Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bus 206 Milestone One 1 Bus 206 Milestone One 1
Bus 206 Milestone One 1 Bus 206 Milestone One 1
The appropriate court for this lawsuit depends upon several factors. Three important
considerations include the following: personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction and
minimum contracts. Personal jurisdiction refers to the rights and power the court has to make a
decision regarding the party being sued in a case. In this case, personal jurisdiction is harder to
apply since the Novelty Now is in Florida, the men live in California and the plaintiff, Donald
Margolin, is in New York. In this case personal jurisdiction is given to New York because that is
Subject matter jurisdiction is the rights that a court has to hear certain types of cases.
What that means is things like probate cases are left to state courts whereas state courts do not
have the appropriate jurisdiction to hear patent cases. “Federal courts also have "exclusive"
subject matter jurisdiction over copyright cases, admiralty cases, lawsuits involving the military,
immigration laws, and bankruptcy proceedings” (Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts). Cases that
do not need to be heard at a federal level get handled by state courts. In this case because it
doesn’t fall under any of the cases the federal courts would handle listed above this would be
jurisdiction over a defendant from another state. In this case, if it were found that the defendant
has done business, visited, or lived in New York than personal jurisdiction would apply.
2
refers to ways other than court to resolve a dispute. This can be done through using negotiation,
mediation, or arbitration. These alternative methods can be faster and ultimately a cheaper
interact informally, either with or without lawyers, to attempt to resolve their dispute. Arbitration
is the resolution of a dispute by a neutral third party outside the judicial setting. Mediation is
when the disputing parties select a neutral party to help facilitate communication and suggest
ways for the parties to solve their dispute.” (Kubasek, Browne, Dhooge, Herron, & Barkacs,
2017).
Arbitration is more lenient in the way that it is handled rather than going through a court
setting. This allows for an arbitrator to be chosen and more specifically one can be chosen that
has experiences with the type of case needed. The other advantage to arbitration is that it can be
much less expensive than going through the courts and a judge since it tends to take less time
than litigation and less complicated than going through a court proceeding. There is however a
downside to using arbitration. Although it does tend to cost less than litigation, it can still be
solution this may not always be the best option. Another downside could also be a positive thing
given the circumstance which is confidentiality. Arbitration can be used to keep the situation
under wraps. It gives business’ the opportunity to keep things quiet which can help maintain their
reputation. It can also do the same thing for the coworker if they wanted to keep their identity
to a decision that could benefit both sides. This allows both parties to control the outcome and
feel like they have more power in the decision and so that there are no surprises like what could
happen during litigation with a judge. Just like arbitration, another advantage to mediation is that
it can save both parties money. When using mediation, there is no need for lawyers although it is
possible to still involve them. One disadvantage to using mediation is that if one party has more
power or money, they can use that to their advantage and possibly have an unfair outcome.
Another disadvantage is that although both parties can participate, unless court ordered you can’t
force someone to participate and same thing with the agreement that is come to during
mediation.
In this case, Funny Face, Chris, Matt and Ian, and Novelty Now, may choose to use
mediation or arbitration. With Funny Face being a new business, it would be helpful to have the
confidentiality of using these options to keep the situation quiet and not ruin their reputation. In
using arbitration, this would be possible. This option also allows the company and the consumer
to handle the situation quickly and without spending a lot of the money they would by going
through litigation, which for a new company may be more within their budget. Mediation could
be a good place to start, however, due to the circumstances which caused Mr. Margolin’s face to
be permanently blue, it may be hard to negotiate terms with him. Meaning that arbitration may
be the only option in the long run and ultimately may be the best option for Mr. Margolin to get
the best resolution and most possible compensation. The downside to arbitration is that once a
4
mean even if both parties are unhappy with the decision, the arbitrator’s word would be final.
“An individual or a corporation can be charged with and convicted of a crime. However,
there has been much debate over whether corporations should be held criminally responsible”
(Kubasek, Browne, Dhooge, Herron, & Barkacs, 2017). Chris, Matt and Ian could be subject to
corporate criminal liability. The primary crime that exists in this case is that of fraud. “Fraud
generally requires the following three elements: (1) a material false representation made with
intent to deceive, (2) a victim’s reasonable reliance on the false representation, and (3) damages.
(Kubasek, Browne, Dhooge, Herron, & Barkacs, 2017).” In this particular case, Chris made the
decision to have Novelty Now change the original formula and substitute in PYR which was not
approved by the FDA just to save money. Because of Chris’ decision and actions taken, Mr.
Mangolin’s face was permanently turned blue by Funny Face’s aftershave. With his face being
blue, Mr. Mangolin has incurred medical charges, damage to his face, and had his and his
company’s reputation ruined. Because Matt, Chris and Ian all own Funny Face and Funny Face
is responsible for the creation of the product and Novelty Now helped create the product they
The three key elements follow the WPH business ethical decision-making process. WPH stands
for who, purpose, and how. The who is stakeholders would be the customers in this case, the
purpose/ values would be efficiency, and the how would be by substituting ingredients. In this
5
company because it would minimize costs. Unfortunately, this did not end up working in their
References
Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts. (n.d.). Retrieved July 22, 2020, from
http://adacourse.org/courtconcepts/juris.html
Kubasek, N. K., Browne, M. N., Dhooge, L. J., Herron, D. J., & Barkacs, L. L. (2017).
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/personal_jurisdiction
6