Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Step 1 - Recognize The Course PDF
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Step 1 - Recognize The Course PDF
1. Activity Description
This course is in English and as it is specified in the Rules and conditions for course
development: “The student must develop the proposed activities on due time,
in English. Contributions in different languages won´t be evaluated”.
Individual
The student must develop the following activities:
1. Update the profile, including a current picture where the student can be
identified.
2. Review all environments and download and analyze the syllabus of the course
at the Learning Environment to have a clear understanding of the proposal,
competences and contents to develop.
3. Visit the Course´s General forum at the Initial Environment and participate on
the Social Interaction Forum, sharing in English the following information:
Student´s name
1
Student´s group
Professional profile
Expectations with this course and the course language (English).
Student´s name
Course name
Student´s group number.
6. According to the previous article, the contents outlined in the syllabus of the
course and your own search on internet:
Using your own words, write a one-page (4 paragraphs of 100 to 200 words
each one) article review, including the cites and references in order to avoid
plagiarism, explaining your ideas in relation to:
2
Please note that your article review will be analyzed by Turnitin, to
identify if there is any plagiarism from any other document, even those
delivered by other students.
From guidelines:
PDF format
Page Size: Letter
Font type: Times New Roman
Font size: 12
3
Line spacing: Double
Page margins: 2.54 cm
Paragraph Alignment: Left-aligned
The student must make sure the activity is written on his own words
Before submitting the requested product, student should check that it meets all
the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)
4
a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), also disciplinary measures might be derived.
This criterion Average Level: The student presents his understanding of the
represents 15 importance of technology innovation to promote the socio-
points of the total economic development of Colombia, but it does not evidence
of 25 points of relevant arguments according to the article, evidencing real
the activity. situations in Colombia.
Low level: The student does not present the article review
related to the importance of technology innovation or it isn´t
written in his own words.
5
Second evaluation High Level: The student submits at the Evaluation
criterion: Environment, a PDF document according to the given guidelines,
evidencing proper grammar and spelling, presenting a proper
Present the development of the activities proposed for the recognition of the
document according course.
to the format and
guidelines If your work is at this level, you can get between 8 points
and 10 points
This criterion
represents 10 Average Level: The student submits a document, developing
points of the total part of the proposed activities, evidencing some spelling and
of 25 points of grammar mistakes or missing some guidelines.
the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 2 points
and 7 points