Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Chapter 1
Final Chapter 1
We already have over a billion fellow Indians. Within the next 20 years, we will
have 400 million people below the age of 35 years – more than the entire
population of the United States! Each person, in this bold new generation, will
be in the prime of his or her life, striving for a better tomorrow – creating, in
the process, new growth opportunities, for budding entrepreneurs!
Truly, with economic reforms in the country, and with the virtual removal of all
trade barriers, the world is now our market – and our opportunity!
J.B say and J.H. von Thunen. Jean Baptiste say (1767-1832), the French
political economist assigned the entrepreneur with a crucial role-‘coordination’
and made a distinction between the entrepreneur and capitalist (Say,1967).
Despite its stress on the human factor in the production system, the Havard
tradition never explicitly challenged the equilibrium – obsessed orthodox
economic theory. This was challenged by the neo-Austrian School who argued
that disequilibrium, rather than equilibrium, was the likely scenario and as
such, entrepreneurs operate under fairly uncertain circumstances. The essence
of entrepreneurship consists in the alertness of market participants to profit
opportunities. A typical entrepreneur, according to Kirzner (1979) is the
arbitrageur, the person who discovers opportunity at low prices and sells the
same items at high prices because of intertemporal and interspatial demands.
To sum up, major theories and expositions from Cantillon to Kirzner view the
entrepreneur as performing various functional roles as risk taker, decision
maker, organizer or coordinator, innovator, employer of factors of production,
gap seeker and input completer, arbitrageur, etc. The most appropriate
definition of entrepreneurship that would fit into the rural development
context, argued here, is the broader one, the one which defines
entrepreneurship as: “a force that mobilizes other resources to meet unmet
market demands”, “the ability to create and build something from practically
nothing”, “the process of creating value by pulling together a unique package
of resources to exploit an opportunity”.
Alternative Approaches
Socio-Cultural Approaches
Psychological Approaches
The focus in entrepreneurship shifted from the act to the actors (Shacer &
Scott,1991) in the work of McClelland(1961). According to McClelland and
Winter(1969) need for achievement (n-Ach) is responsible for economic
3
4
Third, the approach does not help predict who will or will not be an
4
5
Achievement-Orientation
While personal initiative and purposeful behaviour can be view as a good
starting point of an entrepreneurial effort, many such initiatives fail. The
archetype successful entrepreneur is supposed to epitomize achievement
motivation (McClelland,1961) which facilitates the creation and development of
enterprises in competitive environments. While critics have raised serious
questions regarding the unique or overarching significance of n-Ach in the
emergence of entrepreneurship (Smelser,1976), this element of personality
has continued in the mainstream of entrepreneurship theory (Shaver &
Scott,1991). People with high n-Ach are known to seek and assume high
degree of personal responsibility, set challenging but realistic goals, work with
concrete feedback, research their environment and choose partners with
5
6
Opportunity-Seeking
The context in which an individual brings to bear his/her initiative,
achievement orientation and visioning have a strong bearing on what it
produces; when these forces are directed towards realizing surplus or value in
a market environment, over a period of time, we see the creation of
enterprises. This perspective of the entrepreneur as a merchant adventurer,
who in Cantillon’s view balances out imperfections in the market
(Gopakumar,1995) in pursuit of what Bentham terms wealth, provided the
historical basis for the development of entrepreneurship. The wealth is seen as
the reward the entrepreneurial individual gains for the risk taken or exercise of
judgment where there is greater possibility for error; this distinguishes
between certain return from wage labour, and return from risk-oriented
production for the market. Hence ‘opportunity seeking’ would include one’s
ability to see situations in terms of unmet needs, identifying markets or gaps
for which product concepts are to be evolved, and the search for creating and
maintaining a competitive advantage to derive benefits on a sustained basis.
Innovativeness
Schumpeter(1949) went on to conceptualize entrepreneurs as persons who are
not necessarily capitalists or those having command over resources, but as
ones who create new combinations of the factors of production and the market
to derive profit. Innovativeness refers to creation of new products, markets,
product-market combinations, methods of production and organization, and
the like that enable the enterprise to gain competitive advantage in the
market.
It is evident that each of the dispositions referred to may be found in all types
of individuals (entrepreneurs and non- entrepreneurs). Then how can we relate
these dispositions to entrepreneurship? We propose that when these five
elements converge at high intensities, in non-restrictive environments, it is
likely to give rise to enterprise formation. Therefore, one may find individuals
who had created enterprises in the past now turning weak because they may
no longer be proactive enterprise creators; instead they may be content to
play the role of managers in their stable business, or turn to community
leadership, and the like. Hence, this perspective lends to a process view of
entrepreneurship.
Entrepreneur
6
7
An entrepreneur is a person who has possession of a new enterprise, venture or idea and is
accountable for the inherent risks and the outcome. The term was originally a loanword from
French and was first defined by the Irish-French economist Richard Cantillon. Entrepreneur in
English is a term applied to a person who is willing to launch a new venture or enterprise and accept
full responsibility for the outcome. Jean-Baptiste Say, a French economist, is believed to have
coined the word "entrepreneur" in the 19th century - he defined an entrepreneur as "one who
undertakes an enterprise, especially a contractor, acting as intermediatory between capital and
labour".
An entrepreneur is a person who develops a new idea and takes the risk of setting up an enterprise
to produce a product or service which satisfies customer needs. All entrepreneurs are business
persons, but not all business persons are entrepreneurs. Let us now think of why all business
persons are not entrepreneurs. Think of a woman who sits by the roadside leading to your home and
who has been selling the same type of food, from the same size of saucepan or pot, from the same
table top, and may not have been able to change her standard of living to any appreciable extent.
Such a woman may be a business person but not an entrepreneur. The entrepreneur, on the other
hand is the business person who is not satisfied with his/her performance and therefore always finds
ways to improve and grow.
Leadership attributes
The entrepreneur leads the firm or organisation and also demonstrates leadership qualities by
selecting managerial staff. Management skill and strong team building abilities are essential
leadership attributes for successful entrepreneurs. Scholar Robert. B. Reich considers leadership,
management ability, and team-building as essential qualities of an entrepreneur. This concept has its
origins in the work of Richard Cantillon in his Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en (1755) and
Jean-Baptiste Say (1803 or 1834) in his Treatise on Political Economy.
Entrepreneurs emerge from the population on demand, and become leaders because they perceive
opportunities available and are well-positioned to take advantage of them. An entrepreneur may
perceive that they are among the few to recognize or be able to solve a problem. Joseph Schumpeter
saw the entrepreneur as innovators and popularized the uses of the phrase creative destruction to
describe his view of the role of entrepreneurs in changing business norms. Creative destruction
encompasses changes entrepreneurial activity makes every time a new process, product or company
enters the market.
Influences, personality traits, and characteristics
The most significant influence on an individual's decision to become an entrepreneur is workplace
peers and the social composition of the workplace. Entrepreneurs also often possess innate traits
such as extroversion and a propensity for risk-taking. According to Schumpeter, an entrepreneur
characteristically innovates, introduces new technologies, increases efficiency, productivity, or
generates new products or services. An entrepreneur acts as a catalyst for economic change and
research indicates that entrepreneurs are highly creative individuals who imagine new solutions by
generating opportunities for profit or reward.
There is a complexity and lack of cohesion between research studies that explore the characteristics
and personality traits of, and influences on, the entrepreneur. Most studies, however, agree that
there are certain entrepreneurial traits and environmental influences that tend to be consistent.
Although certain entrepreneurial traits are required, entrepreneurial behaviours are dynamic and
influenced by environmental factors. Shane and VenKataraman (2000) argue the entrepreneur is
solely concerned with opportunity recognition and exploitation; however, the opportunity that is
recognised depends on the type of entrepreneur which Ucbasaran et al. (2001) argue there are many
different types dependent on their business and personal circumstances.
7
8
Psychological studies show that the psychological propensities for male and female entrepreneurs
are more similar than different. Perceived gender differences may be due more to gender
stereotyping. There is a growing body of work that shows that entrepreneurial behavior is dependent
on social and economic factors. For example, countries which have healthy and diversified labor
markets or stronger safety nets show a more favorable ratio of opportunity driven rather than
necessity-driven women entrepreneurs. Empirical studies suggest that women entrepreneurs possess
strong negotiating skills and consensus-forming abilities.
New research regarding the qualities required for successful entrepreneurship is ongoing, with work
from the Kauffman Institute forming the statistical basis for much of it.
Types of entrepreneurs
Social entrepreneur
A Social entrepreneur is motivated by a desire to help, improve and transform social,
environmental, educational and economic conditions. Key traits and characteristics of highly
effective social entrepreneurs include ambition and a lack of acceptance of the status quo or
accepting the world "as it is". The social entrepreneur is driven by an emotional desire to address
some of the big social and economic conditions in the world, for example, poverty and educational
deprivation, rather than by the desire for profit. Social entrepreneurs seek to develop innovative
solutions to global problems that can be copied by others to enact change.
Social entrepreneurs act within a market aiming to create social value through the improvement of
goods and services offered to the community. Their main aim is to help offer a better service
improving the community as a whole and are predominately run as non profit schemes. Zahra et al.
(2009: 519) said that “social entrepreneurs make significant and diverse contributions to their
communities and societies, adopting business models to offer creative solutions to complex and
persistent social problems”.
Serial entrepreneur
A serial entrepreneur is one who continuously comes up with new ideas and starts new businesses.
In the media, the serial entrepreneur is represented as possessing a higher propensity for risk,
innovation and achievement. Serial entrepreneurs are more likely to experience repeated
entrepreneurial success. They are more likely to take risks and recover from business failure.
Lifestyle entrepreneur
A lifestyle entrepreneur places passion before profit when launching a business in order to combine
personal interests and talent with the ability to earn a living. Many entrepreneurs may be primarily
motivated by the intention to make their business profitable in order to sell to shareholders. In
contrast, a lifestyle entrepreneur intentially chooses a business model intended to develop and grow
their business in order to make a long-term, sustainable and viable living working in a field where
they have a particular interest, passion, talent, knowledge or high degree of expertise. A lifestyle
entrepreneur may decide to become self-employed in order to achieve greater personal freedom,
more family time and more time working on projects or business goals that inspire them. A lifestyle
entrepreneur may combine a hobby with a profession or they may specifically decide not to expand
their business in order to remain in control of their venture. Common goals held by the lifestyle
entrepreneur include earning a living doing something that they love, earning a living in a way that
facilitates self-employment, achieving a good work/life balance and owning a business without
shareholders. Many lifestyle entrepreneurs are very dedicated to their business and may work within
the creative industries or tourism industry, where a passion before profit approach to
entrepreneurship often prevails. While many entrepreneurs may launch their business with a clear
exit strategy, a lifestyle entrepreneur may deliberately and consciously choose to keep their venture
8
9
fully within their own control. Lifestyle entrepreneurship is becoming increasing popular as
technology provides small business owners with the digital platforms needed to reach a large global
market
Entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship is the act of being an entrepreneur, which can be defined as "one who undertakes
innovations, finance and business acumen in an effort to transform innovations into economic
goods". This may result in new organizations or may be part of revitalizing mature organizations in
response to a perceived opportunity. The most obvious form of entrepreneurship is that of starting
new businesses (referred as Startup Company); however, in recent years, the term has been
extended to include social and political forms of entrepreneurial activity. When entrepreneurship is
describing activities within a firm or large organization it is referred to as intra-preneurship and may
include corporate venturing, when large entities spin-off organizations.
According to Paul Reynolds, entrepreneurship scholar and creator of the Global Entrepreneurship
Monitor, "by the time they reach their retirement years, half of all working men in the United States
probably have a period of self-employment of one or more years; one in four may have engaged in
self-employment for six or more years. Participating in a new business creation is a common
activity among U.S. workers over the course of their careers." And in recent years has been
documented by scholars such as David Audretsch to be a major driver of economic growth in both
the United States and Western Europe.
9
10
Entrepreneurial activities are substantially different depending on the type of organization that is
being started. Entrepreneurship ranges in scale from solo projects (even involving the entrepreneur
only part-time) to major undertakings creating many job opportunities. Many "high value"
entrepreneurial ventures seek venture capital or angel funding (seed money) in order to raise capital
to build the business. Angel investors generally seek annualized returns of 20-30% and more, as
well as extensive involvement in the business. Many kinds of organizations now exist to support
would-be entrepreneurs, including specialized government agencies, business incubators, science
parks, and some NGOs. In more recent times, the term entrepreneurship has been extended to
include elements not related necessarily to business formation activity such as conceptualizations of
entrepreneurship as a specific mindset (see also entrepreneurial mindset) resulting in entrepreneurial
initiatives e.g. in the form of social entrepreneurship, political entrepreneurship, or knowledge
entrepreneurship have emerged.
History
The entrepreneur is a factor in microeconomics, and the study of entrepreneurship reaches back to
the work of Richard Cantillon and Adam Smith in the late 17th and early 18th centuries, but was
largely ignored theoretically until the late 19th and early 20th centuries and empirically until a
profound resurgence in business and economics in the last 40 years. Donald Trump is the best
example.
In the 20th century, the understanding of entrepreneurship owes much to the work of economist
Joseph Schumpeter in the 1930s and other Austrian economists such as Carl Menger, Ludwig von
Mises and Friedrich von Hayek. In Schumpeter, an entrepreneur is a person who is willing and able
to convert a new idea or invention into a successful innovation. Entrepreneurship employs what
Schumpeter called "the gale of creative destruction" to replace in whole or in part inferior
innovations across markets and industries, simultaneously creating new products including new
business models. In this way, creative destruction is largely responsible for the dynamism of
industries and long-run economic growth. The supposition that entrepreneurship leads to economic
growth is an interpretation of the residual in endogenous growth theory and as such is hotly debated
in academic economics. An alternate, description posited by Israel Kirzner suggests that the
majority of innovations may be much more incremental improvements such as the replacement of
paper with plastic in the construction of a drinking straw.
For Schumpeter, entrepreneurship resulted in new industries but also in new combinations of
currently existing inputs. Schumpeter's initial example of this was the combination of a steam
engine and then current wagon making technologies to produce the horseless carriage. In this case
the innovation, the car, was transformational but did not require the development of a new
technology, merely the application of existing technologies in a novel manner. It did not
immediately replace the horsedrawn carriage, but in time, incremental improvements which reduced
the cost and improved the technology led to the complete practical replacement of beast drawn
vehicles in modern transportation. Despite Schumpeter's early 20th-century contributions,
traditional microeconomic theory did not formally consider the entrepreneur in its theoretical
frameworks (instead assuming that resources would find each other through a price system). In this
treatment the entrepreneur was an implied but unspecified actor, but it is consistent with the concept
of the entrepreneur being the agent of x-efficiency. Different scholars have described entrepreneurs
as, among other things, bearing risk. For Schumpeter, the entrepreneur did not bear risk: the
capitalist did.For Frank H. Knight (1921) and Peter Drucker (1970) entrepreneurship is about
taking risk. The behavior of the entrepreneur reflects a kind of person willing to put his or her career
and financial security on the line and take risks in the name of an idea, spending much time as well
as capital on an uncertain venture. Knight classified three types of uncertainty.
10
11
• Risk, which is measurable statistically (such as the probability of drawing a red color ball
from a jar containing 5 red balls and 5 white balls).
• Ambiguity, which is hard to measure statistically (such as the probability of drawing a red
ball from a jar containing 5 red balls but with an unknown number of white balls).
• True Uncertainty or Knightian Uncertainty, which is impossible to estimate or predict
statistically (such as the probability of drawing a red ball from a jar whose number of red
balls is unknown as well as the number of other colored balls).
The acts of entrepreneurship are often associated with true uncertainty, particularly when it involves
bringing something really novel to the world, whose market never exists. However, even if a market
already exists, there is no guarantee that a market exists for a particular new player in the cola
category.
The place of the disharmony-creating and idiosyncratic entrepreneur in traditional economic theory
(which describes many efficiency-based ratios assuming uniform outputs) presents theoretic
quandaries. William Baumol has added greatly to this area of economic theory and was recently
honored for it at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Economic Association.
The entrepreneur is widely regarded as an integral player in the business culture of American life,
and particularly as an engine for job creation and economic growth. Robert Sobel published The
Entrepreneurs: Explorations Within the American Business Tradition in 1974. Zoltan Acs and
David Audretsch have produced an edited volume surveying
ENTREPRENEURSHIP SKILLS
Who is an entrepreneur?
Now let us consider the characteristics or some special qualities and strengths which make an
entrepreneur different from a business person. It is important for us to note that a successful
entrepreneur possesses the following characteristics.
Initiative
An entrepreneur takes actions that goes beyond job requirements or the demand of the situation
Opportunity seeking
An entrepreneur is quick to see and seize opportunities. He/she does things before he/she is asked to
work by people or forced by situation.
Persistence
An entrepreneur is not discouraged by difficulties and problems that come up in the business or
his/her personal life. Once she sets a goal she is committed to the goal and will become completely
absorbed in it.
Information seeking
An entrepreneur undertakes personal research on how to satisfy customers and solve problems.
He/she knows that different people have different capabilities that can be of help to them. He/she
seeks relevant information from his/her clients, suppliers, competitors and others. He/she always
wants to learn things which will help the business to grow.
Demand for quality and efficiency
An entrepreneur is always competing with others to do things better, faster, and at less cost he/she
strives to achieve excellence.
Risk taking
11
12
Are you afraid of uncertainties? Then you cannot be an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurs are not high
risk takers. They are also not gamblers; they calculate their risks before taking action. They place
themselves in situations involving moderate risk so they are moderate risk takers.
Goal setting
An entrepreneur sets meaningful and challenging goals for him/herself. An entrepreneur does not
just dream. Him/she thinks and plans what he/she does. He/she is certain or has hope about the
future.
Commitment to work
An entrepreneur will work long hours after into the night just to be able to keep his/her promise to
his/her client. He/she does the work together with his/her workers to get a job done. He/she knows
how to make people happy to work for him/her due his/her dynamic leadership.
Systematic planning and monitoring
An entrepreneur plans for whatever he/she expects in the business. He/she does not leave things to
luck. He/she plans by breaking large tasks down into small once and puts time limits against them.
Since and entrepreneur knows what to expect at anytime he/she is able to change plans and
strategies to achieve what he/she aims at.
Persuasion and networking
An entrepreneur acts to develop and maintain business contacts by establishing good working
relationship. Uses deliberate strategies to influence others.
Independence and self confidence
Most entrepreneurs start business because they like to be their own boss. They are responsible for
their own decisions.
Intrapreneurship
Intrapreneurship is the act of behaving like an entrepreneur, except within a larger organization.
Definition
In 1992, The American Heritage Dictionary acknowledged the popular use of a new word,
intrapreneur, to mean "A person within a large corporation who takes direct responsibility for
turning an idea into a profitable finished product through assertive risk-taking and innovation".
Intrapreneurship is now known as the practice of a corporate management style that integrates risk-
taking and innovation approaches, as well as the reward and motivational techniques, that are more
traditionally thought of as being the province of entrepreneurship.
History
The first written use of the terms ‘intrapreneur,’ ‘intrapreneuring,’ and ‘intrapreneurship’ date from
a paper written in 1978 by Gifford & Elizabeth Pinchot. Later the term was credited to Gifford
Pinchot III by Norman Macrae in the April 17, 1982 issue of The Economist. The first formal
academic case study of corporate entrepreneurship or intrapreneurship was published in June 1982,
as a Master's in Management Thesis, by Howard Edward Haller, on the intrapreneurial creation of
PR1ME Leasing within PR1ME Computer Inc. (from 1977 to 1981). [This academic research was
later published as a real world case study by VDM Verlag as Intrapreneurship Success:A PR1ME
Example by Howard Edward Haller, Ph.D. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English
Language included the term 'intrapreneur' in its 3rd 1992 Edition, and also credited[ Gifford Pinchot
III as the originator of the concept. The term "intrapreneurship" was used in the popular media first
12
13
in February 1985 by TIME magazine article "Here come the Intrapreneurs" and then the same year
in another major popular publication was in a quote by Steve Jobs, Apple Computer’s Chairman, in
an interview in the September 1985 Newsweek article, where he shared, “The Macintosh team was
what is commonly known as intrapreneurship;only a few years before the term was coined—a
group of people going, in essence, back to the garage, but in a large company."
Employee Intrapreneur
"Intrapreneurship refers to employee initiatives in organizations to undertake something new,
without being asked to do so." Hence, the intrapreneur focuses on innovation and creativity, and
transforms an idea into a profitable venture, while operating within the organizational environment.
Thus, intrapreneurs are Inside entrepreneurs who follow the goal of the organization.
Intrapreneurship is an example of motivation through job design, either formally or informally. (See
also Corporate Social Entrepreneurship: intrapreneurship within the firm which is driven to produce
social capital in addition to economic capital.)
Employees, such as marketing executives or perhaps those engaged in a special project within a
larger firm, are encouraged to behave as entrepreneurs, even though they have the resources,
capabilities and security of the larger firm to draw upon. Capturing a little of the dynamic nature of
entrepreneurial management (trying things until successful, learning from failures, attempting to
conserve resources, etc.) adds to the potential of an otherwise static organization, without exposing
those employees to the risks or accountability normally associated with entrepreneurial failure.
Examples
Many companies are famous for setting up internal organizations whose purpose is to promote
innovation within their ranks. One of the most well-known is the "Skunk Works" group at Lockheed
Martin. The group was originally named after a reference in a cartoon, and was first brought
together in 1943 to build the P-80 fighter jet. Because the project was to eventually become a part of
the war effort, the project was internally protected and secretive. Kelly Johnson, later famous for
Kelly's 14 rules of intrapreneurship, was the director of this group.
Another example could be 3M, who encourage many projects within the company. They give
certain freedom to employees to create their own projects, and they even give them funds to use for
these projects. (In the days of its founders, HP used to have similar policies and just such an
innovation-friendly atmosphere and intrapreneurial reputation.) Besides 3M, Intel also has a
tradition of implementing intrapreneurship.
13
14
Ernst & Young’s ‘Igniting innovation: How hot companies fuel growth from within,’
explains that the best way for a company to foster creative thinking is to tap resources
it already has: its own employees.
Encouraging people to explore high-risk, high-reward ideas within the safety and
support of a larger, well-established corporate structure is at the heart of being
intrapreneurial. The report also explores the concrete ways corporate giants keep their
market leadership, and the role that governments play to encourage innovation in
both new and established companies.
‘Igniting innovation,’ which is being released during the 2010 Ernst & Young Strategic
Growth Forum in Palm Springs, can be downloaded at http://www.ey.com/innovation.
A 2010 Ernst & Young survey underscores the importance of creating an environment
that fuels creativity but deals effectively with failure. The global survey, which polled
263 of the world’s leading entrepreneurs (all winners of Ernst & Young’s Entrepreneur
of the Year awards), found that 82% of the respondents agreed strongly that the
ability to innovate was critical to the growth of their organisations. Nearly half of the
respondents surveyed said that generating innovative ideas became more difficult as
their organisations grew in size and complexity.
“Large, established companies are often comprised of rigid structures that can stifle
the entrepreneurial spirit. In the face of fierce global competition, companies need to
be increasingly agile in order drive growth and lasting success,” said Maria Pinelli,
Americas Director, Strategic Growth Markets, Ernst & Young LLP.
Based on insights gleaned from the 2010 global survey, interviews with senior
business leaders, and Ernst & Young’s own extensive experience working with
entrepreneurial-minded companies, the white paper offers strategies on how to
cultivate effective intrapreneurship within an organisation. These six key strategies
include:
It is critical to give people enough time away from their day jobs to work on creative
ideas, while setting up formal processes to make sure those ideas go somewhere.
Google, for example, has set up a formal process for encouraging intrapreneurship
through its Innovation Time Off project, which enables employees to spend about 20%
14
15
Encourage everyone from all ranks and functions to contribute to the innovative
process. IBM, for example, uses “jams” – massive online brainstorming conferences –
to generate ideas and solve problems. Its famous 2006 Innovation Jam involved
150,000 participants and resulted in US$100 million being appropriated to start 10
new businesses.
Statistical research has established that diverse viewpoints result in better ideas and
better products. PepsiCo, for example, attributes about US$ 250 million to new
products inspired by diversity efforts.
Backing bold ideas can backfire. Be prepared to deal with failed ventures, internal
conflicts, financial risks and intellectual property battles. Set risk limits up-front.
Furthermore, the white paper explores changes that need to be set in motion if the
strategies are to be successful in the long run – from creating a culture of flexibility to
encouraging the happy accident.
Institutionalising intrapreneurship
According to the report, these guidelines can help companies free up organisation
gridlock and set up a supportive environment that fosters the creative process. The
paper cautions, however, that they will succeed only if there is support from senior
management and a framework that views intrapreneurship as an end-to-end process.
15
16
“By following these six key strategies, and providing a supportive and nurturing
environment, companies can institutionalise intrapreneurship so that it becomes an
inseparable part of a company’s operations. Only then can the process of continuous
innovation take place – allowing the company to stay a market leader.
Intrapreneur vs Entrepreneur
Let´s face it, when under pressure to grow, organizations of all kinds look to their roots and
their previous successes for answers. Rekindling business growth inside an organization often
represents the toughest challenge to a maturing organization. Can it regain its entrepreneurial
spirit and continue to thrive despite its mature culture? By turning to Intrapreneurs, the
company hopes it can have the best of both worlds. It can work if owners follow the above
steps.
Intrapreneurs, by definition, embody the same characteristics as the Entrepreneur, conviction,
passion, and drive. The more the Intrapreneur expresses himself, the more the company is
forced to confront its own effectiveness. If the company is supportive, the Intrapreneur
succeeds. When the organization is not, the Intrapreneur usually fails or leaves to start a new
company.
In closing, every effective worker has Intrapreneurial traits that may or may not culminate in
an Entrepreneurial life. Ask yourself how close are you to becoming an Entrepreneur? Your
answer will help you to decide whether you should stay or go!
Entrepreneur Vs Entrepreneurship
16
17
society.
Normally, it is not an easy idea to compare the people who are called as ‘entrepreneurs’
because they are working in new, un-explored areas with the managers of large organizations,
who are working inside organizational boundaries. A comparison is to be done, is when
someone makes a career change for example he is moving from a big company to a small
start-up or vice versa. There are some advantages and disadvantages to each side.
Manager of a large scale enterprise:
Pros:
Cons:
faces restrictive corporate environment that subdues creativity and risk taking
17
18
Entrepreneur :
Pros:
Answers to no one(boss)
Cons:
This is pure entrepreneurship, although you could argue that there was little risk involved –
other than the risk that his young friends might think him a little daffy.
More info-
18
19
When you compare managers and entrepreneurs you need to first look at the
definitions of both titles. A manager is someone who directs a team and an
entrepreneur is someone who organizes, manages, and assumes the risks of a
business or enterprise. With these definitions you can surmise that an
entrepreneur can be a manager but a manager cannot be an entrepreneur. The
reasons for this are plentiful, but it basically comes down to the type of person
you are. If you like to control all aspects of a situation then you are generally a
manager, but if you are someone who works through problems with people
then you are more likely an entrepreneur.
A manager is someone who is what is known as a micro-manager. They like to
control all aspects of their workplace. Each person is given their assigned tasks
and a manager will look over your shoulder until you finish it. They do not like
to give up control enough to find out if you could do it on your own because
they think if you make a mistake that it will come down on them.
Unfortunately, with this attitude the people who work for a manager are less
likely to grow in their career and will either stagnate or leave the company or
position quickly. This will help to perpetuate the feelings of the manager that
no one can measure of to him in their skill levels. This type of demeanor works
well when you have a person that needs to be consistently supervised.
Someone who can't take a task and see if through on their own, they need to
have it explained to them step by step.
An entrepreneur is generally considered a leader versus a manager. They will
give people tasks and a deadline and generally leave them alone until it is
completed. They will trust people to get the job done without having to
constantly look over their shoulder. When they hire someone they believe that
they have hired someone who is qualified to handle the tasks before them, so
they don't think they should have to ask for status reports on an hourly basis.
The people who work for them are normally intelligent individuals who will
move up quickly in the company, because their boss has helped to build their
confidence and it will be noticed by not only their boss but other people within
the company. This type of manager believes that it is important to have people
with varied skill sets because it will only enhance his own skills and abilities.
Of the two different types of managers mentioned, it is normally more
productive to work for a leader versus a manager. You will be able to improve
your skill set and to move up within the company because you have learned
good managerial skills from a true leader. Learning how this type of person
manages an office will help you to be able to become a leader within the
company and it will help you in all facets of your life.
Attributes and Characteristics of a successful Entrepreneur
Many people believe they have the attributes to be successful entrepreneurs.
However, most of them are driven primarily by disenchantment with their
present jobs. They long for the independence and freedom that owning a
business represents. They forget that the rewards of owning a business are
accompanied by the risks and uncertainty their present employer is assuming
for them. They want the glory, but they may not have what it takes to tough it
19
20
out on their own. If you think you've got what it takes to run your own show,
read on and see if you can identify with some common characteristics of
successful entrepreneurs.
• They strive to maintain absolute control over their destinies. Most have
little, if any, management experience but have worked in a large
organization where they were frustrated by the slow pace, politics and
inefficiency.
• They are goal-oriented to a fault, and they cannot tolerate mediocrity
or failure. Success is the only result acceptable to them, and they are
workaholics in their quest.
• While they are willing to make great sacrifices to achieve success, they
are also impatient and bored by the planning and administrative aspects
of their companies, often ignoring these tasks.
• They have large egos needing to be nurtured. They tend to believe
they are always right, and it is difficult for them to heed the advice of
others (no matter how sound the advice) when it differs from their own
beliefs.
• They are calculated risk takers. They tend to have a gut feeling to
guide them, and they are willing to "bet the store" on their choices.
• They are good communicators who can generate enthusiasm within
others because they believe so deeply in their cause. However, they
sometimes have trouble accepting the fact that their employees are not
driven by the same inner motivation to succeed. Therefore, they often
fail to properly motivate their own employees.
• They are weak in money matters, seeing cash only as a means to an
end, rather than as an essential commodity needing to be constantly and
carefully monitored. Either they are so positive they will succeed that
financial planning seems irrelevant to them, or they are so
uncomfortable in dealing with finances that they avoid money matters as
much as possible, hoping they will go away.
• They are totally focused on their own super-widget. Left to their own
devices, they may manufacture enough super-widgets to fill an entire
20
21
warehouse before they realize they should have worried about marketing
long before they began the production process.
• Because they are so self-confident, energetic and driven to succeed,
they often perceive themselves as infallible. If they read about
something, they believe they can accomplish it. They fail to realize, often
until it's too late, that no amount of drive or raw talent can substitute for
experience.
• Above all, they are visionaries. They see a vision of the future, and they
strive against all odds to make their vision a reality.
21
22
3. Plan everything.
Planning every aspect of your home business is not only a must, but also builds habits that every home business
owner should develop, implement, and maintain. The act of business planning is so important because it
requires you to analyze each business situation, research and compile data, and make conclusions based mainly on
the facts as revealed through the research. Business planning also serves a second function, which is having your
goals and how you will achieve them, on paper. You can use the plan that you create both as map to take you from
point A to Z and as a yardstick to measure the success of each individual plan or segment within the plan.
1. The money you receive from clients in exchange for your goods and services you provide (income)
2. The money you spend on inventory, supplies, wages and other items required to keep your business operating.
(expenses)
Self-promotion is one of the most beneficial, yet most underutilized, marketing tools that the majority of home
business owners have at their immediate disposal.
must rely on imagination, creativity and attention to the smallest detail when creating and maintaining a
professional image for their home business.
The home business owner can actually answer phone calls, get to know customers, provide personal attention and
win over repeat business by doing so. It's a researched fact that most business (80 percent) will come from repeat
customers rather than new customers. Therefore, along with trying to draw newcomers, the more you can do to
woo your regular customers, the better off you will be in the long run and personalized attention is very much
appreciated and remembered in the modern high tech world.
23
24
15. Be accessible.
We're living in a time when we all expect our fast food lunch at the drive-thru window to be ready in mere
minutes, our dry cleaning to be ready for pick-up on the same day, our money to be available at the cash machine
and our pizza delivered in 30 minutes or it's free. You see the pattern developing--you must make it as easy as you
can for people to do business with you, regardless of the home business you operate.
You must remain cognizant of the fact that few people will work hard, go out of their way, or be inconvenienced
just for the privilege of giving you their hard-earned money. The shoe is always on the other foot. Making it easy
for people to do business with you means that you must be accessible and knowledgeable about your products and
services. You must be able to provide customers with what they want, when they want it.
24
25
that you can continue to grab more attention and grow your business.
25
26
Being practical is the first quality any entrepreneur must be able to master if they want to be
successful. Practicality would give that successful entrepreneur the ability to make decisions on
business matters with a clear frame of mind and common sense. This results in them seeing things
that others may not. We must remember that not all products sell. A successful entrepreneur would
be able to see this and make decisions based on unbiased information, current knowledge and past
experience. They must not let external factors affect their judgement and understand that the rise or
fall of a business will highly depend on the decision that they make..
A successful entrepreneur must also be imaginative and creative. They must be able to look outside
the square and see things others do not. They must be able to offer solutions to difficult problems as
well as being able to brainstorm ideas for their products. They must be able to create a business that
will set them apart from others.
An achiever
Another key quality of a successful entrepreneur is that they are achievers. Getting things done is
important. Remember you need to keep driving your business vehicle until you are satisfied with
the result and achieved your goal. Those that stop halfway will never see what they can really
achieve. Successful entrepreneurs are the ones that are persistent, motivated, independent and
26
27
hardworking. They have a clear vision of what they want to achieve and set out to form a plan,
followed by an action in order to reach their goals. They are proactive and get things done.
Self Discipline
Those who are self disciplined are one step closer to becoming a successful entrepreneur. We all
would love to have fun instead of work, or watch TV instead of doing our tax but remember it is
this self control that distinguishes those that are successful to those that are not. When you want to
succeed in anything, not just business, you must teach yourself time management, stress
management and also be able to separate work from play.
Independence
Not only do successful entrepreneurs have to possess self discipline but they must also show
independence. Being independent means that they are aware of the decisions needed to be made and
can make them on their own. They are not afraid of being alone and being different. They
understand what is required of the business and are the decision makers.
Take Action
Remember business means business and if you keep sitting on the fence you will always be the
watcher. To be a successful entrepreneur you must chose which side of the fence you want to jump
over to and make the most of it. Do not ponder on all the pros and cons of a problem too much and
delay important projects. You must be a quick thinker and act fast. When necessary make a choice,
take action and deal with all the obstacles as they come. Be productive. Sitting around and waiting
for things to happen is not going to make you a successful entrepreneur.
Patience
Patience is the key to success. We all know that a business needs time to build up. Success does not
happen overnight (unless extremely lucky). Entrepreneurs understand this and often like to put ideas
into actions and wait to see the results. Whatever the results may be they often go back and tweak
their ideas to produce better results. This is what differentiates a successful entrepreneur from one
that is not so successful.
Determination
Another quality that entrepreneur must have in order to succeed is determination. In the business
world it comes without saying that competition is everywhere and this can lead people to lack the
confidence e and motivation required to succeed. A successful entrepreneur can take failure as it is
and then tries again, maybe using a different approach. Point is they believe in their ability to
become successful and it is this belief that allows them to stand up again after they fall.
Motivation
Motivation is a skill that entrepreneurs cannot lack. In any business venture there is bound to be
both success and failure. A successful entrepreneur must not let failure block their view of what
could be a successful business. If they can put aside the disappointment and motivate themselves to
try again, they are one step closer to reaching their goal. When all enthusiasm and motivation is lost
then this is when the business is also lost.
27
28
Knowledge is the source of your success and is a number one requirement in becoming a successful
entrepreneur. It is much easier to excel in an area that is familiar to you instead of one that you have
to learn about from the beginning. Most people fail in business because they lack the knowledge.
They either do not know how to run a business or they do not offer the right support and service that
their customers would like. In addition to this, you must not only have knowledge for your niche but
also a passion for your business in order to succeed. If you like what you do you will inevitably be
more willing to research and learn about it. Overall, everyone has the ability to become an
entrepreneur but not everyone can succeed. Knowing your niche allows you to portray the other
qualities in this article better.
1. OPTIMAL ROLE
A system of entrepreneurship has evolved in the U. S. that has been quite successful and
that may have considerable applicability to some other technologically advanced
countries, such as Germany and Japan, which appear to need more economic dynamism.
The system needs modification however, for underdeveloped economies like India’s. In
particular, I believe that the optimal role for individual entrepreneurs – and the public
policies necessary to support this role – are somewhat different in India than in an
advanced economy.
In advanced countries, most resources are already in or near their highest-valued use.
Any increase in their productivity requires new technologies (broadly defined). Without
new technologies, economic growth winds down and business life stagnates.
In the U.S., small businesses started by individual entrepreneurs and the initiative of
large established companies play complementary roles in developing new technologies.
Startups have advantages in conducting low budget experiments on novel ideas.
Although the results achieved by any single startup are not dramatic, their collective
efforts transform novel yet primitive ideas into technologies of demonstrable commercial
* Funding was provided by the Wadhwani Foundation. Prof. K. Kumar, from the Indian Institute of
Management served co-leader of the team. Prof. Edmund Phelps suggested I prepare this memo for use in
his course “World Economic Problems” and provided considerable help in its revision.
28
29
viability. And as these technologies appear ready for prime time, large established
companies (or transitional companies seeking to become large) mobilize the resources
required for these technologies’ mass use. It’s pointless to argue about whether the
contributions of the small or the large companies are more important. Technological
progress in advanced economies requires both types of contributions.*
In an under-developed economy, however, increases in living standards do not require
U.S.-style technological innovation. Almost by definition, the actual productivity of its
resources is below that in developed economies since the technologies in wide use in it
are inferior to the technologies already introduced and in extensive use in developed
economies. Rapid growth can be achieved merely through the introduction into and
diffusion through the economy of such superior technologies. (A contrary view is that
poor countries need to evolve “appropriate” technologies of their own to raise their
productivity.) Moreover, the returns from investing in new technologies are generally
lower than the returns from acquiring and implementing existing technologies from the
developed countries. This is because existing technologies can be acquired at lower costs
since the outlays required for their development have already been incurred. And
although there is some uncertainty about the fit of transplanted technologies with the
local environment, the basic technical and market risks are long gone. Therefore
resources devoted to innovation would actually impair growth by diverting resources
from the more valuable tasks of adopting known-to-be superior technologies.
This has implications for the role of wealth-constrained individual entrepreneurs in an
underdeveloped economy and their relationship to large organizations.
An ample supply of applicable, unexploited technologies from the developed world will,
barring perverse policy interventions, supplant most of the demand that would otherwise
have existed for innovations from indigenous entrepreneurs. Therefore, one of the
important roles that entrepreneurs play in the U.S., namely, their role in early-stage
innovation, has relatively little value in India.
Moreover, individual entrepreneurs do not have the capital and personnel required to
acquire technologies from abroad.† Proven technologies usually require large-scale
operation. New technologies often start-out in niche markets; their subsequent
application to mass use turns on the realization of significant economies of scale, through
mass production techniques, for instance. So by the time many technologies become
proven they are no longer suited for entrepreneurs’ small startup businesses. In addition,
the acquisition of proven technologies, even when it is just a matter of copying or reverse
engineering, involves fixed costs. These costs are more easily amortized by a large
enterprise. And, large, established organizations (including wealthy family groups) have
natural advantages in mobilizing the resources required to operate a large-scale
enterprise. So, much of the low-hanging fruit offered by proven overseas technologies
lies outside the reach of wealth-constrained individual entrepreneurs.
* Amar Bhidé, The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
† Hereand below I include in “acquire” not only the transfer of the know-how but also the evaluation,
modification, and learning necessary to make the new technology profitable.
This does not mean, though, that small entrepreneurs cannot contribute to
underdeveloped countries’ progress in catching up. Even in the U.S., experimenting with
completely new technologies is only one of the contributions that individual
entrepreneurs make to economic growth. The entrepreneurs’ capacity to try out highly
novel ideas has value not just in the very early stages of a new technology; even after the
basic elements of a new technology have been proven, considerable trial and error is
necessary for its widespread diffusion. Thus, low budget entrepreneurs played the
29
30
preeminent role in the development of the personal computer between 1975 and 1980.
Yet, their contribution didn’t end after IBM entered the market in 1981. In the decades
that followed, entrepreneurs helped develop a host of complementary products and
services that made the PC a ubiquitous artifact.
Similarly, the successful implementation of technologies that are ‘new’ to India will
almost certainly require a host of new complementary goods and services to make them
suitable for local use. Individual entrepreneurs who have a comparative advantage is
conducting low budget experiments can play a critical role in developing such small-scale
complements, many of them unique to the less developed economy. For instance, large
companies may have an advantage in acquiring and implementing modern technologies
to build automobiles; however the widespread diffusion of the new automobiles requires
a host of new distribution and servicing outlets. Individual entrepreneurs may enjoy
advantages in starting these outlets.
Premji and Narayan Murthy the galaxy of India's Entrepreneurial superstars is as drawn out as it
is illustrious. Not surprisingly that this years Forbes listing of the wealthiest has more billionaires
additions from India than any other nation, apart from the U.S. This spoke loudly of the role of
entrepreneurs in the economic Development of India. on an Economic tangent, if we were to
come remotely close to that very-Elusive 'Developed' nation status then poverty has to
necessarily bid adieu. Ten million jobs need to be in order by the year 2020 as estimated by CII
and NASSCOM. So, Entrepreneurial contribution towards this cause assumes critical importance.
In the end According to Czarniawska Georges and wolft who chose the
language of theoretical
performance rather than Economics to distinguish among Management,
Leadership and
Entrepreneurship offers a very illuminating characterization of
entrepreneurship. According to
him management is the activity of introducing order by coordinating flows of
things and people
through collective action, Leadership is symbolic performance, expressing the
hope of control
over destiny and entrepreneurship is quite simple: "The making of Entire new
world".
31
32
These discouraging figures turn momentarily pale when it is seen that, among
women a good
number are successful and have scaled to the peak where many men find it
hard to reach. They
are mentors for hundreds of thousands of women particularly in business
having the qualities like
hard work, devotion, sincerity, professionalism and significant managerial
capacity.
"If women get the opportunity to develop as entrepreneurs, I think they can do
very well because
they very early in life learns to manage available resources and time
successfully"
And it is very true because women are far more better Managers as compared
to their Male
counterparts because they learn Management not in Schools but through real
life Experiences.
The biggest challenge that many literate and illiterate women in rural and
urban areas faces in
entering into small industry as entrepreneurs is due to the lack of knowledge
on product, Market
and Quality and its to be seen that some committee should be constituted and
the
recommendations which are placed should be implemented in phases to root
out the problems
mentioned above.
32
33
CONCLUSION
Knowledge capital reigns supreme, and the future is here and no… and how! If
the cutting edge
of business is about marketing new ideas and creating dramatic super Brands,
then make no
mistake his time, the enterprising will surely form the fuel of tomorrows
business and economy.
34
35
Culture is a hot buzzword among corporate and entrepreneurial companies alike. It's what everyone
is striving for, what brings on the loyalty, what attracts and keeps the really awesome employees.
If done right, it seems so simple. Good corporate culture, in its purest sense, and at its most
successful, has the look and feel of something organic and uncontrived, something that just exists.
But alas, there's the rub, and at once the wonderful twist: Corporate culture cannot, does not and
never will exist "just because." Culture is a balancing act between many elements of a company and
requires careful execution at each level.
This is especially true for entrepreneurial companies, where what's going on is the building of a
business as well as a culture. Corporate culture must be led, nurtured, constantly monitored and
adjusted. Much like a "culture" in a petri dish, it requires that you combine the right ingredients, in
the right way, to ensure that what you grow is not an aberration of your intentions.
Laying the Groundwork
When I founded Net Daemons, my computer consulting company, I had very definite ideas of what
I wanted to provide for our future employees, a safe and comfortable environment, which enabled
people to learn, grow and, at the same time, focus on their day-to-day work.
From early on, I felt it was important to treat every employee with trust and respect. That meant
assuming automatically that each was an honest, hard-working, reliable and dependable individual.
Rather than requiring all employees show up at nine and leave at five, for example, I expected each
person to do the job assigned, and to apply the right amount of time and quality of skills toward the
accomplishment of each task.
While I wasn't aware, back then, that I was creating what is now considered "corporate culture," I
knew I was looking to create a place of employment where employees were at once valued for who
they were and what they brought to the table. This was critical for our business, which sold
knowledge and a system of collaboration between some 45 engineers providing network-
administration and internet-development solutions. If a team isn't in sync, you can't sell a team
approach, and you're no better than the single consultant.
What Makes a Culture Entrepreneurial?
As one of our engineers once put it, in an entrepreneurial culture, work is more than a job, it's a
lifestyle. Employees are more like a team than in most companies, and in some cases, we're even
like a family.
What also evolved was a set of rules for creating and maintaining NDA's petri dish. In creating your
own, consider these rules:
• Treat people with respect. This is a very simple premise, which threads through each and
every complicated issue that can arise within a company. Respect and trust provide the
necessary base for a vibrant and sustainable corporate culture.
• Help employees stay healthy. When employees get sick, they miss work, so it makes sense
to offer health insurance as a benefit. We covered 100% of employee health plans. I never
want an employee to experience a catastrophic illness and not be covered by insurance. We
also offered unlimited sick time. While I had seen this type of policy backfire elsewhere, it
nonetheless allowed people to be sick when they really were sick, and not feel obligated to
gobble up each "allotted" sick day. You may also want to add a wellness allowance for
health-club membership.
• Open doors to communication. Create an environment where people can interact with each
other, support each other and recognize each other's efforts and achievements. Provide
positive rewards for positive behavior. Share information, so that employees are aware of
38
39
the direction of the company and are involved in it. Use all-hands meetings for financial and
operational information, team-building and social events. Offer incentive programs to
reward effort and improve quality of life.
• Build camaraderie. Make time for people to get to know each other and the company. We
held an annual off-site meeting to build team spirit and discuss where the company was
going. At such events you can also distribute and share your business plan and discuss issues
and ideas raised by your strategies.
Maintaining Entrepreneurial Culture
Once you have healthy, trusted and informed employees, don't let the culture that's evolving just be.
It needs to be watched so that it grows as you intended. The trick is standing back, but not too far
back. In maintaining your culture, consider these rules.
• Let the team build itself. Within that safe, comfortable, open environment, let employees
grow together without being made to.
• Participate without controlling. Let the culture thrive, without your either meddling with it
or ignoring it.
• Don't forget the little things. Culture is made up of many small actions that, when put
together, create something larger than the sum of the parts. There are many things a CEO
can do to make employees feel a part of the company. Some are just common courtesies:
hallway conversations, saying "hello" in the morning, opening doors, asking after people's
families and partners. Others are little extras, such as flowers to say thank you and happy-
birthday e-mail messages. Eating lunch with employees, helping spouses find jobs and
participating in team events show that you, the CEO, are involved with your employees.
Treating employees with respect helps enable them to do their jobs to the best of their abilities. If
you challenge people to raise their bars, provide fun activities, keep people informed and humanize
your management, you get culture. From these basics, you will grow in your petri dish a strong,
healthy culture that will allow you, your company and your employees to flourish.
40
41
corporate culture.
• Help employees stay healthy. When employees get sick, they miss work, so it
makes sense to offer health insurance as a benefit. We covered 100% of
employee health plans. I never want an employee to experience a catastrophic
illness and not be covered by insurance. We also offered unlimited sick time.
While I had seen this type of policy backfire elsewhere, it nonetheless allowed
people to be sick when they really were sick, and not feel obligated to gobble
up each "allotted" sick day. You may also want to add a wellness allowance for
health-club membership.
• Open doors to communication. Create an environment where people can
interact with each other, support each other and recognize each other's efforts
and achievements. Provide positive rewards for positive behavior. Share
information, so that employees are aware of the direction of the company and
are involved in it. Use all-hands meetings for financial and operational
information, team-building and social events. Offer incentive programs to
reward effort and improve quality of life.
• Build camaraderie. Make time for people to get to know each other and the
company. We held an annual off-site meeting to build team spirit and discuss
where the company was going. At such events you can also distribute and
share your business plan and discuss issues and ideas raised by your
strategies.
Maintaining Entrepreneurial Culture
Once you have healthy, trusted and informed employees, don't let the culture
that's evolving just be. It needs to be watched so that it grows as you intended.
The trick is standing back, but not too far back. In maintaining your culture,
consider these rules.
• Let the team build itself. Within that safe, comfortable, open environment, let
employees grow together without being made to.
• Participate without controlling. Let the culture thrive, without your either
meddling with it or ignoring it.
• Don't forget the little things. Culture is made up of many small actions that,
when put together, create something larger than the sum of the parts. There
are many things a CEO can do to make employees feel a part of the company.
Some are just common courtesies: hallway conversations, saying "hello" in the
morning, opening doors, asking after people's families and partners. Others are
little extras, such as flowers to say thank you and happy-birthday e-mail
messages
42
43
ENTREPRENEURIAL CULTURE-
Entrepreneurship is not an inborn skill, it is a product of the environment. It involves a complex of
economic and social behaviour. To be successful, an entrepreneur has to remain dynamic and
responsible to the whole environment. Entrepreneurship can hardly survive under any given
circumstances. It can flourish only under the right environment. It is a part of the total system. The
social values, culture, government policies, political system, technology, economic conditions,
customs, laws, etc. influence the growth of entrepreneurship.
In fact, the entrepreneurship cannot be kept aloof from the changing social values, ideologies, new
emerging aspirations, environmental pressures, religious beliefs, consumer wants and society needs
etc. Business is a system made up of certain environmental factors which require the entrepreneur to
adopt a dynamic attitude and a new strategy of their own.
Entrepreneurial culture implies a set of values, norms and traits that are conducive to the growth of
entrepreneurship.
Cultural values deeply affect entrepreneurship and the level of economic development – Structural
conditions make development possible – cultural factors determine whether the possibility becomes
an actuality.
Culture has everything to do with the entrepreneurial process and focuses on the discovery and
interpretation of opportunities, neglected by others. No entrepreneur can overlook the country’s
cultural heritage and values if he wants to survive and progress. He needs to function on the basis of
social expectations, desires and goals. The entrepreneur has to respect the human society, its
cultural values and traditions.
Awareness and understanding of the cultural environment of business maybe useful to the
entrepreneur in several ways:
i) To better understand the behaviour and conduct of people with regard to entrepreneurship.
ii) To predict behaviour and determine how people will act in a certain situation as regards to
entrepreneurship.
iii) It develops the sensitivity of the entrepreneur.
iv) It facilitates change of the entrepreneur.
Understanding entrepreneurial culture is important, not only to the theoretical understanding of
entrepreneurship, but also to entrepreneurship as a practical enterprise, which can provide new and
fresh ideas of entrepreneurship, by looking at innovative business behaviour in other times, in other
societies and in other cultures – and also by looking at entrepreneurship from novel angles and
much wider perspective.
Culture is of great importance to entrepreneurship, because it determines the ethos of people. It
trains people along particular lines. It creates distinctions. It conveys a sense of identity. It enhances
social system stability. It creates people, enterprising men and risk bearers. It determines goods and
services. The understanding of culture enables the entrepreneur to skillfully manipulate the cultural
codes of his society, balancing between the permissible and the profane, tugging moral codes into a
new conformation.
The entrepreneur’s ability to “read” opportunities cannot be due to isolation or separateness, but is
rather due to a higher degree of sensitivity to what others are looking for. And it is culture that gives
pre-direction to the entrepreneur’s vision, enabling him to read certain things. They can pick up the
sense of where their fellows in the culture stand, what values they adhere to, what purposes they
pursue, what they consider beautiful and what they deem profane.
43
44
The entrepreneur’s ability to move ahead with confidence, his struggle to turn setbacks into
opportunities, to advance and survive in the business world is the knowledge and instinct that comes
from experience gathered in a particular cultural milieu.
Sociologists like Max Weber argue that entrepreneurship is most likely to emerge under a specific
social culture. According to them, social sanctions, cultural values and role expectations are
responsible for the emergence of entrepreneurship. For many researchers, modern entrepreneurship
is a distinctly new variant of a timeless species created and sustained by culture and creative of it at
the same time.
Some cultures are enormously supportive of entrepreneurship – indeed to the point where
entrepreneurship develops its own culture, such as in Hong Kong. Others (such as Communist
Countries) regard the entrepreneurial way of life with suspicion. The differences go a long way
towards explaining why some societies are vibrant and progressive, while others stagnate.
Religion/ caste and family influences greatly determine entrepreneurial culture. Some religions are
found to be conducive to entrepreneurship, while others inhibit entrepreneurship. Religious beliefs
produce intensive exertion in occupational pursuits, the systematic ordering of means to an end and
the accumulation of assets. It is these beliefs and the caste system that are found to influence the
propensity to become an entrepreneur.
Religion often determines what business one stays out of. In India, it is religiosity that keeps many
people in business and often determines what business one stays out of. The mighty Birlas chose to
stay out of the hotel business because of the necessity to consider serving non-vegetarian food.
Religion based norms become easy and convenient reference points for designing one’s course of
actions.
Family too plays an important role in shaping entrepreneurial instincts. Family background, simply
familiarity with a business environment, growing from “table talk” at home is the key to increasing
the probability that an offspring will later become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurs are very much in
terms with the ‘conversations’ going on around him. Brought up in a family, where commercial
activity is part of the daily household routine, it becomes a conscious battle for the entrepreneur to
create viable business.
The characteristics of the family enterprises – commitment, continuity, putting a face to the
company and close interaction between the family and the business – may have a strong impact on
the strategic choices in the business.
Family background of business-family values, business conversations as a part of the daily
household routine, family support and encouragement, has given these young entrepreneurs, the
drive, the desire, and the motivation to create their own viable business unit. On the other hand,
successful family business that have been forced on in heritage, has curbed the development of
independent, innovative ventures.
Family enterprises also play a major role in regional and local economics – often act as the engines
of their economic development as they have a positive attitude towards growth, and their growth is
usually more cost efficient than of other firms. The owners that put a face to their family enterprises
are committed to developing their firms as well as to their continuity.
To conclude, the influence of human institutions such as norms, values, morals, family ties and
support – in other words – culture- form the framework within which individuals can pursue
entrepreneurial opportunities.
44
45
45