Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Counseling Children and Adolescents: Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy and Humanism
Counseling Children and Adolescents: Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy and Humanism
and Adolescents:
Rational Emotive Behavior
Therapy and Humanism
Ann Vernon
Specific parallels between rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) and humanism
are described, with specific emphasis on the application o f these principles with chil-
dren and adolescents. Concepts are illustrated with case studies and a description of the
similarities between rational emotive and humanistic, or affective, education.
Although rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) has been tested with many
disorders and has fared well in psychotherapy and counseling outcome studies
(Solomon & Haaga, 1995), critics throughout the years have maintained that REBT
places too little emphasis on the therapeutic relationship (Garfield, 1995), and
that rational is equated with being “cold, calculating, and certainly manipula-
tive” (Woods, 1996). Consequently, for these as well as other reasons, REBT has
often been described as an antihumanistic theory. People who listen to the critics
not only fail to distinguish between therapeutic conditions and therapeutic style,
but they also practice a form of irrational thinking by overgeneralizing and as-
suming that all REBT practitionersare insensitive,display poor interpersonal skills,
and must be as linguistically colorful as its founder Albert Ellis. In reality, REBT
does subscribe to many of the same premises that characterize a humanistic per-
spective. These premises are described in this article as they apply to working
with children and adolescents.
As 8-year-old Jessica entered the counselor’s office, the counselor could see that
she was nervous about the visit. To put her young client more at ease, the counse-
lor first explained that she was there to help Jessica solve her problems and sug-
gested that they get to know each other by playing a short game called Who Are
You? After a few rounds of back-and-forth questions about pets, hobbies, family
members, and favorite foods, Jessica was more relaxed and seemed ready to start
the session.
Ann Vernon is a full professor at the University of Northern Iowa. Correspondence re-
garding this article should be sent to Ann Vernon, 514 Schindler Education Center, Uni-
versity of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0604.
In the late 1960s and throughout the 1970s, educational reformers began to apply
principles of humanistic psychology to education (Lyon, 1971). These reformers
claimed that learning is facilitated when the student participates responsibly in
the learning process, when learning is relevant, and that learning which involves
feelings as well as intellect is the most lasting and pervasive (Patterson, 1973;
Rogers, 1969). Increasing personal efficacy, developing more satisfying relation-
ships with others, fostering self-reliance, increasing self-understanding and per-
sonal strength, and developing other aspects of ideal functioning characterized
this approach to learning (Alschuler, 1975; Patterson, 1973).
Parallels can be drawn between humanistic education and REBT. According to
Ellis (1993), REBT therapists teach their clients how to overcome their emotional
and behavioral problems to help them “actively seek and arrange for a fuller, hap-
pier, and more self-actualizing existence” (p. 25). Self-actualization is also an
important goal of the humanistic approach to education (Patterson, 1973; Read,
1975). Humanistic education, like REBT, is concerned with the development of
good attitudes and feelings or, as Patterson (1973) stated “it is the education of
the emotions, the fostering of adequate emotional development as a legitimate
and desirable goal of education” (p. 14). In addition, REBT emphasizes cogni-
tive and behavioral development, which also is consistent with the wholistic
philosophy of humanism. As Rogers (1969) stated, significant learning “makes
a difference in the behavior, the attitudes, and perhaps even the personality of
the learner” (p. 5).
Dryden and Neenan (1995) noted that REBT therapists and counselors teach
clients what causes their emotional upset and how to help themselves remedy their
problems. The goal of this educative approach is to help clients overcome self-
defeating emotions and behaviors that prevent them from achieving their goals
and achieving happiness. Through the use of homework, instructional activities,
rational coping statements, bibliotherapy, and didactic lessons on the nature of
emotional disturbance, clients learn how to get better rather than just feel better.
As illustrated by the case of Jessica, REBT actively endorses an educational
approach with children as well as adults. In the example described, this 8-year-
old benefited from techniques that taught her to think of alternatives and check
EMOTIONAL, EDUCATION
EMPOWERMENT
CONCLUSION
The intent of this article was to point out the many ways in which rational emo-
tive behavior therapy is a humanistic theory. As discussed, REBT does espouse
the establishment of a therapeutic relationship. Although most REBT therapists
and counselors are more active and directive than the nondirective therapists as-
sociated with the humanistic movement, it is important to recognize that there is
wide variation in therapeutic style. Variation of therapeutic style in REBT does
not mean a departure from the theoretical principles. Perhaps those who claim
that REBT is not humanistic need to look harder at the parallels cited in this article.
In addition to believing in the importance of the therapeutic relationship, REBT
stresses self-actualization, self-efficacy,and self-reliance, as does humanism. Fur-
thermore, as discussed in this article, the humanistic education movement with
its emphasis on affective education is the same concept as rational emotive
education.
Is REBT humanistic? Let me count the ways. . . .
REFERENCES
People who are only good with hammers see every problem as a nail.
-Abraham Maslow