Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Epictetus On General Principles (Prolēpseis) : Agamemnon Achilles
Epictetus On General Principles (Prolēpseis) : Agamemnon Achilles
The
Stoic
philosopher
Epictetus
makes
reference
to
conceptions
human
beings
possess
called
prolēpseis
in
Greek
(translated
as
“general
principles”
or
preconceptions”).
The
Stoics
also
employed
another
term
for
these,
ennoiai,
“general
ideas.”
These
are
very
basic
and
general
conceptions
that
all
human
beings,
according
to
Stoic
doctrine,
possess
by
being
human.
They
are
employed
in
reasoning,
inference,
and
choice.
Or
in
other
words,
they
are
applied
to
particular
cases,
experiences,
and
objects.
Some
general
principles
Epictetus
specifically
mentions
and
discusses
are
what
we
can
call
moral
conceptions.
Some
of
the
examples
are
basic
moral
categories:
• the
Good
and
the
Bad
• the
Useful
and
the
Harmful
• the
Just
and
the
Unjust
(or
the
Right
and
the
Wrong)
• the
Beautiful
and
the
Ugly
(or
the
Fair
and
the
Foul,
Noble
and
Ignoble)
• the
Holy
and
the
Unholy
• the
Needed
and
the
Unnecessary
• the
Appropriate
and
the
Inappropriate
(or
Duty
and
against
Duty)
• What
is
In
Our
Control,
and
What
is
Not
In
Our
Control
Others
are
implications
or
features
of
these
conceptions
• that
the
Good
is
to
be
chosen
and
pursued
• what
is
needed
and
noble
ought
to
be
done
• that
the
Just
is
morally
beautiful
and
becoming
• that
the
Holy
is
to
be
preferred
to
everything
else
Epictetus
holds
that
all
people
possess
these
general
conceptions,
and
that
moreover
in
themselves,
these
general
ideas
systematically
interconnect
with
each
other,
so
that
they
do
not
enter
into
any
sort
of
contradiction
with
each
other.
When
these
general
conceptions
are
applied
in
particular
or
specific
cases,
however,
then
people
are
liable
to
run
into
all
sorts
of
difficulties,
mistakes,
and
even
conflicts.
The
conflict
between
Agamemnon
and
Achilles
narrated
in
the
Illiad
provides
an
example:
AGAMEMNON
ACHILLES
SHARED
C OMMON
G ENERAL
P RINCIPLES
the
Noble
ought
to
be
done
the
Needed
o ught
to
b e
d one
Particular
A
pplication
Particular
A
pplication
I
should
not
b
e
compelled
CONFLICT!
You
should
b
e
compelled
to
give
B riseis
back
to
give
Briseis
back
Copyright
2015
Gregory
B.
Sadler,
Ph.D
ReasonIO:
philosophy
into
practice
Epictetus
on
General
Principles
(Prolēpseis)
When
we
are
dealing
with
particular
cases,
because
of
their
different
standpoints
and
their
different
understandings
of
these
general
principles,
people
tend
to
apply
them
–
or
misapply
them
–
at
variance
to
each
other.
This
brings
them
into
conflict
–
a
situation
in
which
both
parties
think
themselves
to
be
acting
rationally
and
in
accordance
with
the
general
principles,
and
the
other
not
to
be.
It
is
also
possible
for
a
person
to
fall
into
error
in
their
own
use
of
their
general
conceptions.
Epictetus
uses
the
classical
example
of
Medea,
who
killed
her
own
children
in
order
to
revenge
herself
upon
her
husband,
Jason,
for
his
infidelity
and
divorce
of
her.
PARTICULAR
CIRCUMSTANCES
GENERAL
CONCEPTIONS
ACTION
APPLICATION
What
it
means
for
a
person’s
Kill
our
revenge!
I
should
take
desires
not
to
be
realized
children!
Medea
has
been
wronged
and
insulted
by
her
husband
Jason
In
order
for
us
to
be
able
to
apply
these
general
conceptions
properly,
it
is
not
enough
to
possess
general
conceptions
–
nor
is
it
enough
to
grasp
the
particulars
properly.
What
is
missing
in
the
case
of
most
people
is
clearly
understanding
the
general
principles
in
themselves
and
understanding
how
to
properly
apply
them,
and
this
requires
discipline
and
training
(generally
supplied
by
the
theory
and
practice
involved
in
Philosophy).
Epictetus
argues
that
what
is
required
is
taking
the
general
conceptions
that
we
possess
and
fitting
them
into
a
complete
system
of
ideas
in
which
it
becomes
clear
what
the
general
conceptions
are,
how
they
fit
together,
and
how
they
properly
apply
to
particular
cases.
PARTICULAR
CIRCUMSTANCES
SYSTEM
of
GENERAL
CONCEPTIONS
Particular
A
pplication
GENERAL
GENERAL
CONCEPTION
(correct)
CONCEPTION
GENERAL
CONCEPTION
New
PARTICULAR
CIRCUMSTANCES
All
are
clearly
and
distinctly
understood
New
Particular
Application
and
do
not
contradict
each
other
(correct)
Copyright 2015 Gregory B. Sadler, Ph.D ReasonIO: philosophy into practice