Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 56 views

    Attribute Agreement Analysis For Wynik - Summary Report

    Uploaded by

    Istvan
    The appraisals from the test matched the standard 76% of the time, which is an acceptable accuracy rate. Some key points: Appraiser A had the highest accuracy at 82.5%, while Appraiser B was just below the average at 80.7%. The overall error rate was 24% and mixed ratings, where items were rated both ways, accounted for 21.1% of ratings. The summary provides accuracy rates and misclassification information and recommends areas to focus on for improvement like training or operating definitions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Attribute Agreement Analysis For Wynik - Summary Report

    Uploaded by

    Istvan
    56 views1 page
    The appraisals from the test matched the standard 76% of the time, which is an acceptable accuracy rate. Some key points: Appraiser A had the highest accuracy at 82.5%, while Appraiser B was just below the average at 80.7%. The overall error rate was 24% and mixed ratings, where items were rated both ways, accounted for 21.1% of ratings. The summary provides accuracy rates and misclassification information and recommends areas to focus on for improvement like training or operating definitions.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Attribute Agreement Analysis for Wynik - Summary Report

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The appraisals from the test matched the standard 76% of the time, which is an acceptable accuracy rate. Some key points: Appraiser A had the highest accuracy at 82.5%, while Appraiser B was just below the average at 80.7%. The overall error rate was 24% and mixed ratings, where items were rated both ways, accounted for 21.1% of ratings. The summary provides accuracy rates and misclassification information and recommends areas to focus on for improvement like training or operating definitions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    56 views1 page

    Attribute Agreement Analysis For Wynik - Summary Report

    Uploaded by

    Istvan
    The appraisals from the test matched the standard 76% of the time, which is an acceptable accuracy rate. Some key points: Appraiser A had the highest accuracy at 82.5%, while Appraiser B was just below the average at 80.7%. The overall error rate was 24% and mixed ratings, where items were rated both ways, accounted for 21.1% of ratings. The summary provides accuracy rates and misclassification information and recommends areas to focus on for improvement like training or operating definitions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Attribute Agreement Analysis for Wynik

    Summary Report

    Is the overall % accuracy acceptable? Misclassification Rates


    < 50% 100%
    Overall error rate 24,0%
    1 rated 0 35,0%
    No Yes
    0 rated 1 0,0%
    76,0%
    Mixed ratings (same item rated both ways) 21,1%
    The appraisals of the test items correctly matched the standard
    76,0% of the time.

    % Accuracy by Appraiser Comments

    100
    Consider the following when assessing how the
    measurement system can be improved:

    82,5 • Low Accuracy Rates: Low rates for some appraisers may
    80,7
    indicate a need for additional training for those appraisers.
    80
    Low rates for all appraisers may indicate more systematic
    76,0%
    problems, such as poor operating definitions, poor
    64,9 training, or incorrect standards.
    • High Misclassification Rates: May indicate that either too
    60
    many 1 items are being rejected, or too many 0 items are
    being passed on to the consumer (or both).
    • High Percentage of Mixed Ratings: May indicate items in
    the study were borderline cases between 1 and 0, thus very
    40
    difficult to assess.

    20

    0
    A B C

    You might also like