Dakota Tillman

Digital Learning Environments

Online Learning Module

1. Instructional Objectives

Objective #1: Students will identify the expectations of technology use in the classroom by

completing a multiple choice quiz summarizing the exceptions of technology with 80% or higher

accuracy. (Cognitive Domain)

Objective #2: Students will demonstrate their understanding of the usage of instructional time

by completing a research report showing their understanding of paraphrasing in the allotted time.

(Cognitive Domain)

Objective #3: Students will develop a presentation that provides five examples of curated

content using a Web 2.0 resource. (Cognitive Domain)

2. Description of Assessments

Assessment on Objective #1: Students will identify the expectations of technology use in the

classroom by completing a multiple choice quiz summarizing the exceptions of technology with

80% or higher accuracy.

Objective of Assessment #2: Students will demonstrate their understanding of the usage of

instructional time by completing a research report showing their understanding of paraphrasing

in the allotted time.

Objective of Assessment #3: Students will develop a presentation that provides five examples of

curated content using a Web 2.0 resource.

3. Detailed Data

Expectation of Technology Use Quiz Data:

Rubrics for Plagiarism Research Report:
Rubrics for Curated Content Project:
4. Analysis of Data From Assessments:

- Expectations of Technology Quiz:

Average Score: 90%

Highest Score: 100%

Lowest Score: 75%

- Plagiarism Research Report:

Average Score: 86%

Highest Score: 95%

Lowest Score: 65%

 - Curated Content Project

Average Score: 81%

Highest Score: 90%

Lowest Score: 65%

5. Field Notes:

Students were comfortable while working through the online instruction, and some finished the

module earlier than expected. The students did very well on the expectations of technology quiz,

and still maintained a high average for the other two projects. The questions were all related to

the plagiarism research report and curated content project. The questions pertaining to the

research report typically were questions about the specifics of paraphrasing, such as how to

properly cite or quote from an article. It was evident the students were not experienced in

paraphrasing and citing which made this project very beneficial to them. Th questions

concerning the curated content assignment were more focused on the functionality of Adobe

Spark and Canva than the actual assignment itself. One topic that should have been covered more

in-depth is public speaking and presenting to an audience. Some students were not very

comfortable during their presentation, and tips and strategic methods should have been provided

to help the students. Students stated the rubrics were very easy to understand and straight

forward which help them answer some questions on their own.

6. Evaluation Rubric

Content Module Review for <<Dakota Tillman>>

Peer Reviewer: <<Natania Riley>> Review Date: 4/12/2020

Unacceptable (1 Point) Acceptable (2 Points) Target (3 Points) Points

Content curation tool is linked 1. Content curation tool is Must have all of these criteria: 3
to the online course. OR embedded (not linked) in the 1. Content curation is
• Content curation tool online course. AND embedded (not linked) in the
selected from the article 2. Content curation tool online course.
“17 of the Best Content selected from the article “17 of 2. Content curation tool
Curation Tools” and links the Best Content Curation selected from the article “17 of
to a minimum of 4 Tools” and links to a minimum the Best Content Curation
unique web resources. of 6 unique web resources. Tools” and links to a minimum of
OR BUT Also… 8 unique web resources (do
• Many duplicate web sites • One duplicate web site not select more than one from a
included. OR included. OR single domain name.)
• Tool selected was not Resources do not exactly 3. Resources match the
from the content curation match the instructional instructional objectives, are
list. OR objectives. OR high-quality and age
• Resources do not match • Some resources are not appropriate.
the instructional age-appropriate. OR 4. ALL links are active.
objectives. OR • One of the links is not 5. Annotations are descriptive
• Most resources are not active. OR and qualitative.
age-appropriate. OR • Annotations are complete 6. Annotations are age-
• More than one link is not but some simply provide appropriate to guide learners to
active. OR a content summary. use of the resources.
• Annotations are missing/
incomplete.

Online Module does not
include any social media. OR
• Social media is not
effectively integrated. OR
• Social media links are
not active. OR
• Course does not contain
sufficient discussions.
OR
• Discussions do not
match course objectives.
1.Online Module contains at
least two different social
media apps. AND
2. All links to social media are
active. AND
3. Social media is integrated
into the course content in a
meaningful way. AND
4. Course contains at least
two discussions. AND
5. Discussions match content.
AND
6. At least one discussion post
is created using a social
media format.
Must have all of these criteria: 2
1.Online Module contains 2 or
more different social media
apps.
2.All links to social media are
active.
3.Social media is effectively
integrated into the course
content in a meaningful way.
4. Course contains multiple (>2)
discussions.
5. Clear match between the
discussion question and the
instructional objectives.
6. Discussion focuses on higher
level thinking.
7. At least two discussions are
posted using a social media
format (ie. Facebook, Pinterest,
Twitter, etc).
 1. Course rubric does not
contain sufficient levels.
OR
• Course rubric does not
contain criteria that align
with content. OR
• Quiz does not measure
the stated objectives. OR
• Quiz contains
grammatical and/or
spelling errors. OR
• Quiz is not created using
an online tool (ie. Quizlet
or Google Forms).
• 1.Course rubrics contain Must have all of these criteria: 3
levels that are well • 1.Course rubric contains
defined. AND levels that are well defined
• 2.Course rubric contains and fit the learning target.
at least two levels of • 2. Course rubric contains 3
student performance. or more levels to
AND distinguish between
• 3.Rubric criterion align student performance.
with overall content. AND • 3. Rubric criteria directly
• 4.Quiz questions match align with the activity it is
instructional objectives. intended to assess.
AND • 4. Quiz questions match
• 5.Quizzes are instructional objectives.
grammatically correct • 5. All multiple choice
and do not contain any questions have at least 3-4
misspellings. AND response options; No True/
6.Quiz is created using an False questions.
online tool such as Quizlet or • 6. Quizzes are
Google Forms. grammatically correct and
do not contain any
misspellings.
7.Quizzes are created using an
online tool such as Quizlet or
Google Forms.

1.Online Module does not
show evidence or has limited
evidence of meeting the
needs of diverse learners.
1.Online Module utilizes 3+
elements of Universal Design
for Learning. AND
2. Online Module offers some
evidence of Differentiated
Instruction. AND
3. Online Module shows
evidence of some accessibility
adaptations. AND
4. Links to (2+) assistive
technology resources
provided.
Must have all of these criteria: 2
1. Online Module clearly
utilizes Universal Design
for Learning (6+
checkpoints).
2. Online Module utilizes
Differentiated Instruction
as evidenced by
differentiated assignments.
3. Online Module includes
specific accessibility and/
or assistive technology
resources.
4. Multiple (4+) assistive
technology resources are
linked to.

Content and 1. Much of the instructional
Organization content I needed to
complete the content
module was missing. OR
2. I couldn’t access the site
on the first try. OR
3. I had to request access
on 3 or more embedded
content and/or links. OR
4. Navigating through the
course was confusing
OR it was hard to find
things OR there is a lot
of extraneous content on
the site. OR
5. The text on the site is
hard to read. OR
6. There are multiple
grammatical, punctuation
or spelling errors.
1. Most of the instructional Must have all of these criteria:
content I needed to
complete the content 1.
module was present.
AND
2. I could access the site on
the first try. I had to 2.
request access on no
more than 2 embedded
content and/or links. AND 3.
3. It was easy for work
through the course most
of the time. AND 4.
4. There is some
extraneous content on
the site, but it wasn’t 5.
distracting or confusing.
AND
5. The site is well designed 6.
and visually appealing.
All text is legible. AND
6. There are one or two
grammatical, punctuation
or spelling errors.
3
All of the instructional
content I needed to
complete the content
module was present.
I could access the site and
all embedded content and
links on the first try.
It was easy to work
through the course. I knew
what to do next.
There is no extraneous or
placeholder content on the
site.
The site is well designed
and visually appealing. All
text is legible.
There were no
grammatical, punctuation
or spelling errors.

Total Score 13

Peer Reviewer Comments:

Your content module was very organized and well put together. One issue I had was getting on Edmodo to complete that
assignment. The other thing was that you list 3 assistive technology and not 4+ assistive technology resources. If I were
a student taking this course, I would have no problems finding the information and instructions to complete the
assignments. It was easy to work through with no errors. Great Job!

7. Additional Data: No additional data

8. Peer Evaluation Rubric

Content Module Review for Anna Collins

Peer Reviewer: Dakota Tillman Review Date:

Unacceptable (1 Point) Acceptable (2 Points) Target (3 Points) Points

Content curation tool is linked 1. Content curation tool is Must have all of these criteria:
to the online course. OR embedded (not linked) in the 1. Content curation is
• Content curation tool online course. AND embedded (not linked) in the
selected from the article 2. Content curation tool online course.
“17 of the Best Content selected from the article “17 of 2. Content curation tool
Curation Tools” and links the Best Content Curation selected from the article “17 of
to a minimum of 4 Tools” and links to a minimum the Best Content Curation
unique web resources. of 6 unique web resources. Tools” and links to a minimum of
OR BUT Also… 8 unique web resources (do
• Many duplicate web sites • One duplicate web site not select more than one from a 3
included. OR included. OR single domain name.)
• Tool selected was not Resources do not exactly 3. Resources match the
from the content curation match the instructional instructional objectives, are
list. OR objectives. OR high-quality and age
• Resources do not match • Some resources are not appropriate.
the instructional age-appropriate. OR 4. ALL links are active.
objectives. OR • One of the links is not 5. Annotations are descriptive
• Most resources are not active. OR and qualitative.
age-appropriate. OR • Annotations are complete 6. Annotations are age-
• More than one link is not but some simply provide appropriate to guide learners to
active. OR a content summary. use of the resources.
• Annotations are missing/
incomplete.
Online Module does not
include any social media. OR
• Social media is not
effectively integrated. OR
• Social media links are
not active. OR
• Course does not contain
sufficient discussions.
OR
• Discussions do not
match course objectives.
1. Course rubric does not
contain sufficient levels.
OR
• Course rubric does not
contain criteria that align
with content. OR
• Quiz does not measure
the stated objectives. OR
• Quiz contains
grammatical and/or
spelling errors. OR
• Quiz is not created using
an online tool (ie. Quizlet
or Google Forms).
1.Online Module does not
show evidence or has limited
evidence of meeting the
needs of diverse learners.
1.Online Module contains at
least two different social
media apps. AND
2. All links to social media are
active. AND
3. Social media is integrated
into the course content in a
meaningful way. AND
4. Course contains at least
two discussions. AND
5. Discussions match content.
AND
6. At least one discussion post
is created using a social
media format.
• 1.Course rubrics contain
levels that are well
defined. AND
• 2.Course rubric contains
at least two levels of
student performance.
AND
• 3.Rubric criterion align
with overall content. AND
• 4.Quiz questions match
instructional objectives.
AND
• 5.Quizzes are
grammatically correct
and do not contain any
misspellings. AND
6.Quiz is created using an
online tool such as Quizlet or
Google Forms.
1.Online Module utilizes 3+
elements of Universal Design
for Learning. AND
2. Online Module offers some
evidence of Differentiated
Instruction. AND
3. Online Module shows
evidence of some accessibility
adaptations. AND
4. Links to (2+) assistive
technology resources
provided.
Must have all of these criteria:
1.Online Module contains 2 or
more different social media
apps.
2.All links to social media are
active.
3.Social media is effectively
integrated into the course 3
content in a meaningful way.
4. Course contains multiple (>2)
discussions.
5. Clear match between the
discussion question and the
instructional objectives.
6. Discussion focuses on higher
level thinking.
7. At least two discussions are
posted using a social media
format (ie. Facebook, Pinterest,
Twitter, etc).
Must have all of these criteria:
• 1.Course rubric contains
levels that are well defined
and fit the learning target.
• 2. Course rubric contains 3
or more levels to
distinguish between
student performance.
• 3. Rubric criteria directly
align with the activity it is 3
intended to assess.
• 4. Quiz questions match
instructional objectives.
• 5. All multiple choice
questions have at least 3-4
response options; No True/
False questions.
• 6. Quizzes are
grammatically correct and
do not contain any
misspellings.
7.Quizzes are created using an
online tool such as Quizlet or
Google Forms.
Must have all of these criteria:
1. Online Module clearly
utilizes Universal Design
for Learning (6+
checkpoints).
2. Online Module utilizes
Differentiated Instruction 3
as evidenced by
differentiated assignments.
3. Online Module includes
specific accessibility and/
or assistive technology
resources.
4. Multiple (4+) assistive
technology resources are
linked to.
Content and 1. Much of the instructional 1.
Organization content I needed to
complete the content
module was missing. OR
2. I couldn’t access the site
on the first try. OR 2.
3. I had to request access
on 3 or more embedded
content and/or links. OR
4. Navigating through the
course was confusing 3.
OR it was hard to find
things OR there is a lot
of extraneous content on 4.
the site. OR
5. The text on the site is
hard to read. OR
6. There are multiple
grammatical, punctuation 5.
or spelling errors.
6.
Peer Reviewer Comments:
The content module is extremely organized and descriptive. Screenshots are provided for restricted access
assignments for students through Google Classroom.
Most of the instructional Must have all of these criteria:
content I needed to
complete the content 1.
module was present.
AND
I could access the site on
the first try. I had to 2.
request access on no
more than 2 embedded
content and/or links. AND 3.
It was easy for work
through the course most
of the time. AND 4.
There is some
extraneous content on
the site, but it wasn’t 5.
distracting or confusing.
AND
The site is well designed 6.
and visually appealing.
All text is legible. AND
There are one or two
grammatical, punctuation
or spelling errors.
Total Score
All of the instructional
content I needed to
complete the content
module was present.
I could access the site and
all embedded content and
links on the first try.
It was easy to work 3
through the course. I knew
what to do next.
There is no extraneous or
placeholder content on the
site.
The site is well designed
and visually appealing. All
text is legible.
There were no
grammatical, punctuation
or spelling errors.
15