1.1.

1 Influence of Proctive personality on employee motivation

From the regression results Table , the R value was 0..491 indicating that there is a strong

relationship between Proctive personality and employee motivation. The R squared (R2) value of

0.243 shows that 24.3 percent of job satisfaction is explained by the reward system. The

remaining 75.6 percent is explained by other factors. The differential payments and contractual

engagement among different staff explained the higher influence of Proctive personality on the

employee motivation

Model Summary
Std. The error
Adjusted R of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate
1 .491a .243 .27 .13634
a. Predictors: (Constant), Proctive personality
Table Regression analysis between Proactive personality and employee motivation
From table 4.2 it is indicated that the model was significant with the F ratio = 5.087 at p-value

0.000 < 0.01. This is an indication that reward, when considered, has a significant effect on job

satisfaction.

ANOVAb
Sum of
Model Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 22.386 1 22.386 5.087E3 .000a
Residual .959 218 .004
Total 23.345 219
a. Predictors: (Constant), Employee motivation
b. Dependent Variable: Proctive personality
Table 4.1 ANOVA test showing the variation between Proactive personality and Employee
motivation
 Proctive personality had a positive and significant effect on Employee motivation with β

= 1.062 at p-value 0.000 which is less than 0.01. The finding of this study that Proctive

personality had a significant effect on employee motivation asserts earlier finding by Lubanga

(2014), who found a strong and positive correlation between the overall Proctive personality and

the variables of contingent rewards, promotion, supervision, and communication.

Coefficients
Unstandardized Standardized
Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) -.086 .028 -3.102 .002
PROACTIVE
1.062 .015 .979 69.322 .000
PERSONALITY
a. Dependent Variable: EMPLOYEE
MOTIVATION

1.1.2 Multiple Regressions

The multivariate regression analysis is used to identify the mediating effects of Work

engagement on Proactive personality and employee motivation.

1.1.3 Influence of Work engagement on Proactive personality and employee motivation.

 Model Summary
Std. The error
Adjusted R of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate
1 .889a .790 .781 .09962
a. Predictors: (Constant), EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION
PROACTIVE PERSONALITY
Table 4.2 Regression model based influence of EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION and proactive
personality over work engangment.
The above table 4.17 shows the value of adjusted R square as 0.781 which indicates that

the model is 78.1% accurate or best fitted. The R square value is .790 which shows that change

(variation) independent variables incorporate 79.0% percent change independent variable.

ANOVAb
Sum of
Model Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 16.807 2 8.404 3.413E3 .000a
Residual .534 217 .002
Total 17.342 219
a. Predictors: (Constant), EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION, PROACTVE
PERSONALITY
b. Dependent Variable: WORK ENGANMGMENT
Table 4.3 ANOVA test showing the variation between employee motivation and proactive
personality as constant variable and work engagement as the dependent variable.

The overall significance of the regression model has identified by F – value and its

probability. It is, in fact, they explained variance divided by unexplained variance. The above

table 4.18 shows the F-statistic value of 3.413 and its probability is 0.000 which demonstrate a

significant relationship between study variables.

 Coefficients
Unstandardized Standardized
Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) .268 .021 12.605 .000
PROACTVE
.133 .055 .142 2.818 .012
PERSONALITY
EMPLOYEE
.728 .051 .845 14.373 .000
MOTIVATION
a. Dependent Variable: WORK ENGANMGMENT
Table 4.4 Correlation coefficient of employee motivation and proactive personality as constant
variable and employee work engagement as the dependent variable.
The above table shows the coefficient values of independent variables. The direction in

which the dependent variable is led towards by the independent one is ascertained from the Beta

value. proactive personality and employee motivation (independent variables) are seen to be

influencing the employee work engagement which is the dependent variable at a B value of .133

and .728 respectively and sig values .012 and.000.The hypothesis supported the findings to make

judgments for employee work engagement and other variables.

1.1.4 Influence of Merit Based Reward on Voluntary Turnover

Model Summary
Std. The error
Adjusted R of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate
1 .869a .755 .740 .12917
a. Predictors: (Constant), PROACTIVE PERSONALITY
Table 4.5 Regression model based on the influence of proactive personality over employee work
engagement.
Table 4.20 gives the value of adjusted R square which is 0.740 and it indicates that the

model is 74% accurate. The value of R square is .755 and it interpreted that 75.5 % change in

independent variables is occurred due to the change independent variable.

 ANOVAb
Sum of
Model Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 16.299 1 16.299 3.407E3 .000a
Residual 1.043 218 .005
Total 17.342 219
a. Predictors: (Constant), PROACTIVE PERSONALITY
b. Dependent Variable: EMPLOYEE WORK
ENGANGMENT
Table 4.6 ANOVA test showing the variation between proactive personality based as constant
variable and employee work engagement as the dependent variable.

The Anova table shows the relationship between proactive personality and employee

work engagement. The sig value is .000 which is less than 0.01 and the f value is 3.407 so there

is a significant relationship between both variables.

Coefficients
Unstandardized Standardized
Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) .205 .029 7.073 .000
PROACTIVE
.906 .016 .969 58.366 .000
PERSONALITY
a. Dependent Variable: EMPLOYEE WORK
ENGANGMENT
Table 4.7 Correlation coefficient of between proactive personality based as constant variable and
employee work engagement as the dependent variable.
Table 4.22 shows the effect of independent variable on the dependent variable and it

shows the regression coefficient and t- values. From table, the t value of the constant is 7.073

which is significant at 1% level of significance. It shows that if there is no effect of employee

work engagement on proactive personality than there is still some value of independent variables
will be equal to 7.073. The relationship between of employee work engagement on proactive

personality is significant at p- the value of .000 with the t value of 58.366. The beta value of

merit based reward is 0.906.