MOR ROGER ¢. PADUA v. HON. POBERID V-ZANTUASTR, A.N.No. MIT-93~ 8¢¢ October 24,1994 FRO: Maype See oe Sneguesord I ie hs cael apa avec att es Mon split Infor of Riga onde ith (ayers who Pave a ee He complains That come of he cases gerding Wa e__ peep cola Foye not sme hr in lg cng =o rg od dng, tn leben ue orang oe |__| bier ork idgp Zona ity of ret ry th a Fon een tho catia Cosee jn Vie ola 2 HAD: es! : " 2 Fe 0c of idgp Toran enfig. and dng ya mye ro as _ Cases In Wis. \ wie vo tp erode he tt 0 re gar nthe. parity of fe idge. free a ae eeeORACE OF THE_COURt ADNUNICTRATOR, v- 1a Loohala, gona ato ila When Ane cate is ek On — eS a eee aaa et in ree ge ol — Ye cppertoty, fo pow tre gk hte Oct eg ee Gore soem wont Foe dole Kime eh {i ok Sac gh tem “|____ ANONYMOUS v. JUDGE RIO C.AHAS AM. Ne MIT=[I-I801 ferry 27,208 = ___FRCIS The Court reodiee an anonym eter complnt alleging tra: 18 uc rewiedge that: Tadge heros living scardoloudy witha woman Wo ie _ ic tle he five hic man jhe med vita let ocfviies.—__ thr ic Connection id oo elements he coef Ort: vay Untcy and —_ Oirky 5 ne decides ic cases urily in exchange fix mokeial Ona womeary —rideraion j0nd be. Tnadved wit Cote lopmising, Tide, fras_ _____ deed al re int Kfm_and clo ratty were hated _ be Waa tien, |b dicqunted profsonals vppatess ard local Fr caine ae * ee ges ee eee aJUDGE MONA USAT. THRORA,_y. JUDGE. ANTDNIO.A-CARBONELL. AM. No. RIG=0¢- 2145 _ Tine 4¢, 2010 FROG: Dre to tre fda gad over of Tie Ps, Judge Carrel foot. ver_ ind beard 4hednce. Loamana olteqedly refused 4p funrich Taisvia with 0. COPY, L of 4, deeion upon the Teceocfone, igs Fer. Gated jo = Re Saptmm ono Rates eo oxo $+ wotzaty rt dette changing ateing arch — 0. a old rant yc Ti “Tiger bol ge pay ue wie cds 08 eS And fod OF re, Tadge Covorrelé decvon was ron accnedances vith the. thas fre cace and ely fared Tai. —— Be: wetare vk op p cae aces noe — ide idol Code , anal Fox oyerctepring of ___hic autres 5 ct! ne Sn pours! | __ Side Coronal rod ovegi te cory fig Taxon i om ton eo an cand "trey Re od pt, hrc, tinge fr Jc, __ Cottorndl 40 Fate _venderet 0 decision yin Spe rok ye opetal fe requar __resiing, deGPOISERDOORCO MARFIL and TEODOR EXPANOUA v. JUDGE, ORLANDO CUACHON A.M. No. 28400-N fugust 1901 FAK: wate Mio he oot fe ______2aginck Comcivant He tpok- Ongriuavee of re Cuse_ ara tre Compatnark Was __ Oeste. Camettnat after leaning he necpordent_ ic npr fe. motion to aya, {te cxnsnal action he. Fecpordent averted hat Upon knowing that See eS raked Apthe Garang he to EDT yon aca coneINADA P. MARCOS. Tuck FRANCO. WIL aNMNTUR AM.Nb. RN-01- 2002. anyary 201 FRCS: Marcas overt tha re Oct Tudo Ranfntvan jp rowecieg a Sra On Beovtony order condihied ns: ume of fo lowThe ater maced te, —___tot fre Gacen Baca ne Tn ik Gola_was ob mee cepion . Tide, Pariahan Oared “rok Navcos Cad hove pst fled 0. marieseg, 0 taco, inet — Or (nog he ogpera, nt che dd vot Shetroud hove fled 0. woFon fx ‘ IE: Weer or rok dap Rinton vs Fae ic oes ond WU eas a -demeriox, vot to kyon Oe ack AC oe do hot pow, onsite Qos Tonorovre of te law):__RE:ANONUMOUT COMFUANT NANT IVDGE, EDMUND" ACN _ me AM. Nb. pry OF (Bl uly 28, Zong FRCS eter fom re ‘Coerped eo of he tr dt” yo resid \Gofng Arak TepordantGqnedl artes ond cenhensed occured wie on affcial tow He o> sec impoper ems Tn ond ot of open curt AOI fp te recgandort, be Teed ord. opod fin He, did rok tend Jeger Uh — SF orhony hrc ot 8 obe, WA he did Ony aN fe Fado borne enon « sh cent fate, ____ |G rater or no he reports aim ad once ef detcons White 0 offal lene See oe___ HEIRS OF THEUATE REUTER. TCE 0. ASPIRAS v-JUDGE CLIFTON. U-GANRY AM.Nb-RI-OT-20¢5 Dreyer 7, 2004 doroy, pe oe - }— eit Gan sy ter Dn ic pet ote — Hh he diol be gen a medal. sceeciant dole pone tre. 2 cian een (ale — Yes hoya. He Puccced tre calor prone fx Tact netting mbt Lowland wake he ppc i gt ng ke loo. Scroory ord precerialok Be i anil? — Woy Tice Goray, ceoaty fel, te ocitg contr. eatin, Se carat WiPioy ests ee A algeds te, cont ___ ev en of eagles re. a poacigt -__ GRRVE NAY on ts, CUDA T. BASCUG v JUNE EDWIN BB. SJANELLANA AM. No. MIS-OT- lobolo fi ‘led inning 60:0 ckcided and/or hed by Sn rd eg es i 0 Dt — 7 Th.aGre omy. edd ce ope ed en may = fsa, arsed peyton ae — Ree ie SS ea | $e ROMS, cn he have Ween 0 Oroond Er diswagcal.__ JUDGE APORAOION) 6. ANGELEC v. JUDGE MARIN EUSASEMPI. DIY AM. No. RET=10-2248 Geer 29, 2010 HAs: eee ea cages 1 Oy yOGR, Were mite? Tor ce pong Hos de yg ein te — {not dedoy, ofr ri oe nae ehtaube lhe canentdeea = ee counter toot che decided walgect (mes vile te Giered wind Growted. Qe wt ek Tle late on Ge of i de? Hane! a= ae _______ Rend goreal tnt. ge rngio oe ___guctectve tendons. 6f4 date final fed cin eta it mn doe cy xtned — { Somicson Gh ctiona ieee AURA v. JUDE UTARETH GUIERREZ = Wohnen sperne—— a jatoron avened ond Uwectived eon ded fr Cedgion inne ___ Hest yaet Tue tp vender the,jy bitin 90- pt on etn en a eee i ee Despite eo et ee oe Tate or nok {he spond yds done omnis — EES! cceepereas ers Jpfleer toons. chp ne es fd do ae Sree. Cote el belated oj anyei ae Sx tk Ode eo ___ heer ack djqeon cose and etic eft____RONEPAA ST-TAMGANI- Ropu v- Tueticgs GRECORY SON, _ RA ‘ ANL.No.pe-i4-s8<5___ A 2,204, FAUIS: einer horgac regret fr joe, yond conduct —_Unlleconning Justices, ond oancuck. fGia\ {othe Interest of —- Ae ARTES fn reo teeth ia Tn poiieg, Cases fi Wik Tice. Brg rygg come alon® ond rer pices /____le ee oO guna — | pe. eo deo os cli — dcumenic ox sing, x 0 X See Se re ees oe gay oie dope gin HELD: Yes! —___]uital decom dona ney beta th cgrty ana ack ui, __ Cosecy ho appear before Hr cout, Tides gre Pied