This episode explores whether taking a life can be morally justified through a discussion of self-defense, punishment for serious crimes, and wartime killings. Philosophers and criminal justice experts debate the complex issues around the right to life and when, if ever, lethal force is acceptable. Overall the program questions how societies should determine appropriate consequences for unlawful or harmful acts while still protecting human dignity and civil rights.
This episode explores whether taking a life can be morally justified through a discussion of self-defense, punishment for serious crimes, and wartime killings. Philosophers and criminal justice experts debate the complex issues around the right to life and when, if ever, lethal force is acceptable. Overall the program questions how societies should determine appropriate consequences for unlawful or harmful acts while still protecting human dignity and civil rights.
This episode explores whether taking a life can be morally justified through a discussion of self-defense, punishment for serious crimes, and wartime killings. Philosophers and criminal justice experts debate the complex issues around the right to life and when, if ever, lethal force is acceptable. Overall the program questions how societies should determine appropriate consequences for unlawful or harmful acts while still protecting human dignity and civil rights.
This episode explores whether taking a life can be morally justified through a discussion of self-defense, punishment for serious crimes, and wartime killings. Philosophers and criminal justice experts debate the complex issues around the right to life and when, if ever, lethal force is acceptable. Overall the program questions how societies should determine appropriate consequences for unlawful or harmful acts while still protecting human dignity and civil rights.