Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Solid: Oxide Ion Conducting Solid Electrolytes Based On B&O
Solid: Oxide Ion Conducting Solid Electrolytes Based On B&O
Solid: Oxide Ion Conducting Solid Electrolytes Based On B&O
STATE
IONICS
Solid State Ionics 89 (1996) 179-196
Review
Abstract
The high oxide ion conductivity of solid solutions of bismuth oxide was initially discovered by Takahashi and coworkers.
The bismuth oxide based compounds are much better solid electrolytes than the well-known stabilized zirconia. The only
difficulty which has prevented their use in high temperature fuel cells and gas sensors up to now is their instability against
reduction at low oxygen partial pressures. In this article, we review the structural properties, thermal expansion, electrical
conductivity, thermodynamic stability, and surface properties of bismuth oxide and solid solutions of bismuth oxide with
face centred cubic, rhombohedral, tetragonal or layer structures.
Keywords: Solid electrolyte; Oxide ion conductivity; Bismuth oxide; Crystal structure
Oxide ion conducting solid electrolytes play a where M.$: is a M2+-ion in a Zr4+ lattice site and 0;
decisive role in electrochemical cells for measuring is a 02--ion on a regular lattice site.
oxygen activities and thermodynamic data of solid, Yttria stabilized zirconia (Zr, _XYX02pX,2), the
liquid and gaseous phases. They have found wide most often applied solid electrolyte which exhibits
applications for gas monitoring and combustion high oxide ion conduction at elevated temperatures,
control, in metallurgy, petrology, chemical kinetics has a low dissociation pressure and is non-corrosive.
and in solid oxide electrolyte fuel cells [l-S]. However, compared to B&O,, solid electrolytes
Presently available solid electrolytes with high based on ZrO, have a relatively low oxide ion
oxide ion conductivity are mainly derived from solid conductivity at temperatures below 800 K and
solutions of zirconia. Relatively large concentrations require very high sintering temperatures (often high-
of oxide ion vacancies, Vi can be generated in the er than 2000 K).
crystal lattice of ZrO,, if lower valent metal ions are Although there have been some reports on B&O,
substituted for Zr4+ in ZrO,, e.g. Mgzf, Ca2+ and systems earlier [9,10], Takahashi and coworkers [l l]
Y 3+. . were the first to show that the face centered cubic
(fee) phase of Bi,O,, &B&O, stabilized by various
*Corresponding author. aliovalent metal ion substitutions, has the highest
oxide ion conductivity of all oxide ion conductors cooling, in the temperature range 773-923 K. The
known so far. structure of the various Bi,O, phases was investi-
The conductivity of &Bi,O, is one to two orders gated systematically by Harwig [28-301. Table 1 and
of magnitudes higher than that of stabilized zirconia Fig. 1 show the characteristic data and transforma-
at corresponding temperatures. The highest values of tion temperatures for the different phases of B&O,.
conductivities in the B&O, family of oxides are The crystal structure of the monoclinic a-B&O,
observed in the high temperature &phase of B&O, was first determined by Sillen [23]. In the a-Bi,O,
with defect fluorite structure. This high temperature structure, layers of bismuth ions, parallel to the (100)
phase exhibits two vacant oxide ion sites per unit cell plane of the monoclinic unit cell, are separated by
which are statistically disordered. But this phase is layers of oxide ions; the structure is an ordered
only stable in the temperature range 1003- 1097 K. defect fluorite structure [29,30] with one quarter of
Fortunately, substitution of yttrium or rare earth the oxygen sites vacant.
oxides stabilizes the &phase of B&O, down to room The (Y+S transition at 1002 K is accompanied by
temperature [ 12,131. Recently, several investigations an anomalously large transition enthalpy of 29.6
have been performed with the aim of combining the kJ/mole, which is 2.7 times the heat of fusion. The
advantages of stabilized B&O, (high conductivity relative entropy gain due to the o--G transition with
and low sintering temperature) with those of stabi- respect to the total entropy gain from the solid to the
lized ZrO, (low dissociation, non-corrosive) [ 14- liquid state is 75%. This result indicates a degree of
22]. high disorder in the &phase and corresponds to the
The aim of this article is to review the properties melting of the sublattice [31]. Sillen [23] also
of oxide ion conductive solid electrolytes based on reported on a cubic phase obtained by quenching
B&O, with particular emphasis on structure, com- Bi,O,, that has been fused for a long time in a
position and conductivity. porcelain crucible. This cubic structure is related to
the fluorite structure but has ordered defects in the
oxygen sublattice in the (111) direction (Fig. 2).
2. Pure bismuth oxide Each Bi3+ ion has six oxygen neighbours arranged at
Table 1
Structural data of the B&O, phases [29]
Phase (Y 6 a Y
Phase stability temperature range (K) <IO@2 1002-1097 603-923 773-912 *
Temperature (K) 298 1047 916 298
Structure monoclinic fee tetragonal bee
a (nm) 0.58496 0.56595 0.7738 1.0268
6 (nm) 0.81648
c (nm) 0.75101 0.5731
P’ (“) 112.977
* May persist to room temperature.
182 P. Shuk et al. I Solid State Ionics 89 (1996) I79- 196
Fig. 3. Electrical conductivity, log u versus temperature of Bi,O, The thermal expansion coefficients of B&O, were
P81.
first determined by Gattow and Schroeder [32]. They
found very high thermal expansion coefficients for
number ti,,<0.002 [39]); holes are the mobile the a-phase of Bi,O, (Table 2). Levin and Roth
charge carriers. The electronic defect concentrations [26], however, found thermal expansion coefficients
are determined by impurities. These properties are that were a factor of two lower than those from
found in the entire temperature range up to the a+S high-temperature X-ray investigations. Typical val-
phase transition. In the temperature range 923-1002 ues of the thermal expansion coefficient of different
K a rapidly increasing concentration of oxygen phases of B&O, are summarized in Table 2. The
vacancies leads to an increase of the ionic con- transition from the 6- to the P-phase is accompanied
ductivity [28]. In the metastable p- and y-phases, the
conduction is predominantly ionic [28,39]. The Table 2
activation enthalpies as determined from the tem- The average thermal expansion coefficients (Y’ of the B&O,
perature dependence of the ionic conductivity are phases
132, 95 and 38.5 kJ/mol for the /3-, y- and S-phase, Temperature Middle thermal expansion Reference
respectively [28]. range (K) coefficients (Y’ (10-“/K)
According to Harwig [28,38], &B&O, exhibits a P Y 6
high ionic conductivity with mobile oxide ions as the
373-413 12.2
majority charge carriers. This is in agreement with 12.4
473-673
the results of electromotive force and transference 673-848 14.2 ~321
measurements by Takahashi et al. [ 11,401. The 848-948 14.8
conductivity of the a-phase is independent of the 948- IO23 43.6
-
DY 0.20 Rhomb + ? fee
structures on the B&O,-rich side of the binary 0.30-0.40 fee
systems [42,43]. The stability region of the high Er 0.20 fee+? fee
ionic conductivity phases can be extended to room 0.25-0.30 fee
Yb 0.10 Tetragonal fee+?
temperature by incorporation of 22-27 mol% WO,
0.20 Tetragonal + ? fee
[44], 25-43 mol% Y,O, [45], 35-50 mol% Gd,O,
0.30 fee
[46], 17.5-45 mol% Er,O, [47], 28.5-50 mol% fee+?
Dy,O, [48], 30-40 mol% Sm,O, [49], 15-26 mol%
Nb,O, and 20-25 mol% Ta,O, [50], lo-35 mol%
Pr,O, 66 [51,52], and 30-50 mol% Tb203_5 [52,53]. La
- Sm
3.1.1. Structure
Most of the ion conducting solid solutions of
- Gd
B&O, form with the fee structure of the high
temperature &B&O, phase. In addition, a rhom- -Y
bohedral structure corresponding to the rhombohedr- - Er
al Bi,O,-SrO structure (analysed by Sillen et al.
[54]) or a rhombohedral LaOF-structure were found
[55]. The type of structure that forms is largely
dependent on the ion radius of the substituted metal I I I I
cations and on their concentration. Some examples 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
of the relationship between the structure and the x
composition in solid solutions of Bi,O, with rare Fig. 4. Stability ranges of the rhombohedral and fee phases of
earth oxides are summarized in Table 3. Fig. 4 shows (Bi,O,),_,(Ln,O,)” in the ionic radius vs. composition diagram
the regions of fee and rhombohedral phases which [491.
stabilization of the relatively loose high temperature (B&O,), _JY203)+ oxide ion ordering occurs along
&phase structure occurs by a contraction of this the (111) and (110) directions. Subsequent neutron
structure due to the substituent. If the difference scattering and X-ray diffraction experiments on
between the ionic radius of Bi3+ (0.111 nm [59]) fluorite-type solid solutions (B&O,), _.,(Ln,O,),
and the substituted Ln3+ is large, the substitution (Ln=Y, Er, Yb) have revealed substantial short-
will result in a large distortion of the host lattice and range ordering, the extent of which increases with
only a small amount of substituent is necessary for increasing content of the substituent [65-671.
supplying the energy required to stabilize the fee A new phase, found by Watanabe et al. in the
phase of Bi,O,. Conversely, a small difference bismuth-rich region of the systems Bi,O,-Y,O,
between the ionic radii of Bi3+ and Ln3+ requires a [W and B&O,-Ho,O, [691 has a
large amount of substituent to stabilize the fee phase, Bi 0,765Sr0,2350,,383-tyPe layered structure with hexa-
as for example is the case for Gd3+ (Fig. 5). Too gonal symmetry and shows high oxide ion con-
large a difference between the ionic radii of the Ln3+ ductivity [70-721.
and Bi3+ ions makes the fee phase unstable [48].
A large number of ternary and quaternary Bi,O,- 3.1.2. Ionic conduction
based oxides have been synthesized and character- Verkerk et al. [48,58] studied the relationship of
ized [60-631. The substitution of two different metal the ionic radius of the Ln3+ substituent ion and the
oxides instead of only one favored the stabilization minimum amount of Ln,O, (xmin) required to stabi-
of the S-phase down to room temperature at distinct- lize the fee phase of Bi,O, and the affect of these
ly lower concentration of the oxides [62]. This factors on the conductivity. The correlation between
cooperative effect was attributed to the entropy the ionic radius and x,,,~” is given in Fig. 5. There are
increase in the quaternary systems, which is the main two opposing tendencies that must be optimized for
factor determining the defect properties of the fee maximal conductivity [48]: first, the ionic conduc-
phase. tivity increases with increasing ionic radius. Second,
It was shown by Battle et al. [64] that in x,,,~” increases with increasing ionic radius (Fig. 5),
however, a high x,,,~” value results in low oxide ion
conductivity. Nevertheless, the influence of the ionic
radius on the ionic conductivity is smaller than the
affect of the Ln,O, content. Therefore optimum
ionic conductivity is achieved by lowering x,,,~“. The
0.35 highest oxide ion conductivity occurs at the lowest
x,,,~” required to stabilize the fee phase for B&O,
0.30 stabilized by Er,O,, as shown in Fig. 6 [48].
In a highly defective structure a completely ran-
0.25
dom arrangement of oxygen vacancies is unfavour-
able and is only possible in small domains. A model
-2
of the short-range ordered units, or ordered microdo-
* 0.20
mains proposed for (Bi,O,),,,,(Ln,O,),,,, by Ver-
kerk et al. [73] is shown in Fig. 7. For this
0.15 composition every tetrahedron consists of three
Bi3+-ions and one Ln3+-ion, denoted as a (Bi,Ln)-
tetrahedron. Fig. 7 shows the oxide ions of a (001)
L
0.098 0.100 0.102 0.104 0.106 plane at z = 3 14. The cations above and below this
r ion @ml plane are indicated. The oxide ions are displaced in
Fig. 5. x,,,, the minimum value of x required to stabilize the fee
the direction of the lanthanide ions. It is clear from
phase in Bi,O,),_,(Ln,O,), vs. the ionic radius (r,,,,) of Ln’+ Fig. 7 that there are two different O-O distances.
[481. Indeed, from diffuse neutron scattering studies of
P. Shuk et al. I Solid State Ionics 89 (1996) 179-196 185
/“--
K) two types of O-O distances have been identified:
0.268 nm and 0.290 nm respectively [73]. At about
the same temperature (870 K) a knee in the Ar-
rhenius plot of B&O, stabilized with Y,O, [45],
Gd,O, [46], Er,O, [47] or Dy,O, [48] was reported.
r-
The anomaly was ascribed to a change in the defect
713 K structure. The activation energy of the conductivity
is determined by the strength of the Ln-0 bond and
by the energy necessary for 02- ions to migrate
through the tetrahedral planes. In the low tempera-
ture region the effect of the Ln-0 bond strength is
predominant. Only oxide ions in the (Bi,Ln)-tetra-
hedron are mobile. Migration of an oxide ion from
3+ 3+ 3+
Yb3’ Er Y3+Dy Gd one tetrahedron to an empty site in the next one
involves breaking of the Ln-0 bond and passage
0.098 0.100 0.102 0.104 0.106 through (Ln,Bi)-, (Bi,Ln)- or (B&)-tetrahedral
r IO” (nm)
planes. At about 870 K the lattice disorders, resulting
Fig. 6. Electrical conductivity, log (T of (Bi,O,),_,(Ln,O,), for in a increase of the Ln-0 distance. In the high
x,,, vs. the ionic radius of the substituted Ln’+ [48]. temperature region all the oxide ions take part in the
conductivity process and there are no preferential
diffusion paths. Detailed calculations are necessary
to determine whether the strength of the Ln-0 bond
or the energy to migrate through a tetrahedral plane
is predominant at high temperatures [73].
Typical solid electrolytes based on Bi,O, are
summarized in Table 4. Most of them show fee or
rhombohedral crystal structure. Fig. 8 shows, that
solid electrolytes based on Bi,O, have one or two
orders of magnitude higher oxide ion conductivity
than stabilized zirconia. The y-type
B&V, _XMx05,5_y (M = Cu, Co, Ni) also present very
attractive conductivities, especially at low tempera-
tures and will be discussed separately.
Table 4
Typical solid electrolytes based on B&O, [12,13,41,47,48,52,56,57]
-2 - 773 I
-10 I I I I I
-5 -3 -I I 3 5 7
The hole and electron conductivity of Bi,,,,Y,,,,O,,, these crystals were twinned. Bi,VO,., is in fact the
can be expressed by the following equations [75]: upper limit of solid solution formation in B&O;
xVO,s with 0.86-(x< 1. On heating, the room-tem-
~~,/S*cm-’ = 5.0. 102[p(0,)lbar]“4 perature a-Bi,VO 5.s phase transforms through the
.exp[-106kJI(RT~mol)], (4) P-phase (stable at 720-840 K) to the tetragonal
y-Bi,VO,, phase [77]. a-Bi2V05,5 can be indexed
u,/S.cm-’ = 3.4. 105[p(02)lbar-“4 in a face-centered orthorhombic cell with a =
0.5533(l), b=0.5611(1) and c= 1.5288 nm. The
. exp[-213 kJI(RT. mol)]. (5)
mean cell parameters of the p form seems to be
tetragonal with a = b = 1.1285(S), and c = 1.542( 1)
Bouwmeester et al. [76] performed isothermal
nm at 775 K. The y-phase is tetragonal with a =
oxygen permeability experiments on sintered
0.3988(2), c = 1.542( 1) nm at 885 K and space group
Bi,.,,Er,.,,O,., and obtained a p-type electronic
14/mmm [78]. Thus the prototype y-cell is a subcell
conductivity similar to that of the Y substituted
of the (Y and the p cells according to the relationship
phase:
[77]:
a,/S.cm-’ = 3.0. 102[p(0,)lbar]“4
. exp[-91 kJI(RT. mol)]. (6)
These values of hole and electron conductivities of ap#2d2a,, b,#d2a,, cs#c,.
Bi,O, solid electrolytes are much lower than the
oxide ion conductivity in a broad oxygen partial The idealized structure of the y-phase, without
pressure range. Defect electron conductivity domi- oxygen vacancies, is presented in Fig. 10 with
nates oxide ion conductivity only at very low oxygen
partial pressures p(02)<10-‘6 Pa at 1000 K.
3.2.1. Structure
The structure of B&VO,., is of Aurivillius-type
[93] with [Bi20212+ layers sandwiched between
defect [VO,,,(V,),,,]*- perovskite-like slabs, with
the perovskite slab containing oxygen vacancies Vi
responsible for the high oxide ion conductivity
[77,78]. Bush et al. [94] first identified Bi,VO,,, as
an orthorhombic phase with unit cell parameters
a = 1.662, b = 1.684 and c = 1.55 nm. Owing to the
large unit cell volume, Mairesse [41] presumed that Fig. 10. The ideal structure of y-type Bi,VO, 5.
188 P. Shuk et al. I Solid State Ionics 89 (1996) I79- 196
solid electrolyte
Mixed conductors based on B&O, are of principal
interest as electrode materials and semipermeable v;;,o;
membranes for use in electro-catalysis and in gas solid electrolyte
separation. Solid solutions of B&O, with mixed- Fig. 12. Scheme of electrode reaction at the gas/solid electrolyte/
valent ions can lead to mixed electronic and ionic electrode interface for: (a) metal electrodes, (b) mixed-conducting
conduction. Studies of a number of B&O,-based electrodes.
mixed conductors e.g. Bi,03-Tb,O, [52,53,56,98-
1001, B&O,-Pr,O,, [51,52,98,99], B&O,-BiVO,
[101,102] and Bi,03-Y,03-TiO,_, [103] have
been reported. Some excellent mixed-conducting charge transfer reaction occurs over the whole
materials with high oxide ion conductivity, close to surface, because both oxide ions and electrons are
the conductivity of &Bi,O, and comparable p-type mobile, and so polarization losses are reduced
electronic conductivity, were found in solid solutions [99,108].
of Bi,O, with Tb,O,. The hole conductivity de- Mixed conductors based on B&O, are presented in
creases with decreasing Tb4+ concentration and Table 5 in comparison with some other mixed
oxygen pressure [ 1011. conductors.
Some molybdates, Bi,Mo,O,,, P-Bi,Mo,O,,,
Bi,Mo,O, and Bi,MoO, have shown very high
ionic-electronic conductivity even at temperatures as 5. Electronic surface properties of Bi,O, solid
low as 573 K [104-1061. electrolytes
A two-phase system consisting an intimate mix-
ture of an electronic conductor and an oxide ion Recently the electronic surface properties of
conducting phase is another approach to obtain a Bi,O,-based solid electrolytes have been studied by
mixed electron-ion conducting material. Both phases UV- and X-ray-photoelectron-spectroscopies (UPS,
should exhibit continuous conduction paths in the XPS) as well as electron-energy-loss-spectroscopy
mixture. Shen et al. [107] recently found promising (EELS) [109,110]. UPS yields information on the
results for mixed conduction in the ceramic two- work function of electrons and the ionisation energy
phase system consisting of oxide ion conducting of the surface. Using solid metal-metal oxide mix-
Bi ,,75Y,,250,.5 and the electronic conducting tetra- tures (such as Fe-FeO) as solid reference contacts
gonal phase Bi,CuO,_,. during the photoemission experiments, the position
Mixed-conducting oxides based on Bi,O, used as of the Fermi level was obtained with relation to the
electrode materials can have a number of advantages valence band edge and for the corresponding oxygen
in comparison with traditional noble metal elec- partial pressure (fixed by the metal-metal oxide
trodes. In the case of metal electrodes (e.g. Pt), system) [ill]. In addition EELS was used to de-
charge transfer between the electrode and the solid termine the energy difference between the highest
electrolyte occurs at or near the three-phase gas/ occupied and lowest unoccupied electronic levels,
electrode/solid electrolyte interface (Fig. 12). A i.e. the band gap between the valence band and the
potentially better electrode material is one for which conduction band. A band gap E, =2.8 eV was
oxygen exchange is not limited to the three-phase derived from the EEL spectrum [ 1 lo]. The data from
contact region. At a mixed-conducting electrode, the UPS and EELS suggest the band scheme in Fig. 13.
190 P. Shuk et al. I Solid State tonics 89 (1996) 179-196
Table 5
Properties of mixed-conducting oxides
Table 7
T W)
IO00 900 800 700 Fqrilibrium oxygen pressure of (B&O,), _,(Me,O,), solid elec-
trolytes from electrochemical measurements [ 1331
IO 11 12 13 14 15
F4 (K-’ )
According to Takahashi et al. [ 1281 the overall
decomposition reaction of B&O, solid electrolytes is
Fig. 14. Temperature dependence of polarization resistivity rP of
various electrodes with Bi 0 7SY0250,.5 solid electrolyte [126]: Ag
described by:
(1h L%,% ,CoO, CV, Pr,,,% $00, (3), Nd, ,Sr,, $00, (4).
(B&O,),-,(Me,O,), ~(Bi,O,),-x~,(Me,O,), +
SrCo,,Pe,, $L (5).
2cuBi + 3a/2 0,. (7)
oxygen species are assumed to be active at low Thermodynamic data on S-B&O, and their solid
temperatures and to enhance the rate determining solution have been obtained by electrochemical
step of the electrode reaction corresponding to the measurements. Data shown in Table 6 indicates good
charge transfer step [ 1271. agreement between various investigators. Verkerk
and Burggraaf [132] showed that the range of ~(0,)
where (B&O,), _X(Ln,O,), solid electrolytes are
7. Stability range stable against reduction did not increase by addition
of Dy,O, or Er,O, with respect to pure S-Bi,O,.
At high temperatures, solid electrolytes based on However, later electrochemical investigations of
B&O, are unstable towards a reduction to metallic Berezovskaya et al. [133] showed a considerable
Bi under low oxygen pressure. For practical applica- increase of stability of (Bi,O,), _X(Ln,O,), solid
tions, it is very important to know the limiting electrolytes with increasing dopant concentration
oxygen partial pressure where reduction occurs. (Table 7).
Table 6
Temperature dependence of the standard Gibbs free energy for the formation of S-B&O, and solid electrolytes based on Bi,O, from
electrochemical measurements (referred to 1 mole B&O,)
Table 8
121P Hagenmuller and W. van Go01 eds., Solid Electrolytes.
General Principles, Characterization, Materials, Applications
A comparison of the calculated values of the decomposition
Academic Press, New York, 1978).
oxygen partial pressure of pure Bi,O, and a rhombohedral phase
t31 T. Takahashi and A. Kozawa eds., Application of Solid
in the Bi,O,-St-G system [134]
Electrolytes (JEC Press, Ohio, 1980).
Temperature Decomposition oxygen partial pressure 141 S. Chandra, Superionic Solids: Principles and Applications
T (K) ~(0,) (Pa) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 198 1).
[51 H. Rickert, Electrochemistry of Solids (Springer, Berlin,
(BizG,),,.5,(Sr% 43 B&G, 1982).
853 4.96. IO-“’ 1.61. IO-’ WI P.T. Mosely and B.C. Tofield, Solid State Gas Sensors
903 8.04. IO-’ 3.37.10-” (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1987).
[71 T. Seiyama (ed.), Chemical Sensor Technology, Vol. l-4
943 6.032.10-K 3.03. to-’
(Kodansha, Tokyo, 1988-1992).
194 P. Shuk et al. I Solid State Ionics 89 (1996) 179-196
[S] W. Gopel, T.A. Jones, M. Kleitz, I. Lundstrom and T. 1381 H.A. Harwig and A.G. Gerards, J. Solid State Chem. 26
Seiyama eds., Chemical and Biochemical Sensors, Vol. 2, 3 (1978) 265.
(VCH, Weinheim, 1991/ 1992). r391 P. Shuk and H.-H. Mobius, Z. physik. Chem. 266 (1985) 9.
[9] A.D. Neuimin, L.D. Yushina, Yu.M. Ovchinnikov and SF. [401 T. Takahashi, H. Esaka and H. Iwahara, J. Appl. Electro-
Palguev, Electrochem. of Molten Salts and Solid Electrolytes them. 7 (1977) 31.
(Sverdlovsk) 4 (1963) 11 I (in Russian). [411 G. Mairesse, in: Fast Ion Transport in Solids, ed. B. Scrosati
[IO] L.D. Yushina and S.F. Palguev, Electrochem. of Molten Salts (Kluver, Amsterdam, 1993) 27 1.
and Solid Electrolytes (Sverdlovsk) 5 (1964) 153 (in Rus- ~421 E.M. Levin and R.S. Roth, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 68A
sian). (1964) 197.
[I I] T. Takahashi, H. Iwahara and Y. Nagai, J. Appl. Electro- [431 F. Hund, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 333 (1964) 248.
them. 2 (1972) 97. r441 T. Takahashi and H. Iwahara, J. Appl. Electrochem. 3 (1973)
65.
[I21 T. Takahashi and H. Iwahara, Mat. Res. Bull. 13 (1978)
1451 T. Takahashi, H. Iwahara and T. Arao, J. Appl. Electrochem.
1447.
5 (1975) 187.
[131 P. Shuk, A. Vecher and V Samochval, Lett. of Byeloruss.
1461 T. Takahashi, T. Esaka and H. Iwahara, I. Appl. Electro-
Univ. 1 (1984) 8 (in Russian).
them. 5 (1975) 197.
[14] K. Keizer, M.J. Verkerk and A.J. Burggraaf, Ceram. Int. 5
[471 M.J. Verkerk, K. Keizer and A.J. Burggraaf, J. Appl.
(1979) 143.
Electrochem. IO (1980) 81.
[I51 K. Keizer, A.J. Burggraaf and G. de With, J. Mater. Sci. 17
[481 M.J. Verkerk and A.J. Burggraaf, J. Electrochem. Sot. 128
(1982) 1095.
(1981) 75.
[16] A.J.A. Winnubst and A.J. Burggraaf, Mat. Res. Bull. 19
[491 H. Iwahara, T. Esaka, T. Sato and T. Takahashi, J. Solid
(1984) 613. State Chem. 39 (1981) 173.
[17] A.J.A. Winnubst, A.H.A. Scharenborg and A.J. Burggraaf,
[501 T. Takahashi, H. Iwahara and T. Esaka, J. Electrochem. Sot.
Solid State Ionics 14 (1984) 319. 124 (1977) 1563.
[18] M. Miyayama and H. Yanagida, Mat. Res. Bull. 21 (1986)
1511 T. Esaka, H. Iwahara and H. Kunieda, J. Appl. Electrochem.
1215. 12 (1982) 235.
[19] M. Miyayama, T. Nishiand and H. Yanagida, J. Mater. Sci.
r521 P. Shuk, S. Jakobs and H.-H. Mobius, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.
22 (1987) 2624. 524 (1985) 144.
[20] A. Vecher, P. Shuk, E. Naumovich and T. Khodorenko, Ion I5 (1985)
[531 T. Esaka and H. Iwahara, J. Appl. Electrochem.
Melts and Solid Electrolytes (Kiev) 4 (1989) 73 (in Russian). 447.
[21] P. Shuk, E. Naumovich, A.Vecher and A. Bumblis, Ion Melts [541 L.G. Sillen and B. Aurivillius, Z. Kristallogr. 101 (1939)
and Solid Electrolytes (Kiev) 5 (1990) 77 (in Russian). 483.
[22] E. Naumovich, Thesis, Byelorussian University, Minsk [551 W.H. Zachariasen, Acta Crystallogr. 4 (1951) 231.
(1991, in Russian). [561 H.T. Cahen, T.G.M. van den Belt, J.H.W. de Wit and G.H.J.
[23] L.G. Sillen, Ark. Kemi Mineral. Geol. 12A (1937) 1. Broers, Solid State Ionics I (1980) 41 I.
[24] G. Gattow and H. Schroder, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 318 [571 H.T. Cahen, Thesis, State University Utrecht (1980).
(1962) 176. [581 M.J. Verkerk, Thesis, University of Twente (1982).
[25] G. Gattow and D. Schiitze, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 328 [591 R.D. Shannon and CT. Prewitt, Acta Crystallogr. 25B
(1964) 44. (1969) 925.
[26] E.M. Levin and R.S. Roth, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 68A [601 G. Meng, M. Zhou and D. Peng, J. Chinese Silicate Sot. 13
(1964) 189. (1985) 366.
[27] C.N.R. Rao, G.V Subba Rao and S. Ramdas, J. Phys. Chem. [611 G. Meng, C. Yu and D. Peng, J. China Univ, Sci. Techn.
73 (1969) 672. Suppl. 15 (1985) 225.
[28] H.A. Harwig, Thesis, State University Utrecht (1977). WI G. Meng, C. Chen, X. Han, P. Yang and D. Peng, Solid State
(291 H.A. Harwig, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 444 (1978) 151. Ionics 28-30 (1988) 533.
[30] H.A. Harwig and J.W. Weenk, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 444 1631 D. Mercurio, M. El Farissi, B. Frit, J.M. Reau and J.
(1978) 167. Senegas, Solid.State Ionics 39 (1990) 297.
[31] H.A. Harwig and A.G. Gerard& Thermochim. Acta 28 1641 P.D. Battle, C.R.A. Catlow, J.W. Heap and L.M. Moroney, J.
(1979) 121. Solid State Chem. 63 (1986) 8.
[32] G. Gattow and H. Schroder, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 318 [651 PD. Battle, C.R.A. Catlow and L.M. Moroney, J. Solid State
(1962) 176. Chem. 67 (1987) 42.
[33] B.T.M. Willis, Proc. Roy. Sot. A274 (1963) 134. [661 P.D. Battle, G. Hu, L.M. Moroney and D.C. Munro, J. Solid
[34] B.T.M. Willis, J. Phys. Radium 25 (1964) 431. State Chem. 69 (1987) 30.
[35] B.T.M. Willis, Acta Crystallogr. 18 (1965) 75. t671 P.D. Battle, C.R.A. Catlow, AV. Chadwick, P. Cox, G.N.
[36] PD. Battle, C.R.A. Catlow, J. Drennan and A.D. Murray, J. Greaves and L.M. Moroney, J. Solid State Chem. 69 (1987)
Phys. Cl6 (1983) L561. 230.
[37] A. Poluyan, Thesis, Byelorussian University, Minsk (1987, w31 A. Watanabe and T. Kikuchi, Solid State Ionics 21 (1986)
in Russian). 287.
P. Shuk et al. I Solid State Ionics 89 (1996) 179-196 195
[69] A. Watanabe, Solid State Ionics 34 (1989) 35. [98] P. Shuk, Thesis, University of Greifswald (1982).
[70] P. Conflant, J.C. Boivin and D. Thomas, J. Solid State Chem. [99] P. Shuk, A. Vecher and V Samochval, Thermochemica Acta
35 (1980) 192. 93 (1985) 461.
[71] J.C. Boivin and D.J. Thomas, Solid State Ionics 3/4 (1981) [IOO] N.M. Sammes and G.J. Gainnsford, Solid State Ionics 62
457. (1993) 179.
[72] J.C. Boivin and D.J. Thomas, Solid State Ionics 5 (1981) [ 1011 I.C. Vinke, Thesis, University of Twente (1991).
523. [102] T. Lu and B.C.H. Steele, Solid State Ionics 21 (1986) 339.
[73] M.J. Verkerk, G.M.H. van de Velde and A.J. Burggraaf, J. [IO31 M. Liu, A. Joshi, Y. Shen and K. Krist, Novel mixed
Phys. Chem. Solids 43 (1982) 1129. ionic-electronic conductors for oxygen separation and
[74] T. Takahashi ed., High Conductivity Solid Ionic Conductors, elcctrocatalys, US Patent No. 5, 273, 629 (1993).
Recent Trends and Applications (World Scientific, Singa- [ 1041 L. Boon and R. Metselaar, Solid State Ionics I6 (1985)
pore, 1989). 201.
[75] T. Takahashi, T. Esaka and H. Iwahara, J. Appl. Electro- [ 1051 L. Boon and R. Metselaar, Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem.
them. 7 (1977) 303. 27 (1990) 381.
[76] H.J.M. Bouwmeester, H. Kruidhof, A.J. Burggraaf and P.J. [IO61 P.J. Gellings and H.J.M. Bouwmeester, Catal. Today 12
Gellings, Solid State Ionics 53-56 (1992) 460. (1992) I.
[77] F. Abraham, M.F. Debreuille-Gresse, G. Mairesse and G. [ 1071 Y. Shen, A. Joshi, M. Liu and K. Krist, Solid State Ionics
Nowogrocki, Solid State Ionics 28-30 (1988) 529. 72 ( 1994) 209.
[78] F. Abraham, J.C. Boivin, G. Mairesse and G. Nowogrocki, [IO81 S.P.S. Badwal, M.J. Bannister and M.J. Murray, J. Elec-
Solid State Ionics 40/4l (1990) 934. troanal. Chem. I68 (1984) 363.
[79] T. Iharada, A. Hammouche, J. Fouletier, M. Kleitz, J.C. [109] P. Shuk, H.-D. Wiemhofer, U. Guth and W. Gopel, Ionics,
Boivin and G. Mairesse, Solid State Ionics 48 (1991) 257. in press (1996).
[80] J.C. Boivin, R.N. Vannier, G. Mairesse, F. Abraham and G. [I IO] P. Shuk, H.-D. Wiemhofer and W. Gopel, Solid State Ionics,
Nowogrocki, ISSI Letters 3 (1992) 14. in press (1996).
[81] C.K. Lee, D.C. Sinclair and A.R. West, Solid State Ionics 62 [ 11 I] W. Gopel and H.-D. Wiemhofer, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys.
(1993) 193. Chem. 94 (1990) 981.
[82] R.N. Vannier, G. Mairesse, G. Nowogrocki, F. Abraham and [I 121 H.-D. Wiemhofer, S. Harke and U. Vohrer, Solid State
J.C. Boivin, Solid State Ionics 53-56 (1992) 713. Ionics 40/41 (1990) 433.
[83] R.N. Vannier, G. Mairesse, F. Abraham and G. Nowogrocki, [ 1131 H.-D. Wiemhofer and U. Vohrer, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys.
J. Solid State Chem. 103 (1993) 441. Chem. 96 (1992) 1646.
[84] R.N. Vannier, G. Mairesse, F. Abraham and G. Nowogrocki, [I 141 A.A. Agasiev, A.Kh. Zeinally, S.J. Alekperov and Ya.Yu.
Solid State Ionics 70/71 (1994) 248. Guseinov, Mat. Res. Bull. 21 (1986) 765.
[85] F. Krok, W. Bogusz, W. Jakubowski, J.R. Dygas and Ban- [I 151 V Dharmadhikari, S.R. Sainkar, S. Badrinarayan and A.
gobango, Solid State Ionics 70-71 (1994) 211. Goswami, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 25 (1982)
[86] K. Reiselhuber, Thesis, Technical University Vienna (1990). 181.
[87] K. Reiselhuber, G. Domer and M.W. Breiter, Electrochim. [I 161 MS. Hegle, P. Barboux, CC. Chang, J.M. Tarascon, T.
Acta 38 (1993) 969. Venkatesan, X.D. Wu and A. Inam, Phys. Rev. B 39 (1990)
[88] J.R. Dygas, F. Krok, W. Bogusz, P. Kurek, K. Reiselhuber 4752.
and M.W. Breiter, Solid State Ionics, 70-71 (1994) 239. [I 171 L. Zhao and I. Zhang, Solid State Comm. 90 (1994) 709.
[89] A.J. Franchlin, A.V. Chadwick and J.W. Couves, Solid State [I 181 M.J. Verkerk, M.W.J. Hammink and A.J. Burggraaf, J.
Ionics 70/7l (1994) 215. Electrochem. Sot. 130 (1983) 70.
[90] J. Yan and M. Greenblatt, Solid State Ionics 81 (1995) 225. [119] B.A. Boukamp, I.C. Vinke, K.J. de Vries and A.J.
[9l] E. Pemot, M. Anne, M. Bacmann, P. Strobel, J. Fouletier, Burggraaf, Solid State Ionics 32-33 (1989) 918.
R.N.Vannier, G. Mairesse, F. Abracham and G. Nowogrocki, [I201 B.A. Boukamp, J. de Vries and A.J. Burggraaf, in: Non-
Solid State Ionics 70/7l (1994) 259. Stoichiometric Compounds Surfaces, Grain Boundaries and
[92] E. Pemot, M. Anne, M. Bacmann, P. Strobe1 and J. Fouletier, Structural Defects, J. Nowotny and W. Weppner eds.
Solid State Ionics 78 (1995) 183. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989) 299.
[93] B. Aurivillius, Arkiv. Kemi. 1 (1949) 463, 499; 2 (1950) [I211 H. Nagamoto and H. Inoue, J. Electrochem. Sot. 136
519; 5 (1952) 39. (1989) 2088.
[94] A.A. Bush and Yu.N. Venevtsev, J. Inorg. Chem. 31 (1986) [I221 H. Tanabe and S. Fukushima, Electrochim. Acta 31 (1986)
769 (in Russian). 801.
[95] J.B. Goodenough, A. Manthiran, M. Paranthaman and Y.S. [I231 I.C. Vinke, K. Seshan, B.A. Boukamp, K.J. de Vries and
Zhen, Mater. Sci. and Eng. B12 (1992) 357. A.J. Burggraaf, Solid State Ionics 34 (1989) 235.
[96] J.B. Goodenough, A. Manthiran, M. Paranthaman and Y.S. [124] I.C. Vinke, B.A. Boukamp, K.J. de Vries and A.J.
Zhen, Solid State Ionics 52 (1992) 105. Burggraaf, Solid State Ionics 5 I (I 992) 249.
[97] S. Lazure, R.-N. Vannier, G. Nowogrocki, C. Muller, M. [I251 V. Kharton, E. Naumovich, P. Shuk, A. Demin and A.
Anne and P. Strobel, J. Mater. Chem. 5 (1995) 1395. Nikolaev, J. Electrochem. (Moscow) 28 (1992) 1693 (russ).
196 P. Shuk et al. I Solid State Ionics 89 (1996) 179-196
[126] P. Shuk, A. Vecher, V. Kharton, L. Tichonova, H.-D. [ 1331 Yu. Berezovskaya, I. Vasilieva and A. Maiorova, Lett. of
Wiemhofer, U. Guth and W. Gopel, Sensors and Actuators Acad. Sci. SU (Moscow) 301 (1988) 626 (in Russian).
B 15/16 (1993) 401. [ 1341 K.Z. Fung and A.V Virkar, J. Am. Ceram. Sot. 74 ( 1991)
[ 1271 T. Inoue, N. Seki, K. Eguchi and H. Arai, J. Electrochem. 1970.
Sot. 137 (1990) 2523. [135] K.Z. Fung, H.D. Baek and A.V. Virkar, Solid State Ionics 52
[128] T. Takahashi, T. Esaka and H. Iwahara, J. Appl. Electro- (1992) 199.
them. 7 (I 977) 299. [136] Ch. Wang, X. Xu and B. Li, Solid State Ionics 13 (1984)
[ 1291 D. Chatterji and JV. Smith, J. Electrochem. Sot. 120 (1973) 135.
889. [137] J.R. Jurado, C. Moure, P. Duran and N. Varverde, Solids
[I301 G.M. Mehrotra, M.G. Frohberg and M.L. Kapoor, Z. State Ionics 28-30 (1988) 518.
physik. Chem. N.F. 99 (1976) 304. [138] A.V. Virkar, J. Electrochem. Sot. 138 (1991) 1481.
[131] H.T. Cahen, M.J. Verkerk and G.H.J. Broers, Electrochim. [ 1391 A.M. Azad, S. Larose and S.A. Akbar, J. Mater. Sci. 29
Acta 23 (1978) 885. (1994) 4135.
[132] M.J. Verkerk and A.J. Burggraaf, J. Appl. Electrochem. 10
( 1980) 667.