Weli 1 PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Short Research Report

Journal of Concussion
Volume 3: 1–4
Treatment of posttraumatic headache ! The Author(s) 2019
Article reuse guidelines:
migraine phenotype with erenumab – sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/2059700219878292
An observational study journals.sagepub.com/home/ccn

James A Charles

Abstract
Objective: To report the observed effect of erenumab in mild posttraumatic headache migraine phenotype with and
without aura.
Background: There is no clinical algorithm of pharmacotherapy for migraine following posttraumatic headache. Most
migraine preventatives that are typically used are either ineffective or not tolerated.
Methods: Seven patients who met the clinical criteria for migraine with or without aura following posttraumatic
headache who failed or were intolerant of conventional migraine preventatives were treated with erenumab 140 mg
subcutaneously. Most had no history of migraine. In those patients with a history of migraine, the posttraumatic
headache migraine headaches were different than the past migraine experience. Descriptive headache intensity or
disability using the Head Impact Test-6 and monthly headache days were recorded before and after treatment. All
patients were debilitated on presentation and demonstrated no signs of spontaneous resolution.
Results: Patients responded with a 95% (SD 1.22, p < .001) reduction in headache days. All Head Impact Test-6 scores
went from disabling to non-disabling without adverse effects. Most required only one dose of erenumab with no
migraine recurrence. Onset of efficacy often became apparent within days to four weeks. Extended follow-up six
months after treatment revealed no relapses.
Conclusions: Erenumab is effective in the treatment of posttraumatic headache with migraine phenotype in this small
cohort. Large-scale studies are urgently required for this highly prevalent, disabling, condition which has no effective
established treatment.

Keywords
Migraine, posttraumatic headache, concussion, CGRP-R, migraine preventatives
Date received: 14 June 2019; accepted: 27 August 2019

Introduction these patients are treated with preventatives used in


The prevalence of posttraumatic headache (PTH) is non-traumatic migraine patients, but the response is
approximately three million of which 20% are adoles- usually inadequate.
cence.1 Most patients who present with PTH will Erenumab is a CRRP-receptor monoclonal anti-
manifest migraine phenotype which has all the charac- body which is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
teristics of migraine with and without aura.2,3 All approved for the preventative treatment of migraine. It
patients represented in this observational study fell has an excellent safety profile, impressive efficacy data,
under the International Classification of Headache
Disorders-vs 3 (ICHD3) classification as acute head-
ache attributed to mild traumatic injury to the head Holy Name Medical Center, Teaneck, USA
5.1.2.4 The PTH phenotype was migraine: typical fea-
Corresponding author:
tures include throbbing pounding headache, photopho- James A Charles, Holy Name Medical Center, 718 Teaneck Rd, Teaneck,
bia, nausea, vomiting, visual aura, brainstem aura, and NJ 07666-4245, USA.
inability to engage socially, in school, or work. Most of Email: jacharlesmd@gmail.com
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and
distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.
sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
2 Journal of Concussion

can be effective as quickly as one week, and has virtu- allowed but were never taken daily and their need
ally no adverse effects except for very low incidence of tapered off quickly with the rapid response to erenu-
injection site reactions and constipation. Erenumab mab. The patients were relatively healthy and con-
was the first of the three current FDA approved founding variables such as non-morbid obesity and
CGRP monoclonal antibodies. It is the only antibody concurrent minor illnesses were not significant to be
targeting the CGRP receptor. Of the three FDA considered in the outcome analysis. No patient had
approved CGRP monoclonal antibodies, erenumab medication overuse headache syndrome, pregnancy,
has the longest (3 yr) open label extension data.5 Six secondary gain motivation, or psychiatric disorders.
patients were treated with erenumab with clinical Baseline monthly headache days (MHDs) and Head
migraine phenotype following PTH. Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) were recorded and restated
two months after receiving erenumab 140 mg. Only
Methods one patient (patient 5) required a second dose, and
All patients met the criteria for migraine with or with- the MHD and HIT-6 were recorded two months after
out aura as delineated in ICHD3. The etiology of their the second dose. Doses were administered in the office
migraines was head trauma which was defined as PTH by a certified medical assistant. Data were assessed
secondary to mild traumatic injury to the head. All retrospectively.
patients had normal exams and head imaging. Three
patients had a remote history of migraine six months or
longer with symptoms that differed from the PTH-
induced migraine phenotype and their history of Results
migraine. General informed consent was obtained
Patients experienced a 95% (SD 1.22, p < .001) reduc-
from all patients. Erenumab is FDA approved for the
tion of MHDs in two months, with headache remission
preventative treatment of migraine with and without
often commencing within a week of treatment. Prior to
aura. An AHS publication recently recommended
treatment with erenumab, all six patients had HIT-6
using CGRP mAbs in the pediatric population where
scores above 60 indicating severe disability. Two
other preventives have failed or not tolerated.6 All
patients failed prior treatments and were disabled months posttreatment, all HIT-6 scores fell below
from migraine with intense high-frequency headache, 49 which is no disability. Patients were very satisfied
and inability to work, attend school, or engage in with the reduction of headache, photophobia, nausea,
social circles. Ineffective preventative treatments given and dizziness. All patients returned to normal activities
for at least four weeks alone or in combination which of daily living, work, and school activities. Following
were discontinued with erenumab administration discharge from treatment, patients required either no
included daily topiramate, amitriptyline, gabapentin, abortives or rare use of OTC analgesics. Those patients
doxepin, venlaxafine, memantine, ibuprofen, naproxen, with a history of migraine had no difference in response
and ondesterone. Abortives such as non-steroidal anti- to erenumab. There were no adverse effects reported.
inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) triptans, or over the There were no relapses. Findings are summarized in
counter non prescription (OTC) analgesics were Table 1.

Table 1. Table of Pre and Post Treatment Data.

Patient Onset to Rxa MHDs preRX MHDs postRxb HIT-6 preRx HIT-6 postRxc Repeat dosed

1. 41 Fe 4 weeks 30 1 72 42 No
2. 18 Fe 4 weeks 30 1 62 36 No
3. 29 Fe 5 weeks 30 0 74 42 No
4. 15 M 4 weeks 30 0 64 36 No
5. 29 F 5 weeks 20 1 72 38 Yes
6. 29 M 11 weeks 30 2 69 36 No
7. 48 F 6 weeks 30 0 72 36 No
MHD: monthly headache days; HIT-6: Head Impact Test-6.
a
Onset of posttraumatic migraine to first erenumab 140 mg treatment ¼ baseline period. All patients developed headache on day 1 of trauma.
b
MHD after three months after erenumab 140 mg except for patient 5 MHD recorded after second dose of erenumab given at three months following
first dose of erenumab and MHD recorded one month after second dose or four months after first dose.
c
HIT-6 posttreatment at three months, except patient 5 HIT-6 recorded one month after second dose or four months after first dose.
d
Repeat dose of erenumab 140 mg given four weeks after first dose.
e
History of migraine.
Charles 3

Discussion migraine demonstrated efficacy with a placebo effect


of approximately 30%. None of these patients had psy-
These seven patients were severely symptomatic from
chiatric or secondary gain issues, or currently active
migraine that followed mild posttraumatic head injury.
preexistent migraine. Many had failed previous
Each patient went from severe disability to no head-
migraine preventatives. The efficacy and safety of ere-
ache disability and 95% reduction of MHDs with the
numab 140 mg in the virtual elimination of migraine
reduction often commencing within a few weeks
was extremely impressive with no adverse effects.
of receiving erenumab 140 mg. There were no
Concussion with PTH migraine phenotype is a public
adverse effects.
health problem. This pilot observation study should
The real impact of erenumab on these patients was
lead to larger studies to validate these findings and
striking. Patient 6 was a 29 y/o laborer who fell off a
determine if erenumab, which is safe and effective,
truck, hit head, and experienced daily migraine with no
should be in the forefront for the treatment of PTH
history of migraine. For 11 weeks he could not return
with migraine phenotype.
to work and was unresponsive to vestibular therapy,
topiramate, amitriptyline, gabapentin, and non-daily
Author’s contribution
triptan and NSAID abortives. Three weeks after one
dose of erenumab, he went back to work with rare JAC: Had full access to all the data in the study, integrity of
the data and the accuracy of the data analysis; study concept
headaches. Patient 4 was a 15 y/o male student wrestler
and design; analysis; interpretation of data; drafting of the
who was thrown to the floor during wrestling with head
manuscript; critical revision of the manuscript for important
trauma, had daily migraines and could not attend intellectual content; statistical analysis; technical or material
school due to severe pounding headaches and photo- support; study supervision. JAC is the speaker for Supernus
phobia worsened with academic engagement. Within and Amgen.
five days of erenumab, he was asymptomatic and
back to his academic classes. Declaration of conflicting interests
There are no FDA approved treatments for PTH
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with
with migraine phenotype. Studies have shown that con-
respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of
ventional treatment of PTH migraine phenotype results
this article.
in 26% relief and 74% no relief.7,8 Differences in
regional volumes, cortical thickness, surface area, and
Funding
curvature were noted comparing PTH migraine pheno-
type to migraine patients using functional magnetic The author(s) received no financial support for the research,
resonance imaging.9 However, CGRP receptors are authorship, and/or publication of this article.
ubiquitous in the cortex of the entire brain.10 The tri-
geminal vascular access of CGRP-R mAbs via the ORCID iD
meninges may explain the robust response of these James A Charles https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-830X
patients to erenumab. Perhaps there is amplification
of the trigeminovascular system in PTH migraine phe- References
notype which would account for the failure of conven- 1. Traumatic brain injury and concussion, www.cdc.gov
tional migraine preventatives which do not directly (accessed 13 September 2019).
antagonize CGRP receptors which is the mechanism 2. Hoffman J, Lucas S, Dikmen S, et al. Natural history of
of action of erenumab. The presence of pre- and post- headache after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma
synaptic receptors can explain the efficacy of CGRP- 2011; 29: 1–8.
mAbs. In a rat model of concussion, headache and 3. Lucas S, Hoffman JM, Bell KR, et al. Characterization
pain-related behaviors were mediated through a of headache after traumatic brain injury. Cephalalgia
CGRP-dependent mechanism. Concussed rats’ tactile 2012; 32: 600–606.
pain and hypersensitivity were inhibited by anti- 4. International Classification of Headache Disorders-3
(ICHD3). Cephalgia. 2013ICHD3b. Cephalgia 2013;
CGRP antibody treatment.11
3: 629–808.
5. Ashina M, Goadsby P, Reuter U, et al. Long-term safety
Conclusions and tolerability of erenumab: three-plus year results from
an ongoing open-label extension study in episodic
This is a small observational study on the effect of migraine. In: 2018 American Headache Society annual sci-
erenumab on patients with PTH-migraine phenotype entific meeting, San Francisco, CA, 28 June–1 July 2018.
with no control group. A placebo effect cannot be Abstract 431139.
excluded, and the original studies that led to FDA 6. Szperka C, VanderPluym J, Orr S, et al.
approval of erenumab for episodic and chronic Recommendations on the use of anti-CGRP monoclonal
4 Journal of Concussion

antibodies in children and adolescents. Headache 2018; study demonstrating differences in brain structure.
58(10): 1658–1669. J Headache Pain 2017; 18: 87.
7. Erickson J. Treatment outcomes of chronic post- 10. Tschopp FA, Henke H, Petermann JB, et al. Calcitonin
traumatic headaches after mild head trauma in US sol- gene-related peptide and its binding sites in the human
diers: an observational study. Headache 2011; central nervous system and pituitary. Proc Natl Acad Sci
51: 932–944. 1985; 82: 248–252.
8. DiTomasso C, Hoffman J, Lucas S, et al. Medication 11. Bree D and Levy D. Development of CGRP-dependent
usage patterns for headache treatment after mild trau- pain and headache related behaviors in a rat model of
matic brain injury. Headache 2014; 54: 511–519. concussion: implications for mechanisms of post-
9. Schwedt TJ, Chong CD, Peplinski J, et al. Persistent traumatic headache. Cephalgia 2018.
post-traumatic headache vs. migraine: an MRI

You might also like