveness of appraiser "A"
No. of corret decision x 100 = ### X100=
Total no. of opportunities 25 ### %
Effectiveness of appraiser "B"
No. of corret decision x 100 = ### X100=
Total no. of opportunities 25 ### %
Effectiveness of appraiser "C"
No. of corret decision x 100 = ### X100
Total no. of opportunities 25 ### %
Average of Effectiveness "A, B & C"= ### %
Summary Acceptance Criteria for Reference
False Effectiv- False Effecti-
Kappa Ref / Effec. Miss Kappa Ref / Miss
Alarm eness Alarm veness
↓ Rate Effec Rate
Rate Rate Rate Rate
A 100.00 0.00 0.00 ### Good >=90 <=2 <=5 >=90
B 100.00 0.00 0.00 ### Avg >=80<90 <=5 <=10 >=80<90
C 100.00 0.00 0.00 ### Not Acc. <80 >5 >10 <80
CONCLUSION :-->
1) For appraiser `A` Kapa is >=90 hence attribute gauging system is good.
Miss rate is <=2 hence attribute gauging system is good.
False alarm rate is <=5 hence attribute gauging system is good.
Effectiveness Rate is ### ###
2) For appraiser `B` Kapa is >=90 hence attribute gauging system is good.
Miss rate is <=2 hence attribute gauging system is good.
False alarm rate is <=5 hence attribute gauging system is good.
False alarm rate is ### ###
3) For appraiser `C` Kappa is >=90 hence attribute gauging system is good.
Miss rate is <=2 hence attribute gauging system is good.
False alarm rate is <=5 hence attribute gauging system is good.
False alarm rate is ### ###
ACTION PLAN :--> 1) Training required for the appraiser ### ### ###
PREPARED BY:- APROVED BY:-