Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MR Second Za Predevanje
MR Second Za Predevanje
Ottavio Alfieri
S.Raffaele University Hospital, Milan
Secondary Mitral Regurgitation
(ischemic or non-ischemic)
MR
Levine, R. A. et al. Circulation 2005;112:745-758
Surgical Risk vs Benefit in SMR
Optimum Surgical Risk
Value
Limited
Value ?
Clinical Benefit
?
Medical treatment
Limited HTx / VAD
Value
Clinical Benefit
Changes in recommendations
2012 2017
Indications for mitral valve intervention in secondary mitral
regurgitation (continued)
IIb C (modified) (continued)
When revascularization is not
indicated and surgical risk is not
low, a percutaneous edge-to-edge
procedure may be considered in
patients with severe secondary
mitral regurgitation and LVEF
>30%, who remain symptomatic
despite optimal medical
management (including CRT if
indicated) and who have a
suitable valve morphology by
echocardiography, avoiding
futility.
www.escardio.org/guidelines
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease 10
(European Heart Journal 2017 - doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391)
What is new in the 2017 Valvular Heart
Disease Guidelines?
Changes in recommendations
2012 2017
Indications for mitral valve intervention in secondary mitral
regurgitation (continued)
IIb C (modified) (continued)
In patients with severe secondary
mitral regurgitation and LVEF
<30% who remain symptomatic
despite optimal medical
management (including CRT if
indicated) and who have no
option for revascularization, the
Heart Team may consider
percutaneous edge-to-edge
procedure or valve surgery after
careful evaluation for ventricular
assist device or heart transplant
according to individual patient
characteristics.
www.escardio.org/guidelines
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease 11
(European Heart Journal 2017 - doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391)
What is new in the 2017 Valvular Heart
Disease Guidelines?
Changes in recommendations
2012 2017
Indications for mitral valve intervention in secondary mitral
regurgitation (continued)
Additional statement:
The lower thresholds defining
severe MR compared to primary
MR are based on their association
with prognosis. However, it is
unclear if prognosis is
independently affected by MR
compared to LV dysfunction. For
isolated mitral valve treatment in
secondary MR, thresholds of
severity of MR for intervention
still need to be validated in clinical
trials. So far, no survival benefit
has been confirmed for reduction
of secondary MR.
www.escardio.org/guidelines
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease 12
(European Heart Journal 2017 - doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391)
Moderate SMR in CABG
pts
Severe SMR in CABG pts
Perioperative mortality
Late mortality Recurrence of moderate-to-
severe MR
Isolated severe SMR
Options for operable pts with severe
SMR
• Undersized anuloplasty
• Anuloplasty and procedures on the
subvalvular apparatus
• Valve replacement (with preservation of the
subvalvular apparatus)
UNDERSIZED ANNULOPLASTY
( preferably with a complete and rigid ring)
Residual/recurrent MR≥2+ after
undersized annuloplasty
- Advanced LV remodelling
- systolic sphericity index >0.7,
- LVEDD >65mm
- LVESV ≥ 145 ml (or ≥ 100
ml/m2)
- End-systolic interpapillary
muscle distance >20mm
Lee et al. Circulation
- Basal aneurysm/dyskinesis
2009;119:2606
Additional procedures to associate to undersized
annuloplasty to enhance effectiveness and
durability
Papillary Head Optimization(PHO)
A modification of Kron’s method