REVISIONS

Items Rev. Description Remark

Changed to suitable with new "Power consumption list" - Rev 7

1 A
-18/10/2013

EN-I01-F23/01/300611 File name: 790-12-MAX-700-E-401-03_RevA

EN-I01-F23/01/300611 File name: 790-12-MAX-700-E-401-03_RevA
 Reference Document

BOM DKE
No Doc.Name Doc.No Rev Type of Doc Date issued
Rev

1 A Main cable trench : Cable trench routing layout 790-12-MAX-700-E-600 D DWG 8-Jul-13
2 A 33/6kV Single line diagram 790-12-MAX-700-E-000 D DWG 5-Jul-13

EN-I01-F24/01/181013 File name: 790-12-MAX-700-E-401-03_RevA

BILL OF MATERIAL

Project name: 790-MAX-MAX CEMENT

Project no.: 30123-M Max
Rev.: A
Date: 28-Oct-2013
Made by: DTL

Ref: For M.V. Power Cables

QUANTITY
Item No. Description SPECIFICATION Unit Estimate REMARK
Actual
(Spare 10%)

A H Cables (MV. Power Cables)

1 3x95 HT 2XSY CU/XLPE/PVC - 6/10 (12)KV m Err:504 Err:504

2 3x120 HT 2XSY CU/XLPE/PVC - 6/10 (12)KV m Err:504 Err:504

3 3x150 HT 2XSY CU/XLPE/PVC - 6/10 (12)KV m Err:504 Err:504

4 3x185 HT 2XSY CU/XLPE/PVC - 6/10 (12)KV m Err:504 Err:504

5 3x240 HT 2XSY CU/XLPE/PVC - 6/10 (12)KV m Err:504 Err:504

6 3x500 HT 2XSY CU/XLPE/PVC - 6/10 (12)KV m Err:504 Err:504

7 1x185 HO 2XSY CU/XLPE/PVC - 6/10 (12)KV m Err:504 Err:504

8 1x240 HO 2XSY CU/XLPE/PVC - 6/10 (12)KV m Err:504 Err:504

9 1x500 HO 2XSY CU/XLPE/PVC - 6/10 (12)KV m Err:504 Err:504

10 3x120 HT 2XSY CU/XLPE/PVC - 20/35 (40.5)KV m Err:504 Err:504

B Cable Termination

1 3x95 6 KV set #REF!

2 3x120 6 KV set #REF!

3 3x150 6 KV set #REF!

4 3x185 6 KV set #REF!

5 3x240 6 KV set #REF!

6 3x500 6 KV set #REF!

7 1x185 6 KV set #REF!

8 1x240 6 KV set #REF!

9 1x500 6 KV set #REF!

10 3x120 (33kV) 33 KV set #REF!

C BUS BAR - COOPER BAR

6kV, 200A, 50Hz bus bar (MH1TA01)

1 connect from M.V. transformer to 6kV (4mm x 20mm) m 6
existing L.B.S.
6kV, 200A, 50Hz bus bar (PD1TA02)
2 connect from M.V. transformer to 6kV (4mm x 20mm) m 6
existing L.B.S.

EN-I01-F24/01/181013 Page 4 of 6 File name.: 790-12-MAX-700-E-401-03_RevA

AIR-CONDITIONED SPACE DESIGN PARAMETER SHEET

Project Name: Nuevitas Cement

Project No.: 930197_C
Rev.: 0
Date: 12/11/2018

1. CCB

Occupant Densities Outdoor Air Flow rate

NO AC Function Type

(m2/person) (L/s.person)
Miscellaneous Spaces
Main entry lobbies 10.0 5.5 Ashare 62.1-2013
Office space 20.0 8.5 Ashare 62.1-2013
Conference/meeting 2.0 3.1 Ashare 62.1-2013
Miscellaneous Spaces
Computer (not printing) 25.0 10 Ashare 62.1-2013
Educational Facilities
Science laboratories 4.0 8.6 Ashare 62.1-2013
Computer lab 4.0 7.4 Ashare 62.1-2013
Free offce 5.0 8.6 In fact
Other 5.0 8.6 In fact
HVAC SOLUTION COMPARISION-WATER CHILLER VS ROOFTOP SYSTEM

Project Name: Project Name:

Project No.: Project No.:
Rev.: Rev.:
Date: Date:

NO ITEMS WATER CHILLER + COOLING TOWER SYSTEM ROOFTOP AIR CONDITIONER

1 FUNCTIONALITY

Water cooled chiller system is a comples system, include: water Rooftop system is simplier than chiller system, it include rooftop air conditioner
chiller, cooling tower, condenser pump, chilled water pump, Air located at the roof of building and the air duct from the unit to conditined area.
handling unit, duct and pipe system.
System use water cooled water chiller to cooled water from 12 oC to System use rooftop air conditioner with direct expansion coil to cooled the air and
7oC. The cooled water (7oC) will be pumped to AHU to cool the air distribute to conditioned area via air duct system.
in air conditioned area. There are two water loops in the system: the
chilled water loop from the chiller to AHU and the cooling water loop
from cooling tower to chiller. The cooled air will be moved from AHU
to air conditioned room by the fan in the AHU via air duct system.

2 INSTALLATION
Hight installation cost Lower installation cost than chiller system
Requires a professional contractor for installation because the Easy to installation
system is complex and included many equipment and materials.

Need technical area for chiller, pump, cooling tower and AHU. Saving more space than chiller system, just need space for roof top unit on
the roof of building.

Need water treatment system. No need water treatment system

3 MAINTENACE & OPERATION

Require professional operation staffs for operating system. No need professional staffs for operation.

High operation cost Low operation cost

4 CAPITAL COST
Higher capital cost than Rooftop system Lower capital cost

5 POWER COMSUMTION
(Estimate forsubstation with
300 kW cooling capacity)
Lower power consumption Higher power consumption than chiller system
1 x Water chiller: 1 x 65 kW Rooftop Air Conditioner: 2x 70 kW
1 x Cooling tower: 1 x 2 kW
1 x Chilled Pump: 1 x 6 kW
1 x Cooling Pump: 1 x 8 kW
2 x AHU: 2 x 10 kW
Total power consumption: 101 kW Total power consumption: 140 kW